EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

12.04.09

Scarcity vs Abundance: Microsoft and Copyright Cartel vs the World and the People

Posted in DRM, Europe, Finance, Free/Libre Software, Google, Microsoft, Vista 7 at 10:21 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Al Capone mugshot and Steve Ballmer

Summary: A view on the latest attack on rights and freedom, with well-deserved focus on Microsoft Corporation’s role

WHAT was rather unsettling but telling the other day is that Microsoft was conspicuously missing from a large-scale opposition to Mandelson’s bill [1, 2], which is a Christmas gift from England to Hollywood (and the MAFIAA™ in particular). It seems safe to conclude that Microsoft is yet again sidling with the Copyright Cartel. Windows Vista and Vista 7 already have DRM crippleware built in, baked into the very core of the operating system.

According to the following new article about ACTA, there is a connection to Microsoft, which can be formulated as follows:

The term “counterfeiting” is now being used to reference any type of minor infringement of the temporary government monopolies granted to holders of patents, copyrights, trademarks or any other related rights. Rather than being seen as an offense against consumers, it has been transformed into an offense allegedly committed by consumers.

[...]

As I included in my submission to the 2009 Copyright consultation, this minor form of infringement is sometimes beneficial to the copyright holder. In 2007 Jeff Raikes, then President of the Microsoft Business Division , said “If they’re going to pirate somebody, we want it to be us rather than somebody else”. This is a recognition that while being directly compensated for a use of a copyrighted work is ideal, that infringement is better for the copyright holder than people switching to alternatives.

A far more serious form of copyright infringement is when a corporation, many that include staff lawyers who should be expected to know better, infringe copyright and commercially redistribute someone elses work without permission. As one example, yesterday I read Microsoft pulls Windows 7 download tool where Microsoft was yet again accused of commercial copyright infringement.

We should simply refer to this as “strike one”, and be done with it.

While Microsoft is just one company, they are easily accused of copyright infringement more than 3 times in any given month. If it were not for that fact that nearly every so-called “3 strikes” law were bogus, companies such as Microsoft would not be allowed to have an Internet connection (No more Bing, no more Windows or Office update or even development/testing of any of their Internet products, no more Hotmail, etc).

It isn’t as if Microsoft is alone. Brad M. Kuhn, the tech director at the Software Freedom Law Center, blogged on Sunday that, “Since 21 August 2009, I’ve been finding one new GPL violating company per day (on average) and I am still on target to find one per day for 365 days straight.”

The terms of the GPL are clearly aimed at commercial companies, given the license already grants everything a private citizen would ever want which is to legally redistribute the unmodified software for free to anyone they want, and for any recipient to use the software for free. This means that all of these potential GPL violations are commercial violations that are far more serious than anything a private citizen would do. This type of infringement is far less forgivable given companies commercially redistributing copyrighted works should be expected to hire lawyers to understand the relevant legal contracts and license agreements, while citizens shouldn’t be expected to.

Glyn Moody shares this good new essay, titled “IP and Artificial Scarcity”

Someone recently told me “I just ran across a few of your interviews and writings. I was particularly impressed with the point that IP creates scarcity where none existed before. Despite its obviousness, it is characteristic of IP that had not occurred to me before.”

Moody also shares this new example of scarcity versus abundance.

Pixies fans on the hunt for holiday fixes are in luck: The deluxe edition of the legendary band’s high-art megabox The Minotaur is finally hitting mailboxes. That includes our own, which is where Wired.com’s Michael Calore found the collector-gasm for the video tour above.

Later on, Moody writes about the subject himself.

One of the (many) things that get my goat about ACTA is the sheer dishonesty of the project. It was originally put forward as aiming to curb large-scale counterfeiting – hence its name, Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement.

It was sold as only going for the “big fish”, with promises that ordinary people wouldn’t be inconvenienced. In fact, it was purely for their benefit, its proponents explained, since one of the most heinous kinds of counterfeiting it attempts to tackle is counterfeit drugs – an undeniable health hazard.

