11.10.20

Gemini version available ♊︎

Inside the EPO During Corona: ‘Sick’ António Campinos Uses a Global Sickness to Illegally Rob EPO Staff, Already Besieged by the Pandemic

Posted in Deception, Europe, Patents at 4:42 pm by Guest Editorial Team

How One Family’s Deep Pockets Helped Reshape Donald Trump’s CampaignSummary: The merciless António Campinos keeps lying to staff (citing a notorious ‘study’ from Donald Trump’s friend) and working behind staff’s backs to crush their financial stability; the following letter was sent by the Central Staff Committee back in March (at the same time the UK had just entered nationwide lock-down)

THE lock-down ‘wave’ across Europe is putting in jeopardy not only the physical health of millions but also the mental health of an order of magnitude more. Those who still managed to keep their job (usually by working from home) aren’t exactly calm; the risk of losing one’s job is real, it is growing over time, and it’s getting harder and harder to seek alternative employment to catch up/keep up with one’s mortgage payments, student debt or whatnot.

“…the risk of losing one’s job is real, it is growing over time, and it’s getting harder and harder to seek alternative employment to catch up/keep up with one’s mortgage payments, student debt or whatnot.”The EPO is a rich organisation, so there’s no real excuse for Benoît Battistelli‘s friend to continue crushing the staff in the financial sense (let/set aside other aspects of this crushing).

Here’s what staff representatives wrote to Campinos, citing relevant documents for factual backing/support:

Reference: sc20051cl – 0.3.1/4.2.2
Date: 24.03.2020

Mr António Campinos
President of the EPO

ISAR – Room 1081

OPEN LETTER

Discussions on the salary adjustment procedure

Dear Mr President,

A draft new salary adjustment procedure was sent to the WG GCC SSPR on 20 March 2020, still following the approach spelling conflict with staff for the entire duration of its application. In this letter, the Central Staff Committee would like to highlight the biggest flaw (Article 9) and proposes a way forward.

Your proposal is not viable (many technical and legal problems, and no acceptance by staff). Article 9 (affordability clause) is an infamous mechanism continuously cutting the purchasing power of active staff and pensioners. It is certainly not what your staff from whom you expect so many efforts, also at times of a pandemic, deserves. It would be perceived as adding insult to injury. The proposal is as such not acceptable as it

- does not fulfil the minimum criteria for a Salary Adjustment Procedure in an International Organisation;
- violates1 Article 33 of the European Patent Convention;
- wilfully distorts all statistics provided by Eurostat and ISRP after approval of the national statisticians2 and
- will further erode competitiveness of EPO salaries and more generally its attractiveness.

______
1 See footnote on page 13 of the presentation by Mercer dated 16 March 2020: “Pending assessment by Legal regarding compatibility with EPC and Service Regulations”. The Office also seems to have realised that their own proposed methodology is not only very complex, but involves legal risks. We are wondering whether the legal assessment has been carried out in DG 4 or DG 5 and whether it can be communicated to us.
2 We advise again that you have your proposal urgently checked by expert statisticians at Eurostat or ISRP.


In other words, your proposal is not fit for the purpose of adapting the salaries in the second biggest and very successful European Organisation. We urge you to reconsider this article in particular and to enter into the good faith discussion with the staff representation, which is not the case so far.

At this point in time we see two options that we could support to get out of this impasse. You could consider postponing

1. the discussion by one year. In view of Article 10 of the Salary Adjustment Procedure, this would be no problem. It would reassure staff that you are not trying to unfairly take advantage of the current pandemic. It would also be in line with what national governments do under such circumstances, see for instance the decision of the French President to suspend the implementation of a pension reform.

2. the submission of a CA document for decision on the matter to the October meeting of the Administrative Council (AC). Pending this, we inform you that in case of agreement on a salary adjustment procedure, we are ready to give also a positive opinion in the GCC to one additional Article that you are proposing provided it is modified as laid out in the Annex. In other words we would agree to postponing implementation of the adjustments from 1 July to 1 January on a yearly basis (as was done in the Co-ordinated Organisations 27 years ago) provided a compensation for this postponement is implemented in the form of an adjustment of the salary and pension scales (as was also done in the Co-ordinated Organisations3).

This would address any perceived difficulty for management to adopt a new salary adjustment procedure in October with retroactive effect. It would allow extending the discussions to be ready for a decision at the October meeting of the Administrative Council and thus maintain your original time-frame, without staff feeling abused by keeping the June Council for decision.

Both options above would allow you to continue the discussion with us in a more serene atmosphere and on the basis of the basic principles which we have expressed, i.e. a temporary limitation of the adjustment for a determined period and the inclusion of a sharpened exception clause that would trigger in the event of a crisis. We are ready to discuss both the intensity and the duration of such mechanisms, as we already stated. However, by essence these mechanisms (moderation and exception clauses) should be based exclusively on the specific

______
3
CCR/R(93)5, see Article 17

Article 17


indicator, as the latter is the element in a salary adjustment procedure that adjusts the purchasing power uniformly in all places of employment and for pensioners.

The mechanisms that your advisors have been proposing so far are distorting the basic figures provided by the ISRP and Eurostat, rendering correction mechanisms unnecessarily complex, wilfully failing to conform with the provided statistics, and being legally unsafe and socially unacceptable. The EPO would therefore vastly deviate from all other comparable International Organisations in Europe (EU and Co-ordinated Organisations) in such a sensitive area. Is this your mandate?

The consultants have just provided an additional document on 23 March 2020 showing that the solutions we propose have the potential of achieving the savings you are looking for whilst preserving the essential principles on which staff cannot compromise.

You have the chance to depart from your predecessor’s regulation and implementation policy, thereby succeeding in re-establishing social dialogue according to mandate and being seen as the President fully trusting staff to be able to carry it out.

Yours sincerely,

Michael Sampels
Acting Chairman of the Central Staff Committee


ANNEX

CHAPTER VIII

OTHER ARRANGEMENTS

Article ..

Compensatory adjustment at 1 July 2020

Salary scales shall be adjusted at 1 July 2020 by a percentage equal to half of the average weighted trend in Harmonised Index for Consumer Prices for the European Union for the period 1 July 2019 – 1 July 2020 as provided by Eurostat.


The above contains many acronyms, but it’s self-contained in the sense that people who aren’t familiar with EPO affairs can mostly catch up. As the Central Staff Committee put it at the time, more concisely (citing the Donald Trump-connected Mercer ‘study’):

Following the flawed Financial Study of Oliver Wyman and Mercer, Mr Campinos is still putting measure 1 on the table for approval in the coming June council. His proposal is not viable (many technical and legal problems) and provides a mechanism for continuously cutting the purchasing power of active staff and pensioners. It is certainly not what staff deserves after the massive efforts expected at times of a pandemic. It would be perceived as adding insult to injury. In view of the coming discussions, the Central Staff Committee (CSC) has sent Mr Campinos an open letter available here.

There’s a similar passage or paragraph in the letter. For those who wish to know more about the notorious ‘study’, read this.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Audio: Mark Shuttleworth Targeted Young Males and With Sexy Pictures

    The Web is rotting away, old links become broken links within months or years, so I’ve decided to encode a 3-minute segment of the whole as Ogg



  2. What a Difference Half a Decade Makes (When Linux Foundation is 'Having Fun')

    Media shaming campaigns may have taken their toll on the founder of Linux, who is now bossed by someone who rejects Linux and is married to a Microsoft booster. Like Richard Stallman under FSF guidance (and conditions for return, mostly for fear of further media assaults and attack dogs), he has become a more publicity-shy and private person. The Linux Foundation has in effect reduced the founder of what it’s called after (Linux) into a weekly release manager and mascot, whose brand it is gradually diluting/cheapening.



  3. Links 15/05/2022: GNU libiconv 1.17

    Links for the day



  4. [Meme] Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court (UPC) Cannot Be Reconciled With the Law

    Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court (UPC)? Impossible. But Team UPC counts on an endless torrent of fake news managing to convince you (and more importantly politicians) otherwise.



  5. Even Team Battistelli is Sometimes Admitting -- Out in Public! -- That Unified Patent Court (UPC) is Neither Legal Nor Desirable

    Daniel X. Thomas and other people who are “too old to punish” (consequences to their career profoundly minimised owing to seniority) are among those who push back against the Unitary Patent or Unified Patent Court (UPC); any sane person — not a career-climbing litigation zealot — can identify the pertinent facts and realise that what’s going on here is an injustice of unprecedented proportions in the patent discipline



  6. [Meme] Common Sense at EPO

    The European examiners who deal with patents prefer a system that works for science, for Europe, not for foreign megacorporations that amass millions of low-quality patents and weaponise these to discourage competition



  7. Patent Granting at the EPO Has Collapsed by 24% Owing to Much-Needed Industrial Action

    Seeing that the EPO’s management routinely violates the law and even the very legal basis of the EPO’s existence (it is a monopoly in Europe; no body has the authority to compete against it), the EPO’s examiners have embarked on a ‘Work-to-Rule’ campaign — working in compliance with the rules as defined 49 years ago and revised over the decades — and the European Patent Convention (EPC) takes priority over unlawful demands from middle and upper management; this is proving highly effective so far and it will carry on until demands are met, i.e. until the law is obeyed and staff is treated with respect/dignity



  8. [Meme] Milan is a Suburb in London

    As long as Italy is not the UK and London means London “proper” (not the French town called London) the UPCA is invalid and no matter how much Team UPC (and its puppets in EPO management) may plead, this whole system is bound to implode



  9. The Latest Propaganda Tactics of Team UPC: Pretending Unified Patent Court Already Exists and Unitary Patents Are Default When If Fact None Even Exists

    8 years ago Benoît Battistelli said that the UPC was imminent; now, after 4 years of António Campinos, it’s still not here and Team UPC speculators say it won’t happen this year, either; just like the EPO constantly lies (both to the public and to its very own staff) Team UPC continues to lie to itself (self-delusion) and to us; both also routinely break the law, engage in deliberate violations of longstanding conventions, and scrap constitutions, which in turn becomes a breaking point for the EU’s credibility and the legal profession



  10. Links 15/05/2022: More Azure Shutdowns and Windows Security Blunders Aplenty

    Links for the day



  11. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, May 14, 2022

    IRC logs for Saturday, May 14, 2022



  12. Links 15/05/2022: Pika Backup 0.4

    Links for the day



  13. Changes in the Site and the Capsule

    A 10-minute explanation of what we've been up to lately and what's changing; hopefully I'll have a lot more free time in months to come and we'll be able to produce about a dozen posts per day



  14. Links 14/05/2022: Alt Linux 10.0 Released

    Links for the day



  15. Links 14/05/2022: Builder GTK 4 Porting and Raspberry Pi Matrix Dashboard

    Links for the day



  16. Elon Musk is Right About Twitter Faking Its Importance and Using Doctored, Manipulated 'Stats' (or Bots) to Boost Valuation Based on Lies

    Today’s empirical proof that Twitter is totally faking its relevance and reach/influence, based on “Analytics” of my long-inactive account; the SEC will once again — quite likely as usual — let Musk get away with it, killing a company for personal gain as a temporary shareholder who amassed a ton of free publicity (he paid nothing at all and sent the company into a death spiral, pretty much in the same way Microsoft and Icahn did Yahoo! or Microsoft and Elop did Nokia)



  17. Who Brings Home the Bacon (Revenue), Sheela or James (Jim)?

    Sheela (yes, wife of the nontechnical Linux Foundation chief, who equates Microsoft critics with people who kick puppies) has a history working with several companies that are closely connected to Microsoft (not just Bakkt); can that be reconciled as not a conflict of interest?



  18. The 'Original' Linus Torvalds on Self-Hosting

    The fast-aging founder of Linux spoke as shown above (2005); so much has changed since then…



  19. IRC Proceedings: Friday, May 13, 2022

    IRC logs for Friday, May 13, 2022



  20. Links 13/05/2022: NetworkManager 1.38 and Pseudo-Security

    Links for the day



  21. Links 13/05/2022: GCC 12 Becoming Default Compiler in Tumbleweed

    Links for the day



  22. Links 13/05/2022: End of 'About BSD'

    Links for the day



  23. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, May 12, 2022

    IRC logs for Thursday, May 12, 2022



  24. Links 12/05/2022: AlmaLinux OS 8.6 and LibreOffice 7.2.7

    Links for the day



  25. [Meme] Yes, Minister, Yes!

    We’re meant to think that patents — not sharing — are going to save the world



  26. Central Staff Committee of the EPO Reminds the EPO's Management, Yet Again, That It is Breaking Laws

    Sinking quality of European Patents, plus a Patent Granting Process that is not compliant with the law, quite likely mean the EPO drives straight into a wall; the Central Staff Committee is still trying to save the institution, but management is uncaring and unresponsive (these people typically serve a term and leave, so they couldn’t care less about the long-term viability of their employer)



  27. Formalities Officers Team Managers at the European Patent Office Consider Stepping Down

    Formalities Officers Team Managers at Europe's second-largest institution face a growing list of issues; some are even "considering stepping down," according to internal documents



  28. Links 11/05/2022: KDE Gear 22.04.1 and EuroLinux 8.6

    Links for the day



  29. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, May 11, 2022

    IRC logs for Wednesday, May 11, 2022



  30. SPAMnil Appears to be Buying Fake Views in YouTube (to Embellish a Failing Channel)

    It seems like SPAMnil is ordering clickbots or similar to boost the “views” of his videos (by a factor of 10 or more, as before); I’ve gathered what I believe to be more than sufficient evidence of that (the above uses the Wayback Machine to make a point) and this is not about a channel's failure but an ethical breach, a liability for the Linux Foundation that likes to brag with false numbers in order to sell PR services


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts