Bonum Certa Men Certa

The EPO in Violation of the EPC and Nobody Holds Anyone Accountable for Such Violations

Video download link | md5sum b8da83957e1ea46ad2b8acf1ec3f439f EPC Assassinated Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 4.0



Summary: Violations of the foundational document of the EPO have become so prevalent that one has to gasp and wonder if EPOnia is basically the EU's Kremlin (the dictators do anything they want, even in clear violation of the constitutions, with post hoc justifications and cover-up)

The Central Staff Committee (CSC) of the EPO has just circulated a latter dated yesterday, coming about 24 hours after the greenwashing of a likely illegal practice from Team Campinos. They bragged about not giving anything physical for a patent, as if this was about saving the planet or something, ignoring all sorts of laws as well as common sense.



Benoît Battistelli made violations of the EPC very routine (he also promoted European software patents using all sorts of lies, just as he did with the UPC), so why can't Team Campinos continue this tradition? Breton doesn't mind, so the EU is basically in their pockets. Illegality is being declared "legal" with no actual explanation or rationalisation.

To quote the CSC's message to EPO staff: "With the current implementation of the Patent Work Bench it is for instance possible that an action (such as a decision to refuse an application under Article 97(2) EPC) sent by the first examiner and approved by all members of the division is later amended by the first examiner without the amendment having to be approved by any other member of the division. Comparing this to the paper file flow, this is equivalent to the first examiner changing the text of the decision after all three members of the division have signed, without informing the other members of the division of the change.

"It may become a serious issue for the reputation of the Office and the perceived integrity of its decisions in the Patent Granting Process. It is easily possible – making use of proper digital signatures for all actions requiring the signatures of the members of the examining division – to provide legally sound proof of both the authenticity of the content of the signed documents as well as the identity of the undersigned.

"In this open letter, we therefore request the Office to swiftly develop a working solution for a truly electronic file flow that meets the requirements of the EPC."

As promised when I recorded the above video (I always do the videos before any of the articles), we're converting the full text of the letter into simple HTML, which will be archived as text, then become richer plain text and GemText:

centralSTCOM@epo.org Reference: sc22025cl Date: 10.03.2022

European Patent Office | 80298 MUNICH | GERMANY Mr Steve Rowan Vice-President DG 1

By email

OPEN LETTER

Formal deficiencies in the fully electronic Patent Granting Process

Dear Mr Rowan,

Since 2020 the Office has developed, with impressive speed, tools to implement a fully electronic Patent Granting Process (PGP). One of the core tools to achieve this goal is the Patent Work Bench (PWB). The conversion to a fully electronic PGP must meet certain standards to be acceptable to both public and staff. We have concerns that the PWB currently fails to meet such standards, in particular as regards its compliance with the EPC.

Among other processes, PWB replaces the paper file flow within the Examining Division to authorise decisions to refuse an application, intentions to grant a patent, or summons to oral proceedings. The EPC requires that each of these actions be signed by all members of the division (Article 97(1) and (2) EPC, Rules 111 and 113 EPC).

However, the PWB is inadequate to meet the requirements of the EPC.

With the current implementation of the PWB it is for instance possible that an action (such as a decision to refuse an application under Article 97(2) EPC) sent by the first examiner of the division and approved by the second member and the chair is later amended by the first examiner without the amendment having to be approved by any other member of the division. Comparing this to the paper file flow, this is equivalent to the first examiner changing the text of the decision after all three members of the division have signed, without informing the other members of the division of the change.




It may become a serious issue for the reputation of the Office and the perceived integrity of its decisions in the PGP, should the public become aware of the unsatisfactory authorisation of electronic actions by the Examining Division. This situation is regrettable because it is easily possible – making use of proper digital signatures for all actions requiring the signatures of the members of the examining division – to provide legally sound proof of both the authenticity of the content of the signed documents as well as the identity of the undersigned, and to avoid embarrassing decisions and judgments (as, e.g., decision J16/17 or AT-ILO Judgments Nos. 1344 and 2417).

We therefore request the Office to swiftly develop a working solution for a truly electronic file flow that meets the requirements of the EPC.

Yours sincerely,

Alain Dumont Chairman of the Central Staff Committee


It's too easy to lose count of the number of times (and ways) the EPO violates then EPC. Who will be held accountable for it? If nobody ever gets punished for it, why will that ever stop? Why does the world not sanction the EPO? Carte blanche for dictators and narcissists encourages them to do more of the same.

Recent Techrights' Posts

Links 01/06/2025: Bird Flu, Food Price Inflation, and Growing US-China Hostilities
Links for the day
Links 01/06/2025: "Vibe Coding" Turns Out to be a Fraud and Amazon Merits Boycott, Argue Bloggers
Links for the day
Gemini Links 01/06/2025: "Stardust" and Ideal PC Setup
Links for the day
Links 01/06/2025: Windows TCO, Openwashing, "It's FOSS" Still Promoting Microsoft
Links for the day
Gemini Links 01/06/2025: Simplification and Networks Everywhere
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, May 31, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, May 31, 2025
Google Bribes EFF. EFF Promotes LLM Slop as 'Fair Use'. To GAFAM It's a Low-Cost Lobby Hedge.
So the bribes pay off ("slush fund") and the word spreads
Slopwatch: Fake Text and Images, Financial Bubbles, and Scams in "Intelligent" Clothing
Sometimes what they mean by "AI" is just cheap labour somewhere else, as we discussed in IRC a few hours ago
Why Microsoft is Collapsing (Similar to What's Happening at IBM), As Insiders See It
IBM seems like one heck of a mess
Reliable Computing Means Free (Libre) Computing
Sites that want to promote security ought to deal with the biggest issues
Links 31/05/2025: US Court Orders Sides With RFE/RL, War Updates From Ukraine
Links for the day
Gemini Links 31/05/2025: ARM Server and power_supply Subsystem
Links for the day
Links 31/05/2025: Slop Stigmatised as Disinformation, Catalyst/Driver of "Death of Communication"
Links for the day
Common Sense 101: Do Not Write Blog Posts Saying You Want to Murder Colleagues (or Yourself)
Only crazy people would think stabbings are a joke
Microsoft Bankruptcy
"Microsoft unit in Russia to file for bankruptcy, database shows"
Techrights Does Not Compete With LLM Slop, It Exposes the Bastards, Plagiarists and Scammers Who Do That
People like Scam Altman, still facing a lawsuit from his own sister for sexual abuse against her
Links 31/05/2025: Microsoft-Connected Builder.ai is a Fraud and US is Purging Students Based on Race/Nationality
Links for the day
Gemini Links 30/05/2025: Limmat, Doomscrollers, and Arguments Parsing
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, May 30, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, May 30, 2025
The "AI" (Slop) Bubble Already Popped, But It's Not an Overnight Collapse
where Microsoft put its money
No More Steven Astorino at IBM, Chatter About Weekly/Nonstop Layoffs at IBM
What happened? Good luck guessing.
Looking at Corruption in Europe, Going Beyond the EPO
Expect a new series to kick off very soon
Slopwatch: Security SPAM and LLM Slop for SEO and FUD Purposes, Perpetually Tarnishing the Perception of Linux and (Open)SSH Security
A lot of this Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt (FUD) comes from Microsoft and its LLMs
Links 30/05/2025: Google's LLM Slop Pushers Are Killing Journalism and Shira Perlmutter Fails to Stop Bribed Regime From Legalising Plagiarism (in "AI" Clothing)
Links for the day
Links 30/05/2025: Offline Arts and "Threshold of Patience"
Links for the day
Signing Off Serious Lies With a Statement of Truth is No Joking Matter
It's not hard to see what's happening here
Links 30/05/2025: LLM Slop Already Ingests and Vomits Its Own Garbage, Facebook Exec Admits Copyrights a Concern Too
Links for the day
Mass Layoffs at Microsoft Result in More Whistleblowers From Microsoft
Microsoft's predatory pricing is further
Slopwatch: Planet Ubuntu Became LLM Slop and Some People Fail to See the Immorality of Plagiarism
it lessens the incentive for people to publish real articles
EPO Poll: 68% Dissatisfied With Quality of Slop (Wrongly Framed as "AI") for Patent Classification
Slop does not work, it's just falsely advertised with extra hype (funded by slop pushers that sponsor the major media)
Big Crowds Gather to Learn About Software Freedom From the Man Who Started GNU/Linux in 1983
"It was a great success"
Microsoft Layoffs Again in Bay Area
Microsoft relies on people's false belief that being "in LinkedIn" will get you a job; well, seems like even working inside LinkedIn really sucks and you lose the job
Gemini Links 30/05/2025: Fighting Against the Bad News, and Slop is Dehumanisation Disguised as "Intelligence"
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, May 29, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, May 29, 2025