EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

06.10.08

Reader’s Thoughts on Mark Shuttleworth’s Response (Regarding Microsoft Codecs)

Posted in Free/Libre Software, GNU/Linux, Mono, Patents, Ubuntu at 2:45 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

It was only several hours ago that this mailing list thread came to our attention. Therein, Mark Shuttleworth addresses a post from Boycott Novell. An anonymous reader took it upon himself to respond to it. His response is quoted below in full. Context and background can be found here.


“FOSS distros shouldn’t be a vector for licensing problems…”If Mark Shuttleworth wants to be unambiguous about it, he needs to state “is not and shall not” make a deal for closed codecs. I know that comes close to splitting hairs, but his answer will help prevent unpleasant surprises.

If he’s dealing with proprietary codecs, or general Microsoft technology, he should be wise from the mistakes of others: there’s a trail of out of work CEOs that thought that their company should remain “willing to work with Microsoft, under reasonable and transparent conditions, to further goals that we share” e.g.

“I once preached peaceful coexistence with Windows. You may laugh at my expense — I deserve it.”

Be’s CEO Jean-Louis Gassée

Mark’s not dumb. He shouldn’t try to act dumb. Just how would Canonical survive a deal with Microsoft when no other company to-date has?

However, that’s not as concrete as the mono infection which is listed on the project page:

Subnotebooks, especially those with small HDs or SSDs don’t have 100′s of GB to spare for mono-bloat for just a few packages. Subnotebooks, especially those with low power CPUs don’t have the gigacycles to deal with mono’s bloat spaghetti code. FOSS distros shouldn’t be a vector for licensing problems, like the ones still unresolved after (10?) years of mono.

Note F-Spot:
     http://www.canonical.com/netbooks

Note mono infection:


$ apt-cache depends f-spot
f-spot
  Depends: dbus
  Depends: libart-2.0-2
  Depends: libatk1.0-0
  Depends: libc6
 |Depends: libc6
 |Depends: <libc6.1>
  Depends: <libc0.1>
  Depends: libcairo2
  Depends: libexif12
  Depends: libflickrnet2.1.5-cil
  Depends: libgconf2.0-cil
 |Depends: libgl1-mesa-glx
  Depends: <libgl1>
    libgl1-mesa-glx
    libgl1-mesa-swx11
  Depends: libglade2.0-cil
  Depends: libglib2.0-0
  Depends: libglib2.0-cil
  Depends: libgnome-vfs2.0-cil
  Depends: libgnome2.0-cil
  Depends: libgnomeui-0
  Depends: libgnomevfs2-0
  Depends: libgphoto2-2
  Depends: libgphoto2-port0
  Depends: libgtk2.0-0
  Depends: libgtk2.0-cil
  Depends: libgtkhtml3.16-cil
  Depends: libjpeg62
  Depends: liblcms1
  Depends: libmono-addins-gui0.2-cil
  Depends: libmono-addins0.2-cil
  Depends: libmono-cairo2.0-cil
  Depends: libmono-corlib2.0-cil
  Depends: libmono-sharpzip2.84-cil
  Depends: libmono-sqlite2.0-cil
  Depends: libmono-system-data2.0-cil
  Depends: libmono-system-web2.0-cil
  Depends: libmono-system2.0-cil
  Depends: libmono2.0-cil
  Depends: libndesk-dbus-glib1.0-cil
  Depends: libndesk-dbus1.0-cil
  Depends: libx11-6
  Depends: libxcomposite1
  Depends: mono-runtime
  Depends: sqlite
  Depends: sqlite3
  Recommends: dbus-x11
  Recommends: dcraw

I fought to mention that subnotebooks are often being used in environments/situations where the instability caused by mono causes more harm than in more relaxed situations.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

16 Comments

  1. Rui Miguel Silva Seabra said,

    June 10, 2008 at 6:04 pm

    Gravatar

    apt-cache depends fubar will list you all the packages fubar depends on.

    apt-cache rdepends fubar will list you all the packages depending on fubar.

    For f-spot it’s:
    apt-cache rdepends f-spot
    f-spot
    Reverse Depends:
    ubuntustudio-graphics
    ubuntu-desktop
    gobuntu-desktop

  2. Victor Soliz said,

    June 10, 2008 at 6:42 pm

    Gravatar

    Rui Miguel Silva Seabra: So metapackages intended to install f-spot among other things, depend on f-spot, hmnn…

  3. Woods said,

    June 11, 2008 at 12:18 am

    Gravatar

    ubuntu-desktop depends on F-Spot?
    Doesn’t that mean that removing F-Spot would also remove ubuntu-desktop package?
    Either rdepends reports that a bit funnily or it’s a new development in Hardy, since in 7.10 I could still rip out mono et al. without a problem (I hit the ubuntu-desktop problem when trying to rip out Evolution, if memory serves me…)

    That is bad news indeed, since it would mean that removing mono et al. would break the desktop pretty badly. If memory serves me, lack of ubuntu-desktop-package will cause problems when upgrading your installation.
    (disclaimer: I haven’t tried out Hardy, so this is just speculation)

  4. Roy Schestowitz said,

    June 11, 2008 at 12:47 am

    Gravatar

    Would it be worth posting a separate inquiry/mention of this?

  5. Woods said,

    June 11, 2008 at 1:21 am

    Gravatar

    >Would it be worth posting a separate inquiry/mention of this?

    Well, apparently rdepends also lists “Recommended” and “Suggests”-fields (http://osdir.com/ml/debian.apt.devel/2003-08/msg00044.html) so this would, fortunately, be a false alarm (this time)

    Only to way to be sure is to boot up Hardy, rip out mono et al. and see what happens (sigh, I guess it’s download-time after all…:-) )

  6. Roy Schestowitz said,

    June 11, 2008 at 1:25 am

    Gravatar

    Yes, I realise it’s a false alarm a while ago in thew IRC channel where this was brought up.

  7. Chris Lees said,

    June 11, 2008 at 6:56 am

    Gravatar

    You know, you can rip out Mono without twisting Apt into circles. Just find out what files are in the Mono package, and then delete them. I must say, I’ve never heard of Mono causing problems with the rest of the system, even on subnotebooks. In short, I’m accusing boycottnovell.com of FUD.

    Remaining willing to work with Microsoft should always be a possibility, should there be a culture shift in the corporation. We’ve seen enough culture shifts in computing to know it can happen. As for the codecs, maybe you should write a rabid article about how terrible Fluendo is, because they sell licenses for the Windows Media codecs (https://shop.fluendo.com), and then advise your readers to remove all Gstreamer packages from their systems?

  8. Roy Bixler said,

    June 11, 2008 at 8:43 am

    Gravatar

    : You know, you can rip out Mono without twisting Apt into
    : circles. Just find out what files are in the Mono package,
    : and then delete them.

    That’s a bad idea and could cause you other (technical) problems down the road.

    : I must say, I’ve
    : never heard of Mono causing problems with the rest of the
    : system, even on subnotebooks. In short, I’m accusing
    : boycottnovell.com of FUD.

    Whereas I call it being outspoken and having an opinion. I happen to agree with it and consider it a bad idea to promote Microsoft APIs, always playing catch-up. It’s been tried before and we’ve all seen the results of the defunct competitors who tried this. This is aside from the issue of possible software patents.

    : Remaining willing to work with Microsoft should always be a
    : possibility, should there be a culture shift in the corporation. We’ve seen
    : enough culture shifts in computing to know it can happen.

    That’s unlikely but possible. Trust should be earned over time and I see no change in Microsoft’s culture so far.

  9. Roy Schestowitz said,

    June 11, 2008 at 8:47 am

    Gravatar

    IBM is one among others who were betrayed by Microsoft. It’s a pattern without any exception I can think of. See http://boycottnovell.com/2007/12/01/antitrust-letters-doj/

  10. Needs Sunlight said,

    June 11, 2008 at 9:09 am

    Gravatar

    If rdepends also lists “Recommended” and “Suggests” fields, that’s probably a bug which can and should be fixed upstream.

  11. Miles said,

    June 11, 2008 at 9:52 am

    Gravatar

    Whereas I call it being outspoken and having an opinion.

    Exactly, so let’s not confuse opinion with fact ;-)

    Since the opinion is one of fear, uncertainty, and doubt – it is also by definition FUD.

  12. RyanT said,

    June 11, 2008 at 12:26 pm

    Gravatar

    I’ve never seen or heard anything about mono making a system more unstable, and in fact myself have uninstalled mono completely, with no problems at all. At the same time, I noticed no performance changes.

    FFS get this through your thick skull – despite what many people have pointed out, you continue to ignore that these are just codecs that the only way to legally acquire are to actually pay for them, and how in the world does this represent a further, larger deal in the leagues of Novells.

    Also, anything involving taking out Evolution isn’t a problem with infection – I myself through experience have found many, completely safe normal packages have ended up taking out important things (including desktop packages) without any intention. It is a dependency problem, not suspicious infection. You just have to make sure to check the changes to ensure anything that’s not needed to take out isn’t.

    Agreed with Miles said, this is FUD. A shame as I quite like this site too.

  13. Roy Schestowitz said,

    June 11, 2008 at 12:44 pm

    Gravatar

    Ryan,

    The intention is not to cause alarm or incite panic. It’s supposed to show dangers where they exist so that they can be addressed or avoided. I guess there’s no gentle way to put this, but we at least try. Sorry if you find this counter productive…

  14. Lovecraft said,

    June 11, 2008 at 6:57 pm

    Gravatar

    As I understood it they were taking steps to allow OEM’s to have legally licensed codecs for things that end users would see as critical. What the hell is the big deal. We all dislike Microsoft, but the vitriol this site spews over the most minor concessions, all in the name of principle is crazy. Who exactly is alright? Give this site a few years and they’ll have blacklisted every distro with more than a thousand users.

  15. RyanT said,

    June 11, 2008 at 7:58 pm

    Gravatar

    Sorry for me little outburst.

    Roy, you seem like your heart’s in the right place and all, but as I see it, this site has very real danger of falling into the same trap as many other sites with similar campaigns.

    While they rally against bias, and show themselves as the white knights of the land, they get caught up ina trap, and go in circles around their own speculation, do a complete around-the-world and end up out the other side exactly what they were against and trying to avoid – bias.

    I don’t think you’ve gone there yet, but as each day passes, more and more you get too far ahead of yourself in certain things, you take certain bits of logic too far or present it in a way that is alarming or incites panic, even if not intended.

    Please, step out of this little world once in a while as a grounder – read some articles of the opposing side (well written, well thought out ones, not the raving ones that are often pointed out). If you spend too much time in this little world of boycott novell, you could end up in a downward, overly conspiratorial spiral that’ll make people take this site a lot less seriously.

    Sometimes you can be on the mark, but more and more I think you can get ahead of yourself, the recent Ubuntu codecs deal being the one that has been the straw to break the camels back. Not just because it is a well loved distribution, but because the logic takes too big a jump for people to believe, and is also too narrow of a view.

    Be more thorough, both in your research of Novell and of subjects like this where things like mono performance and the like come out of nowhere without seemingly much backup, but also in widening your view. Stop constantly focusing on the MS side of things all the time, or trying to imply the MS influence, because you are heading into a spiral of over selling things and seeing other things that might not be there.

    And, just to make sure it’s seen, I’ll post what I put in the other codecs thread here:

    Adding in proprietary codecs would only be limiting choice if you couldn’t in any way choose any other form of codec, or re-encode the file to another one.

    You are removing choice, because you are not allowing people to view content in formats they already use, amongst many others. You are causing more harm than good – you are putting up flimsy, unnecessary barriers, especially when you consider that without those codecs, then how are people supposed to change their files into new, open formats instead?

    The only way to do it is transition, which is exactly what Netbook Remix is doing. Including the codecs for people that need, and including the open formats too, ready and waiting to be converted to. They wouldn’t be able to do that without the proprietary codecs in the first place so they can read and convert them, meaning no transition, no more FOSS converts,etc etc.

    Why do you think OpenOffice includes support for MS Office foramts? Because people still have documents in taht format, and the only way you’re going to get new people and get them to transfer over completely, you have to be compatible with said formats in the first place, otherwise there’s no way to access or change formats.

    By not having the codecs, they would be blocking themselves from a much larger audience ripe for transition.

  16. Roy Schestowitz said,

    June 11, 2008 at 10:07 pm

    Gravatar

    @ Lovecraft: No, we don’t blacklist more distributors. Maybe these posts were not comprehended. Mark Fink’s messages deceived a great deal in that regard.

    @ RyanT: Thanks for the insightful thoughts. I largely agree with what you say. I’ll probably post a clarification later on (it requires a long explanation).

What Else is New


  1. Links 22/1/2018: Linux 4.15 Delayed Again, Libinput 1.9.901

    Links for the day



  2. Team UPC Calls Critics of the UPC Idiots, Deletes Their Comments, and Blocks Them

    A new low for Team UPC, which is unable to cope with reality and has begun literally mocking and deleting comments of people who speak out truths



  3. How the Opposition to CRISPR Patents at the EPO Sent Shockwaves Through the Industry

    Additional reports/coverage on the EPO (European Patent Office) revoking Broad Institute's CRISPR patent show that the issue at hand isn't just one sole patent but the whole class/family of patents



  4. Unified Patents Says That RPX, Which Might Soon be Owned by Patent Trolls, Paid Patent Trolls Hundreds of Millions of Dollars

    Unified Patents, which helps crush software patents, takes note of RPX’s financial statements, which reveal the great extent to which RPX actually helped trolls rather than stop them



  5. IAM Together With Its Partner, IIPCC, is Lobbying the USPTO to Crush PTAB and Restore Patent Chaos

    Having handled over 8,000 petitions (according to Professor Lemley's Lex Machina), PTAB champions patent quality at the USPTO, so front groups of the litigation 'industry' creep in and attempt to lobby the likely next Director of the USPTO (inciting him against PTAB, as usual)



  6. Software Patents Are Still Dropping Like Flies in 2018, Thanks to Alice v CLS Bank (SCOTUS, 2014) and Section 101 (USPTO)

    Section 101 (§ 101) is thriving in the sense that it belatedly throws thousands of patents -- and frivolous lawsuits that depend on them -- down the chute; the patent trolls and their allies in the patent microcosm are very furious and they blame PTAB for actually doing its job (enforcing Section 101 when petitioned to do so)



  7. Patent Troll Finjan Looks Like It's About to Collapse, But Patent Maximalists Exploit It for Software Patents Promotion

    Patent trolls are struggling in their use of software patents; few (if any) of their patents are upheld as valid and those that miraculously remain in tact become the subject of fascination if not obsession among trolls' advocates



  8. The Attacks on PTAB Are Slowing Down and Attempts to Shield Oneself From Inter Partes Reviews (IPRs) Are Failing

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) reapplies patent eligibility tests/guidelines in order to squash likely invalid patents; The litigation 'industry' is not happy about it, but its opposition to PTAB is also losing steam



  9. Links 21/1/2018: Wine 3.0 Coverage, KaOS 2018.01, Red Hat Among 'Admired Companies'

    Links for the day



  10. Blockchain Patents Are a Catastrophe in the Making as Trolls and Aggressors Accumulate Them

    As patents pertaining to blockchains continue to be granted -- even in defiance of Alice/Section 101 -- it seems likely that patent wars will sooner or later erupt, involving some large banks, IBM, and patent trolls associated with the notorious Erich Spangenberg



  11. Qualcomm/Broadcom/NXP Combination Would Become a Disastrous Patent Thicket Which Benefits Nobody

    Worried by the prospect of mega-mergers and takeovers which would put far too much market power (and monopoly through patents) in one place, governments and corporations speak out



  12. Patent Litigation in East Asia: Huawei, Samsung, HTC, Nintendo and COLOPL

    A quick look at some high-profile cases in which large Asian firms are embroiled; it seems clear that litigation activities have shifted eastwards (where actual production is done)



  13. Patent Litigation in the US is Down Sharply and Patent Trolls' Demise Has Much to Do With It

    Docket Navigator and Lex Machina both show a significant decline in litigation -- a trend which is likely to carry on now that TC Heartland is in tact (not for just half a year but a whole year) and PTAB completes another record year



  14. Cheating the US Patent System is a Lot Harder After TC Heartland

    Some new examples of tricks (and sometimes cheats) attempted by patent claimants and their representatives; it does not go as well as they hoped



  15. RPX Might Soon be Owned by Patent Troll Erich Spangenberg

    RPX, whose top executives are leaving and business is gradually dying, might end up as another 'asset' of patent trolls



  16. Patent Quality (Not Numbers) as an Asset: Oppositions, Appeals and Rejections at the EPO

    Benoît Battistelli wants a rubber-stamping operation (like INPI) rather than a functional patent office, but oppositions at the Office prove to be fruitful and many erroneously-granted patents are -- by extrapolation -- already being revoked (affecting, in retrospect, Battistelli's so-called 'results')



  17. Links 19/1/2018: Linux Journalism Fund, Grsecurity is SLAPPing Again

    Links for the day



  18. The EPO Ignores This Week's Decision Which Demonstrates Patent Scope Gone Awry; Software Patents Brought Up Again

    The worrisome growth of European Patents (EPs) — a 40% jump in one year in spite of decline in the number of patent applications — is a symptom of the poor judgment, induced largely by bad policies that impede examiners’ activities for the sake of so-called ‘production’; this week's decision regarding CRISPR is another wake-up call and software patents too need to be abolished (as a whole), in lieu with the European Patent Convention (EPC)



  19. WesternGeco v ION Geophysical (at the US Supreme Court) Won't Affect Patent Scope

    As WesternGeco v ION Geophysical is the main if not sole ‘major’ patent case that the US Supreme Court will deal with, it seems safe to say that nothing substantial will change for patent scope in the United States this year



  20. Links 18/1/2018: MenuLibre 2.1.4, Git 2.16 Released

    Links for the day



  21. Microsoft, Masking/Hiding Itself Behind Patent Trolls, is Still Engaging in Patent Extortion

    A review of Microsoft's ugly tactics, which involve coercion and extortion (for businesses to move to Azure and/or for OEMs to preload Microsoft software) while Microsoft-connected patent trolls help hide the "enforcement" element in this whole racket



  22. Patent Prosecution Highway: Low-Quality Patents for High-Frequency Patent Aggressors

    The EPO's race to the bottom of patent quality, combined with a "need for speed", is a recipe for disaster (except for litigation firms, patent bullies, and patent trolls)



  23. Press Coverage About the EPO Board Revoking Broad's CRISPR Patent

    Even though there's some decent coverage about yesterday's decision (e.g. from The Scientist), the patent microcosm googlebombs the news with stuff that serves to distract from or distort the outcome



  24. Links 17/1/2018: HHVM 3.24, WordPress 4.9.2

    Links for the day



  25. No Patents on Life (CRISPR), Said EPO Boards of Appeal Just a Few Hours Ago

    Broad spectacularly loses its key case, which may soon mean that any other patents on CRISPR too will be considered invalid



  26. Only Two Weeks on the Job, Judge Patrick Corcoran is Already Being Threatened by EPO Management

    The attack on a technical judge who is accused of relaying information many people had already relayed anyway (it was gossip at the whole Organisation for years) carries on as he is again being pushed around, just as many people predicted



  27. EPO Board of Appeal Has an Opportunity to Stop Controversial Patents on Life

    Patent maximalism at the EPO can be pushed aback slightly if the European appeal board decides to curtail CRISPR patents in a matter of days



  28. Links 16/1/2018: More on Barcelona, OSI at 20

    Links for the day



  29. 2018 Will be an Even Worse Year for Software Patents Because the US Supreme Court Shields Alice

    The latest picks (reviewed cases) of the Supreme Court of the United States signal another year with little or no hope for the software patents lobby; PTAB too is expected to endure after a record-breaking year, in which it invalidated a lot of software patents that had been erroneously granted



  30. Patent Trolls (Euphemised as “Public IP Companies”) Are Dying in the United States, But the Trouble Isn't Over

    The demise of various types of patent trolls, including publicly-traded trolls, is good news; but we take stock of the latest developments in order to better assess the remaining threat


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts