Bonum Certa Men Certa

EPO Breaking the Law With Microsoft and Promoting Fake 'Encryption' That Violates Confidentiality on Many Levels

Video download link



Summary: An explanation of how truly ridiculous the EPO has become, handing over to Microsoft (and to the US government) just about all of the EPO's communications in direct violation of the law, as well, so the only question now is, will the law actually be enforced soon? Contact your local MP/MEP and report this to him/her.

THE EPO is breaking the law. The António Campinos regime is just as bad as Benoît Battistelli's, even when it comes to privacy and pressuring judges to allow unlawful patents, such as software patents.



Steve Rowan - Vice President DG1 - Patent Granting ProcessIn parts of the series prior to this one, including Part II, we explained what the EPO had done and why it's illegal. I recorded a video (the one above) prior to the publication of Part II.

It's a long video, we could add a lot of links to it (I thought of many that would be relevant while recording it, but failed to take notes throughout), though the ones that seem of most relevance are Microsoft and the NSA relations, the latest Exchange fiasco (as recently as hours ago they still try to distract from it), how end-to-end encryption (e2ee) really works and some background about Stephen Rowan. The full text of the communication is reproduced below:

04.02.2021

Home > Organisation > DG 1 > The Vice-President > Announcements > 2021

Outlook Migration to the Cloud



Data encryption requirements for sending highly confidential data via Outlook

As announced in previous intranet items published in May and December 2020, our Outlook mailboxes are being transferred to the cloud. The transfer will take place in phases and cover only emails since 1 January 2021. As regards the patent grant process, only the following documents are classed as "EPO strictly confidential" and must not be sent by email without encryption: (i) application documents of unpublished applications (EP, PCT, national) (ii) search reports, search opinions, communications and decisions relating to unpublished applications (iii) search statements resulting in the disclosure of unpublished application documents (Guidelines B-III, 2.4; B-IV, 2.4) (iv) documents excluded from file inspection (documents which are marked as non-public in DI+, such as dissenting opinions, medical certificates, PACE requests, etc.) Guidance for the storage of strictly confidential information in the cloud The storage of strictly confidential documents in the cloud should be avoided, and data should not be copied unnecessarily from the EPO's specialised document management systems such as DI+. In practice, this means that, instead of e.g. copying data into an email, you should send a link to the document in the document management system (see also "How to send an email with document links or zipped attachment via Outlook"). Where sharing of strictly confidential data is necessary, the data must be encrypted before storing it in the cloud or sending a link to it via email. It is strongly recommended that you do not send the data directly in an email but instead encrypt the document, store it in the cloud, e.g. on SharePoint or OneDrive, and then send the recipients a link to the encrypted document by email. The password then needs to be shared via a separate channel, e.g. in a Teams chat, via Skype or on the telephone. Sending encrypted attachments is strongly discouraged, as they might not pass spam filters: using encrypted attachments is a very common way to infect user computers, so our email gateways do not allow encrypted attachments to be sent from or to our Outlook cloud instance. The easiest and safest way of encrypting a document is to use the built-in capabilities of the Office programs. Simply protect the document with a password, which also will encrypt the document with a strong encryption algorithm. Obviously, this password should be safe. As a rule of thumb, it should be about as complex as our login passwords, but of course not identical to a password already used. Chat is a good way to send the password, as a long random password can be easily copied and pasted from the chat into the password prompt in the Office program. Examples of how to apply encryption in popular Office programs are in the document annexed here.

Reasons and background

The level of security provided by Microsoft's cloud services is very high and will even mean an improvement in information security for our email system. In the cloud, our mailboxes will be protected by the most sophisticated systems. Email in Microsoft's datacentres is stored with a high standard of encryption, both in transit and at rest. With the help of contract terms, a data protection agreement and technical implementation, the EPO has ensured the best possible protection for the data stored using Microsoft's cloud services. Microsoft guarantees that the data itself is stored on EU servers within the jurisdiction of the European data protection rules (GDPR). Under the US Foreign Intelligence and Surveillance Act (FISA) and the US Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act (CLOUD Act), Microsoft is obliged to grant security and intelligence agencies access to data stored in its cloud, even when stored on EU servers. However, the protection level offered by Microsoft is still sufficiently high for DG 1 processes in place for confidential data exchange not to need encryption. By contrast, to comply with the highest standards, which of course include the requirements imposed under the GDPR, encryption is needed for strictly confidential data. The guidance on the use of cloud tools therefore states that it is only strictly confidential data that must not be stored in plain form in the cloud, whereas merely confidential information can be stored there without limitations. The EPO defines "strictly confidential" in its "policy for information classification" (document attached) as: EPO strictly confidential: Information unauthorised disclosure of which could compromise or cause severe damage to the EPO or could cause damage to an identifiable individual or his or her reputation. Access control cannot be delegated by the information owner, and is restricted to registered named persons only. See here for more information. The vast majority of DG 1 documents do not fall into this category, and this is true for typical performance related data too, since even poor performance must be regarded as "normal" working behaviour and cannot be considered to actually cause damage to an individual. For strictly confidential data, additional access control measures, such as registering people with access, are already implemented where required.

04.02.21 | Author: Steve Rowan - Vice President DG1 - Patent Granting Process


In Part III, which we will publish tomorrow, lots more will be shown.

Recent Techrights' Posts

Rust People: Drain the Swap, You're Holding It Wrong
Does Rust make sense?
Slopwatch: LinuxSecurity, linuxconfig.org, and Plagiarised Phoronix
Many articles out there are nowadays fake
European Patent Office Illegally Gutting and Outsourcing Its Functions, Acting Like an Above-the-Law Commercial Business (It Won't Stop at Formalities Officers (FOs) and Classification Slop at the EPO)
breaking/violating laws and conventions
Links 19/09/2025: Lobbyist of American GAFAM Becomes Data Protection Commissioner in Europe
Links for the day
The Right to Punch People (Apparently)
At Brett Wilson, Brett's job title is "Head of Crime" and Wilson normalises calls for violence
 
About 700 New Gemini Capsules in 13 Months (or 54 Per Month)
4.8K would represent a 20% increase
Techrights the Name Turns 15
About 6 weeks from now we turn 19
Microsoft is Running Out of Time and Floating Fake Figures, Fake Projects, Fake Narratives, Fake Excuses
Also, a lot of Microsoft's "revenue" claims are circular financing (i.e. Microsoft buying from itself, which means Ponzi-like fraud)
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, September 19, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, September 19, 2025
Gemini Links 20/09/2025: Navigating the Pressures of Modern Life and SpellBinding Accidentally Wrote Another Gemini Server
Links for the day
Links 19/09/2025: Press Freedom Dying in US, Anti-Austerity Strikes in France, and Alan Rusbridger to Leave 'Prospect'
Links for the day
Offloading to the Sister Site
In the interest of not overwhelming readers
Links 19/09/2025: Coffee Club and "SpellBinding is Now Absurdly Fast"
Links for the day
Links 19/09/2025: Media Freedom Ceases to Exist in US, "Consider Dropping Twitter/X"
Links for the day
Gemini Links 19/09/2025: Thinking and Insect Bites
Links for the day
Microsoft E.E.E.: Git Will Now (or Very Soon) Fully Depend on Rust, Which is Controlled by Microsoft
Microsoft now makes Git dependent on Rust, or making Git dependent on GitHub, which is proprietary
Slop or Fake Articles Have Turned Linux Journal From a Pioneering/Trailblazing "Linux" Magazine Into a Nuisance
some sites with former reputation - good reputation - turn into cesspools
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, September 18, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, September 18, 2025
Brett Wilson LLP Seem to Have Had Only One Litigation Client in 2025, He Was Previously Charged, Just Like the Serial Strangler From Microsoft (Whom They Now Represent)
Karma is superstition, regulators are not
Project 2030 to Cover How "Project 2025"-Styled Anti-Media Zealots From America Targeted Techrights and Tux Machines
The common denominator is also their attacks on women
Brett Wilson LLP Failed to Meet Deadlines Set by Judge 7 Months Earlier, Tried to Ruin Our Holiday, Then Had the Audacity to Ask Us for Over 3,000 Pounds for Its Own Lateness
As a matter of principle we will never respond to assassin while we are on holiday
On Claims That After Bluewashing Red Hat Will Increasingly Become an Indian Company
Discussed this week (long and detailed)
Americans Attacking British Sites Only Months After They Leave America
We find it kind of funny if not ironic that this site, originally an American site, got legal harassment only from Americans and only months after it had moved to the UK
Despite Losing Over a Quarter Million Dollars a Year Software in the Public Interest (SPI) Gives Helping Hand to Libreboot
SPI's financial state depends a lot on its public image or its reputation
Slopwatch: Google Helps Plagiarism and Sends Traffic to Ripoff Artists
That Google as a company helps spamfarms is noteworthy
If You Want to Know the Future, Listen to the Free Software Foundation (FSF) and Andy Farnell
We're sure the FSF will have plenty of its own output
Links 18/09/2025: A Taliban Ban on Internet Access and Troubled US Job Market
Links for the day
Gemini Links 18/09/2025: Computer Literacy and Accessing Alhena's Database
Links for the day
Links 18/09/2025: US War on Media (Truth Banned, Cancel Culture by the Hard Right), NYT Chief Executive Warns Cheeto is Deploying ‘Anti-press Playbook'
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, September 17, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, September 17, 2025