Bonum Certa Men Certa

Central Staff Committee of the European Patent Office (EPO) Reports Growing Secrecy at the EPO

posted by Roy Schestowitz on Jul 29, 2024,
updated Jul 29, 2024

rewards exercise

THE EPO's Central Staff Committee (CSC) is circulating a message sent to António Campinos last Friday. The representation says: "The recent change in the rewards exercise, from a single annual event, to three rewards events during the year, has seen a change toward the negative. The announcement for the awards for the first round and second round of strategic bonuses of 2023, and the first bonus round of 2024 have been notably missing any statistics at all. This is of concern, because without sharing this data, staff are left to make their own assumptions about the distribution and fairness."

Here is the full publication they've circulated among staff:

European Patent Office | 80298 MUNICH | GERMANY

European Patent Office
80298 Munich
Germany

Central Staff Committee
Comité central du personnel
Zentraler Personalausschuss

Tel. +49 -89- 2399 - 2120
+49 -170- 2251 - 7271
centralSTCOM@epo.org
Reference: sc24049cl

Date: 26.07.2024

M. António Campinos
President of the EPO

ISAR – R.1080

OPEN LETTER

No “transparency” in the rewards exercise anymore?

No way to know if the bonuses are being rewarded fairly across specific groups of staff.

Dear Mr. President,

Since 2018, an annual announcement has been made on the intranet regarding the outcome of the rewards exercise. Included in the announcement is a document providing the detailed statistics related to the distribution of the rewards among various groupings of staff, including DG, job group, gender, colleagues on maternity leave, part-timers, newcomers, etc. The staff representation repeatedly asked for more granularity than DG level in the rewards statistics. However, the administration argued that this was not possible for data protection reasons. At a time when Directorates have reached around 200 members in DG1 and Teams are growing, data protection should not be an issue anymore.

The practice of publishing detailed statistics was initiated by you, Mr Campinos, and contrasted with the policy of your predecessor who had systematically refused to provide any data. More transparency in the distribution of rewards is always welcome and can contribute to creating a culture of trust. When the Office openly illustrates where improvements can be made to improve the fairness of the system, and works on closing gaps between groups of staff, an impact on engagement, motivation, and trust can be achieved. The statistics suggest improvements in the rewarding of women on maternity leave, and some progress on the gender gap, for example.

The recent change in the rewards exercise, from a single annual event, to three rewards events during the year, has seen a change toward the negative. The announcement for the awards for the first round and second round of strategic bonuses of 2023, and the first bonus round of 2024 have been notably missing any statistics at all. This is of concern, because without sharing this data, staff are left to make their own assumptions about the distribution and fairness.

In addition, for the bonuses that have, until now, been rewarded at the same time as the pensionable rewards, we have seen a concerning trend over the last two years for a gap opening between the rewarding of men and women, and a continued and increasing gap between rewarding of full- and part-time staff. We bring these significant issues of potential discrimination to the attention of the administration for the purposes of assisting the calibration and harmonisation of rewards processes, with the hope that it will be addressed before the next exercise.

Rate of allocation of a bonus to eligible women and men

One aspect that has been missing from the statistics thus far is the average value of the bonus for the disaggregated groups of staff. While there is now an upper and lower limit to the combined value of bonuses that may be rewarded to an individual, the data related to the average value per DG (Directorate and Team), job group, gender, part-timers, newcomers, etc would also be valuable in assessing the fairness of the distribution.

In light of the above, we have three requests:

1 – That the detailed statistics continue to be published on the intranet, including for the new bonus reward rounds, past and future

2 – That the average value of the bonus is included for the disaggregated data

3 – That more granularity at Directorate and Team level is provided

We hope that this is an area in which we can continue to collaborate, working towards the goals of the SP2028 in improving staff engagement and building trust. We look forward to your reply.

Yours sincerely,

Derek Kelly
Chairman of the Central Staff Committee

"In this open letter to the President," they say, "we have three requests: 1. That the detailed statistics continue to be published on the intranet, including for the new bonus reward rounds, past and future. 2. That the average value of the bonus is included for the disaggregated data. 3. That more granularity at Directorate and Team level is provided."

There's lots more above. It's part of a decade (or longer) long trend.

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

This is the Man Who's Attacking Linus Torvalds et al in "a Disease" (Social Control Media)
One thing that Richard M. Stallman and Torvalds can agree on is that Social Control Media should be avoided
Unlike GAFAM, Free Software Serves You, It Does Not Serve Governments and MElons (Overlapping Forces)
Tired of oligarchy controlling your life through gadgets and "apps"?
When It Comes to Social Control Media, Linus Torvalds is Channeling Techrights
GAFAM workers know exactly who to aim at
New EPO Paper: Promoting (Rewarding) People Who Grant Many Illegal European Patents to Make More Money (at Europeans' Expense) While Patent Courts in the EU Are Themselves Illegal
now the coup is sort of complete and even the "courts" are part of the corruption
Slopwatch: Carnival of LLM Slop and FUD Spewed by Bots, Pasted in by MaKenna Hensley and Day
Welcome to the Web in 2025. Articles about "Linux", "Security", and the Web (e.g. "Firefox") are fake.
Links 07/02/2025: Amazon’s Stock Collapses and US Government Being Dismantled (Still)
Links for the day
 
Microsoft Windows Falls to 12% in Myanmar
Remember that Microsoft is virtually 0% in mobile
Gemini Links 08/02/2025: "Thought Leaders" and Returns to Gemini Protocol
Links for the day
Links 08/02/2025: MElon Coup, Mass Layoffs at Facebook, and PlayStation Network Down
Links for the day
On Wars Against Founders
We need to insist that founders remain
Links 08/02/2025: News Corp Admits Traffic Declines, Wildlife Trafficking Tackled
Links for the day
Gemini Links 08/02/2025: Lamp and Notions
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, February 07, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, February 07, 2025
Gemini Links 07/02/2025: Mid-level Details and Simple Code
Links for the day
Links 07/02/2025: US 'Demolition Crew', e-ID Loopholes, and Sanctions
Links for the day
Professor Eben Moglen on How Social Control Media Metabolises Humans and Constrains Freedom of Thought
Nothing of value would be lost if all these data-harvesting giants (profiling people) vanished overnight
Social Control Media is Narcissism
Nowadays there's a lot more literature and even press coverage explaining the harms of Social Control Media
Debian Left Twitter (MElon "X"), We Think the Free Software Foundation (FSF) Should Do the Same
What would the FSF really lose if it stopped posting there?
statCounter Sees GNU/Linux Share Doubling in China Over the Past Year
It'll be interesting to see what data in the coming months shows
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, February 06, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, February 06, 2025
Richard Stallman (RMS) Confirms Next Week's Talk in Europe
He gave at least 2 talks in Europe last month
Nationalism As A Service (NaaS) by Microsoft Azure, Gutting the US Government for Profit
Will Microsoft be receiving bailouts as a reward for all this?
Rumours of IBM Layoffs Apparently Confirmed Yesterday, IBM Canada Consulting Impacted (as Rumoured)
when IBM has layoffs we must also read it as Red Hat layoffs
Tons of Anti-Linux 'Articles' Published by Bots (LLMs), Maybe Microsoft's
Upon closer inspection, all this FUD turned out to be LLM garbage
Gemini Links 06/02/2025: Voicemail Sucks and Night of Lights
Links for the day
Ubuntu Desktop Director of Engineering Has Only One Blog Post. It Promotes Microsoft Windows.
Remember that even 15 years ago (more or less, maybe 16 years ago) Canonical appointed a a 'former' Microsoft manager (Spencer) to lead Ubuntu on the desktop
Links 06/02/2025: YouTube Takedowns Out of Control, 'DOGE' Breaking Laws
Links for the day
IBM Red Hat on "era of cloud computing", pushing "hey hi" (AI) hype in Microsoft Azure
LLM slop might actually be more benign than Microsoft promotion
Corruption and Rule-Breaking Prevail at the European Patent Office (EPO), Europe's Second-Largest Institution
The law does not really exist at the EPO; it can be perceived as merely a "recommendation"
statCounter: More Countries Where Windows is Around 1% "Market Share" (People Have Moved to Android/Linux)
in some nations Windows is already 1% or less
404 Media Says "Workers at NASA Told to Drop Everything to Scrub Mentions of Indigenous People, Women from Its Websites" But There's Also Accessibility in the Firing Line
In the case of abandoning accessibility, everyone stands to be hurt and proprietary software can be brought in to replace standards
When BetaNews Writes Real Articles About "Linux" They Promote Windows
The Web is in a bad state. We need to at least try to correct this.
Gemini Links 06/02/2025: Cynicism and "Real Magic on the C64"
Links for the day
Links 06/02/2025: New Sanctions, Layoffs, and Executive Orders
Links for the day
Distros and Desktop Environments, Devices
GNU/Linux focused
New Rumours of IBM Layoffs in 2025, IBM Consulting Still Struggles, Based on Management
"Hey hi" (AI) has been a common excuse for business failure
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, February 05, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, February 05, 2025