EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

10.11.07

Here Come the Patent Infringement Suits (Updated)

Posted in Action, Courtroom, Free/Libre Software, FUD, GNU/Linux, Intellectual Monopoly, Law, Novell, Patents, Red Hat, Steve Ballmer at 12:33 pm by Shane Coyle

Hmmm…. Ballmer Was Right?

Recently, in his most recent FUD eruption regarding Red Hat and alleged Microsoft IP violations, the Microsoft CEO also implied that one day soon other companies would "go to the open source world".

That’s why we’ve done the deal we have with Novell, where not only are we working on technical interoperability between Linux and Windows but we’ve also made sure that we could provide the appropriate, for the appropriate fee, Novell customers also get essentially the rights to use our patented intellectual property. And I think it’s great the way Novell stepped up to kind of say intellectual property matters. People use Red Hat, at least with respect to our intellectual property in a sense have an obligation to eventually to compensate us. [emphasis ours]

There are plenty of other people who may also have intellectual property. And every time an Eolas comes to Microsoft and says, “Pay us,” I suspect they also would like to eventually go to the open source world. So getting what I’ll call an intellectual property interoperability framework between the two worlds I think is important.

Well, it appears that a company known as IP Innovation LLC is now filing suit against Red Hat and Novell, regarding a patent for "a User Interface with Multiple Workspaces for Sharing Display System Objects". Having adopted a no-look policy regarding spurious software patents, I cannot comment on any specifics (the patent number is below for the curious and masochistic).

IP Innovation LLC et al vs. Red Hat Inc. et al

Plaintiffs IP Innovation and Technology Licensing Corp. claim to have the rights to U.S. Patent No. 5,072,412 for a User Interface with Multiple Workspaces for Sharing Display System Objects issued Dec. 10, 1991 along with two other similar patents.

Defendants Red Hat Inc. and Novell have allegedly committed acts of infringement through products including the Red Hat Linux system, the Novell Suse Linex[SIC] Enterprise Desktop and the Novell Suse Linex[SIC] Enterprise Server.

“Red Hat’s and Novell’s infringement, contributory infringement and inducement to infringe has injured plaintiffs and plaintiffs are entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate them for such infringement but in no event less than a reasonable royalty,” the original complaint states.

The plaintiffs also allege that defendants received notice of the patents, therefore the infringing activities have been deliberate and willful.

Plaintiffs are seeking an injunction from the court, increased damages and other relief that the court or a jury may deem just and proper.

T. John Ward Jr. of Ward & Smith Law Firm in Longview is representing the plaintiff.

The case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Leonard E. Davis.

Case No. 2:07-cv-00447-LED

Now, I don’t believe this is the first infringement suit that has ever been filed against Red Hat, but is this the leading edge of a new wave of litigation spurred on by Mr. Ballmer’s repeated accusations? We’ll have to wait and see, I suppose. In the meantime, can anyone think of any prior art for having ‘multiple workspaces’ in your GUI?

Update:
The folks at Groklaw have picked up the ball and started running on this one, so you can find fairly comprehensive coverage of this suit and possible connections between the plaintiff (an Acacia subsidiary) and our friends from Redmond over there as well.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

13 Comments

  1. Shane Coyle said,

    October 11, 2007 at 2:06 pm

    Gravatar

    Over at SeattlePI.com, there is some information about Microsoft and the University of California – a party to the Eolas infringement suit, apparently. UC licensed the technology to Eolas, and in return received 30.4M as their share of the settlement, it has not been disclosed what Eolas’ share was or the conditions of the agreement.

    Microsoft and Eolas Technologies are keeping the terms of their patent settlement under wraps. However, the University of California was also a plaintiff in the litigation, because it licensed to Eolas the technology at the center of the high-profile dispute. And the UC’s status as a public entity means it’s required to disclose what it received from the deal.

    It received $30.4 million, a UC spokesman said when I asked today.

    Interestingly, comments are already implying that the MS-Eolas part of the deal will include an agreement that Eolas does indeed go after Red Hat et al. Of course, the comment is from Fake Steve Ballmer, so take it for what it’s worth.

