EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

05.20.10

Disable Aero in Vista 7

Posted in Microsoft, Security, Vista 7, Windows at 5:36 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Aero

Summary: Resource-hungry visual effects become a security threat to Windows

YET another security problem is found in Vista 7, which begs for the question, “how on Earth does the GUI/presentation layer pose a risk to the entire operating system?”

Microsoft on Tuesday warned users of a vulnerability in 64-bit versions of Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 that could expose users to malware attacks.

[...]

Bryant said a patch would be forthcoming, but didn’t say when. In the meantime, users can prevent attacks by disabling the Windows Aero Theme. To turn it off, choose Start > Control Panel and click on Appearance and Personalization. Then click on Change the Theme. Then select one of the Basic and High Contrast Themes.

Vista 7 — like its predecessors — is not secure. Also see:

Did anyone really think that Vista 7 would improve security? Some say that Vista 7 is less secure than Vista. What’s even more perplexing:

People who paid for Vista do not feel they should pay again for “7″. Folks who sell defective cars should expect no more custom. Consumers may find “7″ acceptable but business wants to be free of the burden of that other OS. Some businesses and organizations will go with “7″ as the line of least resistance but GNU/Linux really looks good to users and administrators who have kept XP going for years. My users are asking for something fast that runs on our hardware. “7″ is not happening. We even were given some brand new machines with 3gB RAM, and, to my surprise, find they shipped with XP… That says something about this notion that customers are demanding “7″. Why would an OEM ship us XP if that were the case?

Best of Windows is not the best operating system.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

14 Comments

  1. your_friend said,

    May 20, 2010 at 12:57 pm

    Gravatar

    Vista 7 is pretty? It’s one of the ugliest and least efficient interfaces inflicted on users. Virtual desktops are still rudimentary and the flip view is useless for anything but advertising to the ignorant. Microsoft’s ribbon interface is a confusing change for prior users that wastes screen space in the more limited direction of most LCDs, forcing people to bow their heads and scroll a lot. The looks themselves are a step backwards from previous less cluttered versions of Windows. The proportions are even worse, being more complicated and less coherent than others that were forced by technical limitations. The overall result is something that is more cluttered and bewildering than the electronic games section of a casino but twice as crass.

  2. Yuhong Bao said,

    May 20, 2010 at 8:08 pm

    Gravatar

    “Vista 7 — like its predecessors — is not secure. Also see:”
    I already rebut some of them, particularly bad is the “Vista 7 Security “Cannot be Fixed. It’s a Design Problem.”” one (see the IRC logs).

    your_friend Reply:

    A dozen cases of complete failure can be rebutted? After 25 years of the worst kinds of software insecurity you still think Windows can be used for anything but non networked games or toys? What amazing faith you have.

    Yuhong Bao Reply:

    I was rebutting the evidence used. See old IRC logs.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Microsoft will need to rebuild Windows. It still lacks security features that are found in UNIX/Linux.

    Marketing hype campaigns about “security” and UAC restrictions are not enough.

    Yuhong Bao Reply:

    It still lacks security features that are found in UNIX/Linux.
    What features? UAC is a pretty close clone of sudo, for example.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Repositories for starters. I can’t give you a complete list right now. See http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/10/22/linux_v_windows_security/

    Yuhong Bao Reply:

    Yea, I have read this. Let me try to rebut some of them. The first one “Windows has only recently evolved from a single-user design to a multi-user model” is just plainly not true. NT has existed since 1993, even before Windows 95! On RPC, I know (I have seen Blaster, for example), but that is not easy to change even if Windows is rewritten since it is a network protocol, for God’s sake. And yes MS has been trying to make Windows more modular, see Windows Server 2008, for example, which was released after the article.

    Yuhong Bao Reply:

    Now 95 indeed ended up more popular than NT, which led to for example a lot of Win32 applications written without the NT security model in mind.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Yea, I have read this. Let me try to rebut some of them. The first one “Windows has only recently evolved from a single-user design to a multi-user model” is just plainly not true. NT has existed since 1993, even before Windows 95! On RPC, I know (I have seen Blaster, for example), but that is not easy to change even if Windows is rewritten since it is a network protocol, for God’s sake. And yes MS has been trying to make Windows more modular, see Windows Server 2008, for example, which was released after the article.

    Please provide me with proof that it’s more modular. Microsoft patented a modular O/S, but it does not mean this was properly implemented (or that Microsoft invented it).

    Now 95 indeed ended up more popular than NT, which led to for example a lot of Win32 applications written without the NT security model in mind.

    The article is not from early NT days. It’s just several years old. I think you are nitpicking.

    Yuhong Bao Reply:

    Please provide me with proof that it’s more modular. Microsoft patented a modular O/S, but it does not mean this was properly implemented (or that Microsoft invented it).
    Windows Server 2008, with it’s Server Core support, should be proof that MS is at least trying to make it more modular.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Please provide me with proof that it’s more modular. Microsoft patented a modular O/S, but it does not mean this was properly implemented (or that Microsoft invented it).

    Windows Server 2008, with it’s Server Core support, should be proof that MS is at least trying to make it more modular.

    Trying. It’s still not there. For a truly modular architecture see how Linux/GNU/X can be decoupled.

  3. Yuhong Bao said,

    May 21, 2010 at 3:51 pm

    Gravatar

    “The article is not from early NT days. It’s just several years old. ”
    Which only makes the claim that “Windows has only recently evolved from a single-user design to a multi-user model” even less true. NT has existed for more than a decade by then.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    That’s just a distraction really. It’s not the ‘meat’ of the article.

What Else is New


  1. Weaponising Russophobia Against One's Critics

    Response to smears and various whispering campaigns whose sole purpose is to deplete the support base for particular causes and people; these sorts of things have gotten out of control in recent years



  2. When the EPO is Run by Politicians It's Expected to Be Aggressive and Corrupt Like Purely Political Establishments

    António 'Photo Op' Campinos will have marked his one-year anniversary in July; he has failed to demonstrate morality, respect for the law, understanding of the sciences, leadership by example and even the most basic honesty (he lies a lot)



  3. Links 16/6/2019: Tmax OS and New Features for KDE.org

    Links for the day



  4. Stuffed/Stacked Panels Sent Back Packing After One-Sided Patent Hearings That Will Convince Nobody, Just Preach to the Choir

    Almost a week ago the 'world tour' of patent lobbyists in US Senate finally ended; it was an utterly ridiculous case study in panel stacking and bribery (attempts to buy laws)



  5. 2019 H1: American Software Patents Are as Worthless as They Were Last Year and Still Susceptible to Invalidation

    With a fortnight left before the second half of the year it seems evident that software patents aren't coming back; the courts have not changed their position at all



  6. As European Patent Office Management Covers up Collapse in Patent Quality Don't Expect UPC to Ever Kick Off

    It would be madness to allow EPO-granted patents to become 'unitary' (bypassing sovereignty of nations that actually still value patent quality); it seems clear that rogue EPO management has, in effect, not only doomed UPC ambitions but also European Patents (or their perceived legitimacy, presumption of validity)



  7. António Campinos -- Unlike His Father -- Engages in Imperialism (Using Invalid Patents)

    Despite some similarities to his father (not positive similarities), António Campinos is actively engaged in imperialistic agenda that defies even European law; the EPO not only illegally grants patents but also urges other patent offices to do the same



  8. António Campinos Takes EPO Waste and Corruption to Unprecedented Levels and Scale

    The “B” word (billions) is thrown around at Europe’s second-largest institution because a mischievous former EUIPO chief (not Archambeau) is ‘partying’ with about half of the EPO’s all-time savings, which are supposed to be reserved for pensions and other vital programmes, not presidential palaces and gambling



  9. Links 15/6/2019: Astra Linux in Russia, FreeBSD 11.3 RC

    Links for the day



  10. Code of Conduct Explained: Partial Transcript - August 10th, 2018 - Episode 80, The Truth About Southeast Linuxfest

    "Ask Noah" and the debate on how a 'Code of Conduct' is forcibly imposed on events



  11. Links 14/6/2019: Xfce-Related Releases, PHP 7.4.0 Alpha

    Links for the day



  12. The EPO is a Patent Troll's Wet Dream

    The makers of software and games in Europe will have to spend a lot of money just keeping patent trolls off their backs — a fact that seems to never bother EPO management because it profits from it



  13. EPO Spreading Patent Extremists' Ideology to the Whole World, Now to South Korea

    The EPO’s footprint around the world's patent systems is an exceptionally dangerous one; The EPO amplifies the most zealous voices of the patents and litigation ‘industry’ while totally ignoring the views and interests of the European public, rendering the EPO an ‘agent of corporate occupation’



  14. Guest Post: Notes on Free Speech, and a Line in the Sand

    We received this anonymous letter and have published it as a follow-up to "Reader's Claim That Rules Similar to the Code of Conduct (CoC) Were 'Imposed' on LibrePlanet and the FSF"



  15. Links 13/6/2019: CERN Dumps Microsoft, GIMP 2.10.12 Released

    Links for the day



  16. Links 12/6/2019: Mesa 19.1.0, KDE neon 5.16, Endless OS 3.6.0 and BackBox Linux 6

    Links for the day



  17. Leaked Financial 'Study' Document Shows EPO Management and Mercer Engaging in an Elaborate “Hoax”

    How the European Patent Office (EPO) lies to its own staff to harm that staff; thankfully, the staff isn't easily fooled and this whole affair will merely obliterate any remnants of "benefit of the doubt" the President thus far enjoyed



  18. Measuring Patent Quality and Employer Quality in Europe

    Comparing the once-famous and respected EPO to today's joke of an office, which grants loads of bogus patents on just about anything including fruit and mathematics



  19. Granting More Fundamentally Wrong Patents Will Mean Reduced Certainty, Not Increased Certainty

    Law firms that are accustomed to making money from low-quality and abstract patents try to overcome barriers by bribing politicians; this will backfire because they show sheer disregard for the patent system's integrity and merely lower the legal certainty associated with granted (by greedy offices) patents



  20. Links 11/6/2019: Wine 4.10, Plasma 5.16

    Links for the day



  21. Chapter 10: Moving Forward -- Getting the Best Results From Open Source With Your Monopoly

    “the gradual shift in public consciousness from their branding towards our own, is the next best thing to owning them outright.”



  22. Chapter 9: Ownership Through Branding -- Change the Names, and Change the World

    The goal for those fighting against Open source, against the true openness (let's call it the yet unexploited opportunities) of Open source, has to be first to figuratively own the Linux brand, then literally own or destroy the brand, then to move the public awareness of the Linux brand to something like Azure, or whatever IBM is going to do with Red Hat.



  23. Links 10/6/2019: VLC 3.0.7, KDE Future Plans

    Links for the day



  24. Patent Quality Continues to Slip in Europe and We Know Who Will Profit From That (and Distract From It)

    The corporate media and large companies don't speak about it (like Red Hat did before entering a relationship with IBM), but Europe is being littered and saturated with a lot of bogus software patents -- abstract patents that European courts would almost certainly throw out; this utter failure of the media to do journalism gets exploited by the "big litigation" lobby and EPO management that's granting loads of invalid European Patents (whose invalidation goes underreported or unreported in the media)



  25. Corporate Front Groups Like OIN and the Linux Foundation Need to Combat Software Patents If They Really Care About Linux

    The absurdity of having groups that claim to defend Linux but in practice defend software patents, if not actively then passively (by refusing to comment on this matter)



  26. Links 9/6/2019: Arrest of Microsoft Peter, Linux 5.2 RC4, Ubuntu Touch Update

    Links for the day



  27. Chapter 8: A Foot in the Door -- How to Train Sympathetic Developers and Infiltrate Other Projects

    How to train sympathetic developers and infiltrate other projects



  28. Chapter 7: Patent War -- Use Low-Quality Patents to Prove That All Software Rips Off Your Company

    Patents in the United States last for 20 years from the time of filing. Prior to 1994, the patent term was 17 years from when the patent was issued.



  29. The Linux Foundation in 2019: Over 100 Million Dollars in Income, But Cannot Maintain Linux.com?

    Today’s Linux Foundation gets about 0.1 billion dollars per year (as explained in our previous post), so why can’t it spend about 0.1% of that money on people who write for and maintain a site that actually promotes GNU/Linux?



  30. Microsoft and Proprietary Software Vendors a Financial Boon for the Linux Foundation, But at What Cost?

    The Linux Foundation is thriving financially, but the sources of income are diversified to the point where the Linux Foundation is actually funded by foes of Linux, defeating the very purpose or direction of such a nonprofit foundation (led by self-serving millionaires who don't use GNU/Linux)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts