Bonum Certa Men Certa

How to Win Lawsuits in 5 Simple Steps

posted by Roy Schestowitz on Feb 06, 2026,
updated Feb 06, 2026

At the trial hearing, Dr and Mrs Schestowitz also made extensive and sustained submissions objecting to the manner in which Dr Garrett and his legal team have been conducting this litigation against them. It is plain that they have both, in general, found the experience of being proceeded against for libel intrusive, frightening and intimidatory. I was told that they experienced it as motivated by an intention to harm them and their websites financially, and to interfere with their investigative journalism. They objected specifically to Dr Garrett’s having made contact with their internet service provider and other web hosts in an attempt to have the publications taken down, to the obtaining of their postal and online contact details, to the threatening tone of solicitors’ correspondence, to the conduct of the disclosure process, to the conduct by the same firm of solicitors of a second set of proceedings against them which Dr and Mrs Schestowitz had unsuccessfully sought to have consolidated with Dr Garrett’s claim, and to a reference made in formal documentation to a previous name of Mrs Schestowitz, a matter to which she took extremely strong exception. They felt, in short, that they had been ‘harassed’ by this litigation.

As just noted elsewhere, the SRA - the national regulator [1, 2, 3, 4] - doesn't care about facts or obvious (as clear as daylight) abuse of process, so here's how to win a case:

  1. Target the finances of the target, target relatives also
  2. Do a copypasta of a claim* (draft of claims)
  3. Deny the right to bring up relevant evidence (Disclosure), including a spouse speaking of rape
  4. Deny the ability to bring up evidence/testimonies in trial by starting a second case with the same copypasta of a claim (see 2) which induces further legal costs**
  5. Keep issuing threats every week and send 60 kilograms of legal papers to the target, even when there's no legal basis for either

This is British justice in a nutshell; and the regulator exists only in name. We'll be covering this in years to come.

_____

* In the future we'll show they didn't even bother drafting it from scratch, they just reuse the same templates again and again, then charging a lot of money for chatbot-like shortcuts.

** Second case coordinated with the first, exactly the same legal team (lawyer and barrister), foreigners from the US, abusers of women.

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

Gemini Links 11/07/2026: Old Computer challenge, Poems, Antenna, and More
Links for the day
Links 11/07/2026: "Trademark wars of Influencer Culture", Xinuos Uses Copyrights Versus UNIX
Links for the day
North America: GNU/Linux Measured at 10%
To better understand what contributes to the gains
Following Corrections and Adjustments statCounter Sees GNU/Linux at 7.1%, an All-Time High
There is a lot of layoffs at Microsoft this month
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, July 10, 2026
IRC logs for Friday, July 10, 2026
Links 11/07/2026: Wednesday-Saturday News Catch-up
Links for the day
Prioritising High-Importance News
In order to fully catch up with news we'll not publish many new articles until next week
The Register MS: "AI" More Than 80 Times in One Article. But It's Not an Article, It's Sponsored Keyword-stuffed Page.
The Register MS is being paid to actively promoted this scheme
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, July 09, 2026
IRC logs for Thursday, July 09, 2026
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, July 08, 2026
IRC logs for Wednesday, July 08, 2026
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, July 07, 2026
IRC logs for Tuesday, July 07, 2026