  2. John Drinkwater said,

    October 11, 2007 at 3:35 pm

    Gravatar

    Why would Ballmer remind people about Eolas if this wasn’t the case ;)

  3. Vexorian said,

    October 11, 2007 at 4:23 pm

    Gravatar

    I guess they should also sue apple, since they are including ‘workspaces’ as well.

    And microsoft, one microsoft toy has been doing this for ages.

  4. Michael Parkatti said,

    October 11, 2007 at 9:27 pm

    Gravatar

    Seriously, what is Microsoft going to do next, pursue patents for the Latin Alphabet? Hmmmmmm

    http://www.humblenarrator.com/2007/10/09/microsoft-awarded-patent-for-latin-alphabet/

  5. Slated said,

    October 11, 2007 at 9:43 pm

    Gravatar

    It seems that IP Innovation LLC are pursuing an old patent on behalf of Xerox:

    http://www.google.com/patents?id=3tUkAAAAEBAJ&dq=5,072,412

    Patent number: 5072412
    Filing date: Mar 25, 1987
    Issue date: Dec 10, 1991
    Inventors: D. Austin Henderson, Jr., Stuart K. Card, John T. Maxwell, III
    Assignee: Xerox Corporation

    If upheld, this could be a problem for anyone using the X Window System, since multiple workspaces is an inherent part of its design.

    Why would they wait 16 years to assert their patent rights?

    Isn’t there some kind of statute of limitations on patents?

    If these old Xerox patents (I’m sure there are many) are going to be asserted now after all these years, then you may as well wave bye-bye to all modern operating systems, since they are all fundamentally designed around Xerox’s ideas. This of course includes Windows, GNU/Linux, OpenBSD, Solaris, and Mac OS X.

    I really can’t see this being upheld, somehow. It would be the end of every OS on the planet.

  6. Slated said,

    October 11, 2007 at 9:53 pm

    Gravatar

    Well I found out that apparently software patents expire 17 years after being granted.

    Talk about an 11th hour bid!!!

    OK, so what joker decided it would be a good idea to assert a patent that was about to expire?

    Is this a joke?

  7. Shane Coyle said,

    October 12, 2007 at 12:33 am

    Gravatar

    Here is a great writeup on the background of the plaintiff – IP Innovations, seems they are an Acacia subsidiary and Xerox sold them these patents.

    Acacia subsidiary IP Innovation LLC and fellow patent troll Technology Licensing Corp sued Red Hat and Novell in Marshall, Texas today. The claim? That Linux infringes the three patents in suit. Acacia previously sued Apple on one of these patents; Apple settled quickly. The patents were originally issued to Xerox, who sold them to Acacia and TLC. Thanks, Xerox.

  8. Shane Coyle said,

    October 12, 2007 at 12:41 am

    Gravatar

    And, apparently some are drawing connections back to Microsoft already. We’ll have to see how that pans out…

  9. vexorian said,

    October 12, 2007 at 12:19 pm

    Gravatar

    A rational question is to ask “why also Novell”? Yes, we all know
    Novell and MS are buddies and all so this is a reason to think MS is not behind
    this lawsuit.

    Imho what’s going to happen is that Novell will be VERY collaborative and
    willing to accept to pay royalties for this BS patent, the game will be make Red
    Hat play alone. The expected aftermath (for MS-Novell) would be to make Red Hat
    look like a rogue company that does not respect IP. And yes, thanks to Novell
    the case will be much harder to solve for Red Hat than before, probably Novell
    will rush in making a deal so there’s precedent…

    Laugh at the ridiculous theory all you want, I just hope Novell does not prove
    me right on this one. But if they do, then I hope nobody will argue to me whose
    side Novell is playing for.

  10. Shane Coyle said,

    October 12, 2007 at 1:29 pm

    Gravatar

    I believe that, if Novell makes a deal, it must be for everyone’s use (including Red Hat) or not at all – the GPL ‘liberty or death’ clause.

  11. Steve Ballmer said,

    October 12, 2007 at 4:40 pm

    Gravatar

    I only implied that they should go after Linux, if they do that’s fine, there was nooooo pressure from us on them about it whatsoever! Then we paid them $60,000,000.

    http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com

  12. John Drinkwater said,

    October 13, 2007 at 9:26 am

    Gravatar

    “Novell and MS are buddies and all so this is a reason to think MS is not behind this lawsuit.”

