07.14.09

Gemini version available ♊︎

Microsoft’s Veiled Attack on Google Tries to Incite GNU/Linux People Against Chrome OS

Posted in FUD, GNU/Linux, Google, Kernel, Microsoft at 4:29 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

“Diversionary tactics, holding action, and retreats may each seem contrary to the achievement of the overall objective when considered solely in their own terms, but taken in light of the overall conflict, may contribute to overall success.”

Microsoft, internal document [PDF]

Summary: How Microsoft works to create civil wars and Google hate/unrest (and even get Apple fans to distrust or dislike Google)

LET US START with some background or an introduction to Google’s real impact in this area of desktop operating systems. Everyone has heard the news by now because the entire mainstream press covered it. Sam Varghese explains quite correctly why Microsoft is so scared (with only another Vista down the road and still no proper support for ODF [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]).

Chrome OS: Nice curveball from left field, Google

[...]

Also remember, this is an operating system that Google has announced, one that will come up against Microsoft’s main cash cows, Windows and, by extension, Office.

According to new research, Chrome OS will gain tremendously because of ARM chips that are inexpensive and very energy efficient. 55 percent market share is projected.

Researcher: Chrome to boost Atom to ARM switch in netbooks

[...]

While Intel’s Atom holds more than an 80 percent share of the 23.5-million netbooks sold in 2009 the ARM processor will to gain a 55 percent market share of the 96.0 million netbooks sold in 2012, according to researchers.

As Slated puts it, “ARM-incompatible Microsoft Windows Vista-7 need not apply.”

Microsoft must respond fast. As usual, Microsoft does not respond by making better products; Microsoft just attacks its competition with vandalism or words.

Several people disparage Google and Ubuntu (even quite publicly) right now. Microsoft is also trying to have UNIX/Linux people attack Google over Chrome OS in particular. We have found Enderle, Yankee and Gartner doing it and as wallclimber puts it, it’s all aimed at making these products less appealing. “I have mixed feelings about it,” she adds. As another reader emphasised yesterday, “Microsoft is trying to spin Google OS as an attack against Linux.” As we shall show in a moment, Enderle apparently incites Apple fans against Chrome OS and Google (Safari and Chrome are both based on WebKit, which used KHTML). It’s a divisive role and we previously showed that Microsoft’s strategy includes trying to create ‘civil wars’ inside or between competitors (for example, the use of Novell/patents against GNU/Linux and Mono/Ximian against critics and doubters of Microsoft).

Let’s proceed to some actual new examples. We wrote about Rob Enderle just days ago because he continues to spread Linux lies and he incites people against Chrome OS (the Guardian does this too). But as Pamela Jones at Groklaw puts it (in reference to other punditry), “I must point out that Chrome runs on the Linux kernel. The Google announcement linked to by the article says so: “The software architecture is simple — Google Chrome running within a new windowing system on top of a Linux kernel.” So, it’s just Linux getting wings into the cloud, and Chrome running on the kernel. So Google is using Linux to challenge Microsoft. Once again, we see how appropriate it is to distinguish between the Linux kernel and the GNU/Linux operating system, so folks don’t get confused as to which you mean. Here the author means GNU/Linux operating systems, like Ubuntu or other desktop distributions.

“Microsoft is also trying to have UNIX/Linux people attack Google over Chrome OS in particular.”Enderle is again spinning the Chrome OS announcement. He uses ECT (owner of LinuxInsider, which is considered rather GNU/Linux-hostile) to attack Apple and Google at the same time, thereby creating tension between the two (angle: Chrome attacks Apple). That is on top of all the lobbying against Google, whose important role in on-line office suites Microsoft had dismissed until it got something of its own ready and then re-announced old news (it was last re-announced only yesterday).

FUD like this is not uncommon, but one reader illustrates the nature of this attack by quoting and responding. For instance, Enderle writes: “The good news for both companies is that it doesn’t look as though Google fully understands what it will take to succeed in this space. That means this move may be riskier for Google than it is for either Microsoft or Apple, unless Google focuses, builds up marketing competency, and executes better than it currently is…

Our reader says: “This is a disguised directive from Redmond trying to bait Google into changing direction and fight Microsoft own battle on Microsoft’s own territory, rich desktop applications. Whenever you see Microsoft giving advice to anyone, you can be guaranteed it isn’t for the other fellas benefit.”

The reader adds that Enderle is “rewriting history on top of it. This is the true function of shills like Enderle. Relentlessly polluting the record with self-serving distortions like the below.”

Enderle writes: “In short, like Netscape, Google may have instigated one of the biggest changes since the beginning of the PC, but it might be unable to capitalize on it…”

The “FUD injection”, as our reader puts it, is: “Netscape failed to capitalize on the PC revolution.”

He argues that the reality goes like this: “Microsoft tried to buy out Netscape, negotiate with the NSCA for an exclusive license, then licensed Spyglass and never paid them as they ‘gave away’ the client. Meanwhile ‘extending’ their web server app with incompatible HTML extensions.”

See some of the gory details in Comes trial documents and this petition.

Enderle was of course not alone in all this. See what Eric Lai (of a Redmond blog) did when he tried to create Google unrest or describe/accentuate a perceived issue of “fragmentation”. As we noted on Saturday, Lai used a FUD-inspiring headline with a question mark (here is the direct link).

But more obvious are probably the attacks on Chrome OS from the Yankee Group, a longtime friend of Microsoft [1, 2]. From IDG comes the same storyline: “Google OS Could Put Squeeze on Other Flavors of Linux”

But just when some Linux distributions seemed to be gaining a foothold, Google may soon curtail their success. The strength of its brand, and its reputation as a company that builds sleek and easy-to-use products, means it could steamroll over the other Linux candidates, said Joshua Martin, senior analyst at the Yankee Group.

Because Yankee Group is surely an unbiased and “independent” party when it comes to Linux, right?

But wait. That’s not all. Yesterday was the last time we wrote about Gartner and Microsoft and here is some fresh Gartner FUD about Chrome OS. The storyline remains: “Will Chrome endanger Android?” (that’s the headline, with the obligatory question mark to save from accusations of trolling, as usual).

It is funny how all the same Microsoft-friendly analysts come out of the woodwork whenever a real threat to Microsoft appears before a receptive audience/crowd.

Chrome OS is by all means good news for Linux (see the remarks from Zemlin et al of the Linux Foundation). The opposite spin is a form of indoctrination that comes from Redmond through the Microsoft-tilted press. Here is a decent new analysis which is titled “Five Ways Google Spits on Microsoft.”

Even the headlines this week fed off that animus. Google Drops A Nuclear Bomb on Microsoft said one, Google Launching OS, Firing Torpedo Into Microsoft, went another.

The 655-word blog post that announced Chrome OS started it all, of course. But almost lost in the hoopla over that manifesto were the shots Google took at its rival, five taunts that jabbed at Windows’ most notable, and cliched, shortcomings.

Google says: “…the operating systems that browsers run on were designed in an era where there was no Web.”

[...]

Translation: Windows is a headache, plain and simple, and getting it to work right takes the patience of Job and requires that users discard any leisure time and instead dedicate hours every week to the chore.

Windows users, to greater and lesser extents, recognize this as a truth, and plan accordingly by taking the estimated time to, say, add a new printer, then doubling it for a real timetable.

Any more Chrome OS mockery from Microsoft-friendly press people? If so, please share.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

5 Comments

  1. André said,

    July 14, 2009 at 5:22 am

    Gravatar

    The important thing is: Google Chrome OS is driven by hardware manufacturers and zero risk for Google. Remember Microsoft to launch horrible 100 million$ TV spots and marketing campaigns. Google gets all the buzz virtually for free.

    Google Chrome may have just 2% of the browser market but without substantial investment. You have to think anti-BostonConsulting to understand it, and watch the technology chain. It goes like this: Either you control a technology platform or no one else. If you can’t control the browser make sure no one else does. Chrome avoids a firefox lock-in. FF is also Google sponsored technology, just that it is not called “Google FF”. In the old world you focus your ressources on one product. But it is more like a garden and planting new trees is a very simple, very natural thing to do.

    When you built upon open source you don’t have to win with your product to make it change the market. To be precise, Google has not only one browser but also for instance: http://code.google.com/p/arora/
    Software is cheap when you build on the open source stack.

    Chrome OS is a similar cheap investment and they don’t have to “win”.

    “Google Chrome OS is an open source, lightweight operating system that will initially be targeted at netbooks. Later this year we will open-source its code, and netbooks running Google Chrome OS will be available for consumers in the second half of 2010.”

    Lightweight is the future. Gnome Os will not compete with Linux distributions and their KDE or Gnome environments for the Desktop Linux market. Linux distributors as RedHat sell server services. But it will strengthen the platform, the technology stack, in particular because of the hardware manufacturers taken on board.

  2. Femacamper said,

    July 15, 2009 at 9:10 pm

    Gravatar

    I’m thinking of starting a website…how about BoycottGoogleChrome.com?

    Jose_X Reply:

    That would defeat the point of boycottwindows etc. Wait first until monopolies are broken. Then if you still feel strongly about ChromeOS, go for it.

    :-P

    Darth Chaos Reply:

    Greetings from the Prison Planet and Propaganda Matrix forums, Femacamper!

    How about boycottboycottnovell.com? lol But seriously, the moment Alex Jones makes any criticism of Chrome OS, Schestowitz will probably smear Jones as a Microsoft shill.

  3. Jose_X said,

    July 15, 2009 at 10:28 pm

    Gravatar

    >> Microsoft must respond fast. As usual, Microsoft does not respond by making better products; Microsoft just attacks its competition with vandalism or words.

    I think they are trying to work with “partners” to leverage FOSS to remain competitive.

    They try to leverage their monopolies (eg, the information that is closed source) to provide interop issues to which only they hold the keys.

    If they can (ab)use patents to create advantages over FOSS and other FOSS competitors, they will. Eg, success of their dotnet platform on Linux puts them at the top of the patent pecking order. Hopefully software patents will receive a convincing deadly blow soon.

    [Note that the Microsoft Community Promise is a joke. The main problems are: (a) trolls holding the patents as proxies to bypass the "Promise"; (b) extension patents that are easy to infringe once you already implement the core; and (c) a failure for the "Promise" for ECMA dotnet to protect against partial implementations that would be necessary in order to stop infringement on the extension patents (ie, fork mono enough to avoid other patents and you lose the protection from the core patents which still apply).]

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. [Meme] Get Ready for Unified Patent Court (UPC) to be Taken to Court

    The Unified Patent Court (UPC) and Unitary Patent system that’s crafted to empower EPO thugs isn’t legal and isn’t constitutional either; even a thousand fake news 'articles' (deliberate misinformation or disinformation) cannot change the simple facts because CJEU isn’t “trial by media”



  2. The EPO Needs High-Calibre Examiners, Not Politicians Who Pretend to Understand Patents and Science

    Examiners are meant to obstruct fake patents or reject meritless patent applications; why is it that working conditions deteriorate for those who are intellectually equipped to do the job?



  3. Free Software is Greener

    Software Freedom is the only way to properly tackle environmental perils through reuse and recycling; the mainstream media never talks about it because it wants people to "consume" more and more products



  4. Links 25/1/2022: Git 2.35 and New openSUSE Hardware

    Links for the day



  5. IRC Proceedings: Monday, January 24, 2022

    IRC logs for Monday, January 24, 2022



  6. Links 25/1/2022: GPL Settlement With Patrick McHardy, Godot 4.0 Alpha 1, and DXVK 1.9.4 Released

    Links for the day



  7. Proprietary Software is Pollution

    "My daughter asked me about why are we throwing away some bits of technology," Dr. Andy Farnell says. "This is my attempt to put into words for "ordinary" people what I tried to explain to a 6 year old."



  8. Microsoft GitHub Exposé — Part XV — Cover-Up and Defamation

    Defamation of one’s victims might be another offence to add to the long list of offences committed by Microsoft’s Chief Architect of GitHub Copilot, Balabhadra (Alex) Graveley; attempting to discredit the police report is a new low and can get Mr. Graveley even deeper in trouble (Microsoft protecting him only makes matters worse)



  9. [Meme] Alexander Ramsay and Team UPC Inciting Politicians to Break the Law and Violate Constitutions, Based on Misinformation, Fake News, and Deliberate Lies Wrapped up as 'Studies'

    The EPO‘s law-breaking leadership (Benoît Battistelli, António Campinos and their corrupt cronies), helped by liars who don't enjoy diplomatic immunity, are cooperating to undermine courts across the EU, in effect replacing them with EPO puppets who are patent maximalists (Europe’s equivalents of James Rodney Gilstrap and Alan D Albright, a Donald Trump appointee, in the Eastern and Western Districts of Texas, respectively)



  10. Has the Administrative Council Belatedly Realised What Its Job in the European Patent Organisation Really Is?

    The "Mafia" which took over the EPO (the EPO's own workers call it "Mafia") isn't getting its way with a proposal, so it's preventing the states from even voting on it!



