Bonum Certa Men Certa

Formalities Officers Team Managers at the European Patent Office Consider Stepping Down

Video download link | md5sum 6e979641b3a369005c2fcfed8ef8db1e No Way to Run the EPO Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 4.0



Summary: Formalities Officers Team Managers at Europe's second-largest institution face a growing list of issues; some are even "considering stepping down," according to internal documents

THE Central Staff Committee (CSC) of the EPO recently expressed and sent its concerns to Vice-President DG1, noting that Team Managers (TMs) in Formalities Officers teams are "considering stepping down."



The CSC speaks of "an ever-growing list" of issues, as noted in the video above, which later deals with the latest ridiculous fluff from the EPO's Web site, treating a deal with Peru (warning: epo.org link) like it's a big accomplishment (Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos have both visited past colonies of Europe in an effort to seem popular). Peru is of no strategic importance to the EPO, except -- maybe -- raw materials Campinos wants to plunder for corporations with a thirst for patents ("national resources"). The 'young' Campinos should ask his dad first. The EPO's site moreover resorts to greenwashing tactics, pretending that patents somehow save the planet (warning: epo.org link) when in practice they only impede access to technology by litigious means. Maybe the EPO's management wrongly assumes that it managed a bunch of fools. As we'll see in the next article, insulting the intelligence of staff is a self-harming move.

Here is the full letter from the CSC:

Reference: sc22053cl Date: 04/05/2022

European Patent Office | 80298 MUNICH | GERMANY

Mr Steve Rowan Vice-President DG 1

By email

OPEN LETTER

Formalities Officers Team Managers; meetings

Dear Mr Vice-President, Dear Steve,

Staff representation (SR) has organised many meetings with the formalities officer’s (FO) teams since October 2021. During these meetings, we realised that FO Team Managers (TM) had specific feedback they needed to express. With this in mind, we organised two meetings with TMs in The Hague and Munich, shortly before and after the re-organisation of 1 April 2022. We would like to share with you the feedback collected, which causes us great concerns about the potential impact on engagement of staff, some TMs even considering stepping down.

The following topics have emerged from our conversations:

Lack of consultation and support from higher management Before the reorganisation of 1st of April, the TMs were neither consulted, nor could they prepare their staff for the change. TMs have not been consulted on the future units they would be in charge of, neither on capacities nor on other needs. Organisation of capacity and expertise is still not in place. The TMs heavily rely on ancient personal networks. At the same time, some TM’s now have cross-site teams and although the situation is unprecedented, no guidance has been offered on how to handle a hybrid team and make cohesion a reality. The very low managerial time budget seems to not make much sense under these circumstances either.

One role, two categories

Under DG2, FO colleagues appointed as TMs were promoted to Job Group 5 as Head of Section (HOS) with 100% managerial tasks. After the 2018 reorganisation, their job description was suddenly changed to include 20% of production, and the manager role was given ad personam




for this category of TM’s only. Since then, newly appointed TMs remain in Job Group 6, their term has a duration of three years renewable. A low monthly functional allowance is granted but the time budget that initially comprised 80% production / 20% management has been further increased to 70% production / 30% management. This distinction is visible in the EPO telephone book too, where Job Group 6 TMs are shown as “PA admemp patent FO” like every other FO while the Job Group 5 TMs are shown as Heads of a Section.

We believe that creating two distinct categories of TMs performing identical tasks contributes to the feeling of discrimination. There is no obvious justification for this inequality of treatment since the job is the same, only one category is given more time to complete the same task. This situation creates resentment and distrust in management. The dispirited TMs feel that this job is no longer part of a real career with concrete opportunities but merely an extra task. Could it be that one day they will be asked to go back to a 100% FO job? They underline that this is not what they applied for and they are very desperate about the lack of perspectives. Staff representation is currently looking into the discriminatory aspect of the situation.

Teleworking Consistent with general feedback from staff, TMs report screen fatigue and a feeling of isolation. The duty of care fell back on them during the pandemic and this situation appears to last. The permanent situation of teleworking the EPO is aiming at entails that a lot of time be invested in contacting team members individually to maintain inclusion and cohesion in the group. Some TMs fear the sense of belonging will be lost. Working virtually does not allow contacts in person or corridor talks. Conflicts and misunderstanding arise easier when the human touch is missing.

Centralised group for Receiving Office and PCT Chapter II The pilot that has already been existing for more than 18 months has been extended again, and without any clear reason why this structure has not by now been officialised. The uncertainty and instability this situation induces is not acknowledged. These circumstances do not offer an efficient and reliable framework and do not allow TMs or FOs to make plans.

Lack of support structure and platform of expression for Patent Administration (PA) staff and TMs

TMs from the pre-2018 era deplore the suppression of DG2. Under that structure, they felt PA was an entity that was clearly defined and was given a voice. They felt valued. They were offered the tools to do their job properly and were consulted about changes in their area. Thorough training was offered (e.g. cursus at Erasmus university), real means were




invested. DG2 gave them the feeling of respect and recognition. They consider it all lost now. A TM told us she did not recognise the job anymore. She ended up disliking the role she previously took pride in. She said that luckily retirement was coming soon for her, giving the relief she longed for. This feeling of resignation is neither desirable for the colleagues nor for the Office.

In February 2022 we were to meet you about several topics related to Job groups 5&6 staff. This meeting was cancelled and has not been rescheduled since.

Further to the meetings with TMs, we have even more points on an ever-growing list. The CSC would therefore appreciate meeting you at your earliest convenience.

Yours sincerely,

Alain Dumont Chairman of the Central Staff Committee


Will it take a month to respond to this letter? Talent is trickling away in the meantime and there's industrial action still ongoing while the "f**king president" (his own words) is shouting and cursing.

Recent Techrights' Posts

Amid Online Reports of XBox Sales Collapsing, Mass Layoffs in More Teams, and Windows Making Things Worse (Admission of Losses, Rumours About XBox Canceled as a Hardware Unit)...
Windows has loads of issues, also as a gaming platform
 
Consent & Debian's illegitimate constitution
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
The Time Our Server Host Died in a Car Accident
If Debian has internal problems, then they need to be illuminated and then tackled, at the very least in order to ensure we do not end up with "Deadian"
China's New 'IT' Rules Are a Massive Headache for Microsoft
On the issue of China we're neutral except when it comes to human rights issues
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, March 27, 2024
IRC logs for Wednesday, March 27, 2024
WeMakeFedora.org: harassment decision, victory for volunteers and Fedora Foundations
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Links 27/03/2024: Terrorism Grows in Africa, Unemployment in Finland Rose Sharply in a Year, Chinese Aggression Escalates
Links for the day
Links 27/03/2024: Ericsson and Tencent Layoffs
Links for the day
Links 27/03/2024: BBC Resorts to CG Cruft, Akamai Blocking Blunders in Piracy Shield
Links for the day
Android Approaches 90% of the Operating Systems Market in Chad (Windows Down From 99.5% 15 Years Ago to Just 2.5% Right Now)
Windows is down to about 2% on the Web-connected client side as measured by statCounter
Sainsbury's: Let Them Eat Yoghurts (and Microsoft Downtimes When They Need Proper Food)
a social control media 'scandal' this week
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, March 26, 2024
IRC logs for Tuesday, March 26, 2024
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
Windows/Client at Microsoft Falling Sharply (Well Over 10% Decline Every Quarter), So For His Next Trick the Ponzi in Chief Merges Units, Spices Everything Up With "AI"
Hiding the steep decline of Windows/Client at Microsoft?
Free technology in housing and construction
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
We Need Open Standards With Free Software Implementations, Not "Interoperability" Alone
Sadly we're confronting misguided managers and a bunch of clowns trying to herd us all - sometimes without consent - into "clown computing"
Microsoft's Collapse in the Web Server Space Continued This Month
Microsoft is the "2%", just like Windows in some countries
Links 26/03/2024: Inflation Problems, Strikes in Finland
Links for the day
Gemini Links 26/03/2024: Losing Children, Carbon Tax Discussed
Links for the day
Mark Shuttleworth resigns from Debian: volunteer suicide and Albania questions unanswered, mass resignations continue
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Links 26/03/2024: 6,000 Layoffs at Dell, Microsoft “XBox is in Real Trouble as a Hardware Manufacturer”
Links for the day
Gemini Links 26/03/2024: Microsofters Still Trying to 'Extend' Gemini Protocol
Links for the day
Look What IBM's Red Hat is Turning CentOS Into
For 17 years our site ran on CentOS. Thankfully we're done with that...
The Julian Paul Assange Verdict: The High Court Has Granted Assange Leave to Appeal Extradition to the United States, Decision Adjourned to May 20th Pending Assurances
The decision is out
The Microsoft and Apple Antitrust Issues Have Some But Not Many Commonalities
gist of the comparison to Microsoft
ZDNet, Sponsored by Microsoft for Paid-for Propaganda (in 'Article' Clothing), Has Added Pop-Up or Overlay to All Pages, Saying "813 Partners Will Store and Access Information on Your Device"
Avoiding ZDNet may become imperative given what it has turned into
Julian Assange Verdict 3 Hours Away
Their decision is due to be published at 1030 GMT
People Who Cover Suicide Aren't Suicidal
Assange didn't just "deteriorate". This deterioration was involuntary and very much imposed upon him.
Overworking Kills
The body usually (but not always) knows best
Former Red Hat Chief (CEO), Who Decided to Leave the Company Earlier This Month, Talks About "Cloud Company Red Hat" to CNBC
shows a lack of foresight and dependence on buzzwords
IRC Proceedings: Monday, March 25, 2024
IRC logs for Monday, March 25, 2024
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
Discord Does Not Make Money, It's Spying on People and Selling Data/Control (38% is Allegedly Controlled by the Communist Party of China)
a considerable share exists
In At Least Two Nations Windows is Now Measured at 2% "Market Share" (Microsoft Really Does Not Want People to Notice That)
Ignore the mindless "AI"-washing
Internet Relay Chat (IRC) Still Has Hundreds of Thousands of Simultaneously-Online Unique Users
The scale of IRC