EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

10.02.10

Signs of Defeat: Microsoft is Suing Linux Again, Using FAT Software Patents

Posted in GNU/Linux, Google, Microsoft, OIN, Patents, SCO at 2:52 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Microsoft is throwing gorilla dust again

Salt throwing

“We counted over a million lines of code that we allege are infringed in the Linux kernel today.”Darl McBride (SCO), September 11th, 2003

Summary: Microsoft declares patent war on Motorola, which has a very extensive patent portfolio of its own and may never again partner with Microsoft as a result

MICROSOFT grew out of a culture of aggression and its founders are fiends*. Having heard testimonies about extortionists like Bill Gates we are not surprised to see Microsoft going down the same path as SCO. As an increasingly frail company that fewer and fewer people care about, it just needs to roar a little, due to bad judgment from eccentric managers like Steve Ballmer, who famously said that “Linux is a cancer that attaches itself in an intellectual property sense to everything it touches.”

What Ballmer was trying to say is that he cannot compete against GNU/Linux unless he creates and lobbies for something imaginary which he calls “intellectual property” (that would be deceiving terminology for software patents). Ballmer cannot be too happy to see all those dying Microsoft products which he must drop as the company’s value drops too.

Some years ago we still saw some real announcements coming from Microsoft. Occasionally they announced some new products, but in recent months/years the announcements were often about the death of products and yesterday the main announcement was about Microsoft suing a partner/competitor using software patents. Linux is part of this lawsuit based on the following list of patents from Microsoft Emil (the first few correspond to FAT):

The nine patents in question in the ITC complaint include:

* 5,579,517: Common name space for long and short filenames
* 5,758,352: Common name space for long and short filenames
* 6,621,746: Monitoring entropic conditions of a flash memory device as an indicator for invoking erasure operations
* 6,826,762: Radio interface layer in a cell phone with a set of APIs having a hardware-independent proxy layer and a hardware-specific driver layer
* 6,909,910: Method and system for managing changes to a contact database
* 7,644,376: Flexible architecture for notifying applications of state changes
* 5,664,133: Context sensitive menu system/menu behavior
* 6,578,054: Method and system for supporting off-line mode of operation and synchronization using resource state information
* 6,370,566: Generating meeting requests and group scheduling from a mobile device

There are also comments on this article in LWN.

Microsoft is just suing Linux/Android, which is winning. Apple must be happy to see Microsoft do this. The brutes from Microsoft are now suing the last major hardware company which sells Android-powered phones and does not pay Microsoft for the ‘privilege’. The rest of them, all of which are based in Asia, already pay for imaginary Linux patent infringements (never named, just numbered but not enumerated based on some hypothetical basis).

“After suing another Open Source project, how come M$ say it loves Open Source ? What about Outercurve farce ?”
      –Reader from Brazil
All the major Android-distributing companies — notably HTC, Samsung, and LG — already pay Microsoft for Android (or at least claim to be paying Microsoft for it). All along we kept arguing that the only large distributor of Android which did not pay Microsoft for Linux was Motorola, which has patent prowess just like Nokia. “Guess this time they [Microsoft] went too far,” said to us one of the readers. “Motorola has thousands of patents, covering broad areas(uProcessors, Telco).”

“Nokia could join with Motorola and sue the ASS out of M$. This time they’re not fighting Tom Tom like firms,” said another reader. To quote other responses from Techrights readers: “After suing another Open Source project, how come M$ say it loves Open Source ? What about Outercurve farce ? Shameless face…”

Microsoft’s lawsuit in this case is not so different from the legal action against TomTom (mixture of patents targeting Linux and other areas). HTC appears to have surrendered to Microsoft only after Apple sued them too. Our guess is that Microsoft has been extorting and pressuring Linux/Android vendors for quite a while and Motorola refused to pay for the non-existent/unbacked claims. Here is the coverage from Murdoch’s press

Android has since replaced Microsoft as the mobile operating system of choice for handset vendors that don’t already have their own proprietary software. And while Samsung Electronics Co., LG Electronics Co. and HTC have committed to making Windows Phone 7 devices, all of them have a much larger presence in Android.

In IRC, one reader hypothesises that the timing of this lawsuit was intended to almost coincide with the release of Vista Phone 7 [sic], perhaps in order to ensure that people talk about Android being “not free” while Microsoft keeps waving its lousy new platform, attempting to use half a billion dollars in marketing just persuading carriers/manufacturers to support Vista Phone 7.

Mitchell Ashley remembered quite correctly Ballmer’s words which are analogous to his early laughter at the hypePhone. Ashley chose the headline: “Steve Ballmer: Google Android “just some words on paper”. You can say the same about Windows Mobile 7 today.”

Google Android is winning over customers, whether Microsoft’s Steve Ballmer wants to admit it or not. In a Tokyo press conference in 2007, Ballmer referred to Google’s upcoming Android OS as “just some words on paper right now” and “right now they have a press release — we have many, many millions of customers…”.

We’ve had a very long discussion about what Google and OIN should do about it. gnufreex wrote: “I am now thinking Google should buy some patent troll and go after everything Microsoft makes.”

A complaint could probably be filed by Google because this is racketeering [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. Microsoft is trying to embargo Motorola phones, using a sort of economic pressure/sanction (International Trade Commission [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]) in hope of making Motorola settle rather than pursue justice in court. Microsoft did the exact same thing to TomTom. It’s vicious.

Microsoft said today that it has filed suit against Motorola for patent infringement related to Motorola’s Android smartphones. Microsoft filed the suit in U.S. District Court in Washington and also filed a complaint to the International Trade Commission.

Here is an example of very poor coverage of the lawsuit

Microsoft says Motorola’s Android phones are patent infringers

Techrights’ inception as “Boycott Novell” about 4 years ago was designed to end Microsoft’s patent attacks on GNU/Linux. These attacks began shortly after Novell and Microsoft had signed their patent deal, which was initiated by Novell in the middle of 2006.

“These attacks began shortly after Novell and Microsoft had signed their patent deal, which was initiated by Novell in the middle of 2006.”Beware the spinners who keep pretending that Microsoft has turned soft on software patents. This lawsuit only provided further justification for avoiding Mono and Moonlight, especially in Android (c/f MonoDroid [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15]).

Microsoft has gotten desperate and its mob/lobbyists are spinning this lawsuit as reasonable.

If the allegations are true and Microsoft Florian is indeed one of the mobbyists [sic] on the company’s payroll (like ACT), then utterly disgusting techniques is all this monopoly abuser has got left, trying to force its way back in by ‘spamming’ blogs and getting told off for it, e.g. in the following comment:

When will you stop spamming the intewebs, Florian? Are you get paid per post?

You anti-FLOSS crusade is so ridiculous that it is not even funny anymore. It is really pathetic that Microsoft sends failures like you to do perception management.

To quote one line of nonsense from this mobbyist, “Google must now act constructively and try to work out amicable arrangements with those right holders.” Amazing!
___
* Bad behaviour descends from above. For example, “we will have to consider the patents they violate,” wrote Bill Gates about Star/OpenOffice some years ago.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

12 Comments

  1. faltu said,

    October 2, 2010 at 10:05 am

    Gravatar

    Andriod is stomping all over iPhone. Apple cannot match Google pace of development.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    It’s not just Google’s pace of development. Google enjoys the work from dozens of other large companies on Linux. Apple is essentially trying to catch up with IBM, Intel, HP, Red Hat, Google, and others. Developers are shown (e.g. in new surveys) to prefer to code for Linux/Android, not iOS.

  2. dyfet said,

    October 2, 2010 at 11:34 am

    Gravatar

    I am writing an article on this topic over the weekend. It will be up on planet gnu first, I think.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Let us know when it’s published and where.

    dyfet Reply:

    Done. http://planet.gnu.org/gnutelephony/?p=10

  3. Agent_Smith said,

    October 2, 2010 at 1:51 pm

    Gravatar

    Very upset with all this stuff. The ironic thing, I wrote in Ghabuntu’s blog about the dangers of hostile companies suing Linux/Open Source projects, and, 2 days later, it happens. Seems like I was foreseeing this tragedy.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    It was easy to foresee.

    Jose_X Reply:

    Apple was getting beat, but they got a new life by adopting very large quantities of open source (most popularly, a variant from the BSD family of operating systems). Also, they do allow developers to build third party apps. So Apple is most surely not working alone.

    However, their model is more closed than Google’s. This is one reason they are turning so aggressively to tragic patents. They are a significant handicap courtesy of a very broken patent system.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Apple sells to the rich people’s niche. It needs patents to prevent and to kill commoditisation.

  4. Agent_Smith said,

    October 2, 2010 at 2:04 pm

    Gravatar

    Actually, it was possible, but I did not think they would DO it, not so fast. I never thought they would go down so low.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    The lower MSFT (stock) goes, the lower Microsoft will stoop.

What Else is New


  1. Links 22/2/2018: Qt Roadmap for 2018, Calculate Linux 17.12.2

    Links for the day



  2. As Expected, Bristows and Others Already Lying About UPC Status in Germany, But Doing This Anonymously (to Dodge Accountability for Lies)

    In their characteristic fashion, firms that created the UPC for their self-enrichment purposes, along with publishers/writers who deem it their role to promote the UPC and set up lobbying events for the UPC, look for ways to downplay if not intentionally distort what happened in Germany yesterday



  3. Further Attacks on EPO Staff and the Appeal Boards; Former EPO Boards of Appeal Member Speaks About EPO Scandals

    In the process of devaluing EPO workers and perhaps preparing them for a large round of layoffs information is also revealed about further repressions against the independence of the Boards of Appeal



  4. End of the UPC Lobby and Withdrawal of UPCA May Seem Imminent

    The Unitary Patent fantasy (of mass litigation firms) is coming to an end; in fact, the German government and courts (Bundesverfassungsgericht to be specific) now deem the complaint to be admissible and thus likely legitimate in spite of many attempts to shoot it down



  5. EPO's Board 28 Spikes Article 53 in CA/3/18, Apparently After Battistelli Withdrew It

    The latest plot twist, as odd as that may seem, is that the attack on the rights of thousands of workers (many of whom are rumoured to be on their way out) is curtailed somewhat, at least for the time being



  6. Links 21/2/2018: Apper 1.0, New Fedora ISOs

    Links for the day



  7. Rumour: European Patent Office to Lay Off a Significant Proportion of Its Workforce

    While the Administrative Council of the EPO praises Battistelli for his financial accomplishments (as laughable as it may seem) a lot of families stuck in a foreign country may soon see their breadwinner unemployed, according to rumours



  8. The Patent Trolls' Lobby, Bristows and IAM Among Others, Downplays Darts-IP/IP2Innovate Report About Rising If Not Soaring Troll Activity in Europe

    Exactly like last year, as soon as IP2Innovate opens its mouth Bristows and IAM go into "attack dog" mode and promote the UPC, deny the existence or seriousness of patent trolls, and promote their nefarious, trolls-funded agenda



  9. Links 20/2/2018: Mesa 17.3.5, Qt 5.11 Alpha, Absolute 15.0 Beta 4, Sailfish OS 2.1.4 E.A., SuiteCRM 7.10

    Links for the day



  10. Replacing Patent Sharks/Trolls and the Patent Mafia With 'Icons' Like Thomas Edison

    The popular perceptions of patents and the sobering reality of what patents (more so nowadays) mean to actual inventors who aren't associated with global behemoths such as IBM or Siemens



  11. The Patent Trolls' Lobby is Distorting the Record of CAFC on PTAB

    The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), which deals with appeals from PTAB, has been issuing many decisions in favour of § 101, but those aren't being talked about or emphasised by the patent 'industry'



  12. Japan Demonstrates Sanity on SEP Policy While US Patent Policy is Influenced by Lobbyists

    Japan's commendable response to a classic pattern of patent misuse; US patent policy is still being subjected to never-ending intervention and there is now a lobbyist in charge of antitrust matters and a lawyer in charge of the US patent office (both Trump appointees)



  13. The Patent Microcosm's Embrace of Buzzwords and False Marketing Strives to Make Patent Examiners Redundant and Patent Quality Extremely Low

    Patent maximalists, who are profiting from abundance of low-quality patents (and frivolous lawsuits/legal threats these can entail), are riding the hype wave and participating in the rush to put patent systems at the hands of machines



  14. Today, at 12:30 CET, Bavarian State Parliament Will Speak About EPO Abuses (Updated)

    The politicians of Bavaria are prepared to wrestle with some serious questions about the illegality of the EPO's actions and what that may mean to constitutional aspects of German law



  15. Another Loud Warning From EPO Workers About the Decline of Patent Quality

    Yet more patent quality warnings are being issued by EPO insiders (examiners) who are seeing their senior colleagues vanishing and wonder what will be left of their employer



  16. Links 19/2/2018: Linux 4.16 RC2, Nintendo Switch Now Full-fledged GNU/Linux

    Links for the day



  17. PTAB Continues to Invalidate a Lot of Software Patents and to Stop Patent Examiners From Issuing Them

    Erasure of software patents by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) carries on unabated in spite of attempts to cause controversy and disdain towards PTAB



  18. The Patent 'Industry' Likes to Mention Berkheimer and Aatrix to Give the Mere Impression of Section 101/Alice Weakness

    Contrary to what patent maximalists keep saying about Berkheimer and Aatrix (two decisions of the Federal Circuit from earlier this month, both dealing with Alice-type challenges), neither actually changed anything in any substantial way



  19. Makan Delrahim is Wrong; Patents Are a Major Antitrust Problem, Sometimes Disguised Using Trolls Somewhere Like the Eastern District of Texas

    Debates and open disagreements over the stance of the lobbyist who is the current United States Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division



  20. Patent Trolls Watch: Microsoft-Connected Intellectual Ventures, Finjan, and Rumour of Technicolor-InterDigital Buyout

    Connections between various patent trolls and some patent troll statistics which have been circulated lately



  21. Software Patents Trickle in After § 101/Alice, But Courts Would Not Honour Them Anyway

    The dawn of § 101/Alice, which in principle eliminates almost every software patent, means that applicants find themselves having to utilise loopholes to fool examiners, but that's unlikely to impress judges (if they ever come to assessing these patents)



  22. In Aatrix v Green Shades the Court is Not Tolerating Software Patents But Merely Inquires/Wonders Whether the Patents at Hand Are Abstract

    Aatrix alleges patent infringement by Green Shades, but whether the patents at hand are abstract or not remains to be seen; this is not what patent maximalists claim it to be ("A Valentine for Software Patent Owners" or "valentine for patentee")



  23. An Indoctrinated Minority is Maintaining the Illusion That Patent Policy is to Blame for All or Most Problems of the United States

    The zealots who want to patent everything under the Sun and sue everyone under the Sun blame nations in the east (where the Sun rises) for all their misfortunes; this has reached somewhat ludicrous levels



  24. Berkheimer Decision is Still Being Spun by the Anti-Section 101/Alice Lobby

    12 days after Berkheimer v HP Inc. the patent maximalists continue to paint this decision as a game changer with regards to patent scope; the reality, however, is that this decision will soon be forgotten about and will have no substantial effect on either PTAB or Alice (because it's about neither of these)



  25. Academic Patent Immunity is Laughable and Academics Are Influenced by Corporate Money (for Steering Patent Agenda)

    Universities appear to have become battlegrounds in the war between practicing entities and a bunch of parasites who make a living out of litigation and patent bubbles



  26. UPC Optimism Languishes Even Among Paid UPC Propagandists Such as IAM

    Even voices which are attempting to give UPC momentum that it clearly lacks admit that things aren't looking well; the UK is not ratifying and Germany make take years to look into constitutional barriers



  27. Bejin Bieneman Props Up the Disgraced Randall Rader for Litigation Agenda

    Randall Rader keeps hanging out with the litigation 'industry' -- the very same 'industry' which he served in a closeted fashion when he was Chief Judge of the Federal Circuit (and vocal proponent of software patents, patent trolls and so on)



  28. With Stambler v Mastercard, Patent Maximalists Are Hoping to Prop Up Software Patents and Damage PTAB

    The patent 'industry' is hoping to persuade the highest US court to weaken the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), for PTAB is making patent lawsuits a lot harder and raises the threshold for patent eligibility



  29. Apple Discovers That Its Patent Disputes Are a Losing Battle Which Only Lawyers Win (Profit From)

    By pouring a lot of money and energy into the 'litigation card' Apple lost focus and it's also losing some key cases, as its patents are simply not strong enough



  30. The Patent Microcosm Takes Berkheimer v HP Out of Context to Pretend PTAB Disregards Fact-Finding Process

    In view or in light of a recent decision (excerpt above), patent maximalists who are afraid of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) try to paint it as inherently unjust and uncaring for facts


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts