EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

06.17.08

The Novell Danger (to Free Software) Becomes More Widely Recognised

Posted in GNU/Linux, GPL, Linspire, Microsoft, Mono, Novell, Patents, SCO, Xandros at 12:01 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Occasionally it seems useful to show that we are not along when it comes to criticising Novell. There is this tendency — wishful thinking for some — to say that this Web site is biased against Novell as a matter of principle and blind goals, as opposed to a well-calculated rationale. But this is totally untrue. While Novell does contribute to many projects and is rightly credited for it, the company operates upon selfish interests at the end. Novell is far from a Free software company [1, 2, 3 5]. It’s a lot more like Microsoft.

Have a look at this new press release.

Novell(R) announced today it is the first Linux* vendor to appear on the U.S. Department of Defense Unified Capabilities Approved Products List (APL), as SUSE(R) Linux Enterprise Server 10 Service Pack 2 (SP2) has received the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Special Interoperability Certification from the department’s Defense Information System Agency. With this certification, Novell customers, including government agencies, can rely on SUSE Linux Enterprise Server to support present and future networking standards, offering peace of mind for long-term use.

The APL list is expected to become a Department of Defense and U.S. federal government equipment purchase requirement.

Referring to this portion of the text, Groklaw opines: “This little nugget clariifies for me the sudden Microsoft interest in interoperability and the whole Microsoft-Novell deal.” Earning of a place inside the US government, which traditionally moves some of its operations to Red Hat, is what Microsoft might wish to influence here. It wishes to tax for the use of GNU/Linux and potentially run it under (or alongside) Windows. It’s all about control.

“In many ways, Novell became Microsoft’s ‘GPL factory’, which produces whatever ‘poison’ (legal obligations) or ‘features’ (Windows/Office/.NET hooks) Microsoft wants its competition to contain and bring upstream.”The criticism above is a tad subtle. Novell played an important role in squashing the action brought against Linux by SCO, so it would be hard for Groklaw to be overly critical of Novell, especially amid those final stages of the trial.

Nevertheless, it seems clear that Novell’s role in damaging Free software (using software patents) is precisely what the company might do. Mono, Moonlight, OOXML and some other hostile technologies appear to be among the key outputs of Novell.

The export of such unnecessary software seems to only promote Microsoft’s agenda. In many ways, Novell became Microsoft’s 'GPL factory', which produces whatever ‘poison’ (legal obligations) or ‘features’ (Windows/Office/.NET hooks) Microsoft wants its competition to contain and bring upstream.

Even Matt Hartley, who obviously likes Linspire and Xandros, it finally taking this small shot at Novell: [emphasis is ours]

What About Red Hat, Novell and Canonical? On the distribution development side of things, all three of these companies (excluding Novell’s selling out to Redmond), are on the right path with their own visions for desktop Linux.

BoycottNovell is not the only critic of Novell. It just happens to be a site whose name reflects on these convictions and biases.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

15 Comments

  1. Michael said,

    June 17, 2008 at 1:14 am

    Gravatar

    Hold on – if certification is required for doing business with the feds, then that is an issue with the way they do things. It may have well gone that way as a result of pressure from proprietary interests (it can be a tactic that ensures only big vendors can compete with each other for contacts), but it is what it is, and it isn’t Novell’s doing on the face of it.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if RedHat and other vendors are also in the queue – the press release just says ‘first’. If it becomes a requirement for procurement then they will all have to do it.

    Again I think PJ is jumping the gun a bit here. Because some procurement process requires certification, and Novell has got that certification – ta dah, the whole Novell MS deal makes sense? Hmm, something appears to be missing in that logic.

    As for the APL, MS are already on it, as are IBM, Sun, Cisco and others in their various categories. http://jitc.fhu.disa.mil/apl/ipv6.html

    PJ seems to have lost the plot a little lately, but can’t you do better than this?

  2. ChangingNamesAsIWant said,

    June 17, 2008 at 1:16 am

    Gravatar

    Hell even Microsoft is afraid of Novell. Novell is using microsoft to gain traction into MS strong hold companies. Once they get strong enough they will dump microsoft one day.

  3. Roy Schestowitz said,

    June 17, 2008 at 1:23 am

    Gravatar

    Michael,

    You too might be missing a broader picture. For starters, many of Microsoft’s partners, such as SAP, choose Novell only having received Microsoft’s blessing. Regarding certifications, I could share with you some nasty stories about the fight against OpenSSL (proprietary vendors throwing FUD and “commie” smears to rob it from needed certifications).

    I agree that Groklaw is perhaps jumping the gun here, but based on prior incidents (Novell given precedence with Microsoft’s help), it’s somewhat reasonable to at least suspect.

  4. ChangingNamesAsIWant said,

    June 17, 2008 at 1:24 am

    Gravatar

    Microsoft is foolish enough to befriend Novell…

    Its like feeding milk to a young cobra. Its going to bit you one day when it grows up.

  5. Roy Schestowitz said,

    June 17, 2008 at 1:26 am

    Gravatar

    Not quite. Microsoft typically uses Novell to replace existing Linux deployments or make it the ‘default’ where Linux deployments seem inevitable. Microsoft is the one milking Novell (Linux tax) and exploiting it to spread the Microsoft API, formats, etc.

  6. howard said,

    June 17, 2008 at 2:11 am

    Gravatar

    “The Novell Danger Becomes More Widely Recognized…”

    Hello? This is just another article from your old allies at Groklaw you’re quoting. How do you get to that title for your article?

  7. Roy Schestowitz said,

    June 17, 2008 at 2:20 am

    Gravatar

    OpenAddict, Samba, Rosenberg, Asay, Perens and many others protest against this deal as well. This isn’t news, but I’m merely putting out there some more examples.

  8. Mendez said,

    June 17, 2008 at 4:30 am

    Gravatar

    That is the same bunch that were criticall of it from the start. Not meaning to nitpick but where is the ‘more widely recognized’ here?

  9. Roy Schestowitz said,

    June 17, 2008 at 4:36 am

    Gravatar

    Matt Hartley didn’t express an opinion for example. I could list more examples but not from the news.

  10. Sean Tilley said,

    June 17, 2008 at 8:34 pm

    Gravatar

    After sorting through six links you’ve used for yourself as “examples”, I have yet to find a useful viable source that honestly makes Novell the sinister, backstabbing corporation that you make it out to be.

    And also, how are they damaging free software? I can partially understand Mono, as Gnome is becoming more dependent on it. But, all of this stuff is optional. You don’t *have* to use it, so why is it a problem then?

    Or is it suddenly our duties to determine how someone makes software and how they distribute it? Last time I checked, the FOSS community didn’t control the actions of a company.

  11. Sean Tilley said,

    June 17, 2008 at 8:35 pm

    Gravatar

    Forgive me, make that 13 links to your own site as “sources of information”.

  12. Roy Schestowitz said,

    June 17, 2008 at 8:46 pm

    Gravatar

    Almost each item contains at least one external link. The citations are cross references merely for convenience (it’s quicker to do) and they also isolate external material and put it in context.

  13. Sean Tilley said,

    June 17, 2008 at 9:35 pm

    Gravatar

    Wouldn’t it be better to just reference other websites? Rather than mostly your own personal bias? I’m not trying to put you down, it’s just that it makes the article feel less credible.

  14. Roy Schestowitz said,

    June 17, 2008 at 9:52 pm

    Gravatar

    Had I done it that way, there would be fewer references (only the ones which a globe icon succeeds). I’ve enhanced the publishing software to enable me to reference locally using the primary key that is post #. This enables me to quickly group, based on searches (slicing), previous posts that cover the same issue. Each such post typically contain relevant external article/s.

    So, it’s an issue of practicality rather than one of preference. It would be nicer if I could link directly — without jumping through hoops — to the sites that are an original source, which sometimes 404 unfortunately.

  15. Jonh Arson said,

    June 18, 2008 at 12:19 pm

    Gravatar

    This blog is of high entertainment value, i would compare it to shelleytherepublican.com

    Keep on the good work Roy, you make me laugh harder every day.

What Else is New


  1. Links 19/8/2019: Another Linux 5.3 RC, OpenSUSE's Richard Brown Steps Down, Slackware Creates Patreon Page, Qt 6 Initiated

    Links for the day



  2. Speaking Truth to Monopolies (or How to Write Guest Posts in Techrights)

    We need to have more articles tackling the passage of all power — especially when it comes to software — to few large monopolies that disregard human rights or actively participate in their abolishment in the digital realm



  3. Guarding and Rescuing the FSF Titanic: Free as in Speech

    "While a new breed of so-called anarchists campaign against expression that even the state allows, people are also foolishly overplaying the relevance of the state to free speech issues -- as if it's not a freedom issue when a project is increasingly thought-policed, because the thought-policing isn't on a state level."



  4. Toxic Culture at Microsoft

    Racism, intolerance, sexism and bullying are rampant at Microsoft; but Microsoft would rather deflect/divert/sidetrack to Google and so-called 'GAFA'



  5. Guarding and Rescuing the FSF Titanic: Introduction

    "The FSF isn't just threatened, it will hit a large iceberg in the future that changes it permanently."



  6. Linux Journal and Linux.com Should Have Been Kept Going

    There's apparently no good explanation for the effective shutdown of Linux Journal and Linux.com; London Trust Media Holdings (LTMH), owner of Linux Journal, saw numbers improving and the Linux Foundation, steward of Linux.com, is loaded with money



  7. 2019 Microsoft Glossary

    How Microsoft internally interprets words that it is saying to the public and to the press



  8. 2019 Surveillance Glossary

    Distortion of technical and nontechnical terms in this day and age of '1984'



  9. Openwashing Report: It's Getting Worse, Fast. Everything is Apparently 'Open' Now Even Though It's Actually Proprietary.

    The latest examples (this past week's) of openwashing in the media, ranging from 5G to surveillance



  10. GitHub is a Dagger Inside Free/Open Source Software (FOSS); This is Why Microsoft Bought It

    A year later it seems pretty evident that Microsoft doesn’t like FOSS but is merely trying to control it, e.g. by buying millions of FOSS projects/repositories at the platform level (the above is what the Linux Foundation‘s Jim Zemlin said to Microsoft at their event while antitrust regulators were still assessing the proposed takeover)



  11. Microsoft Grows Within and Eats You From the Inside

    Microsoft entryism and other subversive tactics continue to threaten and sometimes successfully undermine the competition; Microsoft is nowadays doing that to core projects in the Free/Open Source software world



  12. Links 18/8/2019: New KNOPPIX and Emmabuntus Released

    Links for the day



  13. Links 17/8/2019: Unigine 2.9 and Git 2.23

    Links for the day



  14. Computer-Generated Patent Applications Show That Patents and Innovations Are Very Different Things

    The 'cheapening' of the concept of 'inventor' (or 'invention') undermines the whole foundation/basis of the patent system and deep inside patent law firms know it



  15. Concerns About IBM's Commitment to OpenSource.com After the Fall of Linux.com and Linux Journal

    The Web site OpenSource.com is over two decades old; in its current form it's about a decade old and it contains plenty of good articles, but will IBM think so too and, if so, will investment in the site carry on?



  16. Electronic Frontier Foundation Makes a Mistake by Giving Award to Microsoft Surveillance Person

    At age 30 (almost) the Electronic Frontier Foundation still campaigns for privacy; so why does it grant awards to enemies of privacy?



  17. Caturdays and Sundays at Techrights Will Get Busier

    Our plan to spend the weekends writing more articles about Software Freedom; it seems like a high-priority issue



  18. Why Techrights Doesn't Do Social Control Media

    Being managed and censored by platform owners (sometimes their shareholders) isn’t an alluring proposition when a site challenges conformist norms and the status quo; Techrights belongs in a platform of its own



  19. Patent Prosecution Highways and Examination Highways Are Dooming the EPO

    Speed is not a measure of quality; but today's EPO is just trying to get as much money as possible, as fast as possible (before the whole thing implodes)



  20. Software Patents Won't Come Back Just Because They're (Re)Framed/Branded as "HEY HI" (AI)

    The pattern we've been observing in recent years is, patent applicants and law firms simply rewrite applications to make these seem patent-eligible on the surface (owing to deliberate deception) and patent offices facilitate these loopholes in order to fake 'growth'



  21. IP Kat Pays the Price for Being a Megaphone of Team UPC

    The typical or the usual suspects speak out about the so-called 'prospects' (with delusions of inevitability) of the Unified Patent Court Agreement, neglecting to account for their own longterm credibility



  22. Links 17/8/2019: Wine 4.14 is Out, Debian Celebrates 26 years

    Links for the day



  23. Nothing Says 'New' Microsoft Like Microsoft Component Firmware Update (More Hardware Lock-in)

    Vicious old Microsoft is still trying to make life very hard for GNU/Linux, especially in the OEM channel/s, but we're somehow supposed to think that "Microsoft loves Linux"



  24. Bill Gates and His Special Relationship With Jeffrey Epstein Still Stirring Speculations

    Love of the "children" has long been a controversial subject for Microsoft; can Bill Gates and his connections to Jeffrey Epstein unearth some unsavoury secrets?



  25. Links 16/8/2019: Kdevops and QEMU 4.1

    Links for the day



  26. The EPO's War on the Convention on the Grant of European Patents 2000 (EPC 2000), Not Just Brexit, Kills the Unitary Patent (UP/UPC) and Dooms Justice

    Team UPC continues to ignore the utter failures that have led to lawlessness at the EPO, attributing the demise of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) to Brexit alone and pretending that it's not even a problem



  27. Links 15/8/2019: GNOME's Birthday, LLVM 9.0 RC2

    Links for the day



  28. 'Foundation' Hype Spreads in China

    Nonprofits seem to have become more of a business loophole than a charitable endeavour; the problem is, this erodes confidence in legitimate Free software and good causes



  29. Links Are Not Endorsements

    If the only alternative is to say nothing and link to nothing, then we have a problem; a lot of people still assume that because someone links to something it therefore implies agreement and consent



  30. The Myth of 'Professionalism'

    Perception of professionalism, a vehicle or a motivation for making Linux more 'corporate-friendly' (i.e. owned by corporations), is a growing threat to Software Freedom inside Linux, as well as freedom of speech and many other things


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts