EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

12.06.08

Microsoft Attacks, Then Tries to Hijack Free Software

Posted in Asia, Deception, Free/Libre Software, FUD, GNU/Linux, Microsoft, Windows at 12:15 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Deadly embraces, deadly extensions

A Microsoft press release which we mentioned the other day demonstrated the fact that Microsoft remains hostile towards Free software (Microsoft calls it “open source”), yet people are expected to believe that this is not happening. Glyn Moody has explained what all this FUD means (or doesn’t mean).

Those with good memories may recall a phase that Microsoft went through in which it issued (and generally commissioned) a stack of TCO studies that “proved” Windows was better/cheaper than GNU/Linux. Of course, they did nothing of the sort, since the methodology was generally so flawed you could have proved anything.

Worth remembering are the recent attacks from the Gartner Group, which is behind "TCO". Here is a new InformationWeek essay that describes Microsoft as “Open Source Schizoid”, not just "Open Source Xenophobe".

The best word for Microsoft’s attempts to deal with open source is schizoid. On the one hand you have the folks at the Open Source Lab, who are building what bridges they can — and on the other, you have the rest of the company, including its marketing and PR divisions, who may end up undoing what good is done. At the end of the day, they’re still a proprietary-platform outfit, and they have to uphold that.

Who would be fooled by such a two-faced monopolist with a long history of well-documented crimes?

Embracing and Extending Free Software in the Philippines

Winston Damarillo is a renowned Free software advocate, but he seems to have just sold out to Microsoft.

Microsoft’s motives and strategy are very clear. It’s something along the lines of: “Here some money. Stop promoting freedom. Help Windows. Promote ‘open’. Help us sell proprietary Microsoft stacks.”

Here is the main report about this (in English).

Microsoft Philippines is looking to pursue more collaboration with open source developers in the country through its Open Source Interoperability Lab project.

The current Open Source Interoperability Lab is housed in the Commission on Information and Communications Technology (CICT) office at the University of the Philippines Diliman in Quezon City.

As part of this increasing collaboration with the open source community, Microsoft Philippines has inked a partnership with open source software engineering firm Exist Global headed by Winston Damarillo.

This created a small wave and it’s exceptionally disappointing.

Embracing and Extending Python with Microsoft XAML

IronPython, like JPython, is an attempt to ‘bastradise’ a programming language or framework. Companies want to ‘monetise’ a community.

For reasons that are similar to IronRuby’s, this is s mistake [1, 2, 3], but Microsoft has already hijacked such a project and transformed developers in it so that they adopt its own licences that it (Microsoft) can control and change at any time [1, 2, 3]. Here is an example of a new ‘extend’ phase.

Dan Eloff has announced the release of Silvershell 0.6. (Also known as Python/E – Python Everywhere!).

[...]

It runs in the browser with Silverlight 2 or on the desktop with a WPF (Windows Presentation Foundation – which means it won’t run on Mono) User Interface.

We wrote about IronRuby in [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. It’s similar and it’s a thing to be avoided. Microsoft wraps Free technologies with proprietary ones that impede interoperability and introduce patents.

Embracing and Extending Perl with Microsoft Influence

Microsoft is applying to Perl a tactic so similar to one which it applied to Apache [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. A reader has just alerted us to this development.

Commencing this month, Microsoft will be providing every CPAN author with free access to a centrally-hosted virtual machine environment containing every major version of Windows.

For those not realising what Microsoft has in mind, the following vanishing article is worth a look. Microsoft is making some stuff up about intellectual monopolies to undermine Free software, which is wants to police. From the Web Archive: “As far as making the source code available, we at MS strongly feel that there is a need to protect intellectual property (IP) as it is the economic incentive to create better solutions.” This article as a whole is worth a read while it lasts.

It’s the same old story, not the exception. They try to tame developers. First they put them on Windows and ensure all the programmers empower the monopoly and leave GNU/Linux isolated, if not neglected. At the earlier stages, it’s just flirting.

Scandal

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

72 Comments

  1. Needs Sunlight said,

    December 6, 2008 at 12:55 pm

    Gravatar

    This explains the astroturfers stepping up low-profile attacks against6 Perl. Perl is about as close to write-once, run anywhere as we have ever gotten. It’s also the glue that holds the Internet together. And the web. So as former MS-based PHP developers are realizing the benefits of perl, it becomes more of a threat to MS little cult.

    Virtualization or not, Windows is simply not relevant in the web world and perl makes it that much easier to rule out Windows. Just ask the banks how well it went with that little .NOT fail. Perl and Java rule web development, while PHP gets the limelight.

    We hope that the CPAN maintainers collectively “grow a pair” and turn away these time-wasters. Time wasting can ruin an otherwise good developer.

  2. AlexH said,

    December 6, 2008 at 12:58 pm

    Gravatar

    IronPython, like JPython, is an attempt to ‘bastradise’ a programming language or framework.

    Given I obviously missed the memo… exactly what is wrong with Jython?

  3. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 6, 2008 at 1:01 pm

    Gravatar

    Sun hired two prominent Python developers, IIRC, in order to attract developers to its stack.

  4. AlexH said,

    December 6, 2008 at 1:04 pm

    Gravatar

    And what’s wrong with that?

  5. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 6, 2008 at 1:05 pm

    Gravatar

    Solaris is not GNU.

  6. stevetheFLY said,

    December 6, 2008 at 1:08 pm

    Gravatar

    So, that you can use Python to program within the .NET framework is an attack on Python? Compelling argument… :p

    Next thing you’ll say that Linux-PCs being able to connect to a Windows-network is an attack on SAMBA! (Yes, I know this is absurd; and this should demonstrate the absurdity of your claims.)

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

  7. AlexH said,

    December 6, 2008 at 1:08 pm

    Gravatar

    Java doesn’t care what OS it runs on top of. What does Solaris have to do with it?

  8. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 6, 2008 at 1:08 pm

    Gravatar

    But Jython is free software, isn’t it? What does Jython have to do with Solaris?

  9. stevetheFLY said,

    December 6, 2008 at 1:09 pm

    Gravatar

    Roy constantly makes the most absurd claims; don’t let him irritate you too much… It’s just the twisted, mischievous way he thinks.

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

  10. G. Michaels said,

    December 6, 2008 at 2:59 pm

    Gravatar

    @Dan:

    The thing that is wrong with IronPython/IronRuby is that they’re associated with Microsoft. That’s it.

    @Roy:

    For those not realising what Microsoft has in mind, the following vanishing article

    That proves absolutely nothing whatsoever. Microsoft Australia is giving Perl developers an environment where they can test Perl so that it can run better on Windows. That will not affect the state of Perl running on other operating systems, since the amount of people working on them is, to put it mildly, far greater than those trying to make it better on Win32.

    Why don’t you just save everybody a lot of time and write your articles like this:

    X is associated with Microsoft. I hate Microsoft. Nothing should work on Windows, no one should work with Microsoft under any circumstance. I want Microsoft to disappear and die. Therefore X is bad, and you should not use it. If you do, you have sold out and you’re an apologist. If you attempt to tell me any different then you’re an astroturfer, obviously paid by Microsoft. You should be hunted and put down like the worthless dog you are, and that would solve all my problems, because I won’t have to remember to insult you every three days on my blog. Now, look over there, a point release of some obscure GNU/Linux package and pictures of coerced kids with funny signs in India! Weee!

    That would cut down on your bandwidth bills something fierce.

    Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.

  11. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 6, 2008 at 3:26 pm

    Gravatar

    I was away for several hours (gym) and it’s clear to see that a Munchkins festival was here. :-(

  12. G. Michaels said,

    December 6, 2008 at 3:27 pm

    Gravatar

    Stick to pasting red text on people’s comments, Roy. You’re much better at that.

    Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.

  13. jo Shields said,

    December 6, 2008 at 4:02 pm

    Gravatar

    Roy. You’re much better at that.

    Nope. He isn’t. That’s the problem.

  14. AlexH said,

    December 6, 2008 at 6:15 pm

    Gravatar

    Another drive-by shooting on another innocent free software project…

    … actually, counting “not GNU” Solaris, that’s another two.

    Sad.

  15. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 6, 2008 at 6:21 pm

    Gravatar

    Solaris is UNIX, Alex. You already know that.

  16. AlexH said,

    December 6, 2008 at 6:29 pm

    Gravatar

    And? So what of it? It’s free software. As is Jython.

  17. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 6, 2008 at 6:31 pm

    Gravatar

    Roy: Solaris is also free software these days.

    G. Michaels: I’m fully aware why Roy wouldn’t like IronPython, but Jython is completely separate from Microsoft.

  18. Ian said,

    December 6, 2008 at 6:32 pm

    Gravatar

    http://www.opensolaris.org/os/

  19. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 6, 2008 at 6:48 pm

    Gravatar

    CDDL.

  20. AlexH said,

    December 6, 2008 at 6:51 pm

    Gravatar

    This is a free software license.

  21. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 6, 2008 at 6:59 pm

    Gravatar

    So?

  22. AlexH said,

    December 6, 2008 at 7:08 pm

    Gravatar

    So for a “free software supporter” you do a pretty good job of unjustified drive-bys of projects.

    Jython’s “bad” because Sun has the temerity to pay people to work on it, and apparently Solaris is “bad” because it’s under the CDDL.

    Your anti-Microsoft and anti-Novell crusades are at least somewhat internally consistent, but this new stuff is BS.

  23. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 6, 2008 at 7:11 pm

    Gravatar

    I want GNU/Linux, Java, OOo, and MySQL to succeed. I’d rather see btrfs succeed, not ZFS. The same goes for Solaris. Linux hardly has an owner (kernel.org). It’s healthy that way.

  24. AlexH said,

    December 6, 2008 at 7:15 pm

    Gravatar

    Yeah, so you’ve picked your favourites and everything else is to be criticised.

    Nice work, I look forward to running this GNU/Roy monoculture.

  25. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 6, 2008 at 7:17 pm

    Gravatar

    Here’s what RMS told me about Solaris:
    http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/article.php/3717476

  26. G. Michaels said,

    December 6, 2008 at 8:35 pm

    Gravatar

    This wannabe name dropping is so ridiculous. Who do you think you’re impressing?

    Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.

  27. jo Shields said,

    December 6, 2008 at 8:53 pm

    Gravatar

    This wannabe name dropping is so ridiculous. Who do you think you’re impressing?

    His groupies. Duh.

  28. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 6, 2008 at 8:59 pm

    Gravatar

    His groupies. Duh.

    The only “group” I see here is a group of hecklers that try to ruin each and every post with off-topic insults.

  29. jo Shields said,

    December 6, 2008 at 9:10 pm

    Gravatar

    The only “group” I see here is a group of hecklers that try to ruin each and every post with off-topic insults.

    Your little fan club on IRC doesn’t count, then? Unlike them and you, I’ve never contacted any of the “hecklers” directly (and I doubt they’ve contacted each other).

  30. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 6, 2008 at 9:26 pm

    Gravatar

    We think of it as a team, not a group (as in “groupie”). A lot of people are concerned about Novell.

  31. jo Shields said,

    December 6, 2008 at 9:33 pm

    Gravatar

    I’m not so sure. The funny thing is, for a site called “Boycott Novell”, Novell is only third in your category cloud – by a wide margin, most content is about Microsoft. Most posts are about Microsoft.

    I strongly suspect most people are concerned about Microsoft – and simply attack anything vaguely Novell related because theirs is the most recent deal made with the hated enemy

  32. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 6, 2008 at 9:36 pm

    Gravatar

    Stories that we cover which are about Novell naturally have Microsoft involved. We don’t cover the proprietary sides of Novell, such as GroupWise. We do so in the weekends.

    The site “Exploringes the reality behind exclusionary deals with Microsoft and their subtle (yet severe) implications.”

  33. G. Michaels said,

    December 7, 2008 at 1:55 am

    Gravatar

    We think of it as a team

    An enormous team.

    Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.

  34. AlexH said,

    December 7, 2008 at 4:41 am

    Gravatar

    @Roy: RMS’ comments were about the system as a whole. He does not endorse any system which uses non-free software, which includes every GNU/Linux distro bar gNewsense and Blag.

    Given you can run GNU/Solaris it’s in exactly the same boat.

    And I notice you studiously ignore the Jython comments again..

    Seriously, Roy. You see this as “heckling”. I see this as you attacking free software projects without any justification, because this isn’t even related to your anti-Novell jihad. Your only excuse thus far is “I don’t like them”.

    I wonder how many other of your attacks are veiled in thin reasoning but are actually because you have a chip on your shoulder about various products.

  35. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 4:44 am

    Gravatar

    This was not an attack. It was an observation, which I stand by. Care to comment on Python that’s tied to Windows and to XAML? is that a good thing Microsoft is doing?

  36. AlexH said,

    December 7, 2008 at 5:17 am

    Gravatar

    @Roy: it looks like an attack from here, and it’s continued in your comments where you’re urging people not to use them.

    The “Python tied to Windows and XAML” – if you’re talking about IronPython, it isn’t tied to either of those things. It doesn’t even come into contact with XAML.

  37. jo Shields said,

    December 7, 2008 at 6:44 am

    Gravatar

    It doesn’t even come into contact with XAML.

    It can do if you want it to, but it’s hard work: http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ironpython/silverlight/index.shtml

  38. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 6:53 am

    Gravatar

    AlexH,

    It’s a gentle push for developers to embrace WPF and Windows.

  39. AlexH said,

    December 7, 2008 at 7:01 am

    Gravatar

    @Roy: by that measure, every language is a gentle push, because they’re all supported within the .net CLR. Sorry, no dice.

  40. Bob said,

    December 7, 2008 at 9:02 am

    Gravatar

    What about the C and C++ programming languages? Are they languages controlled by Microsoft because of the fact that Microsoft encourages C/++ developers to target WPF and Windows?

  41. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 9:05 am

    Gravatar

    No, but Visual Studio is the danger.

  42. Needs Sunlight said,

    December 7, 2008 at 10:43 am

    Gravatar

    The CDDL is not a Free Software License:
    http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#CDDL

    The gist is that the CDDL does not apply to a whole package as do other licenses, but instead causes intermixture of proprietary binaries throughout.

    CDDL a step in the right direction, but a junk license nevertheless. The binaries present maintenance, security and portability problems. Look up the BLOB discussions from the past ages up through current times, especially around Linux and BSD kernel discussions.

    Java, Python, Perl all run best on non-MS platforms, due very much to the failure of MS to design and implement quality systems. Some of that failure is intentional, some through incompetence and lack of experience of the MS engineers, and some through technology being the lowest priority of the MS movement.

  43. AlexH said,

    December 7, 2008 at 10:46 am

    Gravatar

    @Needs: did you even read the link you’re providing?

    Or do you have some other definition of “free software”?

  44. jo Shields said,

    December 7, 2008 at 10:53 am

    Gravatar

    Or do you have some other definition of “free software”?

    Another prime example of reality taking a holiday here on BN.

    From gnu.org: “This is a free software license.”

    I wonder whether people like Needs Sunlight are liars or stupid. One or t’other.

  45. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 10:58 am

    Gravatar

    Not all FS licences are created equal.

  46. AlexH said,

    December 7, 2008 at 11:04 am

    Gravatar

    “not being equal” isn’t the same as “not being free”, though.

    Decrying CDDL as non-free is Newspeak.

  47. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 7, 2008 at 11:05 am

    Gravatar

    It’s irrelevant whether FSF licenses are created equal or not, CDDL is still a Free Software license.

    I find it amusing that both Roy and his supporters (in this case, Needs Sunlight) clearly fail at reading comprehension and both like to link to articles and summarize them as saying something that they do not say (often times the articles say just the opposite, just as in this particular instance).

  48. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 11:09 am

    Gravatar

    I didn’t say it wasn’t Free. However, as ms-pl shows, the FSF is willing to explicitly encourage against the use of some free licences.

  49. AlexH said,

    December 7, 2008 at 11:10 am

    Gravatar

    @Dan: particularly ironic that they attempt to re-define CDDL as “non-free” in an article attacking Microsoft of hijacking free software :)

  50. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 7, 2008 at 11:12 am

    Gravatar

    AlexH: yea, that is amusing ;-)

  51. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 7, 2008 at 11:17 am

    Gravatar

    Roy: You may not have said that CDDL was not a FS license, but Needs Sunlight did – which is who I was responding to.

  52. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 11:35 am

    Gravatar

    Maybe it’s a lesser appreciated Free software licence. There were already fine ones, e.g. GPL, that Sun could choose.

  53. Jo Shields said,

    December 7, 2008 at 3:22 pm

    Gravatar

    Maybe it’s a lesser appreciated Free software licence. There were already fine ones, e.g. GPL, that Sun could choose.

    Perhaps. But fighting license proliferation isn’t the same as saying “this Free license is non-Free because I don’t like it”

    Could MPL have achieved the same goals as CDDL? Very likely. I think the decision not to use GPL was consicous, as an effort to prevent code sharing by Linux.

    Similarly, Ms-PL *IS* a free software license – largely pointless given it’s almost identical to the more common Apache 2.0 license, but still Free.

    GPL does not “mean” freedom, GPL is a great example of it. Not the same thing. Saying “you may not use that license, because I say so” is, ironically, pretty non-free as a thing to do.

  54. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 7, 2008 at 3:39 pm

    Gravatar

    I’d just like to point out that by Roy’s and Needs Sunlight’s logic, FreeBSD, NetBSD and OpenBSD are not free software (they aren’t GPL and are not maintained by GNU) operating systems and should be avoided.

  55. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 3:45 pm

    Gravatar

    Don’t put false words in my mouth, please.

  56. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 7, 2008 at 4:40 pm

    Gravatar

    Well, you said Solaris should be avoided because it is not GNU. Then Needs Sunlight backed you up and said that the Solaris license (CDDL) is not a Free Software license.

    Did I mis-summarize?

  57. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 4:42 pm

    Gravatar

    Yes, you did.

  58. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 7, 2008 at 5:53 pm

    Gravatar

    How quickly you forget history… Good thing your nonsense is “well documented” here in this thread:

    Here is you saying that Solaris is not GNU (your reasoning for avoiding Solaris, since that’s what AlexH and I were asking):

    http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/06/attack-then-hijack-two-face/#comment-43590

    and after AlexH and I mention that Solaris is under a Free Software license, you reply with a single acronym “CDDL” here:

    http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/06/attack-then-hijack-two-face/#comment-43711

    As far as I can tell, your reason for mentioning CDDL is that you somehow thought that CDDL was not a Free Software license (or at least that’s what it seemed you were trying to say since “CDDL” wouldn’t be a rebuttal to what AlexH and I were saying otherwise).

    That’s when Needs Sunlight followed up and claimed that CDDL is not a Free Software license:

    http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/06/attack-then-hijack-two-face/#comment-44296

    Sure seems like I summarized quite well.

  59. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 6:53 pm

    Gravatar

    The way you put it made it sound like you portrayed me as arguing the CDDL is adverse to the FSD.

  60. Jo Shields said,

    December 7, 2008 at 6:58 pm

    Gravatar

    Not all FS licences are created equal.

  61. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 7, 2008 at 7:03 pm

    Gravatar

    word up.

  62. Jo Shields said,

    December 7, 2008 at 7:51 pm

    Gravatar

    Quite. You know, you could end a lot of this by simply saying, in plain English, whether or not you agree with Needs Sunlight’s assertion that Solaris (and CDDL) is non-Free – or whether you badmouth it simply because it isn’t your favourite, and anything you don’t think is best is automatically worthy of attacks and derision (as seems to be implied by http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/06/attack-then-hijack-two-face/#comment-43716)

  63. AlexH said,

    December 8, 2008 at 3:53 am

    Gravatar

    @Jo: yeah, good luck with that ;)

    Getting clear answers to simple questions is usually impossible at this point.

  64. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 8, 2008 at 8:44 am

    Gravatar

    Yesterday:

    http://systembash.com/content/howto-installing-zfs-and-setting-up-a-raid-z-array-on-ubuntu/

    ZFS is a relatively new filesystem created by Sun. It is released under the CDDL License which is incompatible with Linux’s GPL License, meaning that it can not be installed natively in the kernel.

    People are aware of these issues.

  65. AlexH said,

    December 8, 2008 at 8:53 am

    Gravatar

    @Roy: being incompatible with the Linux kernel isn’t “bad”. If it was, the GPLv3 would be “bad”.

    People are aware of the issues, yes, but it doesn’t make something “non-free” or somehow suspect.

  66. Bob said,

    December 8, 2008 at 5:40 pm

    Gravatar

    “ZFS is a relatively new filesystem created by Sun. It is released under the CDDL License which is incompatible with Linux’s GPL License, meaning that it can not be installed natively in the kernel.”

    I’ll give you a little hint here: ZFS is free software licensed under the CDDL which means that redistributors are not allowed to distribute it together with the GPL’d Linux. That doesn’t matter too much, the most important thing is that ZFS is free software. What people can do is practise their right to freedom 1 and study the code to ZFS to make a ZFS clone.

  67. RyanT said,

    December 8, 2008 at 6:01 pm

    Gravatar

    “It has a copyleft with a scope that’s similar to the one in the Mozilla Public License, which makes it incompatible with the GNU GPL. This means a module covered by the GPL and a module covered by the CDDL cannot legally be linked together. We urge you not to use the CDDL for this reason.

    Also unfortunate in the CDDL is its use of the term “intellectual property”.”

  68. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 8, 2008 at 6:05 pm

    Gravatar

    That’s one of the things that make Linux hackers shudder. They spoke about it.

  69. jo Shields said,

    December 8, 2008 at 9:01 pm

    Gravatar

    If you want to play that game, though, what about the poor BSD developers? They’re unable to gain access to the neat features of Linux due to the nasty restrictive GPL

  70. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 8, 2008 at 9:16 pm

    Gravatar

    I have nothing against BSD. They choose not to sustain the freedom of their software.

  71. Bob said,

    December 9, 2008 at 8:20 am

    Gravatar

    If you want to play that game, though, what about the poor BSD developers? They’re unable to gain access to the neat features of Linux due to the nasty restrictive GPL

    I’ll give you a little hint here: software licensed under the GNU GPL free software. The BSD developers reject GPL software because they don’t wish to incur the requirements of the GPL. That doesn’t matter too much as the most important thing is that GPL software is free software. What people can do is practise their right to freedom 1 and study the code to the GPL program to make a functional clone to license as they wish.

    PS, I’m not addressing you, Jo Shields, but the argument that BSD developers cannot access free software licensed under the GPL because of ideological reasons.

  72. Jo Shields said,

    December 9, 2008 at 8:45 am

    Gravatar

    But how is that different from Roy’s accusations towards OpenSolaris’s Free Software CDDL?

What Else is New


  1. Microsoft is Attacking Android Like Never Before, Qisda the Latest to Sign Patent Extortion Deal

    More blackmail and propaganda against Android, courtesy of the gentler, kinder, 'new' Microsoft



  2. Caution Needed When Microsoft Copywriters Flood the Media With Microsoft Propaganda

    Media actively subverted by Microsoft-sponsored agents of deception, whose goal is to change what people think of Microsoft and its software, even if by lying (they call it 'marketing')



  3. Gartner Staff That Worked for Microsoft and the Latest Nonsense from Gartner or 'Former' Staff

    Gartner waited until 2015 to declare FOSS fit for databases; another example spotted where Gartner staff comes from Microsoft or vice versa



  4. Links 27/4/2015: Debian 9 Named, Linux 4.1 Reaches RC

    Links for the day



  5. Microsoft is Interjecting Itself Into GNU/Linux and Free Software News, Even Events and Foundations

    Microsoft's entryism strategy is proving effective as Microsoft successfully embeds itself inside the idealogical competition, subverting the competition's overall message and diluting the competition's focus on Free software



  6. The Unethical Business of Selling Fear of Free/Libre Software Bugs (Black Duck, Sonatype, and Symantec)

    The spreading of fear of Free/Open Source software (FOSS) is now a growth industry, so proprietary opportunists are eager to capitalise on it, even if by distorting the truth



  7. Patients' Data at Risk as NHS Reinforces Its Microsoft/Accenture Stockholm Syndrome

    The worst privacy violator in the world and the firm behind LSE failures are pocketing as much as £0.35 billion of British taxpayers' money to acquire access to very sensitive data of British people



  8. Links 26/4/2015: Debian 8, OpenMandriva Lx 3 Alpha, Mageia 5 RC

    Links for the day



  9. Links 25/4/2015: Debian LTS Plans, Turing Phone Runs Linux

    Links for the day



  10. Who Kills Yahoo? It's Microsoft, Not Yahoo!

    The media should blame Microsoft, not Marissa Mayer, for what's going on (and has been going on for 7 years) at Yahoo!



  11. EPO Management is Trying Hard to Appease Its Critics While Pushing Forth Unitary Patent Agenda

    The European Patent Office and European Commission promote the agenda of large multinational corporations (at the expense or European citizens) and critics are being kept at bay



  12. Real Patent Reform Will Not Come From Biggest Backers of GNU/Linux, Not Even Google

    A look at the 'new' Google, the company which is hoarding patents (2,566 last year alone) instead of fighting for reform



  13. Microsoft's Troll Intellectual Ventures Loses Software Patents

    Intellectual Ventures is bluffing with software patents, but this time around it doesn't get its way



  14. Links 24/4/2015: Ubuntu and Variants in the News, Red Hat Developer Toolset 3.1

    Links for the day



  15. Links 23/4/2015: Ubuntu 15.04 is Out, Debian 8.0 Out Very Soon

    Links for the day



  16. Links 22/4/2015: Fedora 22 Beta, Atlassian Acquires BlueJimp

    Links for the day



  17. The Dying Debate Over Patent Scope (Including Software Patents) Replaced by 'Trolls' (But Not the Biggest Ones)

    The corporate media and Web sites or people who are funded by large corporations have essentially suppressed any debate about issues in the patent granting process, thereby guarding software patents and preventing criticism of large corporations' power grab



  18. The Patents Gold Rush Continues

    The morbid obsession with monopolising mere ideas still dominates the media, even increasingly in China



  19. 9 Millionth US Patent Tells a Story of Failure and USPTO Misconduct

    The USPTO, much like FISA (notorious court for surveillance/espionage authorisation), has become a rubber-stamping operation rather than a patents examination centre, as new evidence and old evidence serve to show



  20. HBO Helps Shift Debate Over Patents to 'Trolls' (Scale), Not Scope

    More of that awkward shifting of the patent debate towards small actors who are misusing patents, not large conglomerates like Apple and Microsoft which use patents to destroy competitors, crush startups, drive up prices, and so on



  21. Software Patents Are Still Menacing to Free Software: OIN Expands Scope, HEVC Adds to MPEG-LA Burden/Tax, Google and Facebook Give in on Patents

    A look at recent news about software patents and especially Free/libre software, which is inherently incompatible with them



  22. The Latest Developments Around Microsoft's Clever Attack on Android/Linux

    Microsoft's campaign of destruction, extortion, etc. against the most widely used Linux-powered operating system is revisited in light of new reports



  23. The Microsoft 'Community' is Maligning the Free Software Community

    Dishonest generalisations and baseless deductions portray the Free/Open Source software communities as a nasty place that leads to poverty and despair



  24. Googlebombing 'Microsoft Open Source' Even When Microsoft Shuts Down Its 'Open Source' Proxy

    A massive failure by the press to cover the most basic news, which is Microsoft putting an end to a supposedly 'Open Source' effort



  25. Links 22/4/2015: Calculate Linux 14.16, SparkyLinux 4.0 RC KDE

    Links for the day



  26. Links 21/4/2015: Project Photon, Ubuntu Touch Buzz

    Links for the day



  27. Embrace, Extend, Extinguish: How Microsoft Plans to Get Rid of Linux/Android

    Microsoft's sheer abuse against Android is laying bare for everyone to see now that Microsoft has paralysed Google's legal department with potential antitrust action in Europe



  28. Yahoo's Current CEO (Mayer, Formerly of Google) is Trying to End Yahoo! Status as Microsoft Proxy

    There are signs of relinquishing Microsoft's control over Yahoo! after Marissa Mayer worked to end the company's suicidal/abusive relationship with Steve Ballmer's Microsoft



  29. Repeating Microsoft's Lies Without Any Journalistic Assessment

    Poor fact-checking by relatively large media/news sites results in Microsoft's patently false claims being repeated uncritically



  30. Links 19/4/2015: New KaOS (2015.04), Manjaro Linux 0.8.13 Pre1

    Links for the day


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts