Bonum Certa Men Certa

Even Patent Maximalists Across Europe Are Dissatisfied With the European Patent Office's Shameless Race to the Bottom (Illegal European Patents)

Video download link | md5sum dd01061936c4b1b959d6f6fae1f63d88 Even Patent Maximalists Worry About EPO Quality Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 4.0

Summary: Some of the largest clients or customers of the EPO (yes, the EPO views itself and behaves like a for-profit corporation*) are publicly complaining; To quote Siemens: “All the measures are too focused on the improvement of internal processes and their effectiveness, including speed and timeliness. This does not necessarily enhance the actual quality of the granted patents.”

THIS past summer we published a series with European Patent Office (EPO) leaks, showing a plot/ploy by António Campinos to lower patent quality and fake 'growth' (a lot of it by allowing European software patents). The bubble that Benoît Battistelli had created was already imploding years ago and Campinos is desperate to hide it. Moreover, staff actions (strikes and protests, work stoppage/slow-down) are taking their toll. It turns out that treating one's staff poorly results in less work, or at least the appearance of less work. Putting aside aspects like brain drain...

"Public officials became part of the problem with their inaction or even participation."The above video shows this article, which SUEPO has just recommended. It was published one day before the EPO seemingly posted this response/distraction (warning: link) (original entitled "Dissatisfied industry users push back against EPO quality measures" and then the EPO with "Users discuss the final version of the EPC and PCT-EPO Guidelines"). Is the timing a coincidence? Probably not. Then, the EPO published some diversity fluff (warning: link), as the video above explains. Maybe it helps distract from things like these [1, 2]. The news section (warning: link) as a whole is a reputation laundering laughing stock which incites law-breaking.

Here's what the original article said:

The EPO Patent Quality Charter came into force on 1 October, replacing the previous quality policy which the EPO published in 2013. It is an important component of the Strategic Plan 2023, which was launched by the EPO in 2018 with a view to achieving its aims before the end of the five-year period.

However, according to industry, these proposals do not go far enough. While, within the framework of this strategy, a working group of the Standing Advisory Committee (SACEPO) has drawn up concrete proposals – including optimisation of workflows, regular monitoring of processes, further training of employees, and exchange with stakeholders – in-house users remain concerned with the quality of the granted patents.

Chief IP counsel of Siemens, Beat Weibel, told JUVE Patent, “All the measures are too focused on the improvement of internal processes and their effectiveness, including speed and timeliness. This does not necessarily enhance the actual quality of the granted patents.”

For this reason, Weibel has launched an industry initiative in response to what is seen as an onging quality issue at the patent office. Industry Patent Quality Charter signatories jointly commit to a set of quality standards independent to the measures set out by the EPO.

If "users" (sometimes called "clients" or "customers" by the EPO) aren't happy, then the EPO's management ought to be held accountable. However, when the bureaucracy is akin to monarchy and nobody ever resigns or gets punished (except 'low-level' staff) we don't expect accountability any time soon. The reputation of the EPO is sagging. The staff has warned about this for at least a decade. Public officials became part of the problem with their inaction or even participation.

Suffice to say, the legal framework protects EPO management, no matter how rogue, self-destructive and corrupt, from much-deserved prosecution. The organisation's founders did not envision that diplomatic immunity would be leveraged to commit crimes with impunity. Intervention is well ovedue. ____ * The EPO has a monopoly on the ability to grant monopolies on ideas, based on requests for monopolies (patent applications). It's ludicrous to assert that granting more and more monopolies in exchange for money is a good idea that's justified by profits as the EPO is meant to serve the public and advance science, not guard monopolists (about two-thirds of them aren't even European).

Recent Techrights' Posts

Microsoft's Pearls of Wisdom: Layoffs Are Growth
Microsoft boss: layoffs are "long-term growth."
Microsoft Lacks a Solid Strategic Plan Other Than Buying Its Own Stock (and Paying Staff in Shares)
Beware and be cautious of bubbles
Mark Shuttleworth & Debian Day Volunteer Suicide cover-up
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
IRC Proceedings: Friday, February 23, 2024
IRC logs for Friday, February 23, 2024
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
Links 24/02/2024: EA Planning Layoffs and 'Liquor Regulators Are Seeking Revenge on Bars That Broke Pandemic Rules'
Links for the day
Gemini Links 24/02/2024: In Defense of Boilerplate and TinyWM Broke
Links for the day
[Meme] Hide the Bodies
hiding EPO's role in funding Lukashenko
Josef Kratochvíl and All the European Patent Organisation's Chiefs (at the Administrative Council Too) Notified That Over 1,000 Members of Staff Demand Action on Patent Quality and Compliance (Industry Too is Alarmed That Many Invalid Patents Get Granted)
Huge corruption
Debian trademark canceled
Debian trademark canceled
Links 23/02/2024: Feed Aggregator and 2 Years of Invasion, Alexei Navalny’s Mother Blackmailed
Links for the day
Gemini Links 23/02/2024: Getting 'Sick' of Modern Tech and Deletion of One's Reddit Account
Links for the day
Links 23/02/2024: 227 Microsoft Layoffs Noted in Santa Clara and Disaster in Rivian
Links for the day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, February 22, 2024
IRC logs for Thursday, February 22, 2024
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
[Meme] It's NOT Your PC
losing control of hardware
Microsoft's Chatbot Strategy Resulted in Massive Losses, So Now It's Trying to Reinvent Itself as 'Hardware Company' (Once Again, Years After XBox, KIN, Windows Phone and Surface Failed Miserably)
revenues associated with Windows has fallen sharply
Gemini Links 22/02/2024: Removing Radio Ads and Being Seen on the Internet
Links for the day
Mark Shuttleworth and the Question of Liability (Debian Volunteers He Pressured Before the Suicides)
Humanity for me
Mark Shuttleworth's (MS) Canonical Running Microsoft (MS) Ads, Mischaracterising Mass Surveillance as 'Confidential' (the Usual Lie)
The money talks, so the facts are absent
Ads as 'Articles'
Money buys perception manipulation (or reputation laundering) campaigns
Abraham Raji & Debian, DebConf kayak death: search abandoned, evading liability
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Links 22/02/2024: Chatbots Failing 'Big Time' and More Condemnations Appear of Bill Gates
Links for the day
There May be Close to 100,000,000 Laptops and Desktops Running GNU/Linux Around the World in 2024
hard to track the number
Search Engine Market Share Worldwide Shows How Badly Microsoft's Chatbot Strategy (Hopes) and Vapourware Have Failed
Bing, which was marketed as the forefront "product" for chatbots (Microsoft paid the media a lot of money for hype campaigns), gained nothing at Google's expense
[Meme] Demoralising and Putting Down Your Staff
unproductive and dangerous approach
This Week's Letter to António Campinos About Mean-Spirited Line Managers at the European Patent Office (EPO)
Seems like a way to get rid of staff. Some will resign in anger.
Software in the Public Interest (SPI) & Debian obfuscated structure fooled suicide victim's family: the ultimate example of bad faith
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, February 21, 2024
IRC logs for Wednesday, February 21, 2024
Gemini Links 22/02/2024: What We Pass On and HTTP Header Viewer
Links for the day