10.04.07
Gemini version available ♊︎Humour: What If OpenSUSE 10.3 Was Announced Jointly by Novell and Microsoft?
Factual details about the new release will come on Saturday, but for amusement purposes only, here is an E-mail that I received (just… slightly… modified)
____________________________________________
The openSUSE team proudly announces the availability of openSUSE 10.3, to be renamed Enterprise Windows-compatible Linux in the next version.
We’re shipping all the latest open source packages that are available after Mr. Ballmer has completed a quick inspection. As highlights, we’d like to point out the latest desktops, GNOME 2.20 and KDE 3.5.7 plus KDE 4 preview, our MP3 support with Microsoft’s patent coverage (courtesy of Alcatel-Lucent) via gstreamer plug-in by Fluendo, a dual boot process (for Vista), heavily optimised and improved package management, 1-click install option for additional software (patent protection for this idea from Microsoft will last for another 4 years, but Amazon’s one-click-shopping patent remains a threat), OpenOffice 2.3 (with OOXML support), XEN 3.1 and VirtualBox 1.5 (SUSE Linux-exclusive thanks to the interop lab and the joint efforts with our good friends from Redmond) and, last but not least, our 1 CD installation which provides a small but fully loaded Vista trial version. For all the news and impressive screenshots, have a look at http://news.opensuse.org/?p=400 and have a look at things to come at http://microsoft.com/products/vienna
It’s available now to download at http://software.openSUSE.org, only as a x86 version (64-bit is impractical, according to our partners at Redmond and PPC is only used by rival companies) – from our mirrors and via bittorrent.
The following ISOs can be downloaded: the 1 CD open source version with an add-on CD containing proprietary software, such as WGA, Windows Media Player, XPS reader, HD viewer, Silverlight Limited Edition, RealNetworks RealPlayer, .NET clone called Mono, and Sun Java Runtime Environment. DVD ISOs for all architectures are available and contain the open source version plus proprietary add-ons. An installable Live CD will be released in October, and the Edu add-on CD [http://en.opensuse.org/Education] will show up in the same time frame. However, thanks to our recently-commissioned studies, we are told that children prefer Windows.
As usual, openSUSE 10.3 will be available in European retail channels as a boxed product. The Register reports that the price in Britain exceeds 3,000 pounds (true story). In North America, the box will be available through shopNovell [http://shop.novell.com]. Due to production lead times and disruption due to the layoffs that Novell is expecting in October 2007 boxes will start to show up on shelves and in online shops approximately on Oct 11th. Pre-orders can be placed here: http://en.opensuse.org/Buy_openSUSE
We’d like to take this opportunity to thank Microsoft and the whole openSUSE community for tons of protection, coupons, attacking rival Linux distribution with FUD, testing, feedback, contributions and over all participation in helping to make openSUSE 10.3 an awesome distribution. While risking missing out some important contributors, we’d like to spotlight some community members (some of whom are paid) for their outstanding work:
- Ballmer for Producing FUD against rival Linuxes
- Hilf for relentless ‘patent terrorism’
- Francis for Sneak Peeks [http://news.opensuse.org/?cat=17]
- Beineri for his Quickies [http://news.opensuse.org/?cat=12]
- Benji for the 1-click install [http://news.opensuse.org/?p=133]
- Pascal and sPIN for community help [http://help.opensuse.org/]
- All the community translators –
http://en.opensuse.org/OpenSUSE_Localization_Teams
Our top 3 bug reporters for openSUSE 10.3
- Andreas Hanke
- David Binderman
- Casual J. Programmer
Have a lot of fun!
Christoph, Coolo, Michael
____________________________________________
Yes, it’s a joke, as was stated above.
ᶃ Gemini Space
This post is also available in 
Content is available under CC-BY-SA
Serenitude said,
October 5, 2007 at 1:43 am
I have a general question. I like to use the best tool for the job. I just downloaded 10.3, and I have to say, at this moment it’s the distro to beat, and by a longshot. If Gutsy, Mandy, or Fedora 8 are better, then I’ll use them. I have things I want to do on my PC, and I’ll use whatever gives me the best tools. So, I am not a *fanboi* of anything other than using my PC. I personally think de Icaza’s “Superb” OOXML statement is the single-most absurd comment on the internet, but that doesn’t change the fact that at this moment in time, OpenSUSE 10.3 is beyond superb.
So, that being said, I don’t understand why RedHat isn’t boycotted by this site also. As I understand it, they also signed a deal with Microsoft which included interop and liscencing. The only difference I can see in the deal (which granted, I have a very low understanding of), is patent protection. But if Novell denies MS IP, then at the end of the day, what is the difference? RedHat also uses some cut-throat marketing, at both the press-release and blog level. Fedora is a superb distro, but I’m having trouble coming to grips with what exactly the differences are, and why the different treatment? RedHat uses the courts to get that interopability, which is always funny to watch happen to MS, but at the end of they day, their goals are the same.
Ubuntu also has proprietary code, ships Mono apps, is setting up a “buy-it-here” repo in Gutsy (more damaging to Free Software than anything else I’ve seen, outside of OOXML), and Shuttleworth is on record as saying he’d love to do an MS interop deal, if they lose the IP tone. How is this different than what Novell is trying to do?
I’m not trying to troll or flame – I’m trying to understand the differences, and I’m guessing they are subtle, as I can’t see them. I’m guessing that many other viewers ask these same questions to themselves?
Gopal said,
October 5, 2007 at 1:48 am
The only thing missing is IE7.
Roy Schestowitz said,
October 5, 2007 at 2:25 am
You are right about Red Hat and even Mark Shuttleworth balancing the “racketeering” and “extortion” calls by welcoming an IP-FREE deal with Microsoft. There is no problem with interoperability that respects open standard (see Red Hat’s words in the press), but the introduction of closed source code and software patent through an exclusionary deal was a step too far and Novell knew it. There is a lot more that could be said and we covered this before. I can provide pointers if it helps. Just let me know…
Roy Schestowitz said,
October 5, 2007 at 2:30 am
@ Gopal: sarcasm aside, I believe it has been possible for over 6 months (and quite trivial to set up too).
Serenitude said,
October 5, 2007 at 2:47 am
I’m sorry if it’s been covered before. I don’t mean to waste your valuable time by rehashing old business
If the closed source code is Mono, I know Novell, through de Icaza, develops Mono, but Ubuntu defaults with at least 2 Mono apps that I can think of, RhythmBox and F-Spot, and even Redhat ships Evolution as a default on it’s desktop. It seems most, if not all, of the major GNOME players are taking using these products to enhance their desktop with one hand, and denouncing it with the other. In fact, with Gutsy, who is including Evolution, F-Spot, and App-Armor, it’s getting hard to tell the difference between the two without seeing the SLAB menu….
I’m not stating I LIKE the deal, but that it’s subtelties are lost upon me when veiwing the deals and moves other, “respected” distros have made. I’d rather see NO deals, but am having a hard time seeing the difference between them
If it’s not too much trouble, some pointers for reading would help alot, to be able to understand the differences – where we are today – between the various deals and desires for interoperability. Thanks for your patience and time.
Serenitude
Serenitude said,
October 5, 2007 at 2:52 am
BTW: As an aside, for a conspiracy theory, has it ever occured to anyone that Microsoft may, in the long run, be after Unix itself? To base an OS on, and lock Linux as a whole up? If MS could go to court as the official owners of Unix… If Novell became so dependant, as this website suggests, upon Microsoft, that aquisition/selling Unix rights became an issue – that, I’m afraid, is what I fear MUCH more than interoperability
Sorry – wouldn’t be fun if I just looked at things logically. Some conspiracy fun can be had as well
Roy Schestowitz said,
October 5, 2007 at 3:01 am
Mono’s problem are not related to closed source code, but to software patents and Microsoft’s total control over the way .NET evolves. Most examples of closed source code are related to interoperability which is based on what we call ‘binary bridges’. Novell gets exclusive access to Microsoft source code, which is an SCO-type alarm bell in its own right.
Red Hat said that it would avoid Mono, but it is becoming increasingly hard because various parties are (supposed to be) working in tandem with joint goals.
I believe that Canonical was never aware of (or too apathetic towards) the effects of depending on Mono. By association, they are affected by Microsoft’s decisions, so it’s an unhealthy dependency. Microsoft hasn’t a positive history when it comes to playing fair with technologies it controls. There are many examples of this and the leaked Halloween Memos reveal a mouthful.
Serenitude said,
October 5, 2007 at 3:13 am
Thank you for your thoughtful and patient replies. Looks like I have some reading and Googling to do