    Oh come on, this helps their case! The only outcome where MS loses is if the case is thrown out (and asap). They have been saying Linux needs to face up to respecting other’s IP. The whole reason they have been shit-stirring is for the media to take notice; then they get a smaller company to attack Linux again. (notice it is only two Linux companies – yet another MS indication, as they only understand duopolies)

    Two things may happen imho:

    Novell as MS-puppets:
    What’s the likelihood of Novell settling early, Novell gets to say they respect IP, and Microsoft tell everyone so – Novell is an honest mans Linux!
    Novell as a Linux company:
    They fight alongside Red Hat to curb this stupidness.

    Just more FUD because SCO is no longer a burden to us.

  13. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 15, 2007 at 12:50 pm

    Gravatar

    I’ve just gotten back. I think that a very important link to add here is this one. It points to a recent story about Acacia. This classic patent troll signed a patent deal with Novell quite recently.

What Else is New


  1. Links 23/3/2019: Falkon 3.1.0 and Tails 3.13.1

    Links for the day



  2. The Unified Patent Court is Dead, But Doubts Remain Over the EPO's Appeal Boards' Ability to Rule Independently Against Patents on Nature and Code

    Patents used to cover physical inventions (such as engines); nowadays this just isn't the case anymore and judges who can clarify these questions lack the freedom to think outside the box (and disobey patent maximalists' dogma)



  3. Patent Law Firms Still Desperate to Find New Ways to Resurrect Dead Software Patents in the United States

    There's no rebound and no profound changes that favour software patents; in fact, judging by caselaw, there's nothing even remotely like that



  4. Links 22/3/2019: Libinput 1.13 RC2 and Facebook's Latest Security Scandal

    Links for the day



  5. Why the UK Intellectual Property Office (UK-IPO) Cannot Ignore Judges, Whereas the EPO Can (and Does)

    The European Patent Convention (EPC) ceased to matter, judges' interpretation of it no longer matters either; the EPO exploits this to grant hundreds of thousands of dodgy software patents, then trumpet "growth"



  6. The European Patent Office Needs to Put Lives Before Profits

    Patents that pertain to health have always posed an ethical dilemma; the EPO apparently tackled this dilemma by altogether ignoring the rights and needs of patients (in favour of large corporations that benefit financially from poor people's mortality)



  7. “Criminal Organisation”

    Brazil's ex-President, Temer, is arrested (like other former presidents of Brazil); will the EPO's ex-President Battistelli ever be arrested (now that he lacks diplomatic immunity and hides at CEIPI)?



  8. Links 21/3/2019: Wayland 1.17.0, Samba 4.10.0, OpenShot 2.4.4 and Zorin Beta

    Links for the day



  9. Team UPC (Unitary Patent) is a Headless Chicken

    Team UPC's propaganda about the Unified Patent Court (UPC) has become so ridiculous that the pertinent firms do not wish to be identified



  10. António Campinos Makes Up Claims About Patent Quality, Only to be Rebutted by Examiners, Union (Anyone But the 'Puff Pieces' Industry)

    Battistelli's propagandistic style and self-serving 'studies' carry on; the notion of patent quality has been totally discarded and is nowadays lied about as facts get 'manufactured', then disseminated internally and externally



  11. Links 20/3/2019: Google Announces ‘Stadia’, Tails 3.13

    Links for the day



  12. CEN and CENELEC Agreement With the EPO Shows That It's Definitely the European Commission's 'Department'

    With headlines such as “EPO to collaborate on raising SEP awareness” it is clear to see that the Office lacks impartiality and the European Commission cannot pretend that the EPO is “dafür bin ich nicht zuständig” or “da kenne ich mich nicht aus”



  13. Decisions Made Inside the European Patent Organisation (EPO) Lack Credibility Because Examiners and Judges Lack Independence

    The lawless, merciless, Mafia-like culture left by Battistelli continues to haunt judges and examiners; how can one ever trust the Office (or the Organisation at large) to deliver true justice in adherence or compliance with the EPC?



  14. Team UPC Buries Its Credibility Deeper in the Grave

    The three Frenchmen at the top do not mention the UPC anymore; but those who promote it for a living (because they gambled on leveraging it for litigation galore) aren't giving up and in the process they perpetuate falsehoods



  15. The EPO Has Sadly Taken a Side and It's the Patent Trolls' Side

    Abandoning the whole rationale behind patents, the Office now led for almost a year by António Campinos prioritises neither science nor technology; it's all about granting as many patents (European monopolies) as possible for legal activity (applications, litigation and so on)



  16. Where the USPTO Stands on the Subject of Abstract Software Patents

    Not much is changing as we approach Easter and software patents are still fool's gold in the United States, no matter if they get granted or not



  17. Links 19/3/2019: Jetson/JetBot, Linux 5.0.3, Kodi Foundation Joins The Linux Foundation, and Firefox 66

    Links for the day



  18. Links 18/3/2019: Solus 4, Linux 5.1 RC1, Mesa 18.3.5, OSI Individual Member Election Won by Microsoft

    Links for the day



  19. Microsoft and Its Patent Trolls Continue Their Patent War, Including the War on Linux

    Microsoft is still preying on GNU/Linux using patents, notably software patents; it wants billions of dollars served on a silver platter in spite of claims that it reached a “truce” by joining the Open Invention Network and joining the LOT Network



  20. Director Iancu Generally Viewed as a Lapdog of Patent Trolls

    As Director of the Office, Mr. Iancu, a Trump appointee, not only fails to curb patent trolls; he actively defends them and he lowers barriers in order to better equip them with bogus patents that courts would reject (if the targets of extortion could afford a day in court)



  21. Links 17/3/2019: Google Console and IBM-Red Hat Merger Delay?

    Links for the day



  22. To Team UPC the Unified Patent Court (UPC) Has Become a Joke and the European Patent Office (EPO) Never Mentions It Anymore

    The EPO's frantic rally to the very bottom of patent quality may be celebrated by obedient media and patent law firms; to people who actually produce innovative things, however, this should be a worrisome trend and thankfully courts are getting in the way of this nefarious agenda; one of these courts is the FCC in Germany



  23. Links 16/3/2019: Knoppix Release and SUSE Independence

    Links for the day



  24. Stopping António Campinos and His Software Patents Agenda (Not Legal in Europe) Would Require Independent Courts

    Software patents continue to be granted (new tricks, loopholes and buzzwords) and judges who can put an end to that are being actively assaulted by those who aren't supposed to have any authority whatsoever over them (for decisions to be impartially delivered)



  25. The Linux Foundation Needs to Speak Out Against Microsoft's Ongoing (Continued) Patent Shakedown of OEMs That Ship Linux

    Zemlin actively thanks Microsoft while taking Microsoft money; he meanwhile ignores how Microsoft viciously attacks Linux using patents, revealing the degree to which his foundation, the “Linux Foundation” (not about Linux anymore, better described as Zemlin’s PAC), has been compromised



  26. Links 15/3/2019: Linux 5.0.2, Sublime Text 3.2

    Links for the day



  27. The EPO and the USPTO Are Granting Fake Patents on Software, Knowing That Courts Would Reject These

    Office management encourages applicants to send over patent applications that are laughable while depriving examiners the freedom and the time they need to reject these; it means that loads of bogus patents are being granted, enshrined as weapons that trolls can use to extort small companies outside the courtroom



  28. CommunityBridge is a Cynical Microsoft-Funded Effort to Show Zemlin Works for 'Community', Not Microsoft

    After disbanding community participation in the Board (but there are Microsoft staff on the Board now) the "Linux Foundation" (or Zemlin PAC) continues to take Microsoft money and polishes or launders that as "community"



  29. Links 14/3/2019: GNOME 3.32 and Mesa 19.0.0 Released

    Links for the day



  30. EPO 'Results' Are, As Usual, Not Measured Correctly

    The supranational monopoly, a monopoly-granting authority, is being used by António Campinos to grant an insane amount of monopolies whose merit is dubious and whose impact on Europe will be a net negative


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts