EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

03.05.09

Final Analysis of Novell’s Q1 Results and Consequences

Posted in Finance, GNU/Linux, Microsoft, Novell, Ron Hovsepian at 7:42 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Novell cafe

Summary: More evidence that Novell suffers from the Microsoft deal, but the company’s CEO takes bonuses

ACCORDING TO “The Var Guy”, who has been in good touch with Novell for over a year, Novell is heading down.

Check out the one-year stock charts for Novell (NOVL) and Red Hat (RHT). Neither chart is particularly impressive, but the trends are unmistakable. As the economy went from bad to worse in calendar year 2008, Wall Street lost more and more faith in Novell. In stark contrast, sometime in late November 2008 — amid heightened credit crunch concerns — financial pundits started betting heavier and heavier on Red Hat shares.

The comments in Linux Today show that many GNU/Linux users are actually encouraged by Novell’s demise. Here is one response to Novell’s excuses:

Maybe the business world really does not want to do business with Novell. Maybe business customers really do think about the implications of Novell’s deal with Microsoft.

In addition to what we’ve already referenced, here are some more financial analyses:

One issue that we have looked at before is the excessive bonuses that Ron Hovsepian is receiving [1, 2, 3]. The following essay is dedicated to this problem.

What Novell Could Learn From HP About How to Treat Employees

[...]

[C]ontrast this with the recent announcements of layoffs at Massachusetts-based software vendor Novell. Earlier this month, they laid off approximately 100 employees due to a “global economic downturn.” I have to wonder how many of those jobs could have been saved if Novell CEO Ron Hovsepian had declined to accept the sum total of his $6.9 million compensation package last year.

I mean, it’s not as if he didn’t see the potential for layoffs coming. In a December 4, 2008, conference call with analysts he is quoted as saying, “I think we are just evaluating at this point any additional restructures or activities that may take place in 2009, and those would be largely dependent on the overall economic condition and its impact to our revenues, if any.”

In other words, the writing was on the wall late last year but he still grabbed his share of the pie.

Ron Hovsepian will find it hard to dodge criticism, which now comes from IDG as well. Financial News USA covered it also.

Ronald Hovsepian, the president and chief executive of networking software maker Novell Inc., received a compensation package valued at nearly $6.9 million, according to a proxy statement filed Wednesday.
The total was down more than 5 percent from Hovsepian’s 2007 compensation of nearly $7.3 million.Hovsepian, who has served as CEO of Waltham, Mass.-based Novell since 2006, received a base salary of $912,214 and $2 million in cash incentive plan compensation, according to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.His perquisites totaled $137,014 and included $9,200 in 401(k) contributions from the company, $112,244 in deferred compensation matching contributions and $6,263 for financial planning.

What is he being rewarded for?

In other financial news, Novell’s CFO will present at Morgan Stanley’s 2009 Technology Conference.

Novell, Inc. (NASDAQ: NOVL) today announced that Dana Russell, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Novell, will present at the Morgan Stanley 2009 Technology Conference, March 2-4, 2009 at the Palace Hotel in San Francisco. Russell’s presentation will begin at 2:20pm PST on Tuesday, March 3.

There was also a delay.

Company representatives of Novell Inc will be presenting at the 2009 Morgan Stanley Technology Conference today. The Company’s presentation is scheduled to begin at 17:20 ET.

Novell was also mentioned very briefly in the financial press under:

In its conversations last week, Novell confirmed that layoffs are coming, but it used cryptic terminology to ‘dress up’ the statement. Novell cannot operate at a loss forever. It can only delay the inevitable.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

11 Comments

  1. JohnD said,

    March 5, 2009 at 9:08 am

    Gravatar

    Well any decent analyst will try to gauge public opinion of a company in addition to it financial results. So every BN support can give themselves a good pat on the back – it looks like your message is getting out to the media at least.
    But I hate to burst the bubble, the average user doesn’t care about FOSS ideology anymore then they care about MS dirty tactics. You can show the average person a preconfigured Linux machine that does everything their Windows machine can do and they’d probably buy it. Give them one with a default install and start talking about kernel version, package dependency, repositories, compiling source tar balls – their eyes will glaze over and they’ll ask for Windows.
    I’m not sure where the posters are getting their info when they say Novell is operating at a loss – the balance sheet says net income. Operating margin has doubled, liabilities decreased, equity increased. Overall number are down from the previous year, but the have net income for the first quarter as opposed to a loss in the 3rd quarter.
    Their numbers aren’t stellar, but the company is in a better position then GM. Given their cash on hand over 600mil – they could operate for at least 6 months with no income at all – I wish my company was in such a “bad” position.

  2. JohnD said,

    March 5, 2009 at 9:17 am

    Gravatar

    I’d also like to point out that CEO’s taking big bonus’ at the expense of the little guy is a world wide issue, not just a Novell issue. Look at the news and Morgan Stanley who took bailout money and made several hundred millionaires before they were bought by Citi. Refer to the bonehead who dropped 86 grand on a stinking rug. This is not to say that I agree with the bonus RH got, I think it was too high given current circumstances. That being said – a CEO who doubles a company’s operating margin should be entitled to some compensation. My personal opinion is that his compensation should be tied more closely with quarterly and yearly results.
    I think CEO bonus issues should be handled by Boycott Big Business.com.

  3. JohnD said,

    March 5, 2009 at 9:21 am

    Gravatar

    Wasn’t there a post about on here about Novell trying to inflate their stock price by repurchasing shares? My take was that it was just another “trick” by big bad Novell – well here’s a tid bit from a RedHat financial statement:
    Total cash,
    cash equivalents and investments as of November 30, 2008 were $1.1 billion
    after retiring $285 million of convertible debentures and repurchasing 2
    million shares of common stock.
    Hmm looks like Novell isn’t the only company trying to reduce it’s debt and increase share value.
    When a company increases share value does it help the little guy/gal on the street or the company execs?

  4. JohnD said,

    March 5, 2009 at 9:31 am

    Gravatar

    Wait here’s some tid bits from the Var Guy quoted in the post. This is what he had to say in Nov 08
    “Frankly, The VAR Guy doesn’t have the answers to those questions. He does know that Novell has been growing faster than the overall Linux market. And Lenovo recently introduced servers with Novell SUSE Linux rather than Red Hat Enterprise Linux.”
    and
    “Still, Novell’s close alignment with Microsoft — initially criticized by The VAR Guy — seems to be paying dividends as Novell finds itself in more and more corporate data centers. Now, Microsoft solutions providers could give Novell another boost in the IT channel.”
    http://www.thevarguy.com/2008/11/11/novell-attacks-red-hat-with-linux-migration-offer/
    And some tidbits from the post linked above:
    SUSE Linux sales continue to climb. And acquisitions like PlateSpin provide promising revenue opportunities for Novell.
    Oh, and Red Hat did land at the top of The Open Source 50, which tracks the most promising open source partner programs. (Although Novell landed in the No. 3 spot…)
    So we’re looking at the number 1 and 3 seeds in the Open Source 50 – paints a different picture now doesn’t it?

  5. aeshna23 said,

    March 5, 2009 at 1:43 pm

    Gravatar

    “When a company increases share value does it help the little guy/gal on the street or the company execs?”

    All owners of the stock–whether a company exec or the owner of a single share–experience the same percentage increase in value of their stock. Stock repurchases are often the best way a company can help its shareholders, since capital gains are treated favourably compared to dividends (in the United States).

  6. JohnD said,

    March 5, 2009 at 2:11 pm

    Gravatar

    Thanks aeshna23, but my question was a rhetorical one (I’m married to a CPA).
    I was trying to point out that the teflon boys at RedHat boosted their share price using stock buyback just like Novell. Yet Novell was panned for doing it whereas for RedHat is was seen as a positive.

  7. Dan O'Brian said,

    March 5, 2009 at 7:18 pm

    Gravatar

    JohnD: as you’ve already discovered, these BN guys have double standards.

    If Red Hat kills babies, Roy will find a way to spin it as Good For Linux. But if Novell tries to save babies, whether they succeed or not, Roy will spin it as an attempt to destroy FLOSS.

  8. Jose_X said,

    March 6, 2009 at 12:42 am

    Gravatar

    The financial pictures are always a little muddy. There tends to be overshoot and lag/lead as people fight for the best deals on stock. Also, we would be assuming accuracy of public information.

    JohnD covered a lot of points, but from what I have read indirectly (I haven’t looked at NOVL SEC reports), it seems Novell’s Linux growth depends a lot on Microsoft, and that after an initial boost, Microsoft is not coming through (at least not recently). This might be a negotiating tactic on Microsoft’s part or might be indicative of a larger rejection of Novell and/or of Microsoft’s coupon selling.

    [Dan O'Brian] >> as you’ve already discovered, these BN guys have double standards.

    There is some bias and mistakes are made. I see the same from those that defend Microsoft and/or Novell. [I'm speaking generally, of course.]

    Boycottnovell puts out info with reader comments to help all readers make up their own mind on a per topic basis. Some postings are better researched than others.

    [As an aside, Nokia seems to be doing a great job with Qt: http://www.linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2009-03-05-001-35-OS-EM&tbovrmode=1 ]

  9. Jose_X said,

    March 6, 2009 at 12:56 am

    Gravatar

    Qt development has been improving quickly recently. I don’t use it, but some claim QtCreator is very good http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/category/qtcreator/ . You can download it with the Qt libraries and use it for commercial development for no charge. You can get the source code to everything from the git repositories. Nokia also wants to work with Linux distro makers to make sure it’s as easy as pie (press a button) to install this totally free and powerful developer platform on each participating distro.

    Roy, in the future, perhaps any mention of risky and monopolist supporting mono should be followed with a word or ten on (or links to) Qt/QtCreator.

  10. Dan O'Brian said,

    March 6, 2009 at 8:26 am

    Gravatar

    Jose_X: Since you don’t seem to understand the difference, Qt/QtCreator are not alternatives to Mono.

    Qt is a widget toolkit (which is an alternative to Gtk+ or even Windows.Forms, but not an alternative to Mono).

    QtCreator is an alternative to Glade or Microsoft’s widget layout tool (whatever it’s called). Once again, not an alternative to Mono.

    You guys haven’t the foggiest clue what you’re talking about most of the time.

  11. JohnD said,

    March 6, 2009 at 3:23 pm

    Gravatar

    A little more context to the financial side of things:
    “More than 10% of the stocks in the S&P 500 trade for less than $5. And with the market continuing to fall, more big-name firms could hit ‘penny stock’ status.”
    per:
    http://money.cnn.com/2009/03/06/markets/thebuzz/index.htm

What Else is New


  1. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) Gradually Champions Patent Quality, in a Spectacular Reversal on Its Past Ways

    Some of the latest actions and decisions from the Federal Circuit, which originally brought software patents to the United States and is now taking them away, gradually



  2. The Mohawk-PTAB Fiasco Threatens the Tribe's Reputation More Than It Threatens PTAB

    In an effort to dodge scrutiny from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), Allergan Plc offloaded a lot of negative publicity onto the Mohawk people, owing primarily to the Mowhawk Tribe's general counsel, Dale White



  3. Latest EPO Rumours Allege That Benoît Battistelli Rigged the Process of EPO President's Selection

    António Campinos is quite likely the next EPO President, as insiders suspect that many applications for the job got rejected politically



  4. Links 23/9/2017: Mesa 17.1.10 RC, Samba 4.7.0, KStars 2.8.4

    Links for the day



  5. Courts Are Losing Patience for Gilstrap's Unbridled Support of Patent Trolls

    The man whose court has become a trolling ‘factory’ is being refuted (but not reprimanded) by the CAFC, which certainly can see that something is amiss and serves to discredit the system as a whole



  6. Intellectual Ventures, GNU/Linux/Android/FOSS Patents, and the Ascent of European Patent Trolls

    The existing status of GNU/Linux in a world full of patent trolls, which not only target OEMs from Asia -- typically in the US -- but are also dragging them into Europe, aided by the EPO's 'patent bubble'



  7. Shelston IP Blames “Well-Organised and Appropriately-Connected Open Source Lobby” for Ban on Software Patents

    The activism is working and foes of programmers are feeling the pressure, for software patents are being more explicitly banned in some countries



  8. The EPO's Latest Lies About the UPC and SMEs Unraveled, Long-Term Plan Described as Daunting

    The vision of Battistelli and the latest lies (about SMEs) are being criticised anonymously -- for fear of retaliation -- as Europe braces for impact with patent trolls from all around the world



  9. In an Effort to Push the Unitary Patent (UPC), EPO and the Liar in Chief Spread the Famous Lie About SMEs

    The EPO wants people to hear just a bunch of lies rather than the simple truth, courtesy of the people whom the EPO proclaims it represents



  10. Links 21/9/2017: Red Hat's Open Source Patent Promise; Qt 5.6.3, Kali Linux 2017.2 Release

    Links for the day



  11. East Asia's Patent Peril and the Curse of Patent Trolls

    The high cost of China's new obsession with patents and the never-ending saga of Samsung (Korea), which gets dragged into courts not only in the US but also in China



  12. USPTO Starts Discriminating Against Poor People, and Does So Even When They Rightly Point Out Errors

    Even though the burden of proof ought to be on one who grants a monopoly, the legal costs are being offloaded onto those who challenge an erroneously-granted monopoly (even if the court sides with the challenger)



  13. Ambrose Chan Enters Document Security Systems (DSS), a Partly Patent Troll Entity

    The Board of Directors of DSS enlists a man from Singapore, whose lack of technical background suggests that the company is still more of a bully than an innovator



  14. UPC Threatens to Weaponise Software Patents in Countries That Forbade These

    The reality of software patents in Europe and what a Unified Patent Court (UPC) would mean for these if it ever became a reality



  15. The Latest Lies About the Unitary Patent (UPC) and CIPO's Participation in Those

    Team UPC continues to overplay its chances, conveniently ignoring simple facts as well as the Rule of Law



  16. The Patents Policy of Facebook is Causing an Exodus

    Yet another major player walks away from Facebook's code because of software patents



  17. Links 20/9/2017: Wine Staging 2.17, Randa 2017, Redox OS 0.3.3

    Links for the day



  18. When Google Used Alex Converse to Raid the Public Domain With Software Patents

    In its overzealous pursuit of software patents, Google is now turning public domain methods into private 'property' (in defiance of critics)



  19. Mark Kokes, the Man Behind BlackBerry's Patent Aggression, Leaves the Company

    The man behind the patent troll-like behaviour of BlackBerry is leaving



  20. WordPress Demonstrates That Facebook's Patent Strategy is Deterring/Alienating Developers

    React is being dumped following Facebook's attempt to restrict distribution/derivatives using software patents



  21. Links 19/9/2017: Pipewire, Mir Support for Wayland, DRM in W3C

    Links for the day



  22. Links 18/9/2017: Linux 4.14 RC1, Mesa 17.2.1, and GNOME 3.26 on Ubuntu Artful

    Links for the day



  23. Patent Trolls Update: Eolas, Conversant (MOSAID), Leigh Rothschild, and Electronic Communication Technologies

    Patent trolls are still being watched -- as they ought to be -- even though some of them shy away, hide from the media, engage in dirty tricks, and file more lawsuits



  24. Microsoft is Promoting Software Patents in India in Another Effort to Undermine Free/Open Source Software, Microsoft-Connected Trolls Are Still Suing

    The ongoing patent threat to Free/libre Open Source software (FLOSS) and the role played by Microsoft in at least much of this threat



  25. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Under Attack by IBM and Other Patent Parasites Who Undermine Patent Quality

    The PTAB, which has thus far invalidated thousands of abstract/software patents, is under a coordinated attack not by those who produce things but those who produce a lot of lawsuit



  26. Why the Mohawk Tribe Should Fire Its Lawyers and Dump the Patents Which Now Tarnish Its Name

    In order to dodge the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) with its Inter Partes Reviews (IPRs), the Mohawk tribe is being exploited -- very much in direct detriment to its reputation and status



  27. Amazon and Google Have Both Become Part of the Software Patents Problem

    The transition from so-called 'defensive' patents to offensive patents (ones that are used to suppress competition) as seen in Amazon and in Google, which is already suing rivals and is pursuing additional patents by acquisition



  28. Unless Physical, Inventions Are No Longer Patent-Eligible in US Courts, But USPTO Ignores Precedence

    Even though the ability to enforce software patents against a rival (or many targets, especially in the case of patent trolls) is vastly diminished, the US patent office continues to grant these



  29. Citing the European Patent Convention, Spanish Court Tosses Lawsuit With EPO-Granted European Patent

    The quality of European Patents (EPs) -- a subject of growing levels of scrutiny -- as demonstrated in Barcelona this summer



  30. Links 16/9/2017: More of “Public Money, Public Code”, Equifax Failed to Patch for Months

    Links for the day


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts