Bonum Certa Men Certa

Josef Kratochvíl and All the European Patent Organisation's Chiefs (at the Administrative Council Too) Notified That Over 1,000 Members of Staff Demand Action on Patent Quality and Compliance (Industry Too is Alarmed That Many Invalid Patents Get Granted)

posted by Roy Schestowitz on Feb 23, 2024

Letter

THE Central Staff Committee of the understaffed EPO wrote to the so-called 'boss' (more like partner in crime) of António Campinos.

It is a 10-page publication that includes 3 annexes, all of which covered here before (Annex 1, Annex 2, Annex 3; some coincide with the General Assembly and one is a decade old!).

We shall focus on the new bits, dated earlier this week.

The Central Staff Committee wrote this message to staff:

Putting back quality on the agenda of the EPO: Open letter to the Administrative Council

Dear Colleagues,

Staff of the European Patent Office gathered in hybrid General Assemblies in Munich on 24 January, in Berlin on 31 January and in The Hague on 6 February 2024.

A resolution on objective setting and quality was put to a vote and supported by an overwhelming majority: among the 1523 attendees, 1088 voted in favour, 31 against and 66 abstained. The outcome confirms the view that EPO management instrumentalizes the career and performance system to put pressure on staff to produce quantity at the expense of quality of the final products. Such policies result in low level of staff engagement, high incidence of psychosocial risks and mounting criticism from the industry on patent quality (IPQC).

Following the adoption of the resolution, Mr Beat Weibel, Chief IP counsel at Siemens and founder of the IPQC, told Managing IP (PDF article): “We feel now there is an informal coalition between the users of the [EPO] system and those executing the system.” Mr Jorge Thomaier, Head of IP at Bayer, noted that “This message is loud and clear for the EPO management – they should first talk to their staff and then take our (industry members’) help to improve targets, incentivisation, and in the end, the quality of the patents.”

In this letter to the Administrative Council, we urge the Member States to exercise their supervisory role and instruct EPO management to enter into dialogue with the staff representation and to put in place the measures supported by staff in the resolution.

Sincerely yours,

The Central Staff Committee - CSC

The new part of the letter tells the Administrative Council something it already knows but chooses to ignore because Campinos bribes for complicity, as noted here in 2022 and in 2023. It's a huge pile of corruption, more fitting for Russia than for Europe.

Here is the body of the letter in full:

European Patent Office
80298 Munich
Germany

Central Staff Committee
Comité central du personnel
Zentraler Personalausschuss

centralSTCOM@epo.org

Tel. +49 -89- 2399 - 2120

Reference: sc24013cl

Date: 19.02.2024

European Patent Office | 80298 MUNICH | GERMANY

To the Chairman and
The Head of Delegations
of the Administrative Council
of the European Patent Organisation
Mr Josef Kratochvíl

By email

OPEN LETTER

Putting back quality on the agenda of the EPO

Dear Members of the Administrative Council,

Staff of the European Patent Office gathered in hybrid General Assemblies in Munich on 24 January, in Berlin on 31 January and in The Hague on 6 February 2024.

A resolution on objective setting and quality (Annex 1) was put to a vote and supported by an overwhelming majority: among the 1 523 attendees, 1 088 voted in favour, 31 against and 66 abstained. The outcome confirms the view that EPO management instrumentalizes the career and performance system to put pressure on staff to produce quantity at the expense of quality of the final products. Such policies result in low level of staff engagement, high incidence of psychosocial risks and mounting criticism from the industry on patent quality (IPQC).

Back in 2015, the EPO had initiated a project “Closer contacts with major applicants” to foster a better “esprit de service” (Annex 2). Among the companies selected at the time were companies which have now become members of the Industry Patent Quality Charter (IPQC) and are among the top proprietors of Unitary Patents1. Since 2022, these companies express their concerns on the decrease in substantive quality of EPO granted patents. They bring arguments, data and propose working groups to improve our patent system.

_____________

1 “Statistics and trend centre: Requests for unitary effect”, EPO website


However, this time, EPO management closes its door and denies any quality issue without justification (see overview of events2 in Annex 3).

Following the adoption of the resolution, Mr Beat Weibel, Chief IP counsel at Siemens and founder of the IPQC, told Managing IP3: “We feel now there is an informal coalition between the users of the [EPO] system and those executing the system.” Mr Jorge Thomaier, Head of IP at Bayer, noted that “This message is loud and clear for the EPO management – they should first talk to their staff and then take our (industry members’) help to improve targets, incentivisation, and in the end, the quality of the patents.”

We can only urge the Administrative Council to exercise its supervisory role and instruct EPO management to enter into dialogue with the staff representation and to put in place the measures supported by staff in the resolution.

Yours sincerely,

Derek Kelly
Chairman of the Central Staff Committee

List of annexes:
Annex 1 Resolution adopted on objective setting
Annex 2 “Closer contacts with major applicants”, DG1 Note of 16.02.2015
Annex 3 “50 years EPC: The EPO ignoring the skilled person”, CSC paper of 19.01.2024

cc.: Mr A. Campinos; President of the EPO

____

2 “50 years EPC: The EPO ignoring the skilled person”, CSC paper (sc24001cp), 19- 01-2024 [ANNEX 2]

3 “EPO staff vote through resolution urging quality control”, Managing IP, 08-02- 2024

Our expectation is that they won't even bother to respond but now that it's on the record that they were duly informed they cannot say some time later, "oh, we didn't know..."

Board 28 E-meeting

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

Extortion is a Crime, Even If You're Based in Another Continent and Work for Microsoft
reported to British authorities
 
Gemini Links 06/06/2025: "MBA Tear" and Slop ('AI') as Plagiarism
Links for the day
Links 06/06/2025: "Convicted Felon and MElon Trade Insults" and Europe Snubbed by US Again
Links for the day
Links 06/06/2025: Microsoft XBox Bracing For More Mass Layoffs, Climate Disaster, Fake 'Money' Tokens From US President
Links for the day
Gemini Links 06/06/2025: Vanishing Cultures and MElon Implosion
Links for the day
We're in 6/6 Now, Almost Halfway in 2025
2025 was probably the best year for us
South Americans Are Saying Goodbye to Microsoft
We're hardly even "Cherry-Picking" or conveniently singling out one South American nation
Abuse Inside the Polish Patent Office (UPRP) - Part III: Data Protection Failures, Just Like at the European Patent Office (EPO)
Just less than a decade ago we showed that the EPO had illegally shared staff data with third parties
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, June 05, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, June 05, 2025
Pushing Microsoft's Proprietary Trash/Trap as "Open" and "Linux" (Windows is 'Linux' Now?)
Maybe it's time to just stop saying "FOSS". The people who use that term are promoting Microsoft.
Slopwatch: Comparing Linux to Vermin, Attacking BSD With LLM Slop, and Helping Microsoft Demonise Linux/OpenBSD/SSH Over Weak User Passwords
Microsoft must be laughing its arse off, seeing how a bunch of Serial Sloppers (no skills, no comprehension, no integrity, no creativity) and slopfarms use Microsoft LLM to flood the Web with anti-Linux FUD
Links 05/06/2025: US Poised for Another $2.4 Trillion to Debt, Cops Want GAFAM Kill Switches
Links for the day
Links 05/06/2025: First US Spacewalk 60 Years Ago, GNU Octave 10.2.0 is Out
Links for the day
Scandinavia Saying Goodbye to Microsoft
The Danes have had enough of Microsoft
GNU/Linux Measured at 6% in Bangladesh, According to statCounter
Windows isn't growing, it's going away
Nat Friedman Had Left Microsoft GitHub Exactly One Week Before Matthew Garrett Sent His First SLAPP (Which Was an Empty Threat, He Was Abusing the Legal System of Another Continent to Terrorise Critics Who Had Just Unearthed Major Microsoft Scandals)
And it was likely talked about by his lawyers around the exact same time Nat Friedman was packing up
Gemini Links 05/06/2025: Loop Earplugs Review and ANS Forth
Links for the day
Armenian Adoption of GNU/Linux
Russian influence in Armenian must be worrying to Microsoft
Abuse Inside the Polish Patent Office (UPRP) - Part II: Turning a Once-Respected Patent Office Into a Circus and Laughing Stock
It's not legal, but administrators who don't care about the law and don't fear the law would just go ahead and turn things to junk
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, June 04, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, June 04, 2025
Slopwatch: Mindless Slop Pieces, Fake Images and Text, Linux FUD on the Cheap
spewed out by Microsoft-controlled LLMs
Links 04/06/2025: Workers' Strikes, Sudan Exodus
Links for the day
Links 04/06/2025: Linux Foundation PR Spam and Lee Jae-myung Wins Election
Links for the day
Gemini Links 04/06/2025: Future Leaders of the World and Platforming Jordan Peterson
Links for the day
Links 04/06/2025: WSL Backfiring on Microsoft and "Disney, Microsoft Announce Massive Layoffs"
Links for the day
Our Case is a Very Easy Win, the SLAPPs From Microsofters Were a Grave Error, and Censoring Information Won't Work (It'll Only Ever Backfire)
Censoring is what people do when they lose the argument
Say the Truth, the Rest Will Follow
There's no guarantee that writing the truth will result in an audience (or readership), but over time - in the long run - people generally gravitate towards what they know or feel to be crude truth, not just what's comforting (albeit false or self-deluding, usually groupthink dictated from above)
How to Expose High-Level Corruption Without Getting in (Too Much) Trouble
Democracy depends on free press and freedom of the press depends on being able to safely publish (and keep available) material that bad people don't want to be known to anybody
In-Depth EPO Coverage at Techrights Turns Eleven
11 years is a very long time
Windows Measured Below 10% in Afghanistan, GNU/Linux Gaining a Lot
about 80% are Android (Linux) users, compared to only about 10% for Windows
Poland's Political Predicament and Social Control Media
Democracy and fake "tech" don't mix well; the latter tends to interfere with the former and that's why we get more "Putins" out there
EPO: Taking Away From the Staff to Give More to the Rich
The Central Staff Committee (CSC) wrote to EPO staff earlier this week
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, June 03, 2025
IRC logs for Tuesday, June 03, 2025
Abuse Inside the Polish Patent Office (UPRP) - Part I: It's a Lot Like the EPO
we can commence a series soon
Gemini Links 04/06/2025: Inescapable Questions and Quitting All "Oligarch Tech"
Links for the day