But then something strange happened. Counterfeiting morphed into copyright infringement, and yet all the legal heavy guns aimed at massive, criminal counterfeiting remain, now ranged against little you and me.

Finally, Moody shares this piece of copyright propaganda, which echoes the talking points of the BSA when it comes to software [1, 2, 3]. Just because the big companies do not manage to squeeze money out of the population does not mean it is a loss to the country. There is too much focus on “earnings” while neglecting the notion of “savings”. It is spin doctoring, and as far as the press is concerned, it proves to be effective. The press is, after all, part of the media industry, owned by the very same corporations.

Moody has also found this new article from the New Scientist. It describes this as a battle of “The people vs the entertainment industry,” but sadly enough it uses misleading propaganda terms like “piracy”.

The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), suggested by the US administration in 2007, aims to redefine global trade rules. The intention is to stem losses from counterfeiting and internet-mediated piracy of content like music and movies.

It will do that by penalising internet service providers and websites that carry, or help people to find, pirated content. ACTA has quickly proved a hit with G8 nations, the European Union, South Korea and Australia, who are all using it as a basis for future national laws.

ACTA is still being worked up in secret by trade delegations from the many nations involved. But a series of leaks to the Wikileaks website reveal that it will require ISPs to become technological sleuths who monitor their customers’ internet use to “deter unauthorised storage and transmission of infringing content”. Infringers will face a “graduated response”, with disconnection as the ultimate sanction.

The Obama administration’s plans to implement ACTA are still hidden in a thicket of non-disclosure agreements with movie studios and record labels. The UK’s Digital Economy Bill, unveiled in last month, is clearly inspired by ACTA.

Moving on to something a little different, Google has finally responded to the Microsoft|Murdoch insult.

Google tells Murdoch to shut up

[...]

But Schmidt said Google is a “great source of promotion” for newspapers through its aggregator website Google News and other services.

There is also this headsup from Moody, who took special interest in the subject recently. We’re at a crucial legal corssroad in the UK.

Putting up paywalls around online content will not on its own transform the finances of national newspapers, but a mixed strategy of subscriptions and micropayments could prove more successful, according to research published today.

We previously covered the Microsoft|Murdoch situation in:

Microsoft is very afraid of Google, with which it is fighting for the minds of future generations. Now they are both looking to exploit young individuals. Mercury has this new article on the subject.

Microsoft, Google in battle to win over students

[...]

Neither Microsoft nor Google will disclose how much it spends to furnish those educational services, nor will they say how many schools they have signed up. But with schools under budget pressure at both the university and K-12 level, administrators are weighing concerns about the security of their data on a cloud-based network against its powerful educational features, and against its price — in most cases, zero.

Now that Google enters the dictionary and DNS business (mentioned this morning), there is more speculation about Google’s stealth and impact on competitors.

Google has quietly rolled out its own online dictionary, complete with multilingual support and accompanying photos. The new site was first discovered by the LA Times Tech Blog, and you can access it at Google.com/Dictionary.

Some Free software people are rightly concerned, but worries are accentuated due to fear mongering from the Microsoft-faithful crowd.

If Android and later Chrome OS succeed, Google may become the portal to more than just the Web. Its services will have geo-location data as well.

There is no indication yet that such data will be misplaced and/or misused, but the above is from a Microsoft fan, so it is intended to cause uncertainty and doubt. Dana Blankenhorn responds to this endless daemonisation of Google, which in part comes from Redmond.

What I want to know is, where is the evidence? Where is the evidence that Google is evil, or has done evil? I try to read all the critics and mostly what I see are intimations of what they might do.

* They might use their digitizing of books to control the book market.
* They might use their collection of personal data against you.
* They might tie their Android phones and Chromium PCs to Google services and lock others out.
* They might create a search monopoly.
* They might kill the newspaper business.
* They might take over the DNS market, and while they would be better than competitors it’s still evil.

Blankenhorn names it the “Google derangement syndrome”. Microsoft calls it "screw Google". Unless and until Google commits crimes like Microsoft has, Google is a good tool for weakening a fierce enemy of Free(dom) software.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

12 Comments

  1. Yuhong Bao said,

    December 5, 2009 at 5:56 pm

    Gravatar

    “Unless and until Google commits crimes like Microsoft has, Google is a good tool for weakening a fierce enemy of Free(dom) software.”
    Not to mention the fact that while Google is not perfect (no one is), Google is certainly better than MS in many ways.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Can you give me examples of Google playing dirty?

    The only ones I can think of are very subjective (e.g. YouTube incident in Italy and preferential placements for Google products, which the company soon conceded and changed upon complaints).

    Yuhong Bao Reply:

    That is the whole point. Google isn’t perfect, but is certainly much better than Microsoft.

  2. Yuhong Bao said,

    December 7, 2009 at 11:59 pm

    Gravatar

    On Vista DRM, here is an IRC chat with DaemonFC on Vista DRM:
    http://boycottnovell.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/irc-log-25102009.html#tOct%2025%2001:56:31
    I don’t agree entirely with him, I know for a fact that Vista DRM is more than “just what Windows applications do by default” (some of it is in the kernel, but AFRIK most of it is in the audio/video subsystem). But he does agree with me on a few point

    your_friend Reply:

    Security and imaging expert, Peter Gutmann, made an extensive study of DRM in Vista when Vista was new. He concludes that Vista’s digital restrictions are so much a part of the software and hardware that the entire computer industry is taxed. Both GNU/Linux and Mac have to deal with hardware that has been compromised by Microsoft’s overriding desire to restrict and control their customers. Just how baked into the system restrictions are is represented by “tilt bits” that eliminate system performance at treat user cost:

    Vista’s content protection requires that devices (hardware and software drivers) set so-called “tilt bits” if they detect anything unusual. For example if there are unusual voltage fluctuations, maybe some jitter on bus signals, a slightly funny return code from a function call, a device register that doesn’t contain quite the value that was expected, or anything similar, a tilt bit gets set. Such occurrences aren’t too uncommon in a typical computer. … Previously this was no problem — the system was designed with a bit of resilience, …. With the introduction of tilt bits, all of this designed-in resilience is gone.

    It can be argued that Vista is not so much an OS with restrictions added to it, as it is a set of restricted applications that pretend to be an OS. Three years after Vista’s introduction, we see that it was effective at keeping people most people from recording TV shows but a complete failure as an OS. The already decimated Windows ecosystem has only a few players left and Windows has been reduced to a method of consuming Microsoft taxed and approved services rather than a general purpose computing platform. As Gutmann put it, this was by design, “Microsoft have been saying for some years now that they’d really like the PC to go away, to turn into a kind of media platform and content-distribution center for consumers.”

    Success at defeating particular restrictions should not be generalized into an overall defeat of digital restrictions. Eventually, if all the major publishers force enough restrictions into hardware and software, there will be no way around their shemes. We can only hope that there are too many competing factions and that none of them want to hand control over to an abusive company like Microsoft. Free software offers them all an excellent way for them to persue their foolish restrictions in a fractured way that will kill all of them. When Kindle books don’t read on the Barnes and Noble reader and neither read on Vista, we can be sure that all three will vanish in red ink. Companies that don’t burden their customers with restrictions will eat Microsoft’s lunch.

    Yuhong Bao Reply:

    “Security and imaging expert, Peter Gutmann, made an extensive study of DRM in Vista when Vista was new”
    I know, and I today finally was able to download the slides by Guttman, and yes reading it was very interesting.
    “It can be argued that Vista is not so much an OS with restrictions added to it, as it is a set of restricted applications that pretend to be an OS.”
    Now, I doubt DRM is that deep in Vista of course and even Guttman do not claim that.
    “Eventually, if all the major publishers force enough restrictions into hardware and software…”
    I would not go that far, but yea why do you think the music industry was forced to eliminate DRM from online music?

    your_friend Reply:

    I do not understand your concept of deep DRM or how user hostile a system has to be before you conclude DRM is a primary feature of the system. What can be more user hostile and performance defeating than hardware and software specs for “trip bits” that turn the system off due to random fluctuations which normal hardware is designed to ignore? Gutmann argues these specs damage performance for all software that attempts to use hardware made for Vista, in other words DRM is so baked in to Vista that it seeps out and stains the rest of the world. Gutmann is also voices Microsoft intentions to move from general purpose software to media distribution.

    I would argue that Microsoft’s failure to convince people to go along is not for a lack of trying and that there’s been on real change in trajectory. Windows 7 is nothing new or different. If anything, Windows 7 has collected even more anti-features while eliminating several applications that Vista users actually thought of as an improvement over XP.

    I wish that I could share your optimism about music DRM but I don’t see any change of intent or methods by that industry. Microsoft destroyed a large category of music DRM when they tried to prop up Zune by betraying partners and customers of it’s unpopular “Plays for Sure” program. Though Apple does a far better job of taking care of their customers, iPod is notoriously user and sharing hostile. Because iPod is the world’s most popular portable music player, most people live under obnoxious DRM. Finally, given the way Microsoft sacrificed system stability for DRM with the Vista family, it would be fair to say that the industry may be shifting the DRM burden from dozens of failed music formats to the OS level. Video, despite early cracking success, remains a patent and DRM laced nightmare. The anti-democratic and secret ACTA may make matters even worse. It is hard to imagine a more customer hostile industry than the one created by large publishers, where thousands of people are threatened and extorted or ruined in bogus lawsuits.

    Yuhong Bao Reply:

    “I do not understand your concept of deep DRM or how user hostile a system has to be before you conclude DRM is a primary feature of the system. What can be more user hostile and performance defeating than hardware and software specs for “trip bits” that turn the system off due to random fluctuations which normal hardware is designed to ignore? Gutmann argues these specs damage performance for all software that attempts to use hardware made for Vista, in other words DRM is so baked in to Vista that it seeps out and stains the rest of the world. Gutmann is also voices Microsoft intentions to move from general purpose software to media distribution.”
    I know, I have read the Gutmann paper and even the slides. My point is that most of the DRM stuff is in the audio/video subsystems in Vista, with some of the support needed (such as protected processes) in the Vista kernel.
    “Video, despite early cracking success, remains a patent and DRM laced nightmare. ”
    I know, and I was just going to say that just because music DRM is defeated do not mean that video DRM is defeated. In fact, the IRC chat was exactly about this.
    “Windows 7 is nothing new or different.”
    Indeed, I don’t think Windows 7 has changed much regarding the DRM in Vista. But MS may not ever be able to remove it, even in future versions of Windows. In fact, one of my points I was arguing was that if Linux was to add support for Blu-Ray, these same DRM anti-features would probably be needed to be added to Linux as well.
    See these IRC chats:
    http://boycottnovell.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/irc-log-25102009.html#tOct%2025%2001:56:31
    http://boycottnovell.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/irc-log-16092009.html
    http://boycottnovell.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/irc-log-22092009.html

    your_friend Reply:

    Free software never has to restrict users and never will. If people are able to make Vista hardware work it will not be by giving control to Microsoft to Linux kernel modules. Giving owners control of free software is the one way of insuring hardware never does what users want. If you want to submit to Microsoft, you might as well run Vista. Vista, Zune, Xbox and other non free software, however, are the technical failures. There’s probably a lesson about greed and hubris in all of this.

    Yuhong Bao Reply:

    “If people are able to make Vista hardware work it will not be by giving control to Microsoft to Linux kernel modules.”
    Certainly not, and it is unlikely to be necessary. I was talking about playing Blu-Ray discs on Linux and not about this.

    Yuhong Bao Reply:

    “There’s probably a lesson about greed and hubris in all of this.”
    I think the biggest lesson to learn is about artificial scarcity, which is fundamentally flawed.

  3. Yuhong Bao said,

    December 8, 2009 at 12:06 am

    Gravatar

    On Vista DRM, here is an IRC chat with DaemonFC on Vista DRM:
    http://boycottnovell.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/irc-log-25102009.html#tOct%2025%2001:56:31
    I don’t agree entirely with him, I know for a fact that Vista DRM is more than “just what Windows applications do by default” (some of the support needed is in the kernel, but AFRIK most of it is in the audio/video subsystems). But he does agree with me on a few points.

What Else is New


  1. Today's European Patent Office Works for Patent Extremists and for Team UPC Rather Than for Europe or for Innovation

    The International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (AIPPI) and other patent maximalists who have nothing to do with Europe, helped by a malicious and rather clueless politician called Benoît Battistelli, are turning the EPO into a patent-printing machine rather than an examination office as envisioned by the EPC (founders) and member states



  2. The EPO is Dying and Those Who Have Killed It Are Becoming Very Rich in the Process

    Following the footsteps of Ron Hovsepian at Novell, Battistelli at the EPO (along with Team Battistelli) may mean the end of the EPO as we know it (or the end altogether); one manager and a cabal of confidants make themselves obscenely rich by basically sacrificing the very organisation they were entrusted to serve



  3. Short: Just Keep Repeating the Lie (“Quality”) Until People Might Believe It

    Battistelli’s patent-printing bureau (EPO without quality control) keeps lying about the quality of patents by repeating the word “quality” a lot of times, including no less than twice in the summary alone



  4. Shelston IP Keeps Pressuring IP Australia to Allow Software Patents and Harm Software Development

    Shelston IP wants exactly the opposite of what's good for Australia; it just wants what's good for itself, yet it habitually pretends to speak for a productive industry (nothing could be further from the truth)



  5. Is Andy Ramer's Departure the End of Cantor Fitzgerald's Patent Trolls-Feeding Operations and Ambitions?

    The managing director of the 'IP' group at Cantor Fitzgerald is leaving, but it does not yet mean that patent trolls will be starved/deprived access to patents



  6. EPO Hoards Billions of Euros (Taken From the Public), Decreases Quality to Get More Money, Reduces Payments to Staff

    The EPO continues to collect money from everyone, distributes bogus/dubious patents that usher patent trolls into Europe (to cost European businesses billions in the long run), and staff of the EPO faces more cuts while EPO management swims in cash and perks



  7. Short: Calling Battistelli's Town (Where He Works) “Force for Innovation” to Justify the Funneling of EPO Funds to It

    How the EPO‘s management ‘explained’ (or sought to rationalise) to staff its opaque decision to send a multi-million, one-day ceremony to Battistelli’s own theatre only weeks before he leaves



  8. Short: EPO Bribes the Media and Then Brags About the Paid-for Outcome to Staff

    The EPO‘s systematic corruption of the media at the expense of EPO stakeholders — not to mention hiring of lawyers to bully media which exposes EPO corruption — in the EPO’s own words (amended by us)



  9. Short: EPO's “Working Party for Quality” is to Quality What the “Democratic People's Republic of Korea” is to Democracy

    To maintain the perception (illusion) that the EPO still cares about patent quality — and in order to disseminate this lie to EPO staff — a puff piece with the above heading/photograph was distributed to thousands of examiners in glossy paper form



  10. Short: This Spring's Message From the EPO's President (Corrected)

    A corrected preface from the Liar in Chief, the EPO's notoriously crooked and dishonest President



  11. Short: Highly Misleading and Unscientific Graphics From the EPO for an Illusion of Growth

    A look at the brainwash that EPO management is distributing to staff and what's wrong with it



  12. Short: EPO Explains to Examiners Why They Should and Apparently Can Grant Software Patents (in Spite of EPC)

    Whether it calls it "CII" or "ICT" or "Industry 4.0" or "4IR", the EPO's management continues to grant software patents and attempts to justify this to itself (and to staff)



  13. Links 21/4/2018: Linux 4.9.95, FFmpeg 4.0, OpenBSD Foundation 2018 Fundraising Campaign

    Links for the day



  14. As USPTO Director, Andrei Iancu Gives Three Months for Public Comments on 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Software Patenting Impacted)

    Weeks after starting his job as head of the US patent office, to our regret but not to our surprise, Iancu asks whether to limit examiners' ability to reject abstract patent applications citing 35 U.S.C. § 101 (relates to Alice and Mayo)



  15. In Keith Raniere v Microsoft Both Sides Are Evil But for Different Reasons

    Billing for patent lawyers reveals an abusive strategy from Microsoft, which responded to abusive patent litigation (something which Microsoft too has done for well over a decade)



  16. Links 20/4/2018: Atom 1.26, MySQL 8.0

    Links for the day



  17. Links 19/4/2018: Mesa 17.3.9 and 18.0.1, Trisquel 8.0 LTS Flidas, Elections for openSUSE Board

    Links for the day



  18. The Patent Microcosm, Patent Trolls and Their Pressure Groups Incite a USPTO Director Against the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and Section 101/Alice

    As one might expect, the patent extremists continue their witch-hunt and constant manipulation of USPTO officials, whom they hope to compel to become patent extremists themselves (otherwise those officials are defamed, typically until they're fired or decide to resign)



  19. Microsoft's Lobbying for FRAND Pays Off as Microsoft-Connected Patent Troll Conversant (Formerly MOSAID) Goes After Android OEMs in Europe

    The FRAND (or SEP) lobby seems to have caused a lot of monopolistic patent lawsuits; this mostly affects Linux-powered platforms such as Android, Tizen and webOS and there are new legal actions from Microsoft-connected patent trolls



  20. To Understand Why People Say That Lawyers are Liars Look No Further Than Misleading Promotion of Software Patents

    Some of the latest misleading claims from the patent microcosm, which is only interested in lots and lots of patents (its bread and butter is monopolies after all) irrespective of their merit, quality, and desirability



  21. When News About the EPO is Dominated by Sponsored 'Reports' and Press Releases Because Publishers Are Afraid of (or Bribed by) the EPO

    The lack of curiosity and genuine journalism in Europe may mean that serious abuses (if not corruption) will go unreported



  22. The Boards of Appeal at the European Patent Organisation (EPO) Complain That They Are Understaffed, Not Just Lacking the Independence They Depend on

    The Boards of Appeal have released a report and once again they openly complain that they're unable to do their job properly, i.e. patent quality cannot be assured



  23. Links 18/4/2018: New Fedora 27 ISOs, Nextcloud Wins German Government Contract

    Links for the day



  24. Guest Post: Responding to Your Recent Posting “The European Patent Office Will Never Hold Its Destroyers Accountable”

    In France, where Battistelli does not enjoy diplomatic immunity, he can be held accountable like his "padrone" recently was



  25. The EPO in 2018: Partnering With Saudi Arabia and Cambodia (With Zero European Patents)

    The EPO's status in the world has declined to the point where former French colonies and countries with zero European Patents are hailed as "success stories" for Battistelli



  26. For Samsung and Apple the Biggest Threat Has Become Patent Trolls and Aggressors in China and the Eastern District of Texas, Not Each Other

    The latest stories about two of the world's largest phone OEMs, both of which find themselves subjected to a heavy barrage of patent lawsuits and even embargoes; Samsung has meanwhile obtained an antisuit injunction against Huawei



  27. The EPO Continues to Lie About Patent Quality Whilst Openly Promoting Software Patents, Even Outside Europe

    EPO patent quality continues to sink while EPO management lies about it and software patents are openly being promoted/advocatedEPO patent quality continues to sink while EPO management lies about it (the article above is new) and software patents are openly being promoted/advocated



  28. SCOTUS on WesternGeco v Ion Geophysical Almost Done; Will Oil States Decision Affirm the PTAB's Quality Assurance (IPRs) Soon?

    Ahead of WesternGeco and Oil States, following oral proceedings, it's expected that the highest court in the United States will deliver more blows to patent maximalism



  29. Links 17/4/2018: Linux 5.x Plans and Microsoft's 'Embrace'

    Links for the day



  30. The European Patent Office (EPO) Grants Patents in Error, Insiders Are Complaining That It's the Management's Fault

    The EPO has languished to the point where patents are granted in error, examiners aren't happy, and the resultant chaos benefits no-one but lawyers and patent trolls


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts