This video is said to have been "sold to hundreds of corporations, universities, governmental entities and law firms to educate laypersons about Intellectual Property and particularly patents." It's over a decade old, but you can see the trolling element in it -- an element that earned it its name ("Patent Troll").
If the election is run by platforms that have back doors "baked-in" and if the communications are overseen by GAFAM, you would not have to be a "nutty MAGAt" to dispute the outcome
"It means a situation in which somebody accuses someone else of a fault which the accuser shares, and therefore is an example of psychological projection, or hypocrisy. Use of the expression to discredit or deflect a claim of wrongdoing by attacking the originator of the claim for their own similar behaviour (rather than acknowledging the guilt of both) is the tu quoque logical fallacy."
Comments
Felipe Alvarez
2007-09-09 07:49:14
John Drinkwater
2007-09-09 09:03:04
Roy Schestowitz
2007-09-09 09:26:05