Bonum Certa Men Certa

The EPO in Violation of the EPC and Nobody Holds Anyone Accountable for Such Violations

Video download link | md5sum b8da83957e1ea46ad2b8acf1ec3f439f EPC Assassinated Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 4.0



Summary: Violations of the foundational document of the EPO have become so prevalent that one has to gasp and wonder if EPOnia is basically the EU's Kremlin (the dictators do anything they want, even in clear violation of the constitutions, with post hoc justifications and cover-up)

The Central Staff Committee (CSC) of the EPO has just circulated a latter dated yesterday, coming about 24 hours after the greenwashing of a likely illegal practice from Team Campinos. They bragged about not giving anything physical for a patent, as if this was about saving the planet or something, ignoring all sorts of laws as well as common sense.



Benoît Battistelli made violations of the EPC very routine (he also promoted European software patents using all sorts of lies, just as he did with the UPC), so why can't Team Campinos continue this tradition? Breton doesn't mind, so the EU is basically in their pockets. Illegality is being declared "legal" with no actual explanation or rationalisation.

To quote the CSC's message to EPO staff: "With the current implementation of the Patent Work Bench it is for instance possible that an action (such as a decision to refuse an application under Article 97(2) EPC) sent by the first examiner and approved by all members of the division is later amended by the first examiner without the amendment having to be approved by any other member of the division. Comparing this to the paper file flow, this is equivalent to the first examiner changing the text of the decision after all three members of the division have signed, without informing the other members of the division of the change.

"It may become a serious issue for the reputation of the Office and the perceived integrity of its decisions in the Patent Granting Process. It is easily possible – making use of proper digital signatures for all actions requiring the signatures of the members of the examining division – to provide legally sound proof of both the authenticity of the content of the signed documents as well as the identity of the undersigned.

"In this open letter, we therefore request the Office to swiftly develop a working solution for a truly electronic file flow that meets the requirements of the EPC."

As promised when I recorded the above video (I always do the videos before any of the articles), we're converting the full text of the letter into simple HTML, which will be archived as text, then become richer plain text and GemText:

centralSTCOM@epo.org Reference: sc22025cl Date: 10.03.2022

European Patent Office | 80298 MUNICH | GERMANY Mr Steve Rowan Vice-President DG 1

By email

OPEN LETTER

Formal deficiencies in the fully electronic Patent Granting Process

Dear Mr Rowan,

Since 2020 the Office has developed, with impressive speed, tools to implement a fully electronic Patent Granting Process (PGP). One of the core tools to achieve this goal is the Patent Work Bench (PWB). The conversion to a fully electronic PGP must meet certain standards to be acceptable to both public and staff. We have concerns that the PWB currently fails to meet such standards, in particular as regards its compliance with the EPC.

Among other processes, PWB replaces the paper file flow within the Examining Division to authorise decisions to refuse an application, intentions to grant a patent, or summons to oral proceedings. The EPC requires that each of these actions be signed by all members of the division (Article 97(1) and (2) EPC, Rules 111 and 113 EPC).

However, the PWB is inadequate to meet the requirements of the EPC.

With the current implementation of the PWB it is for instance possible that an action (such as a decision to refuse an application under Article 97(2) EPC) sent by the first examiner of the division and approved by the second member and the chair is later amended by the first examiner without the amendment having to be approved by any other member of the division. Comparing this to the paper file flow, this is equivalent to the first examiner changing the text of the decision after all three members of the division have signed, without informing the other members of the division of the change.




It may become a serious issue for the reputation of the Office and the perceived integrity of its decisions in the PGP, should the public become aware of the unsatisfactory authorisation of electronic actions by the Examining Division. This situation is regrettable because it is easily possible – making use of proper digital signatures for all actions requiring the signatures of the members of the examining division – to provide legally sound proof of both the authenticity of the content of the signed documents as well as the identity of the undersigned, and to avoid embarrassing decisions and judgments (as, e.g., decision J16/17 or AT-ILO Judgments Nos. 1344 and 2417).

We therefore request the Office to swiftly develop a working solution for a truly electronic file flow that meets the requirements of the EPC.

Yours sincerely,

Alain Dumont Chairman of the Central Staff Committee


It's too easy to lose count of the number of times (and ways) the EPO violates then EPC. Who will be held accountable for it? If nobody ever gets punished for it, why will that ever stop? Why does the world not sanction the EPO? Carte blanche for dictators and narcissists encourages them to do more of the same.

Recent Techrights' Posts

Hundreds of Microsoft Layoffs (Net Headcount Decrease) in the United Kingdom
headcount decreased
What Really Matters to Companies is Net Income or Profit (Bankruptcy is Possible Even With High Revenue)
We ought to stop talking about revenue without focusing on actual profit
Carole Cadwalladr Talks About How Big Business Tried to Silence Her (and Why You Might be Next)
Our story is very different from Cadwalladr's for many reasons
LLM Slop and SEO SPAM Take Us Further Away From Facts (the Case of IBM Layoffs)
Some of these can impact Red Hat as well
 
Gemini Links 14/04/2025: Silver Pigs and more Foundation, Disliking Computers
Links for the day
Links 14/04/2025: Russian Attack on Sumy Shows No Intention of Peace, Virgin Australia Admits Overcharging People
Links for the day
The Dilemma of Web Browsers Lying About What They Are (in Order to Bypass Discriminatory Gateways Like Clownflare) Worsens Due to LLM Slop
LLM crawlers/scrapers have made sites more restrictive and hostile towards browsers that are potent but not "famous"
Companies Conspiring to Keep Salaries Down and Undermine Competition
People who do all the practical work are being paid less and made to work for much longer
Links 14/04/2025: Disinformation, Public Disdain for LLMs, and "Lessons on Tyranny"
Links for the day
Gemini Links 14/04/2025: Ween and Historic Ada Project Management
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, April 13, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, April 13, 2025
Influencers: Red Hat, Inc's IPO, 1999, post-mortem on the directed share offer to open source developer community
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Links 13/04/2025: Microsoft Cuts to "AI" and Azure (It's Failing), ‘Ghiblification’ Shows Slop Doing Much Harm
Links for the day
Microsoft SLAPPs Against Techrights Losing Momentum
It always backfires
Links 13/04/2025: Tariff Remorse and Chatbots Leak Again
Links for the day
Gemini Links 13/04/2025: No CSS, Spring Scripting
Links for the day
Richard Stallman Turns 72 and Will Be Giving Talks in Europe Soon
We have many local copies of his talks as WebM, having converted files uploaded to YouTube
Revisionism and Lies by LLM Slop and Lazy "Media"
What happened to investigation of issues?
Exposing Corruption and Crimes Against Women Isn't a Crime, It's an Imperative
When evil and greedy people are so desperate to silence you it typically gives you more motivation - not less - to do more of the same
EPO Likely Breaking the Law Yet Again, This Time by Using Slop for Patents (to Lower Costs While Producing Monopolies That Cause Ruinous Lawsuits)
Nobody authorised this
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, April 12, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, April 12, 2025
Links 12/04/2025: Tariffs Standoffs and Spam 'Articles' About Patents
Links for the day
Gemini Links 12/04/2025: Isle Release 0.0.4 (Alpha) and Pokemon
Links for the day
Links 12/04/2025: Science and "DEI" Dismantled Further in the US
Links for the day
Links 12/04/2025: "Part of the Problem" and "Facebook Is Just Craigslist Now"
Links for the day
New EPO Leaks: Replacing Patent Examiners and Classifiers With Deficient Bots (Without Even Asking for Permission)
Any consultation about it? Any media coverage? No.
The Consensus is Changing and Web Sites View LLMs as Evil, a Malicious Force of Plagiarism and a Source of DDoS
It's not about "AI" but about plagiarism of sorts
Slopwatch: Lots of Fake Articles About "Linux" Infect the Web, Google News Still Promotes These as 'News'
people who go to a site like google.com or Google News or even social control media (where users get links from Google) will be directed to read slop, i.e. pure garbage.
Gemini Links 12/04/2025: Sigrblot and Conway Calamity
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, April 11, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, April 11, 2025