EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

03.05.09

Final Analysis of Novell’s Q1 Results and Consequences

Posted in Finance, GNU/Linux, Microsoft, Novell, Ron Hovsepian at 7:42 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Novell cafe

Summary: More evidence that Novell suffers from the Microsoft deal, but the company’s CEO takes bonuses

ACCORDING TO “The Var Guy”, who has been in good touch with Novell for over a year, Novell is heading down.

Check out the one-year stock charts for Novell (NOVL) and Red Hat (RHT). Neither chart is particularly impressive, but the trends are unmistakable. As the economy went from bad to worse in calendar year 2008, Wall Street lost more and more faith in Novell. In stark contrast, sometime in late November 2008 — amid heightened credit crunch concerns — financial pundits started betting heavier and heavier on Red Hat shares.

The comments in Linux Today show that many GNU/Linux users are actually encouraged by Novell’s demise. Here is one response to Novell’s excuses:

Maybe the business world really does not want to do business with Novell. Maybe business customers really do think about the implications of Novell’s deal with Microsoft.

In addition to what we’ve already referenced, here are some more financial analyses:

One issue that we have looked at before is the excessive bonuses that Ron Hovsepian is receiving [1, 2, 3]. The following essay is dedicated to this problem.

What Novell Could Learn From HP About How to Treat Employees

[...]

[C]ontrast this with the recent announcements of layoffs at Massachusetts-based software vendor Novell. Earlier this month, they laid off approximately 100 employees due to a “global economic downturn.” I have to wonder how many of those jobs could have been saved if Novell CEO Ron Hovsepian had declined to accept the sum total of his $6.9 million compensation package last year.

I mean, it’s not as if he didn’t see the potential for layoffs coming. In a December 4, 2008, conference call with analysts he is quoted as saying, “I think we are just evaluating at this point any additional restructures or activities that may take place in 2009, and those would be largely dependent on the overall economic condition and its impact to our revenues, if any.”

In other words, the writing was on the wall late last year but he still grabbed his share of the pie.

Ron Hovsepian will find it hard to dodge criticism, which now comes from IDG as well. Financial News USA covered it also.

Ronald Hovsepian, the president and chief executive of networking software maker Novell Inc., received a compensation package valued at nearly $6.9 million, according to a proxy statement filed Wednesday.
The total was down more than 5 percent from Hovsepian’s 2007 compensation of nearly $7.3 million.Hovsepian, who has served as CEO of Waltham, Mass.-based Novell since 2006, received a base salary of $912,214 and $2 million in cash incentive plan compensation, according to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.His perquisites totaled $137,014 and included $9,200 in 401(k) contributions from the company, $112,244 in deferred compensation matching contributions and $6,263 for financial planning.

What is he being rewarded for?

In other financial news, Novell’s CFO will present at Morgan Stanley’s 2009 Technology Conference.

Novell, Inc. (NASDAQ: NOVL) today announced that Dana Russell, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Novell, will present at the Morgan Stanley 2009 Technology Conference, March 2-4, 2009 at the Palace Hotel in San Francisco. Russell’s presentation will begin at 2:20pm PST on Tuesday, March 3.

There was also a delay.

Company representatives of Novell Inc will be presenting at the 2009 Morgan Stanley Technology Conference today. The Company’s presentation is scheduled to begin at 17:20 ET.

Novell was also mentioned very briefly in the financial press under:

In its conversations last week, Novell confirmed that layoffs are coming, but it used cryptic terminology to ‘dress up’ the statement. Novell cannot operate at a loss forever. It can only delay the inevitable.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

11 Comments

  1. JohnD said,

    March 5, 2009 at 9:08 am

    Gravatar

    Well any decent analyst will try to gauge public opinion of a company in addition to it financial results. So every BN support can give themselves a good pat on the back – it looks like your message is getting out to the media at least.
    But I hate to burst the bubble, the average user doesn’t care about FOSS ideology anymore then they care about MS dirty tactics. You can show the average person a preconfigured Linux machine that does everything their Windows machine can do and they’d probably buy it. Give them one with a default install and start talking about kernel version, package dependency, repositories, compiling source tar balls – their eyes will glaze over and they’ll ask for Windows.
    I’m not sure where the posters are getting their info when they say Novell is operating at a loss – the balance sheet says net income. Operating margin has doubled, liabilities decreased, equity increased. Overall number are down from the previous year, but the have net income for the first quarter as opposed to a loss in the 3rd quarter.
    Their numbers aren’t stellar, but the company is in a better position then GM. Given their cash on hand over 600mil – they could operate for at least 6 months with no income at all – I wish my company was in such a “bad” position.

  2. JohnD said,

    March 5, 2009 at 9:17 am

    Gravatar

    I’d also like to point out that CEO’s taking big bonus’ at the expense of the little guy is a world wide issue, not just a Novell issue. Look at the news and Morgan Stanley who took bailout money and made several hundred millionaires before they were bought by Citi. Refer to the bonehead who dropped 86 grand on a stinking rug. This is not to say that I agree with the bonus RH got, I think it was too high given current circumstances. That being said – a CEO who doubles a company’s operating margin should be entitled to some compensation. My personal opinion is that his compensation should be tied more closely with quarterly and yearly results.
    I think CEO bonus issues should be handled by Boycott Big Business.com.

  3. JohnD said,

    March 5, 2009 at 9:21 am

    Gravatar

    Wasn’t there a post about on here about Novell trying to inflate their stock price by repurchasing shares? My take was that it was just another “trick” by big bad Novell – well here’s a tid bit from a RedHat financial statement:
    Total cash,
    cash equivalents and investments as of November 30, 2008 were $1.1 billion
    after retiring $285 million of convertible debentures and repurchasing 2
    million shares of common stock.
    Hmm looks like Novell isn’t the only company trying to reduce it’s debt and increase share value.
    When a company increases share value does it help the little guy/gal on the street or the company execs?

  4. JohnD said,

    March 5, 2009 at 9:31 am

    Gravatar

    Wait here’s some tid bits from the Var Guy quoted in the post. This is what he had to say in Nov 08
    “Frankly, The VAR Guy doesn’t have the answers to those questions. He does know that Novell has been growing faster than the overall Linux market. And Lenovo recently introduced servers with Novell SUSE Linux rather than Red Hat Enterprise Linux.”
    and
    “Still, Novell’s close alignment with Microsoft — initially criticized by The VAR Guy — seems to be paying dividends as Novell finds itself in more and more corporate data centers. Now, Microsoft solutions providers could give Novell another boost in the IT channel.”
    http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/11/11/novell-attacks-red-hat-with-linux-migration-offer/
    And some tidbits from the post linked above:
    SUSE Linux sales continue to climb. And acquisitions like PlateSpin provide promising revenue opportunities for Novell.
    Oh, and Red Hat did land at the top of The Open Source 50, which tracks the most promising open source partner programs. (Although Novell landed in the No. 3 spot…)
    So we’re looking at the number 1 and 3 seeds in the Open Source 50 – paints a different picture now doesn’t it?

  5. aeshna23 said,

    March 5, 2009 at 1:43 pm

    Gravatar

    “When a company increases share value does it help the little guy/gal on the street or the company execs?”

    All owners of the stock–whether a company exec or the owner of a single share–experience the same percentage increase in value of their stock. Stock repurchases are often the best way a company can help its shareholders, since capital gains are treated favourably compared to dividends (in the United States).

  6. JohnD said,

    March 5, 2009 at 2:11 pm

    Gravatar

    Thanks aeshna23, but my question was a rhetorical one (I’m married to a CPA).
    I was trying to point out that the teflon boys at RedHat boosted their share price using stock buyback just like Novell. Yet Novell was panned for doing it whereas for RedHat is was seen as a positive.

  7. Dan O'Brian said,

    March 5, 2009 at 7:18 pm

    Gravatar

    JohnD: as you’ve already discovered, these BN guys have double standards.

    If Red Hat kills babies, Roy will find a way to spin it as Good For Linux. But if Novell tries to save babies, whether they succeed or not, Roy will spin it as an attempt to destroy FLOSS.

  8. Jose_X said,

    March 6, 2009 at 12:42 am

    Gravatar

    The financial pictures are always a little muddy. There tends to be overshoot and lag/lead as people fight for the best deals on stock. Also, we would be assuming accuracy of public information.

    JohnD covered a lot of points, but from what I have read indirectly (I haven’t looked at NOVL SEC reports), it seems Novell’s Linux growth depends a lot on Microsoft, and that after an initial boost, Microsoft is not coming through (at least not recently). This might be a negotiating tactic on Microsoft’s part or might be indicative of a larger rejection of Novell and/or of Microsoft’s coupon selling.

    [Dan O'Brian] >> as you’ve already discovered, these BN guys have double standards.

    There is some bias and mistakes are made. I see the same from those that defend Microsoft and/or Novell. [I'm speaking generally, of course.]

    Boycottnovell puts out info with reader comments to help all readers make up their own mind on a per topic basis. Some postings are better researched than others.

    [As an aside, Nokia seems to be doing a great job with Qt: http://www.linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2009-03-05-001-35-OS-EM&tbovrmode=1 ]

  9. Jose_X said,

    March 6, 2009 at 12:56 am

    Gravatar

    Qt development has been improving quickly recently. I don’t use it, but some claim QtCreator is very good http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/category/qtcreator/ . You can download it with the Qt libraries and use it for commercial development for no charge. You can get the source code to everything from the git repositories. Nokia also wants to work with Linux distro makers to make sure it’s as easy as pie (press a button) to install this totally free and powerful developer platform on each participating distro.

    Roy, in the future, perhaps any mention of risky and monopolist supporting mono should be followed with a word or ten on (or links to) Qt/QtCreator.

  10. Dan O'Brian said,

    March 6, 2009 at 8:26 am

    Gravatar

    Jose_X: Since you don’t seem to understand the difference, Qt/QtCreator are not alternatives to Mono.

    Qt is a widget toolkit (which is an alternative to Gtk+ or even Windows.Forms, but not an alternative to Mono).

    QtCreator is an alternative to Glade or Microsoft’s widget layout tool (whatever it’s called). Once again, not an alternative to Mono.

    You guys haven’t the foggiest clue what you’re talking about most of the time.

  11. JohnD said,

    March 6, 2009 at 3:23 pm

    Gravatar

    A little more context to the financial side of things:
    “More than 10% of the stocks in the S&P 500 trade for less than $5. And with the market continuing to fall, more big-name firms could hit ‘penny stock’ status.”
    per:
    http://money.cnn.com/2009/03/06/markets/thebuzz/index.htm

What Else is New


  1. Links 19/2/2018: Linux 4.16 RC2, Nintendo Switch Now Full-fledged GNU/Linux

    Links for the day



  2. PTAB Continues to Invalidate a Lot of Software Patents and to Stop Patent Examiners From Issuing Them

    Erasure of software patents by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) carries on unabated in spite of attempts to cause controversy and disdain towards PTAB



  3. The Patent 'Industry' Likes to Mention Berkheimer and Aatrix to Give the Mere Impression of Section 101/Alice Weakness

    Contrary to what patent maximalists keep saying about Berkheimer and Aatrix (two decisions of the Federal Circuit from earlier this month, both dealing with Alice-type challenges), neither actually changed anything in any substantial way



  4. Makan Delrahim is Wrong; Patents Are a Major Antitrust Problem, Sometimes Disguised Using Trolls Somewhere Like the Eastern District of Texas

    Debates and open disagreements over the stance of the lobbyist who is the current United States Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division



  5. Patent Trolls Watch: Microsoft-Connected Intellectual Ventures, Finjan, and Rumour of Technicolor-InterDigital Buyout

    Connections between various patent trolls and some patent troll statistics which have been circulated lately



  6. Software Patents Trickle in After § 101/Alice, But Courts Would Not Honour Them Anyway

    The dawn of § 101/Alice, which in principle eliminates almost every software patent, means that applicants find themselves having to utilise loopholes to fool examiners, but that's unlikely to impress judges (if they ever come to assessing these patents)



  7. In Aatrix v Green Shades the Court is Not Tolerating Software Patents But Merely Inquires/Wonders Whether the Patents at Hand Are Abstract

    Aatrix alleges patent infringement by Green Shades, but whether the patents at hand are abstract or not remains to be seen; this is not what patent maximalists claim it to be ("A Valentine for Software Patent Owners" or "valentine for patentee")



  8. An Indoctrinated Minority is Maintaining the Illusion That Patent Policy is to Blame for All or Most Problems of the United States

    The zealots who want to patent everything under the Sun and sue everyone under the Sun blame nations in the east (where the Sun rises) for all their misfortunes; this has reached somewhat ludicrous levels



  9. Berkheimer Decision is Still Being Spun by the Anti-Section 101/Alice Lobby

    12 days after Berkheimer v HP Inc. the patent maximalists continue to paint this decision as a game changer with regards to patent scope; the reality, however, is that this decision will soon be forgotten about and will have no substantial effect on either PTAB or Alice (because it's about neither of these)



  10. Academic Patent Immunity is Laughable and Academics Are Influenced by Corporate Money (for Steering Patent Agenda)

    Universities appear to have become battlegrounds in the war between practicing entities and a bunch of parasites who make a living out of litigation and patent bubbles



  11. UPC Optimism Languishes Even Among Paid UPC Propagandists Such as IAM

    Even voices which are attempting to give UPC momentum that it clearly lacks admit that things aren't looking well; the UK is not ratifying and Germany make take years to look into constitutional barriers



  12. Bejin Bieneman Props Up the Disgraced Randall Rader for Litigation Agenda

    Randall Rader keeps hanging out with the litigation 'industry' -- the very same 'industry' which he served in a closeted fashion when he was Chief Judge of the Federal Circuit (and vocal proponent of software patents, patent trolls and so on)



  13. With Stambler v Mastercard, Patent Maximalists Are Hoping to Prop Up Software Patents and Damage PTAB

    The patent 'industry' is hoping to persuade the highest US court to weaken the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), for PTAB is making patent lawsuits a lot harder and raises the threshold for patent eligibility



  14. Apple Discovers That Its Patent Disputes Are a Losing Battle Which Only Lawyers Win (Profit From)

    By pouring a lot of money and energy into the 'litigation card' Apple lost focus and it's also losing some key cases, as its patents are simply not strong enough



  15. The Patent Microcosm Takes Berkheimer v HP Out of Context to Pretend PTAB Disregards Fact-Finding Process

    In view or in light of a recent decision (excerpt above), patent maximalists who are afraid of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) try to paint it as inherently unjust and uncaring for facts



  16. Microsoft Has Left RPX, But RPX Now Pays a Microsoft Patent Troll, Intellectual Ventures

    The patent/litigation arms race keeps getting a little more complicated, as the 'arms' are being passed around to new and old entities that do nothing but shake-downs



  17. UPC Has Done Nothing for Europe Except Destruction of the EPO and Imminent Layoffs Due to Lack of Applications and Lowered Value of European Patents

    The Unified Patent Court (UPC) is merely a distant dream or a fantasy for litigators; to everyone else the UPC lobby has done nothing but damage, including potentially irreparable damage to the European Patent Office, which is declining very sharply



  18. Links 17/2/2018: Mesa 17.3.4, Wine 3.2, Go 1.10

    Links for the day



  19. Patent Trolls Are Thwarted by Judges, But Patent Lawyers View Them as a 'Business' Opportunity

    Patent lawyers are salivating over the idea that trolls may be coming to their state/s; owing to courts and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) other trolls' software patents get invalidated



  20. Microsoft's Patent Moves: Dominion Harbor, Intellectual Ventures, Intellectual Discovery, NEC and Uber

    A look at some of the latest moves and twists, as patents change hands and there are still signs of Microsoft's 'hidden hand'



  21. Links 15/2/2018: GNOME 3.28 Beta, Rust 1.24

    Links for the day



  22. Bavarian State Parliament Has Upcoming Debate About Issues Which Can Thwart UPC for Good

    An upcoming debate about Battistelli's attacks on the EPO Boards of Appeal will open an old can of worms, which serves to show why UPC is a non-starter



  23. The EPO is Being Destroyed and There's Nothing Left to Replace It Except National Patent Offices

    It looks like Battistelli is setting up the European Patent Office (EPO) for mass layoffs; in fact, it looks as though he is so certain that the UPC will materialise that he obsesses over "validation" for mass litigation worldwide, departing from a "model office" that used to lead the world in terms of patent quality and workers' welfare/conditions



  24. IBM is Getting Desperate and Now Suing Microsoft Over Lost Staff, Not Just Suing Everyone Using Patents

    IBM's policy when it comes to patents, not to mention its alignment with patent extremists, gives room for thought if not deep concern; the company rapidly becomes more and more like a troll



  25. In Microsoft's Lawsuit Against Corel the Only Winner is the Lawyers

    The outcome of the old Microsoft v Corel lawsuit reaffirms a trend; companies with deep pockets harass their competitors, knowing that the legal bills are more cumbersome to the defendants; there's a similar example today in Cisco v Arista Networks



  26. The Latest Lies About Unitary Patent (UPC) and the EPO

    Lobbying defies facts; we are once again seeing some easily-debunked talking points from those who stand to benefit from the UPC and mass litigation



  27. Speech Deficit and No Freedom of Association at the EPO

    True information cannot be disseminated at the EPO and justice too is beyond elusive; this poses a threat to the EPO's future, not only to its already-damaged reputation



  28. No, Britain is Not Ratifying 'Unitary' Anything, But Team UPC Insinuates It Will (Desperate Effort to Affect Tomorrow's Outcome)

    Contrary to several misleading headlines from Bristows (in its blog and others'), the UPC isn't happening and isn't coming to the UK; it all amounts to lobbying (by setting false expectations)



  29. The EPO's Paid Promotion of Software Patents Gets Patent Maximalists All Excited and Emboldened

    The software patents advocacy from Battistelli (and his cohorts) isn't just a spit in the face of European Parliament but also the EPC; but patent scope seems to no longer exist or matter under his watch, as all he cares about is granting as many patents as possible, irrespective of real quality/legitimacy/merit



  30. Andrei Iancu Begins His USPTO Career While Former USPTO Director (and Now Paid Lobbyist) Keeps Meddling in Office Affairs

    The USPTO, which is supposed to be a government branch (loosely speaking) is being lobbied by former officials, who are now being paid by private corporations to help influence and shape policies; this damages the image of the Office and harms its independence from corporate influence


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts