EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

03.24.07

Has Novell Made OpenOffice Incompatible with Itself?

Posted in GNU/Linux, Interoperability, Office Suites, OpenOffice, Windows at 6:55 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Recently we had a mind-boggling discussion about Novell’s special release of OpenOffice for Windows, with a bunch of extra forbidden fruit. Of particular interest was the following little nugget of information from Novell’s CEO:

What about things [OpenOffice features] that were discussed that didn’t make the cut?

[Hovsepian:] One that we were very interested in would be running some of their toolsets on our Linux platform — Visual Studio and other toolsets. That one didn’t make the cut.

Was the perennial question of a version of Microsoft Office for Linux discussed?

[Hovsepian:] Yes, that was one of the ‘toolsets’ I referred to. That one didn’t make the cut, either. As an executive, I understand that they’re protecting their franchise, and I’m respectful of that.

Now, picture the following scenario: John uses Windows and OpenOffice 2.1.x. He produces a nice presentation using Presenter and also uses a collection of nice and fancy macros for slide transition. He then sends his work over to Anna, who favours the use of GNU/Linux. She uses OpenOffice 2.1.x.

But here comes the fun part. It does not matter which distribution she uses, the software is for some reason unable to reproduce the integrity of John’s presentation, let alone view it without losing some crucial elements. It later turns out that John has unknowingly made use Novell’s special ‘features’.

Has Novell broken the round-trip rule at an intra-application level, rather than inter-application or inter-platform level? Has it led to fragmentation? Is it truly a case of an application not being backward-compatible with self, but also self-incompatible? Can you see GNU/Linux discriminated against here? Was our early questioning justified? Was Pamela right after all?

Novell claims to be working on improved interoperability. Unless the judgment and assumption we make are flawed, Novell has just made Windows less interoperable with Linux.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

7 Comments

  1. Stephane Rodriguez said,

    March 24, 2007 at 8:58 am

    Gravatar

    What I find interesting is that Novell is trying an exclusive support for VBA macros (again, whatever that means in practice), Microsoft themselves are moving away from VBA macros :

    - With Office 2007 documents, file names must end with “M” instead of “X” otherwise macros are disabled.

    - When run on Windows Vista, unsigned VBA macros won’t run. Getting VBA macros signed costs 500$/year.

    - Licensing Microsoft VBA run-time costs 150,000$/year.

    - Microsoft wants to decouple macros and sell licenses of VSTO (Visual Studio for Office) and server licenses (Excel services for instance). Of course, that’s not without an agenda. Licenses of VSTO create further lock-in (not just to Windows, but also .NET at the same time). And server licenses are orders of magnitude more expensive than client apps.

    Long story short, Novell appears to be the “idiots utiles” of the Microsoft agenda. One would think people like Miguel were a bit smarter.

  2. Chris said,

    March 25, 2007 at 10:17 am

    Gravatar

    I never really understood why Novell released their own edition of openoffice. If they were truly committed to helping the project, they would add their features to the main project instead of making their own version.

    Not to mention that the newest openXML plugin for Office 2007 only works on the Novell edition of openoffice.

  3. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 25, 2007 at 10:29 am

    Gravatar

    Chris, the implications are actually worse than that. See the following discussion:

    http://boycottnovell.com/2007/03/06/novell-helps-ooxml/

    “Promoting a Competitor to Openness, on Behalf of Your New Partner”

  4. Stephane Rodriguez said,

    March 26, 2007 at 1:50 am

    Gravatar

    “If they were truly committed to helping the project, they would add their features to the main project instead of making their own version.”

    One has to wonder why they are doing that while Microsoft IS moving away from VBA macros (read my post above, the agenda is to get customers to run arbitrary .NET code on the server). But VBA in general is just a wrapper on top of Windows. VBA imports WIN32, OLE, COM, ActiveX basically all Windows stuff. It is a mistake for Novell to go down that path because they’ll end up shipping a Windows-only build of OpenOffice.

    “Not to mention that the newest openXML plugin for Office 2007 only works on the Novell edition of openoffice”

    It’s a bit worse. The quality leaves much to desire (a number of features were left out since day one, and a number of feature “translations” are actually destructive). Oh, by the way, it only supports Word documents at this point. It does not stop Micro-vell to make announcements at least a year before it makes sense.

  5. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 26, 2007 at 6:37 am

    Gravatar

    I never thought that the timing of Novell’s announcement was a coincience. It almost coincided with Lisa Rajchel’s bizarre decision to fast-track OOXML, despite overwhelming opposition. Strings are being pulled here.

  6. Stephane Rodriguez said,

    March 26, 2007 at 1:07 pm

    Gravatar

    Roy,

    Here is the reason why Lisa Rajchel allowed the 5-month ballot to proceed : http://lnxwalt.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/packing-the-court-at-the-iso/

    In addition, there are many more Microsoft employees in ISO national bodies : there are 3 Microsoft employees in France national body alone.

    The whole ISO fast-track ballot and voting is a farce.

  7. Roy Schestowitz said,

    March 26, 2007 at 6:53 pm

    Gravatar

    Excellent. That’s all we needed to know. Lobbying yet again.

    Q&A: Former Mass. CIO feels ‘bittersweet pride’ after battles with Microsoft, legislature

    ,—-[ Quote ]
    | As CIO of Massachusetts from February to November last year, Louis
    | Gutierrez had to endure most of the brunt of Microsoft Corp.’s political
    | wrath over a state policy calling for the adoption of the Open Document
    | Format for Office Applications, or ODF — a rival to the software vendor’s
    | Office Open XML file format.
    |
    | [...]
    |
    | Do you see any reason for there to be two standards? If you were
    | starting blank-slate, there certainly would not be value to creating
    | two separate standards. Over time, it has sometimes been useful to
    | have the competition of two standards to keep both sides honest.
    | But I don’t see particular value in the long-term co-existence of
    | two separate standards.
    `—-

    http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9012760&source=rss_news50

    From the previous CIO….

    ,—-[ Quote ]
    | Quinn: Almost to a person, to anybody involved or who knows about
    | the ODF issue, they attributed the story to Microsoft, right, wrong
    | or otherwise. Senator Pacheco may be a bully but I do not believe he
    | is disingenious and would stoop to such a tactic. Senator Pacheco and
    | Secretary Galvin’s office remain very heavily influenced by the
    | Microsoft money and its lobbyist machine, as witnessed by their
    | playbook and words, in my opinion.
    |
    | Quinn: I believe that the ODF decision will stand. I believe MS
    | will continue to do anything and everything it can to stop it. And I
    | know my seat wasn’t even empty and they (MS) took another shot at
    | the title, to no avail. This horse is out of the barn and I see no
    | way for it to go back in. Remember, all we are asking for was and is
    | for Microsoft to commit to open and the standards process; so
    | everyone looks really bad if the plug gets pulled at this juncture.
    `—-

    http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20060119232859729

    MA Governor-Elect Names MS Anti-ODF Lobbyist to Technology Advisory Group

    http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20061128161343183

    The Sorry State of Massachusetts

    http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=2006111603531029

    Microsoft offers schools in Mass. free software [to stop ODF adoption]

    http://news.com.com/2100-7344_3-6090196.html?part=rss&tag=6090196&subj=news

    Microsoft plays Massachusetts Senate card

    http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=32515

    Politics and tech companies: follow the money

    http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061110-8194.html

    Years of deadlock on EU patent bring some new thinking

    http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/11/08/business/patents.php

    Leaked letter warns of open source ‘threat to eco-system’

    http://www.techworld.com/news/index.cfm?RSS&NewsID=7109

    Study: open source needs official support; Lobbyist disagrees with “flawed” conclusions
    http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061017-8011.html

    Report Says Nonprofits Sold Influence to Abramoff

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/12/AR2006101200889.html

    Open Source Foes In Bed With Abramoff

    http://politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/10/12/2036223&from=rss

    EU official joins consultancy serving Microsoft

    http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?view=CN&storyID=2006-10-03T134311Z_01_L03693228_RTRIDST_0_TECH-MICROSOFT-OFFICIAL.XML&rpc=66&type=qcna

    US ambassador to the EU was former Microsoft lobbyist

    http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=34706

    US politicians go to bat for Microsoft

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/09/26/microsoft_eu_political_lobbying/

    Changing the Report, After the Vote

    http://insidehighered.com/news/2006/09/01/commission

    Microsoft playing three card monte with XML conversion

    http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=959

What Else is New


  1. European Patents Losing Their Appeal, Lustre and Glamour

    Years of assaults on EPO staff — including EPO judges — have taken their toll and the quality of patents is nothing like it used to be



  2. Software Freedom and The U.S. Constitution

    “We need to stand for the freedom to not use the software — we need to enjoy that freedom without giving up the rest of the existing Free software ecosystem.”