  11. [Meme] Team UPC is Celebrating a Pyrrhic Victory

    Pyrrhic victory best describes what's happening at the moment (it’s a lobbying tactic, faking/staging things to help false prophecies be fulfilled, based on hopes and wishes alone), for faking something without bothering to explain the legal basis is going to lead to further escalations and complaints (already impending)



  12. Links 24/1/2022: Scribus 1.5.8 and LXLE Reviewed

    Links for the day



  13. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, January 23, 2022

    IRC logs for Sunday, January 23, 2022



  14. [Meme] Team UPC Congratulating Itself

    The barrage of fake news and misinformation about the UPC deliberately leaves out all the obvious and very important facts; even the EPO‘s António Campinos and Breton (Benoît Battistelli‘s buddy) participated in the lying



  15. Links 24/1/2022: pgBadger 11.7 Released, Catch-up With Patents

    Links for the day



  16. The Demonisation and Stereotyping of Coders Not Working for Big Corporations (or 'The System')

    The war on encrypted communication (or secure communications) carries on despite a lack of evidence that encryption stands in the way of crime investigations (most criminals use none of it)



  17. On the 'Peak Hacker' Series

    Hacker culture, unlike Ludditism, is ultimately a movement for justice, for equality, and for human rights through personal and collective emancipation; Dr. Farnell has done a good job explaining where we stand and his splendid series has come to a close



  18. Links 23/1/2022: First RC of Linux 5.17 and Sway 1.7 Released

    Links for the day



  19. Peak Code — Part III: After Code

    "Surveillance perimeters, smart TVs (Telescreens built to Orwell's original blueprint) watched over our living rooms. Mandatory smart everything kept us 'trustless'. Safe search, safe thoughts. We withdrew. Inside, we went quietly mad."



  20. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, January 22, 2022

    IRC logs for Saturday, January 22, 2022



  21. Links 23/1/2022: MongoDB 5.2, BuddyPress 10.0.0, and GNU Parallel 20220122

    Links for the day



  22. A Parade of Fake News About the UPC Does Not Change the General Consensus or the Simple Facts

    European Patents (EPs) from the EPO are granted in violation of the EPC; Courts are now targeted by António Campinos and the minions he associates with (mostly parasitic litigation firms and monopolists), for they want puppets for “judges” and for invalid patents to be magically rendered “valid” and “enforceable”



  23. Welcome to 2022: Intentional Lies Are 'Benefits' and 'Alternative Facts'

    A crooks-run EPO, together with the patent litigation cabal that we’ve dubbed ‘Team UPC’ (it has nothing to do with science or with innovation), is spreading tons of misinformation; the lies are designed to make the law-breaking seem OK, knowing that Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos are practically above the law, so perjury as well as gross violations of the EPC and constitutions won’t scare them (prosecution as deterrence just isn’t there, which is another inherent problem with the UPC)



  24. From Software Eating the World to the Pentagon Eating All the Software

    “Software is eating the world,” according to Marc Andreessen (co-founder of Netscape), but the Empire Strikes Back (not the movie, the actual empire) by hijacking all code by proxy, via Microsoft, just as it grabbed a lot of the world’s communications via Skype, bypassing the world's many national telecoms; coders need to fight back rather than participate in racist (imperial) shams such as GitHub



  25. Links 22/1/2022: Skrooge 2.27.0 and Ray-Tracing Stuff

    Links for the day



  26. IRC Proceedings: Friday, January 21, 2022

    IRC logs for Friday, January 21, 2022



  27. Peak Code — Part II: Lost Source

    "Debian and Mozilla played along. They were made “Yeoman Freeholders” in return for rewriting their charters to “work closely with the new Ministry in the interests of all stakeholders” – or some-such vacuous spout… because no one remembers… after that it started."



  28. Links 22/1/2022: Ubuntu MATE 21.10 for GPD Pocket 3, MINISFORUM Preloads GNU/Linux

    Links for the day



  29. Computer Users Should be Operators, But Instead They're Being Operated by Vendors and Governments

    Computers have been turned into hostile black boxes (unlike Blackbox) that distrust the person who purchased them; moreover, from a legislative point of view, encryption (i.e. computer security) is perceived and treated by governments like a threat instead of something imperative — a necessity for society’s empowerment (privacy is about control and people in positions of unjust power want total and complete control)



  30. Peak Code — Part I: Before the Wars

    Article/series by Dr. Andy Farnell: "in the period between 1960 and 2060 people had mistaken what they called "The Internet" for a communications system, when it had in fact been an Ideal and a Battleground all along - the site of the 100 years info-war."


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts