EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

12.16.08

‘Microsoft’ University: Open Source Too Expensive

Posted in Free/Libre Software, Microsoft at 9:22 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

For a little bit of background, see our previous posts about this ongoing mess at the ‘Open’ University (OU) [1, 2]. It was, on the face of it, sort of infiltrated by Microsoft. Here is the latest development, courtesy of Mark Ballard:

But the OU has refused to precipitate the wholesale switch of students from bought Microsoft software to (where appropriate) free open source alternatives because it would require too much effort and the costs would be too high at a time when the governments is squeezing student funding.

How does it cost more to move to Free software? The lamest excuse is to say, “let’s save money by staying with Microsoft and refusing to change.” Is denying Free software now an issue of cost, as opposed to those legends of “readiness”, “reliability”, and “dependability”? Since the OU is located in the UK, someone ought to urge them to ask London hospitals about the cost of viruses (cost of lives too). What about the LSE, which was suspended at a critical time due to a major .NET crash?

Abacus
Look — but dare not touch — the abacus

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

11 Comments

  1. AlexH said,

    December 16, 2008 at 9:26 pm

    Gravatar

    It costs money because they have to provide support, and in general their students have the software already.

    They distribute copies of StarOffice/OpenOffice.org and invest millions in free software. “Microsoft University” is pretty far from the truth.

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 16, 2008 at 9:29 pm

    Gravatar

    That’s why it has scare quotes.

    Regarding cost, not only short-term considerations need to be seen.

  3. AlexH said,

    December 16, 2008 at 10:13 pm

    Gravatar

    Given they’re willing to invest millions in developing a free software portfolio, I don’t think their outlook on costs is particularly short term.

  4. Needs Sunlight said,

    December 17, 2008 at 1:45 am

    Gravatar

    It would not be the first time an insider, operating on MS grant money, torpedoed an upgrade or discussion of open source. That includes even discussing open standards:
    http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/09/01/commission

    The cost argument is bullshit. Few if any users need more than a bit of moral support when upgrading from MS to better systems.

    The disruption is generally in the support staff, which have to be fired and replaced. If they let the MS problem get out of hand, then they won’t be able to retool and usually don’t know enough about IT to become useful in a working environment. However, a second way there might be migration costs is that whenever the MS onsite sales team (aka support department) gets even a whiff of an upgrade, they work feverously to rip out any non-MS infrastructure, especially mail and networking protocols. The web servers and intranets also get nailed hard and heavy with VBA and other insecure, unstable lock-in.

  5. Jim said,

    December 18, 2008 at 6:37 am

    Gravatar

    no suprise then that the new Vice-Chancellor is to be Martin Bean who is a microsoft employee

    http://www.open.ac.uk/platform/news/ou-news/new-vice-chancellor-announced?ONEML=pf001&MEDIA=pf001os_07

  6. Dante said,

    December 18, 2008 at 8:08 am

    Gravatar

    I can see the problem; as an OU student, I will run on Linux. For the OU itself, they’d need to train their tutors and ask that most of their students switch from one almost globally known interface to one that is, lets face it, different from Microsoft’s desktop.

    Note I am not saying bad, or good, but different.

    The obsucre naming conventions for Linux software, for instance, are part of the learning curve. (IE, instead of something with a catchy name, like Azure, or some rubbish like that, it’s given the name of 3543lb.3.0) The fact that there is no one clear guide for installing software in Linux aimed at a M$ customer is a big problem.

    I

  7. Jim said,

    December 18, 2008 at 8:26 am

    Gravatar

    well I am an OU student as well.
    cant say I see much difference in the interface between MS office and open office or star office which the OU supply.
    Better to teach word processing rather than a word processor.

  8. Charles Oliver said,

    December 18, 2008 at 1:09 pm

    Gravatar

    I have to agree with the majority of comments disagreeing with the tack of this article.

    As mentioned the OU distribute StarOffice to students. They also use FirstClass which has a Linux client (not open source) and a web interface.

    Though they aim their requirements Windows, they at least mention Macs on their student pages and it’s quite possible to access all that is required using Linux.

    That’s not a brilliant situation but it’s better than some other UK universities. I have recently been using the facilities at another UK university and the only way I can access parts of their system is via XP in Virtualbox.

    Though the tide is moving against the Microsoft monopoly it’s not gone yet and I guess the OU have to support what people have on their home systems.

  9. Bob Mottram said,

    December 18, 2008 at 3:51 pm

    Gravatar

    Traditionally higher education in the UK was the preserve of a wealthy upper middle class elite, and the Open University’s remit was to open up the possibility of higher education to everyone, by providing it at minimal cost and at the student’s convenience. Given the OU’s goals it absolutely seems like a no-brainer that if they’re requiring students to use computers that the software should be primarily FOSS based – both for reasons of cost and for reasons of facilitating study in computer science and related courses (you cannot genuinely study a Microsoft Windows OS, since the code is a secret).

  10. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 18, 2008 at 3:55 pm

    Gravatar

    Here is an explanation of why Free software is required in education.

  11. Jo Shields said,

    December 18, 2008 at 4:42 pm

    Gravatar

    Here is an explanation of why Free software is required in education

    It’s a reasonable argument – I especially liked the OLPC approach of allowing 1-click access to the source of any app on the system

What Else is New


  1. Freedom is Not a Business and Those Who Make 'Business' by Giving it Away Deserve Naming

    Free software is being parceled and sold to private monopolisers; those who facilitate the process enrich themselves and pose a growing threat to freedom in general — a subject we intend to tackle in the near future



  2. Concluding the Linux Foundation (LF) “Putting the CON in Conference!” (Part 3)

    Conferences constructed or put together based on payments rather than merit pose a risk to the freedom of free software; we conclude our series about events set up by the largest of culprits, which profits from this erosion of freedom



  3. “Mention the War” (of Microsoft Against GNU/Linux)

    The GNU/Linux desktop (or laptops) seems to be languishing or deteriorating, making way for proprietary takeover in the form of Vista 10 and Chrome OS and “web apps” (surveillance); nobody seems too bothered — certainly not the Linux Foundation — by the fact that GNU/Linux itself is being relegated or demoted to a mere “app” on these surveillance platforms (WSL, Croûton and so on)



  4. The European Patent Office Does Not Care About the Law, Today's Management Constantly Attempts to Bypass the Law

    Many EPs (European Patents) are actually "IPs" (invalid patents); the EPO doesn't seem to care and it is again paying for corrupt scholars to toe the party line



  5. The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) Once Again Pours Cold Water on Patent Maximalists

    Any hopes of a rebound or turnaround have just been shattered because a bizarre attack on the appeal process (misusing tribal immunity) fell on deaf ears and software patents definitely don't interest the highest court, which already deemed them invalid half a decade ago



  6. Links 17/4/2019: Qt 5.12.3 Released, Ola Bini Arrested (Political Stunts)

    Links for the day



  7. Links 16/4/2019: CentOS Turns 15, Qt Creator 4.9.0 Released

    Links for the day



  8. GNU/Linux is Being Eaten Alive by Large Corporations With Their Agenda

    A sort of corporate takeover, or moneyed interests at the expense of our freedom, can be seen as a 'soft coup' whose eventual outcome would involve all or most servers in 'the cloud' (surveillance with patent tax as part of the rental fees) and almost no laptops/desktops which aren't remotely controlled (and limit what's run on them, using something like UEFI 'secure boot')



  9. Reader's Claim That Rules Similar to the Code of Conduct (CoC) Were 'Imposed' on LibrePlanet and the FSF

    Restrictions on speech are said to have been spread and reached some of the most liberal circles, according to a credible veteran who opposes illiberal censorship



  10. Corporate Media Will Never Cover the EPO's Violations of the Law With Respect to Patent Scope

    The greed-driven gold rush for patents has resulted in a large pool of European Patents that have no legitimacy and are nowadays associated with low legal certainty; the media isn't interested in covering such a monumental disaster that poses a threat to the whole of Europe



  11. A Linux Foundation Run by People Who Reject Linux is Like a Children's Charity Whose Management Dislikes Children

    We remain concerned about the lack of commitment that the Linux Foundation has for Linux; much of the Linux Foundation's Board, for example, comes from hostile companies



