10.25.07

Gemini version available ♊︎

Microsoft and Novell Work in Isolation to Weed Out Common Threat (Free Linux)

Posted in Boycott Novell, Europe, GNU/Linux, Intellectual Monopoly, Interoperability, Microsoft, Novell, Patents, Protocol, Red Hat, Servers, Virtualisation at 8:48 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Not much is new under the sun. Microsoft has a plan and Novell plays along happily, so long as it is rewarded financially and offered exclusive rights, at the expense of all other Linux distributions.

Here is what Novell had to say about Microsoft’s latest attempt to pretend to have ‘opened up’.

“The majority of our customers have mixed-source environments, and they want their platform vendors to make things work together,” said Roger Levy, senior vice president and general manager, Open Platform Solutions at Novell. “That’s why we entered into a technical collaboration agreement with Microsoft. As a result, Novell is the first vendor to develop and ship technology that will allow a paravirtualized Windows Server 2008 to be hosted as a guest on the Xen hypervisor. Microsoft’s decision to put the hypercall API under their Open Specifications Promise will make it even easier for Novell, our customers and partners, and the entire open source community to develop high-quality virtualization solutions that deliver true interoperability between Windows and Linux.”

Did you spot that bit about “hypercall API” and “Open Specifications”? Guess what? As usual, it contains anti-GPL poison. It is the old trick that involved licensing, which is part of the plan to block those that do not comply with Microsoft’s rules and assimilate.

This one particular issue was not entirely overlooked by Joe Wilcox over at Microsoft Watch.

Microsoft’s decision to license the hypercall API is the right call, although some pundits and competitors might balk at the licensing scheme.

If you think it’s just this hypercall, then think again. Reuters has just published a detailed list of Microsoft patented protocols, which brings back to mind the terms of the agreement in Europe [1, 2].

Microsoft will release interconnection information — called protocols — which rival servers need in order to work smoothly with Microsoft Windows desktops.

It is worth repeating the key argument that Microsoft wants to charge money for standard protocols which is deliberately ‘extended’ with the sole intention of breaking compatibility. It wishes to be rewarded for abuse of standards and sabotage of intercommunication among servers.

Red Hat, which is watching this type of worrisome developments from afar, responds with understandable concern.

While Red Hat welcomed Microsoft’s recent decision to comply with the European Court of First Instance’s antitrust ruling, Michael Cunningham, general counsel for Red Hat, stated that the company was still concerned about Microsoft’s patent model.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

8 Comments

  1. Yuhong Bao said,

    December 15, 2007 at 10:44 pm

    Gravatar

    So, should Red Hat try to implement the spec? Probably not yet, but what if Windows Server Virtualization become common?

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 15, 2007 at 10:56 pm

    Gravatar

    This contains ‘GPL poison’, so it’s merely a tool (bait) to make Linux companies fall for patent deals.

  3. Yuhong Bao said,

    December 15, 2007 at 10:58 pm

    Gravatar

    What GPL poison? and if Windows Server Virtualization become common, should Red Hat still try to implement it?

  4. Yuhong Bao said,

    December 15, 2007 at 10:59 pm

    Gravatar

    In other words, how severe is the GPL poison?

  5. Yuhong Bao said,

    December 15, 2007 at 11:01 pm

    Gravatar

    I wonder what if every Linux vendor assimulated?

  6. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 15, 2007 at 11:48 pm

    Gravatar

    What GPL poison?

    “GPL poison” usually refers to a case where Microsoft deliberately makes its licence/software incompatible with the GNU GPL licence.

    and if Windows Server Virtualization become common, should Red Hat still try to implement it?

    For hypercalls to be implemented, money needs to be paid. Again, you can probably see a separator between free and commercial. There is no good reason to do this, other than to betray Free software and ensure that only companies can deliver a particular solution.

    Companies can be crushed, unlike communities. A year or two ago, Steve Ballmer made a statement that suggests he wants to ‘encapsulate’ GNU/Linux in a company such as Novell, which he can then crush (along with GNU/Linux).

    In other words, how severe is the GPL poison?

    It’s severe enough to make a Free Linux secondary and incomparable with ‘commercial-grade Linux’ (not free). It’s establishing a different situation for TCO comparisons.

    I wonder what if every Linux vendor assimulated?

    That won’t happen any time soon. Red Hat controls a majority of the server market. Novell got together with Microsoft only because it was desperate to get a dent in Red Hat’s dominant position and dethrone it. Novell failed.

    On the desktop, Ubuntu variants seem to have become very popular. Ubuntu’s founder has openly described Microsoft’s action as ‘mafia techniques’ and ‘racketeering’. Needless to say, he is not willing to fall for this whole patent scam. The same goes for Mandriva.

  7. Yuhong Bao said,

    December 15, 2007 at 11:51 pm

    Gravatar

    But what specific poison are you talking about? And indeed I hoped that full assimation would not happen, I was just wondering what if it did happen.

  8. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 16, 2007 at 12:17 am

    Gravatar

    Oh, I apologise for missing the actual question you had in mind. Here is an item that speaks about the licensing route (think Samba/CIFS).

    Licensing may be a sticky point for some third parties interested in licensing the hypercall API. Microsoft will release the API, at no cost, under its Open Specification Promise, which makes a pledge not to sue anyone using hypercall. Promise not to sue isn’t exactly a feel-good licensing term for perceived or real Microsoft competitors. Microsoft’s focus is customers and loyal partners, anyway.

    At a second glance, there’s no cost involved, but there ought to be concerns about the pledge which is similar to OOXML’s pledge that isn’t sufficient to calm one’s mind. Also mind an item where we explained this further. Paula’s item explains why Red Hat might suffer and I haven’t much hope for distributions like Debian in that regard. The notion of API licensing, patents, and promises not to sue should raise flags.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. [Meme] Sirius Open Source, Closed-Minded Bossing

    At Sirius ‘Open Source’, decisions are made in the dark without consultation with staff and many things go wrong as a result; of course the culprits never hold themselves accountable



  2. Links 06/12/2022: LibreOffice 7.5 Alpha and digiKam 7.9.0

    Links for the day



  3. Rumour: Very Large Microsoft Layoffs (Another Round) Next Month, Lists Already Being Prepared





  4. Benoît Battistelli in 2015: EPO is Ready to Start Unified Patent Court (UPC), Expect UPC in 2016

    We’re almost in 2023 and UPC is being delayed again; this is what EPO President Benoît Battistelli said way back in 2015 (official video from the EPO; 3:45-4:34 cropped apart)



  5. IRC Proceedings: Monday, December 05, 2022

    IRC logs for Monday, December 05, 2022



  6. Links 06/12/2022: FreeBSD 12.4 and Inkscape 1.2.2

    Links for the day



  7. Sirius Not-So-‘Open Source’: Cannot Talk to Colleagues, Cannot Speak About Work

    Cover-up and lies became a corporate pattern at the company where I had worked since 2011; it was time to go in order to avoid cooperation in unethical activities



  8. [Meme] Guilt by Association

    Sirius ‘Open Source’ has a history of hostility towards people with disabilities; the company got sued over this, but kept the lawsuit secret



  9. That Time Sirius 'Open Source' Fired a Blind Lady While Gagging Sympathetic Staff

    Sirius 'Open Source' was taken to court after it had wrongly fired a couple of employees, one of whom was blind; this was accompanied by lies about why the staff's communication server was shut down



  10. Links 05/12/2022: Gnoppix Linux 22.12 and Armbian 22.11

    Links for the day



  11. Unified Patent Court (UPC) is “Real Soon Now!” Since 2014

    The Unified Patent Court (UPC) lobby is once again forced to admit issues and delays; we've seen this time and time again for nearly a decade already



  12. Unified Patent Court (UPC) 'Delayed' Again, As Usual, as Unitary Patent Boosters Caught Up in Lies and Scandals

    “UPC [is] delayed by 2 months,” a source has told us, dubbing it “good news” and reaffirming what we’ve said this past year; this litigation lobby's 'wishlist' system isn’t legal, it’s not ready, there are yet more scandals, and journalists have been catching up with these scandals



  13. Links 05/12/2022: GStreamer 1.21.3

    Links for the day



  14. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, December 04, 2022

    IRC logs for Sunday, December 04, 2022



  15. Links 04/12/2022: Status of the 15-Minute Bug Initiative

    Links for the day



  16. When a Company Simply Refuses to Talk to Technical and Exerienced Staff Through Internal Avenues

    When companies behave like monarchies where staff has no role at all in decision-making and decisions are made in violation of those companies’ tenets (or mission statements) it is inevitable that staff will issue concerns, first internally and — failing that — in other channels



  17. [Meme] Kings Instead of Open Consultation Among Peers

    In Sirius there’s no room for debate, even among half a dozen or so technical colleagues; decisions are made in the dark by a tightly-knit cabal (with rather childish superhero cartoons as their avatars) and then imposed on everybody else (hardly democratic, not sane)



  18. Sirius Open Source: The Home of Stress and Bullying by Management

    Part 3 of a report regarding Sirius Open Source, which is imploding after bad judgement and misuse of power against employees



  19. Links 04/12/2022: Fosshost Shudown and OpenIndiana Hipster 2022.10

    Links for the day



  20. Links 03/12/2022: pgAdmin 4 Version 6.17

    Links for the day



  21. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, December 03, 2022

    IRC logs for Saturday, December 03, 2022



  22. Office Manager in Company Without an Office

    Imagine having an “Office Manager” in a company that does not even have an office. Welcome to corporate posturing.



  23. Dishonest Companies Disguised as 'Open Source' (After Abandoning It)

    A deeper look at the way Sirius Open Source presents itself to the public (including prospective and existing clients); This is clearly not the company that I joined nearly 12 years ago



  24. When the Founder of Your Company Supports Donald Trump the Company Ends up Active in Fascist Platforms

    Politics weren’t allowed in Sirius ‘Open Source’, but there were exceptions for some people (close to management) and it didn’t look good



  25. [Meme] Sirius Actually Used to Promote Free/Libre and Open Source Software

    Before people who reject Free/Libre and Open Source software were put in charge of Sirius ‘Open Source’ concrete steps had been taken to support the wider community (or the suppliers, who were mostly volunteers)



  26. Sirius 'Open Source' When It Actually Understood and Respected Software Freedom

    The company my wife and I joined was (at the time) still Free software-centric and reasonably friendly towards staff; today we examine Sirius of a decade ago



  27. Links 03/12/2022: 4MLinux 41, GNOME E-mail System Melting Down

    Links for the day



  28. Links 03/12/2022: KDE Report and Canonical Lying to Staff

    Links for the day



  29. Sirius 'Open Source' Lists 49 Firms/Organisations as Clients But Only 4 of Them Currently Are

    Sirius Open Source is nowhere as popular as it wants people to think



  30. Sirius 'Open Source' Lists 15 People as Staff, But Only 6 Work in the Company

    Sirius Open Source is nowhere as big as it wants people to believe (like it is a trans-Atlantic thriving firm, the “Sirius Group”)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts