YESTERDAY we wrote about some of the latest security concerns at the Pentagon. It's a Microsoft Windows problem. Over at Linux Today, the editor writes: 'I guess those bad foreign infiltrators don't follow the rules, like the USB device ban. And they're still not saying "Windows." The Foreign Affairs article is worth reading, if only for its missing some seriously obvious points, like "don't use a proven malware vector like Windows."'
“It does not take long to find Microsoft involvement with the service, called VITA.”
--Anonymous"It does not take long to find Microsoft involvement with the service, called VITA. The agency uses Microsoft software for web
service, email and recommends it on all systems from desktops to mainframes. A search of the Vita site for "Linux" mostly turns up FUD about security warnings and the last document, which specifies software for systems, contains a lot of FUD about Solaris, Novell and only recommends Linux as an "alternative" for "low end servers". It is no surprise that a system made by experts like that is expensive and failure prone. Perhaps Northrop Grumman sold Virginia a left over "SmartShip" network [2] [3].
"If the state is going to hand what should be protected public records to a private firm, the least they can do is hand them to a company like Google or IBM with the technical expertise to run things. People who use and push Microsoft are obviously incompetent." ⬆