EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

10.11.07

Here Come the Patent Infringement Suits (Updated)

Posted in Action, Courtroom, Free/Libre Software, FUD, GNU/Linux, Intellectual Monopoly, Law, Novell, Patents, Red Hat, Steve Ballmer at 12:33 pm by Shane Coyle

Hmmm…. Ballmer Was Right?

Recently, in his most recent FUD eruption regarding Red Hat and alleged Microsoft IP violations, the Microsoft CEO also implied that one day soon other companies would "go to the open source world".

That’s why we’ve done the deal we have with Novell, where not only are we working on technical interoperability between Linux and Windows but we’ve also made sure that we could provide the appropriate, for the appropriate fee, Novell customers also get essentially the rights to use our patented intellectual property. And I think it’s great the way Novell stepped up to kind of say intellectual property matters. People use Red Hat, at least with respect to our intellectual property in a sense have an obligation to eventually to compensate us. [emphasis ours]

There are plenty of other people who may also have intellectual property. And every time an Eolas comes to Microsoft and says, “Pay us,” I suspect they also would like to eventually go to the open source world. So getting what I’ll call an intellectual property interoperability framework between the two worlds I think is important.

Well, it appears that a company known as IP Innovation LLC is now filing suit against Red Hat and Novell, regarding a patent for "a User Interface with Multiple Workspaces for Sharing Display System Objects". Having adopted a no-look policy regarding spurious software patents, I cannot comment on any specifics (the patent number is below for the curious and masochistic).

IP Innovation LLC et al vs. Red Hat Inc. et al

Plaintiffs IP Innovation and Technology Licensing Corp. claim to have the rights to U.S. Patent No. 5,072,412 for a User Interface with Multiple Workspaces for Sharing Display System Objects issued Dec. 10, 1991 along with two other similar patents.

Defendants Red Hat Inc. and Novell have allegedly committed acts of infringement through products including the Red Hat Linux system, the Novell Suse Linex[SIC] Enterprise Desktop and the Novell Suse Linex[SIC] Enterprise Server.

“Red Hat’s and Novell’s infringement, contributory infringement and inducement to infringe has injured plaintiffs and plaintiffs are entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate them for such infringement but in no event less than a reasonable royalty,” the original complaint states.

The plaintiffs also allege that defendants received notice of the patents, therefore the infringing activities have been deliberate and willful.

Plaintiffs are seeking an injunction from the court, increased damages and other relief that the court or a jury may deem just and proper.

T. John Ward Jr. of Ward & Smith Law Firm in Longview is representing the plaintiff.

The case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Leonard E. Davis.

Case No. 2:07-cv-00447-LED

Now, I don’t believe this is the first infringement suit that has ever been filed against Red Hat, but is this the leading edge of a new wave of litigation spurred on by Mr. Ballmer’s repeated accusations? We’ll have to wait and see, I suppose. In the meantime, can anyone think of any prior art for having ‘multiple workspaces’ in your GUI?

Update:
The folks at Groklaw have picked up the ball and started running on this one, so you can find fairly comprehensive coverage of this suit and possible connections between the plaintiff (an Acacia subsidiary) and our friends from Redmond over there as well.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

13 Comments

  1. Shane Coyle said,

    October 11, 2007 at 2:06 pm

    Gravatar

    Over at SeattlePI.com, there is some information about Microsoft and the University of California – a party to the Eolas infringement suit, apparently. UC licensed the technology to Eolas, and in return received 30.4M as their share of the settlement, it has not been disclosed what Eolas’ share was or the conditions of the agreement.

    Microsoft and Eolas Technologies are keeping the terms of their patent settlement under wraps. However, the University of California was also a plaintiff in the litigation, because it licensed to Eolas the technology at the center of the high-profile dispute. And the UC’s status as a public entity means it’s required to disclose what it received from the deal.

    It received $30.4 million, a UC spokesman said when I asked today.

    Interestingly, comments are already implying that the MS-Eolas part of the deal will include an agreement that Eolas does indeed go after Red Hat et al. Of course, the comment is from Fake Steve Ballmer, so take it for what it’s worth.

  2. John Drinkwater said,

    October 11, 2007 at 3:35 pm

    Gravatar

    Why would Ballmer remind people about Eolas if this wasn’t the case ;)

  3. Vexorian said,

    October 11, 2007 at 4:23 pm

    Gravatar

    I guess they should also sue apple, since they are including ‘workspaces’ as well.

    And microsoft, one microsoft toy has been doing this for ages.

  4. Michael Parkatti said,

    October 11, 2007 at 9:27 pm

    Gravatar

    Seriously, what is Microsoft going to do next, pursue patents for the Latin Alphabet? Hmmmmmm

    http://www.humblenarrator.com/2007/10/09/microsoft-awarded-patent-for-latin-alphabet/

  5. Slated said,

    October 11, 2007 at 9:43 pm

    Gravatar

    It seems that IP Innovation LLC are pursuing an old patent on behalf of Xerox:

    http://www.google.com/patents?id=3tUkAAAAEBAJ&dq=5,072,412

    Patent number: 5072412
    Filing date: Mar 25, 1987
    Issue date: Dec 10, 1991
    Inventors: D. Austin Henderson, Jr., Stuart K. Card, John T. Maxwell, III
    Assignee: Xerox Corporation

    If upheld, this could be a problem for anyone using the X Window System, since multiple workspaces is an inherent part of its design.

    Why would they wait 16 years to assert their patent rights?

    Isn’t there some kind of statute of limitations on patents?

    If these old Xerox patents (I’m sure there are many) are going to be asserted now after all these years, then you may as well wave bye-bye to all modern operating systems, since they are all fundamentally designed around Xerox’s ideas. This of course includes Windows, GNU/Linux, OpenBSD, Solaris, and Mac OS X.

    I really can’t see this being upheld, somehow. It would be the end of every OS on the planet.

  6. Slated said,

    October 11, 2007 at 9:53 pm

    Gravatar

    Well I found out that apparently software patents expire 17 years after being granted.

    Talk about an 11th hour bid!!!

    OK, so what joker decided it would be a good idea to assert a patent that was about to expire?

    Is this a joke?

  7. Shane Coyle said,

    October 12, 2007 at 12:33 am

    Gravatar

    Here is a great writeup on the background of the plaintiff – IP Innovations, seems they are an Acacia subsidiary and Xerox sold them these patents.

    Acacia subsidiary IP Innovation LLC and fellow patent troll Technology Licensing Corp sued Red Hat and Novell in Marshall, Texas today. The claim? That Linux infringes the three patents in suit. Acacia previously sued Apple on one of these patents; Apple settled quickly. The patents were originally issued to Xerox, who sold them to Acacia and TLC. Thanks, Xerox.

  8. Shane Coyle said,

    October 12, 2007 at 12:41 am

    Gravatar

    And, apparently some are drawing connections back to Microsoft already. We’ll have to see how that pans out…

  9. vexorian said,

    October 12, 2007 at 12:19 pm

    Gravatar

    A rational question is to ask “why also Novell”? Yes, we all know
    Novell and MS are buddies and all so this is a reason to think MS is not behind
    this lawsuit.

    Imho what’s going to happen is that Novell will be VERY collaborative and
    willing to accept to pay royalties for this BS patent, the game will be make Red
    Hat play alone. The expected aftermath (for MS-Novell) would be to make Red Hat
    look like a rogue company that does not respect IP. And yes, thanks to Novell
    the case will be much harder to solve for Red Hat than before, probably Novell
    will rush in making a deal so there’s precedent…

    Laugh at the ridiculous theory all you want, I just hope Novell does not prove
    me right on this one. But if they do, then I hope nobody will argue to me whose
    side Novell is playing for.

  10. Shane Coyle said,

    October 12, 2007 at 1:29 pm

    Gravatar

    I believe that, if Novell makes a deal, it must be for everyone’s use (including Red Hat) or not at all – the GPL ‘liberty or death’ clause.

  11. Steve Ballmer said,

    October 12, 2007 at 4:40 pm

    Gravatar

    I only implied that they should go after Linux, if they do that’s fine, there was nooooo pressure from us on them about it whatsoever! Then we paid them $60,000,000.

    http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com

  12. John Drinkwater said,

    October 13, 2007 at 9:26 am

    Gravatar

    “Novell and MS are buddies and all so this is a reason to think MS is not behind this lawsuit.”

    Oh come on, this helps their case! The only outcome where MS loses is if the case is thrown out (and asap). They have been saying Linux needs to face up to respecting other’s IP. The whole reason they have been shit-stirring is for the media to take notice; then they get a smaller company to attack Linux again. (notice it is only two Linux companies – yet another MS indication, as they only understand duopolies)

    Two things may happen imho:

    Novell as MS-puppets:
    What’s the likelihood of Novell settling early, Novell gets to say they respect IP, and Microsoft tell everyone so – Novell is an honest mans Linux!
    Novell as a Linux company:
    They fight alongside Red Hat to curb this stupidness.

    Just more FUD because SCO is no longer a burden to us.

  13. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 15, 2007 at 12:50 pm

    Gravatar

    I’ve just gotten back. I think that a very important link to add here is this one. It points to a recent story about Acacia. This classic patent troll signed a patent deal with Novell quite recently.

What Else is New


  1. Links 5/12/2019: qBittorrent 4.2.0, Expensive Librem 5 and OpenBSD Bugs

    Links for the day



  2. Microsoft Staff Repeatedly Refuses to Tell How Many People Use WSL, Defends Patent Extortion and Blackmail of Linux Instead

    The people who develop WSL (mostly Microsoft employees) get easily irritated when asked how many people actually use this thing; but more interestingly, however, they reveal their disdain for GNU/Linux and support for Microsoft blackmail (for 'Linux patent tax')



  3. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, December 04, 2019

    IRC logs for Wednesday, December 04, 2019



  4. Links 4/12/2019: Tails 4.1, UCS 4.4-3 and Proxmox VE 6.1

    Links for the day



  5. Google Tightens Its Noose

    Now it’s official! Google is just a bunch of shareholders looking to appease the Pentagon at all costs



  6. Europeans Still Need to Save the European Patent Office From Those Who Attack Its Patent Quality

    Patent quality is of utmost interest; without it, as we're seeing at the EPO and have already seen at the USPTO for a number of years, legal disputes will arise where neither side wins (only the lawyers win) and small, impoverished inventors or businesses will be forced to settle outside the courts over baseless allegations, often made by parasitic patent trolls (possessing low-quality patents they don't want scrutinised by courts)



  7. We Never Accepted and Will Never Accept Corporate Money

    Corporate money is a unique problem because of its magnitude and the fact that it's impersonal; shareholders can only ever accept its supposed justifications if they're receiving something in return (of proportional worth to the payment/transaction)



  8. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, December 03, 2019

    IRC logs for Tuesday, December 03, 2019



  9. Links 3/12/2019: elementary OS 5.1 Hera, Plasma 5.17.4, Firefox 71

    Links for the day



  10. Laundering the Reputation of Criminals: That's an Actual Job

    An important reminder that the manufactured, paid-for (media is being bribed) image of Bill Gates is the product of the PR industry he enlisted to distract from his endless crimes



  11. 'Priceless' Tickets to the EPO's Back End and Team UPC

    CIPA's and the EPO's event (later this week) is more of the same; the EPO exists not to serve European businesses but a bunch of law firms and their biggest clients (which usually aren't even European)



  12. IRC Proceedings: Monday, December 02, 2019

    IRC logs for Monday, December 02, 2019



  13. New EPO Leak Shows That the Rumours and Jokes Are Partly True and We Know Who 'Runs the Show'

    Europe’s second-largest institution is so profoundly dysfunctional, a reprehensible kakistocracy of tribalism, money-grabbing career-climbing autocrats and possibly major fraud; today’s leak looks at what motivated and enabled the formation and latest incarnation of “Team Campinos”



  14. Links 2/12/2019: Linux Mint 19.3 Beta, DPL Sam Hartman Talks About SystemD

    Links for the day



  15. What Former Debian Project Leader (Second to the Late Ian Murdock) Thinks About SystemD in Debian GNU/Linux

    Now that Debian is debating and voting on diversity in the technical sense the thoughts of Bruce Perens merit broader audience/reach



  16. Free/Libre Software Will Eventually Become the Norm, 'Open Source' is Just Proprietary Software Trying to 'Buy Time'

    More people are starting to ask questions about Free software while “Open Source” languishes (people can see it’s just a mask for proprietary software); it was a two-decade delaying tactic that’s wearing off (people see GitHub and the OSI/Linux Foundation for what they really are)



  17. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, December 01, 2019

    IRC logs for Sunday, December 01, 2019



  18. Richard Stallman is Active and Doing Well

    The rumour mill may still be humming along; but against all odds — as Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project — Stallman keeps fighting the good fight (in the face of growing resistance)



  19. Banning Former Microsoft Employees Who Complain About Microsoft Lies, Abuses and Crimes

    The official account of Windows Insider is banning people whom it never even spoke to; this seems like a way of 'punishing' people who are not 'true believers' in Microsoft



  20. Wikileaks: Thierry Breton May Have Misused Regulatory/Government Positions to Attack His Competition (in the Market)

    Thierry 'revolving doors' Breton as seen by the United States government



  21. 13 Years of UPC Promises

    The anatomy of UPC 'fake news' or lobbying tactics along the lines of self-fulfilling prophecies and false predictions



  22. Is Water Wet?

    The criteria for patent eligibility reduced only to this question: will allowing these patents increase ‘production’ (number of patent grants)?



  23. The EPO's President Admits He's Illegally Granting Software Patents (CII, 4IR, IoT, AI and Blockchain Mean Software Patents at the EPO)

    The EPO's chief liar is openly and proudly promoting software patents using buzzwords and hype waves (and mysterious acronyms that are rather meaningless but spread by the media in exchange for money received from the EPO)



  24. Tone Policing and the Linux Foundation

    A timely example of situations where the Linux Foundation can seemingly 'cancel' people (using the Code of Conduct) for political opinions



  25. It EEEsn't Just a Microsoft Thing Anymore

    The EEErosion of Python's independence is a known problem and Microsoft is not the sole culprit



  26. Links 1/12/2019: KDE's GTK CSD Support, Skrooge 2.21.0

    Links for the day



  27. Links 1/12/2019: Genode OS 19.11 Release, Sam Hartman (DPL) Speaks Out on SystemD

    Links for the day



  28. Maximalists Cherry-Picking the So-Called 'Corbyn' 'Leak' for Their Patent Agenda While the US Lobbies Britain for Software Patents and Worse

    A quick look at what last week's media coverage may have missed and what patent maximalists don't want to tell us about confidential trade-related documents



  29. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, November 30, 2019

    IRC logs for Saturday, November 30, 2019



  30. Microsoft Loves Linux Because It Pays for It

    Microsoft cannot ‘buy’ Linux itself, so it has been buying (bribing) all the ‘right’ people while telling them (and then they tell us, too!) they “love Linux” (which they don’t even use!)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts