12.01.20

Staff Representation of the EPO Explains to EPO Management That It’s Breaking the Law, Robbing the Staff, and Lying to Staff

Posted in Deception, Europe, Patents at 9:13 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Breaking the law is not OK. Or is it now?

Breaking glass

Summary: Human rights, basic dignity and labour protections of EPO staff are routinely violated and the staff is also being robbed based on false pretenses; the staff representatives write to refute “[t]he Office’s report [which] has been made available on the Intranet”

AS MANY of our readers must know or be aware of by now, last week EPO staff started mass-mailing EPO management, including António Campinos. Collective action is intensifying and this morning an insider passed to us the latest report from staff representation regarding a meeting that predated by one week this collective action (and is partly published in response to white-washing lies from Office management).

“They also mention the EPO’s violation of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) somewhere along the lines. The EPO gets away with violating just about any law it wishes to.”We’d like to share it here because the EPO’s staff representation is routinely gagged by the management (later this month we’ll publish suppressed documents that the EPO’s managers prevented representatives from disseminating to the very people they represent).

The Central Staff Committee wrote to staff:

Report on the CSC meeting with the President of 18 November 2020: “Living in a bubble and the reality check”

The President invited the Central Staff Committee (CSC) and the chairpersons of the Local Staff Committees (LSCs) to another exchange meeting within the frame of the social dialogue.

The Office’s report has been made available on the Intranet, our report of the same meeting might address the same topics, but definitely from a different perspective.

Here’s the full content of the publication:

Munich 30.11.2020
sc20177cp – 0.2.1/4.2.2/4.3

Report on the CSC meeting with the President1 on 18 November 2020

Living in a bubble and the reality check

The meeting (by video-conference) addressed issues of particular interest for staff. It lasted one hour more than scheduled. The present report does not intend to repeat the feedback already given by the Office in its report in the Intranet. It merely addresses a few points from a possibly different perspective, i.e. that of staff representatives.

Salary Adjustment Procedure (SAP) and its implementation

The Administration explained that the adjustment had been correctly calculated to yield 0.50% for NL and DE and 0.36% for AT respectively.

We stressed that staff was being furious about such a low adjustment, which violated the principles of parallelism with the evolution of salaries for civil servants and parity of purchasing power. It is below inflation in NL (–1.20%), AT (–0.74%) and DE (–0.30%), even when housing costs were not taken into account. As to the alleged predictability, it seems that management itself is surprised by the savings already achieved in the first year of the new SAP. As a last attempt to limit litigation, we asked the President to consider our last-minute three proposals, which would prevent punitive savings at the detriment of staff (and pensioners).

The President did not agree and explained that he met much more staff members than we did and that he did not feel that staff would be furious. He recalled that we still have no nominal decrease, which is already a reason for satisfaction in the present times. Therefore the new method was there for six years and that was it. He suggested to “go to Geneva”, i.e. to litigate, if we so wished.

________
1 The chairs of the four Local Staff Committees were also invited.


Career reform

The President announced that a new Circular 364 would be proposed next year but that the career system would remain essentially untouched. As a one-off measure for the current exercise, an additional budget would be spent for automatically granting a step to staff left behind. He had made a similar exercise in January 20202. We expressed that we were not enthusiastic with the low frequency of 1 step every 5 years which is far below the EU regulations for instance. On the PhD recognition, the Office is proposing a new flat-rate approach of 3 years to recognising PhD experience in cases where it does not fulfil the current criteria. It is our common concern that staff is treated with equity. We hope that such provisions will also be applied retroactively to all colleagues under the same circumstances.

Education Allowance

The President sketched again the main lines of the reform and stressed his will to obtain a better childcare and educational system for all staff which is also easier to administrate. However, we stressed again that there are “site specific” differences which must be taken into account to maintain the attractiveness of all sites. There are still no credible alternatives proposed for The Hague, Berlin and Vienna, and staff in these places of employment are thus not ready to embark in the reform as it stands. The President acknowledged that he is aware of these site specific constraints, structure of costs, and expressed his wish to address the matter in the coming months.

Production target setting 2021

The President pointed to the fact that staff should be satisfied to receive a monthly salary for fulfilling an official mission (providing services to the users, generating Gross Domestic Product and employment in Europe…). This was the reality. For DG1, he pointed at a reduction of the global target to 400.000 products and efficiency gains. We argued that the pandemic put a lot of pressure on staff and that the global reduction did not reflect on an individual basis3. VP1 suggested that examiners could discuss their targets on an individual basis with their team managers.

Data protection

We raised the issue of data protection: some tasks and services would be outsourced to companies or workers outside Europe, thus outside the realm of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the EPO-internal Data Protection Guidelines4. The President replied that the Office was being cautious but that the cloud services the Office intended to use increasingly in the future were mostly controlled by Chinese or US American

________
2 See his announcement: “One-off measure – Pensionable reward for eligible colleagues”
3 Inter alia because of the reduction in the number of examiners.
4 German Data Protection Offices have published an Orientation guide on video-conferencing systems
“Orientierungshilfe Videokonferenzsysteme”


companies. However, in his view, there was presently no alternative and he asked us once again to be more realistic.

Reaching staff by email

The President expressed willingness to allow the distribution of mass-emails by staff committees for other purposes than General Assemblies. However, the President insisted on the possibility for staff members to opt-out. We have no objection against providing such an option. We are now looking forward to seeing the promises of the President materialize.

Verification of sick leave / “house arrest”

As a reaction to our open letter requesting an urgent remedy, PD43 announced that Circular 367 would be reviewed. We stressed again that the Appeals Committee has unanimously declared “house arrest” incompatible with the fundamental right to privacy.

Conclusion

We explained in the past why the new SAP was based on unrealistic assumptions. The adjustment figure of 0.50% and 0.36% respectively is now clearly also disconnected from the real life of staff members, the real evolution of purchasing power in the host states and the real adjustment of salaries of civil servants5. In view of this, we wonder why the President accuses us of living in a bubble outside any reality.

Already now, staff has contributed about €1bn to its €2bn alleged additional liabilities until 2038. It remains to be seen which share the member states are ready to shoulder. They discussed document CA/F 27/20 in the latest meeting of the Budget and Finance Committee in October 2020. This document deals with changes in the fee structure but contains no concrete recommendation about fee adjustment following real inflation.

The President is technically right in saying that the adjustment in January 2021 has nothing to do with the performance in 20206 since it relies on data from 2019. Actually, the SAP has always been disconnected from the performance of staff, which is supposed to be rewarded in the career system. However, the President still refuses to rework the career system, which creates frustration every year.

When is enough enough?

The Central Staff Committee

________
5 1,51% in DE, 2,75% in NL and 1,45% in AT
6 The Chief of Staff mentioned that the performance in 2020 would be below target.

They also mention the EPO’s violation of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) somewhere along the lines. The EPO gets away with violating just about any law it wishes to. Consequences are none. This is wrong. This needs to stop. They also note that “Appeals Committee has unanimously declared “house arrest” incompatible with the fundamental right to privacy.”

Later this month we’re planning to publish more documents that explain why the grievances of EPO staff are very much justified and deserve the interest/sympathy of Europeans across every sector (except perhaps patent litigation/trolling). People’s families, living abroad, are besieged by a corrupt regime that lies to them and represses them. We’re supposed to think it’s done in the name of science, yet almost nobody in the EPO’s management is an actual scientist and they rarely ever meet scientists. They don’t care about innovation, all they care about is printing as many patents as possible and as fast as possible to collect fees and then illegally gamble this money away. The European Commission is informally fine with that.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Kluwer Patent Spin and Distortion of Facts (Regarding UPC and More)

    Kluwer Patent Blog disgraces the firm that puts its name on it; instead of sticking to facts they're distorting the facts and the sole/principal goal is to manipulate/mislead the public and public servants



  2. Links 26/1/2021: 4MLinux 35.1, GParted 1.2, Gnuastro 0.14

    Links for the day



  3. IRC Proceedings: Monday, January 25, 2021

    IRC logs for Monday, January 25, 2021



  4. It's Wrong to Assume Red Hat Competes With Microsoft

    The community ought to stop pretending that one monopoly seeks to replace another despite close partnerships (some would say "collusion") between the two



  5. EPO Staff Representation Complains That EPO Management Exploits Pandemic and 'House Arrests' to Overwork Staff, Lower Quality

    The EPO keeps breaking its promises to workers; not only are key employees seeing their net salary cut (inflation factored in) but pensioners too are being robbed and in the meantime the total time spent on work is increasing



  6. Fake News is Not a 'Wing' Thing

    The two-party corporate-led system (and media) would have us obsess/bicker about accuracy of news based on some binary/dual system of blind loyalty rather than underlying facts and priorities



  7. Links 25/1/2021: Huawei on GNU/Linux, NuTyX 20.12.1, Whisker Menu 2.5.3, Lutris 0.5.8.3, Linux 5.11 RC5

    Links for the day



  8. Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) in ZDNet is the Norm

    ZDNet continues to emit lots of garbage 'journalism', in effect Microsoft PR and what's known as "black PR" for Linux; just like Bleeping Computer, which ZDNet hired this writer from, there's no adherence to facts, just smears and innuendo



  9. Truth Tellers Aren't an Enemy of Free Software

    There's a perpetual attack on people who speak out against actors and corporations in positions of great power, however subtle and indirect those attacks may seem on the surface (they don't wish to be held accountable for defaming activists)



  10. The Linux Foundation, With Over 124 Million Dollars in Annual Revenue, is in Trouble Because of the Pandemic, So It's Trying to Reinvent Itself as Training and Certifications Outfit

    With mountains of cash and a Public Relations (PR) or marketing business model the so-called 'Linux' Foundation became reliant on travel, lodging, booths and speeches on sale; COVID-19 is a great risk to that business model



  11. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, January 24, 2021

    IRC logs for Sunday, January 24, 2021



  12. Our Move Further Away From the World Wide Web, the Browser Monopolies, HTTP, and HTML

    The World Wide Web (WWW) is going down a bad path and a clearly regressive direction; the solution isn't going 'retro' but exploring more sophisticated systems which are robust to censorship (localised or globalised) and downtime (related to censorship) while reducing surveillance by leveraging encryption at the endpoints



  13. Important Issues Not Entertained in the Community, Especially Critics of the Status Quo

    here's corporate infiltration inside communities (for oligarchy hunts volunteer, unpaid labour) and those who speak about that as a threat to our cause and objectives are painted as misguided outcasts who must be ignored



  14. Internet Origins of the Mob

    Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock



  15. When Proprietary Software Users Dictate the Freedom-Leaning Communities

    Fedora doesn't care about software freedom and its steward (or parent company) is sometimes imposing proprietary software on staff; they've quit caring



  16. In 2020 Onwards 'Open Source' is Just a Marketing Ploy of Monopolies, Unlike Free Software

    More people are nowadays seeing or witnessing 'Open Source' for what it truly is; the term has become a misleading marketing term of proprietary software firms looking to rebrand as "ethical" (e.g. by sharing some code with other proprietary software firms, over proprietary platforms such as GitHub)



  17. Microsoft: The Year After We Bought GitHub There Was a Significant Decline in Number of New Projects on GitHub

    Microsoft has just admitted that in 2019 GitHub saw a very significant decline in number of new projects (and users, which it is conveniently miscounting by adding 'phantom' ones) on the site. Just what we had heard before they confirmed it (and they foresaw this effect of the takeover, hence the lies about "loving" Linux).



  18. Social Control Media is a Passing Fad, We Should All Go Back to Blogging and Subscribing to RSS Feeds

    The whole "social control media" phenomenon has been oversold or promoted using lies; in reality, as a mountain of evidence serves to show, it's a way to manage society at a macro scale



  19. As Andrei Iancu Removes Himself From the Patent and Trademark Office All Eyes Are on Biden's Next Nomination

    Patent zealots and their front groups already lobby Joe Biden to put one of them in charge of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; we'll soon see if Joe Biden "means business" or simply means monopoly/large corporations (and their law firms/departments)



  20. Data Point: GNU/Linux Share in Desktops/Laptops Nearly Tripled in the Past Decade, Peaking This Past Month (All-Time High)

    Contrary to what some publishers try to tell us, GNU/Linux is still growing and mostly at the expense of Windows



  21. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, January 23, 2021

    IRC logs for Saturday, January 23, 2021



  22. Links 24/1/2021: Nouveau X.Org Driver Release and GhostBSD 21.01.20

    Links for the day



  23. InteLeaks – Part XXX: Harbor Research's Pseudo-scientific 'Research' for Intel, Bizarrely Suggesting a Microsoft Partnership for a Domain Largely Controlled or Dominated by Linux

    The full document that Intel paid for and in turn used to justify cracking down on Free software (obliterating Free software-based workflows inside Intel), instead outsourcing all sorts of things to proprietary software traps of Microsoft



  24. Chromium and Chrome Are Not Free Software But an Example of Microsoft-Fashioned Openwashing Tactics

    It's time to reject Google's Web monopoly (shared with other companies but still an oligopoly); removing its Web browser would be a good start



  25. Links 23/1/2021: Chromium Pains and New Debian Maintainers

    Links for the day



  26. InteLeaks – Part XXIX: Harbor Research Did Not Produce a Study But an Elaborate Hoax for Intel, Suggesting Microsoft Partnership and Outsourcing Based on Zero Evidence and No Solid Rationale

    The pseudo-scientific ‘report’ from Harbor Research is more of the same nonsense we’ve grown accustomed to; unethical if not rogue firms are being paid to lie — or to perpetuate falsehoods which someone stands to gain from



  27. Video: The State of Communities Surrounding GNU/Linux Distributions

    A discussion about the state of volunteer efforts going into the development, maintenance (in the 'maintainership' sense) and support/advocacy of GNU/Linux distros



  28. IRC Proceedings: Friday, January 22, 2021

    IRC logs for Friday, January 22, 2021



  29. InteLeaks – Part XXVIII: Intel Served Report From Microsoft Boosters, Who Provide No Actual Evidence and No Science to Back Their Supposed 'Findings'

    Findings and recommendations from Harbor 'Research' aren't based on any scientific methods, just perceived loyalty, branding, and a bunch of unsourced quotes (from unnamed people with ridiculous job titles like a soup of buzzwords)



  30. Erosion of Communities, Ascent of Corporate-Industrial Fake Communities

    Despite the attempts to manipulate/trick developers (and sometimes users) into becoming unpaid workforce of for-profit companies, there's an exodus back to real communities, which aren't subjected to the fury of wealthy shareholders who utterly dislike or simply don't care for software freedom


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts