Report/Benchmark Says 'Vibe Coding' Results in Security Holes
A human would easily catch - not overlook - basic issues
"Apps" (shallow stuff, nothing rigorous) made with so-called 'vibe coding' tend to "Fail Miserably on Security Controls," argues Kevin Townsend's new article. Worse - you can lose a lot of data and time (trying to actually maintain those produced-by-bots programs). Even the so-called inventor of 'vibe coding' isn't using 'vibe coding' practices, which are mostly promoted by 'vibe coding' bros or slop bros (salesmanship by bots, slopfarms, bribed media). They try to sell something that eventually won't work because it creates more liability and human work (writing or producing code is only a small part of the overall task of development/stewardship). There are risks they don't like talking about. The article from Townsend talks about that. █