  3. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, December 14, 2019

    IRC logs for Saturday, December 14, 2019



  4. Links 15/12/2019: Wine 5.0 RC1 Released, KDE Frameworks 5.65.0, Qubes OS 4.0.2 RC3

    Links for the day



  5. It Matters a Lot What You Call the System

    Why the best name for the best operating system would be "GNU", not "Linux" (media has twisted the words so as to marginalise GNU and its politics/philosophy)



  6. Only the EPO Goes as Far as Bribing Publishers (the Media) to Promote Software Patents and Publish Fictional Stories

    The world’s patent offices are growing tired of granting software patents which courts later toss out (because these patents are not valid); not only does the EPO advocate such patents — typically using a bundle of buzzwords — it’s also bribing the media to help



  7. EU Needs to Show That It Cares About SMEs and Not 'European Champions' That Are Actually Foreign Monopolies

    Judging by the EU’s nearly blind and unconditional support for the management of the EPO — no matter how abusive and corrupt it has gotten — one has to wonder if the ex-EU official in charge of the EPO reveals a profound democracy deficit as well as growing dangers to Europe’s businesses — the productive firms to which patent maximalism often represents far more risk than opportunity



  8. Guest Article: The Free Software Movement Should Come Out From the Box

    "From now onwards we have to think from a user’s rights perspective and mobilise users of Free software. They should know what rights they ought to get."



  9. IRC Proceedings: Friday, December 13, 2019

    IRC logs for Friday, December 13, 2019



  10. Links 13/12/2019: QEMU 4.2.0, GNU Guile 2.9.7

    Links for the day



  11. Links 13/12/2019: Zorin OS 15.1, Vim 8.2

    Links for the day



  12. Linux Foundation Has Outsourced All the Licence Compliance Stuff to Microsoft, a Serial GPL Violator

    OpenChain Specification/OpenChain Project and Automated Compliance Tooling (ACT) are yet more examples -- the latest of many -- of the Linux Foundation being outsourced to Microsoft, not only for code but also documentation and hosting



  13. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, December 12, 2019

    IRC logs for Thursday, December 12, 2019



  14. Copyleft: Keeping Code Free

    Now that news about "Linux" is dominated by promotion of proprietary software we ought to remember what perpetrators of such a strategy seek to eliminate



  15. Plans That Worked, Plans That Failed

    "I am still looking for good news, but the more good I try to find, the more nastiness I uncover. This is by far, Free software's worst year ever. 2019 Sucks!"



  16. Links 12/12/2019: KDE Applications 19.12, Qt Creator 4.11, New VirtualBox

    Links for the day



  17. Brand Dilution in Action

    Microsoft's proprietary software which spies on people and businesses is getting a "free ride" on the "Linux" brand; and nobody seems to care, nobody seems to notice how perverse that it



  18. At the EPO Money -- Not Quality -- is King

    Financiers are ruining quality



  19. The EPO's Strategic Failure 2023

    Potemkin social dialogue



  20. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, December 11, 2019

    IRC logs for Wednesday, December 11, 2019



  21. EPO Promoting Software Patents in Countries Where These Are Illegal

    The EPO's vision of 'unitary' software patents (patents on algorithms in countries that disallow such patents, as per their national laws) won't materialise, but in the meantime a lot of Invalid Patents (IPs) are granted in the form of European Patents (EPs) and this is wrong



  22. We Support GNU and the FSF But Remain Sceptical and Occasionally Worry About an RMS-less FSF

    Richard Stallman (RMS) is not in charge of the FSF anymore (it's Stallman who created the FSF) and there's risk the decisions will be made by people who don't share Stallman's ethics or the FSF's spirit



  23. Links 11/12/2019: Huawei Lobbied by Microsoft (Because of GNU/Linux) and Microsoft Still Googlebombs Linux to Promote 'Teams'

    Links for the day



  24. Links 11/12/2019: Edge Native Working Group, CrossOver 19.0 Released

    Links for the day



  25. Instead of Fixing Bug #1 Canonical/Ubuntu Contributes to Making the Bug Even More Severe (WSL/EEE)

    Following one seminal report about Canonical financially contributing to Microsoft's EEE efforts — celebrated openly by GNU/Linux opponentsclosing bug #1 Ubuntu basically decided not that it was fixed but that it would no longer attempt to fix it (“wontfix”)



  26. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, December 10, 2019

    IRC logs for Tuesday, December 10, 2019



  27. Today's Example of Microsoft's Faked 'Love'

    “On 7 September 2017, users began noticing a message that stated “Skype for Business is now Microsoft Teams”. This was confirmed on 25 September 2017, at Microsoft’s annual Ignite conference,” according to Wikipedia



  28. Links 10/12/2019: Kubernetes 1.17, Debian Init Systems GR

    Links for the day



  29. 'Cancel Culture' as 'Thoughtpolice' Creep

    Richard Stallman spoke about an important aspect of censorship more than 2 decades ago (before “Open Source” even existed); it was published in Datamation (“Censoring My Software”) 23 years before a campaign of defamation on the Internet was used to remove him from MIT and FSF (censoring or ‘canceling’ Stallman himself)



  30. Microsoft Still Hates GNU/Linux and Mark Shuttleworth Knows It (But He is Desperate for Money)

    We're supposed to believe that a PR or image management (reputation laundering) campaign alone can turn Microsoft from GNU/Linux foe into friend/ally


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts