Bonum Certa Men Certa

EPO Breaking the Law With Microsoft and Promoting Fake 'Encryption' That Violates Confidentiality on Many Levels

Video download link



Summary: An explanation of how truly ridiculous the EPO has become, handing over to Microsoft (and to the US government) just about all of the EPO's communications in direct violation of the law, as well, so the only question now is, will the law actually be enforced soon? Contact your local MP/MEP and report this to him/her.

THE EPO is breaking the law. The António Campinos regime is just as bad as Benoît Battistelli's, even when it comes to privacy and pressuring judges to allow unlawful patents, such as software patents.



Steve Rowan - Vice President DG1 - Patent Granting ProcessIn parts of the series prior to this one, including Part II, we explained what the EPO had done and why it's illegal. I recorded a video (the one above) prior to the publication of Part II.

It's a long video, we could add a lot of links to it (I thought of many that would be relevant while recording it, but failed to take notes throughout), though the ones that seem of most relevance are Microsoft and the NSA relations, the latest Exchange fiasco (as recently as hours ago they still try to distract from it), how end-to-end encryption (e2ee) really works and some background about Stephen Rowan. The full text of the communication is reproduced below:

04.02.2021

Home > Organisation > DG 1 > The Vice-President > Announcements > 2021

Outlook Migration to the Cloud



Data encryption requirements for sending highly confidential data via Outlook

As announced in previous intranet items published in May and December 2020, our Outlook mailboxes are being transferred to the cloud. The transfer will take place in phases and cover only emails since 1 January 2021. As regards the patent grant process, only the following documents are classed as "EPO strictly confidential" and must not be sent by email without encryption: (i) application documents of unpublished applications (EP, PCT, national) (ii) search reports, search opinions, communications and decisions relating to unpublished applications (iii) search statements resulting in the disclosure of unpublished application documents (Guidelines B-III, 2.4; B-IV, 2.4) (iv) documents excluded from file inspection (documents which are marked as non-public in DI+, such as dissenting opinions, medical certificates, PACE requests, etc.) Guidance for the storage of strictly confidential information in the cloud The storage of strictly confidential documents in the cloud should be avoided, and data should not be copied unnecessarily from the EPO's specialised document management systems such as DI+. In practice, this means that, instead of e.g. copying data into an email, you should send a link to the document in the document management system (see also "How to send an email with document links or zipped attachment via Outlook"). Where sharing of strictly confidential data is necessary, the data must be encrypted before storing it in the cloud or sending a link to it via email. It is strongly recommended that you do not send the data directly in an email but instead encrypt the document, store it in the cloud, e.g. on SharePoint or OneDrive, and then send the recipients a link to the encrypted document by email. The password then needs to be shared via a separate channel, e.g. in a Teams chat, via Skype or on the telephone. Sending encrypted attachments is strongly discouraged, as they might not pass spam filters: using encrypted attachments is a very common way to infect user computers, so our email gateways do not allow encrypted attachments to be sent from or to our Outlook cloud instance. The easiest and safest way of encrypting a document is to use the built-in capabilities of the Office programs. Simply protect the document with a password, which also will encrypt the document with a strong encryption algorithm. Obviously, this password should be safe. As a rule of thumb, it should be about as complex as our login passwords, but of course not identical to a password already used. Chat is a good way to send the password, as a long random password can be easily copied and pasted from the chat into the password prompt in the Office program. Examples of how to apply encryption in popular Office programs are in the document annexed here.

Reasons and background

The level of security provided by Microsoft's cloud services is very high and will even mean an improvement in information security for our email system. In the cloud, our mailboxes will be protected by the most sophisticated systems. Email in Microsoft's datacentres is stored with a high standard of encryption, both in transit and at rest. With the help of contract terms, a data protection agreement and technical implementation, the EPO has ensured the best possible protection for the data stored using Microsoft's cloud services. Microsoft guarantees that the data itself is stored on EU servers within the jurisdiction of the European data protection rules (GDPR). Under the US Foreign Intelligence and Surveillance Act (FISA) and the US Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act (CLOUD Act), Microsoft is obliged to grant security and intelligence agencies access to data stored in its cloud, even when stored on EU servers. However, the protection level offered by Microsoft is still sufficiently high for DG 1 processes in place for confidential data exchange not to need encryption. By contrast, to comply with the highest standards, which of course include the requirements imposed under the GDPR, encryption is needed for strictly confidential data. The guidance on the use of cloud tools therefore states that it is only strictly confidential data that must not be stored in plain form in the cloud, whereas merely confidential information can be stored there without limitations. The EPO defines "strictly confidential" in its "policy for information classification" (document attached) as: EPO strictly confidential: Information unauthorised disclosure of which could compromise or cause severe damage to the EPO or could cause damage to an identifiable individual or his or her reputation. Access control cannot be delegated by the information owner, and is restricted to registered named persons only. See here for more information. The vast majority of DG 1 documents do not fall into this category, and this is true for typical performance related data too, since even poor performance must be regarded as "normal" working behaviour and cannot be considered to actually cause damage to an individual. For strictly confidential data, additional access control measures, such as registering people with access, are already implemented where required.

04.02.21 | Author: Steve Rowan - Vice President DG1 - Patent Granting Process


In Part III, which we will publish tomorrow, lots more will be shown.

Recent Techrights' Posts

GNU/Linux Grows at Windows' Expense and Microsoft Trolls Infest and Maliciously Target Articles About It
Microsoft is - and has long been - organised crime
They Say I'm Mr. Bombastic
They didn't take good lawyers
 
Computers Got Smaller, So GNU/Linux Got Bigger
Many people here recognise the lack of urgency (or need) to get expensive new laptops
BetaNews is a Plagiarism and LLM Slop Hub, the Chief Editor Isn't Addressing This Problem Anymore
SS Fagioli is basically a parasite leeching off or exploiting other people's work
Links 09/06/2025: Chaos in Los Angeles and Hurricane Season
Links for the day
Links 09/06/2025: Windows TCO and Many Data Breaches
Links for the day
Abuse Inside the Polish Patent Office (UPRP) - Part VI: Political Stunts by Former President Edyta Demby-Siwek and the Connection to Profound Corruption at EUIPO
it's like a money-laundering operation where one politician rewards another at taxpayers' expense
Gemini Links 09/06/2025: Pipelines and Splitgate
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, June 08, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, June 08, 2025
Links 08/06/2025: Tiananmen Carnage Censorship Persists, North Korean Goes Offline
Links for the day
Gemini Links 08/06/2025: Love as an Ethnographic Method and Monitorix Gemini-Frontend v0.1
Links for the day
Links 08/06/2025: Exposure of More GAFAM Surveillance and Social Security Records Compromised
Links for the day
Linux Foundation is a Mediator for Microsoft et al, Not for Small Companies That Support Rather Than Attack the GPL
Many people still wrongly assume that because it is called "Linux Foundation", then it is pro-Linux and represents the same mindset
This Past Friday, Confirming What We Said All Along About Brett Wilson LLP: It's Shrinking, Has Considerable Debt, Loss of Net Assets Despite the Microsoft SLAPP Money
The documents only became publicly available less than 2 days ago
Some of the Many Reasons We Sued Microsofters for Harassment
perpetrators of harassment
For 20 Years Many People Were Sharecropping for Canonical's Oligarch, Now He's Deleting All Their Contributions
"Ubuntu has erased instead of archiving the trove of material at Ubuntu Forums"
There Was Always Too Much 'Crazy Stuff' Going on Around Freenode
What many IRC users lost sight of
Exposing Crime is Not a Crime (It Never Was)
In the eyes of rich and powerful people, those who speak about their crimes are the "criminals"
GNU/Linux Distros Abandoning Microsoft GitHub
Will curl be next to leave Microsoft GitHub?
Expect More XBox Mass Layoffs Soon If the Rumours Are True
From a Microsoft media operative
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, June 07, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, June 07, 2025
Europe Needs to Move Away From GAFAM; The Sooner, the Better
Europe - not just the EU - must abandon GAFAM as soon as possible
The Issue Isn't GNOME's Promotion of Diversity But GNOME Corruption, Abuse, Censorship, and Worse
So-called "Conservative" (republican, pro-Trump, bigoted) people want you to think the problem with GNOME is politics
When the News Sources Become Scarce and Increasingly Full of Polluted/Contaminated 'Content' (With LLM Slop and Slop Images)
Integrity matters
"Linux" Sites That Spew Out LLM Slop
We're lacking enough material for another "Slopwatch"
Abuse Inside the Polish Patent Office (UPRP) - Part V: Breaking the Law, Just Like EPO
We'll hopefully cover some of the pertinent details later this year
Links 08/06/2025: Security Lapses, CISA Cuts, and More
Links for the day
Gemini Links 07/06/2025: Mime Types and Geminisphere Introduction
Links for the day
Links 07/06/2025: Slop Companies Retain All Private Data, More Books Banned in the US
Links for the day
Gemini Links 07/06/2025: "A Monk's Guide to Happiness" and "Wireless Earbuds"
Links for the day
Links 07/06/2025: More Rumours of Mass Layoffs in Microsoft's XBox Division, New COVID Variant
Links for the day
Drug Addiction is a Real Problem, It Destroys Families
a rather sensitive matter
Abuse Inside the Polish Patent Office (UPRP) - Part IV: Political Scrutiny and Errors/Inconsistencies in Official Documents
When such organisations receive scrutiny they start focusing on cover-up and muzzling of facts (or crushing people who say the truth)
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, June 06, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, June 06, 2025