  12. Links 15/4/2019: Linux 5.1 RC5 and SolydXK Reviewed

    Links for the day



  13. Links 14/4/2019: Blender 2.80 Release Plan and Ducktype 1.0

    Links for the day



  14. 'Poor' (Multi-Millionaire) Novell CEO, Who Colluded With Steve Ballmer Against GNU/Linux, is Trying to Censor Techrights

    Novell’s last CEO, a former IBMer who just like IBM decided to leverage software patents against the competition (threatening loads of companies using "platoons of patent lawyers"), has decided that siccing lawyers at us would be a good idea



  15. Guest Post: The Linux Foundation (LF) is “Putting the CON in Conference!” (Part 2)

    Calls for papers (CfP) and who gets to assess what's presented or what's not presented is a lesser-explored aspect, especially in this age when large corporate sponsors get to indirectly run entire 'community' events



  16. Patent Maximalists Are Enabling Injustices and Frauds

    It's time to come to grips with the simple fact that extreme patent lenience causes society to suffer and is mostly beneficial to bad actors; for the patent profession to maintain a level of credibility and legitimacy it must reject the deplorable, condemnable zealots



  17. Further Decreasing Focus on Software Patents in the United States as They Barely Exist in Valid Form Anymore

    No headway made after almost 4 months of Iancu-led stunts; software patents remain largely dead and buried, so we’re moving on to other topics



  18. Links 13/4/2019: Wine 4.6 and Emacs 26.2 Released

    Links for the day



  19. Links 12/4/2019: Mesa 19.0.2, Rust 1.34.0 and Flatpak 1.3.2 Released

    Links for the day



  20. Caricature: EPO Standing Tall

    A reader's response to the EPO's tall claims and fluff from yesterday



  21. The EPO is Slipping Out of Control Again and It's Another Battistelli-Like Mess With Disregard for the Rule of Law and Patent Scope

    The banker in chief is just 'printing' or 'minting' lots and lots of patents, even clearly bogus ones that lack substance to back their perceived value



  22. Global Finance Magazine Spreads Lies About the Unitary Patent and German Constitutional Court

    Alluding to the concept of a "unified European patent," some site connected to Class Editori S.p.A. and based in Manhattan/New York City tells obvious lies about the Unified Patent Court (UPC), possibly in an effort to sway outcomes and twist people's expectations



  23. New Building as Perfect Metaphor for the EPO Under the Frenchmen Battistelli and Campinos

    The EPO is in "propaganda mode" only 9 months after the latest French President took Office; the Office is seen as dishonest, even under the new leadership, which routinely lies to the public and to its own staff



  24. Links 11/4/2019: Twisted 19.2.0 Released, Assange Arrested

    Links for the day



  25. EPO Still Wasting Budget, Paying Media and Academics for Spin

    EPO money continues to flow like water into hands that are complicit in legitimising the EPO's management and policies; this highlights the grave dangers of lack of oversight at the EPO, not to mention lawlessness or lack of enforcement



  26. Links 10/4/2019: Microsoft's GDPR Trouble, New Fedora 29 Images

    Links for the day



  27. Linux Magazine is Run by Advertisers, Not GNU/Linux (and It's Hardly the Exception)

    Advertising is big money — so big in fact that publications no longer care what’s true but instead focus on what text brings them more income (from advertisers, of course)



  28. Guest Post: The Linux Foundation (LF) is “Putting the CON in Conference!” (Part 1)

    Proprietary software giants with their sponsorships and gifts are more like Trojan horses or parasites striving to infect the host; how can the LF be protected from them?



  29. EPO Benefits European Patent Trolls With Dodgy European Patents

    The EPO is a stepping stone for parasitic entities looking to leverage patents for exploitative extortion rackets all over Europe; if they get their way, companies that manufacture and sell things will pay a hefty tax to those who create nothing at all and are often not European, either



  30. The Myth of Quality of European Patents

    Mythology associated with superior quality of European Patents is an antiquated notion (it used to be true a long time ago) and this, along with other factors (such as disrespect for judges), is why the Unified Patent Court (UPC) is almost certainly doomed for good


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts