06.23.09

Gemini version available ♊︎

More on Novell’s Willingness to Sell

Posted in Finance, Microsoft, Novell, SLES/SLED, UNIX at 2:58 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

For sale

Summary: Novell is reportedly willing to sell parts of the company, but what about SUSE and UNIX?

NOVELL’S last BrainShare conference was one of Novell’s last hurrahs. As old photos remind us, Novell chose to go the dark side — so to speak — in order to buy itself some more time on the NASDAQ and perhaps in the market in general.

Novell may soon sell parts of its business [1, 2], but which ones? The one of most relevance to us is the SUSE component; as the rest is quite irrelevant to the patent deal with Microsoft, except for the units which make use of SUSE as the underlying operating system. According to yesterday’s article from Timothy at The Register, Novell’s SUSE component is still not profitable. To quote some fragments of interest from his analysis:

Commercial operating system distributor and software powerhouse wannabe Novell isn’t doing the credibility of its long-term business plan any favors by talking about selling part or all of the company to potential suitors.

[...]

This was a pretty strong signal that Novell might be up for sale, after many years of rumors about the company possibly being acquired by IBM, Microsoft, Hewlett-Packard, and others. The signal was so strong that Novell’s shares rocketed up 10.1 per cent to $4.68 a pop, giving the company a market capitalization of $1.62bn. That’s one way to get the stock price to move.

But it is apparently not what Novell intended, and somewhere between Novell HQ and JP MorganChase, some wires got crossed. Because on Friday afternoon, Novell posted an 8-K form with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that put the kibosh on the talk about a sale or spinout of specific units.

[...]

Maybe. Novell’s Linux business, as it admitted when it reported its second quarter of fiscal 2009 financials at the end of May, is still not profitable, even after $238m in Microsoft SUSE Linux coupon cash has been pumped into the company’s books over the past two years. There’s another $102m that can still be pumped in as Microsoft customers activate the remaining $27m in coupons from the original $240m agreement from November 2006, plus another $75m that came from a second coupon deal the two companies inked at the end of 2008.

Without that Microsoft funny money, Novell would have had to slash costs and payroll, and would not be able to show the decent growth it has attained with its Linux business. So in that regard, it was a smart move, even if it did invoke the ire of the open source community. But depending on Microsoft to help promote Linux is not a sustainable business model.

[...]

It seems that $1bn or $1.62bn are pretty decent valuations for Novell at this point, no matter how much Novell’s top brass might protest, and it also seems very unlikely that any company would shell out the $2.5bn to $3bn in cash it would take to buy Novell, unless that company thought it could remove substantial costs from Novell above and beyond what Novell has done itself.

As someone points out in the comments, there is danger that particular parts will be “bought by Microsoft.”

cuz then MS would own the UNIX source code.

[...]

Another person remarks: “Novell may have a big chunk of cash from the MS coupons, but it isn’t clear how much business they lost by making their deal with MS.”

Novell may have rebutted the speculation that the business as a whole will be sold, but which parts of the company had negotiations going on for sale? Any at all? Here is what was inferred from a meeting with Novell’s CFO, Dana Russell:

DiFucci noted that he held meetings with Novell CFO Dana Russell yesterday. He writes that Russell “entertained the possibility of breaking out some parts or of selling the entire company in order to maximize shareholder value given the current depressed valuation levels.” DiFucci writes that, while Russell also asserted that management is making progress in unlocking some of the value of the company, the discussion about a possible break-up or sale “could signal the company’s willingness to be acquired.”

If Novell gets sold, Boycott Novell will stay. Boycott Novell has already outgrown the narrowing remit of Novell anyway.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. The Future of Techrights

    Futures are difficult to predict, but our general vision for the years ahead revolves around more community involvement and less (none or decreased) reliance on third parties, especially monopolistic corporations, mostly because they oppress the population via the network and via electronic devices



  2. [Meme] UPC for CJEU

    When you do illegal things and knowingly break the law to get started with a “legal” system you know it’ll end up in tears… or the CJEU



  3. Links 20/1/2022: 'Pluton' Pushback and Red Hat Satellite 6.10.2

    Links for the day



  4. The Web is a Corporate Misinformation/Disinformation Platform, Biased Against Communities, Facts, and Science

    Misinformation/disinformation in so-called 'news' sites is a pandemic which spreads; in the process, the founder of GNU/Linux gets defamed and GNU/Linux itself is described as the problem, not the solution to the actual problems



  5. Links 20/1/2022: McKinsey Openwashing and Stable Kernels

    Links for the day



  6. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, January 19, 2022

    IRC logs for Wednesday, January 19, 2022



  7. Links 20/1/2022: Linuxfx 11.1 WxDesktop 11.0.3 and FreeIPMI 1.6.9 Released

    Links for the day



  8. Links 19/1/2022: XWayland 22.1 RC1 and OnlyOffice 7.0 Release

    Links for the day



  9. Links 19/1/2022: ArchLabs 2022.01.18 and KDE's 15-Minute Bug Initiative

    Links for the day



  10. When Twitter Protects Abusers and Abuse (and Twitter's Sponsors)

    Twitter is an out-of-control censorship machine and it should be treated accordingly even by those who merely "read" or "follow" Twitter accounts; Twitter is a filter, not a news/media platform or even means of communication



  11. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, January 18, 2022

    IRC logs for Tuesday, January 18, 2022



  12. Links 19/1/2022: Wine 7.x Era Begins and Istio 1.12.2 is Out

    Links for the day



  13. Another Video IBM Does Not Want You to Watch

    It seems very much possible that IBM (or someone close to IBM) is trying to purge me from Twitter, so let’s examine what they may be trying to distract from. As we put it 2 years ago, "Watson" is a lot more offensive than those supposedly offensive words IBM is working to purge; think about those hundreds of Red Hat workers who are black and were never told about ethnic purges of blacks facilitated by IBM (their new boss).



  14. What IBM Does Not Want You to Watch

    Let's 'Streisand it'...



  15. Good News, Bad News (and Back to Normal)

    When many services are reliant on the integrity of a single, very tiny MicroSD card you're only moments away from 2 days of intensive labour (recovery, investigation, migration, and further coding); we've learned our lessons and took advantage of this incident to upgrade the operating system, double the storage space, even improve the code slightly (for compatibility with newer systems)



  16. Someone Is Very Desperate to Knock My Account Off Twitter

    Many reports against me — some successful — are putting my free speech (and factual statements) at risk



  17. Links 18/1/2022: Deepin 20.4 and Qubes OS 4.1.0 RC4

    Links for the day



  18. Links 18/1/2022: GNOME 42 Alpha and KStars 3.5.7

    Links for the day



  19. IRC Proceedings: Monday, January 17, 2022

    IRC logs for Monday, January 17, 2022



  20. Links 17/1/2022: More Microsoft-Connected FUD Against Linux as Its Share Continues to Fall

    Links for the day



  21. The GUI Challenge

    The latest article from Andy concerns the Command Line Challenge



  22. Links 17/1/2022: digiKam 7.5.0 and GhostBSD 22.01.12 Released

    Links for the day



  23. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, January 16, 2022

    IRC logs for Sunday, January 16, 2022



  24. Links 17/1/2022: postmarketOS 21.12 Service Pack 1 and Mumble 1.4 Released

    Links for the day



  25. [Meme] Gemini Space (or Geminispace): From 441 Working Capsules to 1,600 Working Capsules in Just 12 Months

    Gemini space now boasts 1,600 working capsules, a massive growth compared to last January, as we noted the other day (1,600 is now official)



  26. [Meme] European Patent Office Space

    The EPO maintains a culture of illegal surveillance, inherited from Benoît Battistelli and taken to a whole new level by António Campinos



  27. Gemini Rings (Like Webrings) and Shared Spaces in Geminspace

    Much like the Web of 20+ years ago, Gemini lets online communities — real communities (not abused tenants, groomed to be ‘monetised’ like in Facebook or Flickr) — form networks, guilds, and rings



  28. Links 16/1/2022: Latte Dock 0.11 and librest 0.9.0

    Links for the day



  29. The Corporate Cabal (and Spy Agencies-Enabled Monopolies) Engages in Raiding of the Free Software Community and Hacker Culture

    In an overt attack on the people who actually did all the work — the geeks who built excellent software to be gradually privatised through the Linux Foundation (a sort of price-fixing and openwashing cartel for shared interests of proprietary software firms) — is receiving more widespread condemnation; even the OSI has been bribed to become a part-time Microsoft outsourcer as organisations are easier to corrupt than communities



  30. EPO's Web Site Constantly Spammed by Lies About Privacy While EPO Breaks the Law and Outsources Data to the United States

    The António Campinos-led EPO works for imperialism, it not only protects the rich; sadly, António’s father isn’t alive anymore and surely he would blast his son for doing what he does to progress his career while lying to staff and European citizens


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts