EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

10.25.10

Windows Profit Declines Sharply Because of Competition From GNU/Linux

Posted in Finance, GNU/Linux, Microsoft, Windows at 4:02 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Old building

Summary: Slowly but surely, Free software breaks Windows and other Microsoft platforms by lowering their market value and thus hurting Microsoft’s cashflow

ONE of our sceptical readers has raised an important matter in IRC yesterday. By looking back at some numbers he claims to have found more proof that Vista 7 does not succeed in the marketplace, contrary to these ludicrous claims that “Windows 7 might be a massive commercial success” (utter BS from Engadget, no offence intended). We’ll get to the pertinent details in a moment, not before pointing out that our informant from Sweden, Mikko, claims based on this article that “[S]ilverlight on the web is dead [...] Ballmer states that Silverlight is now pretty much strictly a client, non-cross platform thing, while explicitly stating that when it comes to doing something universal, “the world’s gone HTML5″.” So, we were right about Silverlight all along [1, 2, 3, 4], but that’s a separate story.

Mikko says he “thinks that there’s only bad journalism on Engadget” and we too wrote about the subject. Microsoft even gave this publication an expensive new laptop with Vista 7 (pre-beta) preinstalled so that it can praise Vista 7 before anyone else gets to see it. It’s an exercise of PR.

Windows undoubtedly has a margins problem. Mainstream publications that we cited recently say it clearly as it’s not hard to see. And looking at the source our reader cites, there is this MSFT analysis (Q1 of 2010) and one particular image that says it all. It’s all big minuses for Microsoft’s cash cows too.

Our reader responded by saying: “Record numbers of sales but 52% decline in income? Wow!

“If Microsoft’s sales have been flat of declining, it is no wonder they have gone from virtual dominance to 68% of all units today. 68% is a Vista 7 channel stuffing number, and the actual number is probably greater than that. That is, more than 32% of desktop computers are shipped without Windows…”

As we have shown before, Windows profits declined over the years. Profit fell by more than half based on the above, but income aside, revenue is down 39% too for Windows. That’s pretty shocking unless there’s a snag to be taken into account.

Our reader summarised by saying that “you can’t see the reports, sadly but the SEC will serve them to you… I was more interested in finding the number of licenses Microsoft has sold as a fraction of world PC shipments. Both are slippery numbers, with IDC providing most of the published PC shipment figures to Microsoft boosters and few hits on license numbers.” GNU/Linux is one cause of the stated declines. Microsoft is forced to lower prices to remain competitive. This may help explain the FUD attacks we’ve been seeing recently. One talking point is about GNU/Linux being “fragmented”, which is basically a negative word for “diverse”. “”Fragmented” is a proprietary spectacles view,” explained Groklaw some days ago in relation to Android, and “[p]eople say that about GNU/Linux too. But what they miss is this: you can do whatever you want. That is a wonderful feeling, and it leads to superfast development, not to mention a lot of fun.”

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

11 Comments

  1. lightpriest said,

    October 26, 2010 at 4:20 am

    Gravatar

    Every Linux distro allows you to install a different kernel version or compile one of your own so you could add/remove support or even optimize it for your own needs.
    With package managers and different repositories you have the ability to install an older/newer version of some software if current is buggy or lack some features.
    You can even run the same software with different versions using chroot, if dependency is a problem.

    On Windows, you cannot replace the “Explorer” (shell), you cannot replace “Gena” (the login manager), but still – there are 4 major versions of Windows splitted amongst different SPs and each with its own problems/bugs. Different MSOffice versions sometimes don’t match each other making documents look funny. Different IIS versions have weird bugs, not to mention performance issues.
    Some laptop OEMs build drivers only for Vista/7, making it impossible to use XP with that laptop.

    If anything’s true about fragmentation is that every software has it.
    MS users suffer more from it. If you have a problem with a certain version of Windows you either need to pay for an upgrade, which breaks other stuff, wait for the company to build a fixed version or don’t use the feature you wanted at all.
    If that same problem occures on Linux, at worst you chroot.

    Fragmentation on Linux is an advantage, it was created that way. Fragmentation on Windows is how they do business.

    twitter Reply:

    Fragmentation, as you have noticed, is a non free software problem. Microsoft successfully labled non free Unix “fragmented” and they would like to project this on gnu/linux, bsd and other free software. They might have a point with Android because Google did not use a strong copy left license like GPL3 that would prevent Tivoisation and other non free monkey shines. Anyone can see that there is no such problem with gnu/linux because all of the same free software comes with ever distribution, with a few interesting exceptions that others have not picked up yet. Skype demonstates that it is easy enough to make non free software for gnu/linux distributions but the user is left helpless and dependent on Skype. All of these problems and more exist to a worse extent on Windows, of course. The issue is a typical Microsoft troll which inverts reality for the ignorant.

    It is better to talk about the fundamental issues of software freedom which clear the air quickly. More freedom and fewer restrictions are obviously better for everyone. “Fragmentation” does not exist where people are free to share. Most other software problems boil down to people being uncooperative and abusive towards their neighbors.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    In UNIX, things are typically built upon accepted standards (not vendors), so the notion of “fragmentation” does not quite apply. The modular pieces interact quite nicely.

    twitter Reply:

    Irix, HPUX, AIX, Solaris, SCO, Next and others did incorporate some common and accepted standards but each owner had their selfish pieces that made “open” difficult. Irix had a journaling file system, for example but others did not. Free software has recreated the nice pieces of each and brought them together where they can all be enjoyed at once. I’m no expert in ancient Unix, but differences in C libraries made it difficult to port some work from Solaris to gnu/linux for me. Had all of the owners shared from the start, their hardware would now dominate the computing landscape. As things went, the survivors lost both their independent hardware and software efforts and now bow down before Intel and Microsoft. They were divided and annihilated.

  2. TemporalBeing said,

    October 26, 2010 at 12:12 pm

    Gravatar

    It’s coming to the end-game for Microsoft.

    Back when Windows 9x/Me was released, an upgrade cost $90USD, and the full version (everything!) was $199 at most. WinXP increased that slightly; I think upgrades were $120-130 range, but the full version (Pro) was still only about $199. With Vista, Microsoft more than doubled the cost. All of a sudden upgrades were $199, and the full version was $399! An inflated value that they kept for Win7, only they added the Family Pack (3-5 licenses) for a little more than that $199 upgrade price. Still, not really much of a deal.

    At least with Office they were smart enough not to change the price too significantly; but it’s still pricey; and Microsoft relies Office to drive sales of Windows. So as people and organizations have started moving off of Office, they now find themselves able to move off of Windows as well, or at least in a better position to do so.

    So, I expect that we are at the beginning of the exponential curve downwards of ousting Microsoft from the PC business. The same wave that pushed them to market dominance is now going to crush them.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    They are moving into vapourware mode again.

  3. twitter said,

    October 28, 2010 at 10:44 pm

    Gravatar

    Vista 7 Failure! Despite wild raves by Microsoft boosters, first quarter numbers are not good for Microsoft. Barrons has a concise summary, with some caveats about deferred income and jubilation but little perspective.

    [16.2 billion in revenue] up 25% from a year ago. Operating income was $7.12 billion, up 59%; net income was $5.41 billion, up 51%; EPS was up 55%. Year ago period results included the deferral of $1.47 billion of revenue related to Windows 7 upgrades; adjusted for that factor, revenue was up 13% and operating income was up 20%, while net income was up 16% and EPS rose 19%.

    Sounds great, right? Not when compared to 2009 [2], the tail end of Vista failure. In 2009, the company had income of about 7 billion. So, there is little change from where Vista left them in 2009. In fact, the company is probably worse off because they managed to channel stuff 240 million Vista 7 licenses recently. Not much should be expected beyond that spurt.

    Predictably, Microsoft bills the deferral roller coaster as explosive growth. In this article, for example, claims “During Q1 FY10, before Windows 7 was released…” which is not true. Microsoft was already selling licenses for the new OS and had channel stuffed enough of them to cause a big dip when the revenue was “deferred”. A year later, we have some more channel stuffing billed as actual sales to make an apparent rise. The two year numbers tell the story more clearly but Microsoft boosters pretend to be unable to remember the numbers. Goldfish might do better.

    twitter Reply:

    Tech Crunch points out that Apple had $4 billion more revenue than Microsoft did. If we believe Microsoft when they tell us Windows 7 has been very successfull, the best selling OS EVAR, we have to conclude that Windows success makes no difference. Success or failure, Windows 7, just like Vista, has not made a bottom line difference to Microsoft.

  4. twitter said,

    October 30, 2010 at 1:47 pm

    Gravatar

    Pogson’s figures gave Microsoft more credit than they deserved because he took the company’s word. Microsoft claimed that 240 million coppies of Vista 7 had been shipped/sold. Pogson took that number and divided it by the number of computers shipped/sold in the year which was 350 million. Microsoft’s quarterly report claims only 150 million coppies. The discrepancy most likely comes from the fact that Microsoft pulled a Vista capable scam, promising free “upgrades”, long before they officially released Windows 7. The confusion is intentional, but they lied less to the SEC than they did to everyone else. 150/350 million is far less than Pogson gave the company credit for. XP has made up the majority of business purchases, because business has choices that normal people don’t, but it is probably fair to say that less than 60% of computers shipped with Windows last year.

    Poor Steve Ballmer only got a $670,000 bonus because results were so bad and even people at Information Week realize that Microsoft might not be around in five years.

    twitter Reply:

    The report referenced is actually a proxy report which has executive compensation and number of shares owned.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    The bonus matters a lot less than Ballmer’s shares in the company. But a decline is symbolic. Ron Hovsepian’s bonus (Novell CEO) is almost 10 times that of Ballmer.

What Else is New


  1. Links 23/5/2016: GNOME 3.22, Calculate Linux 15.17

    Links for the day



  2. 'Celebrity' Patent Trolls and the Elusive Battle Against Patent Trolls (or Eastern District of Texas Courts) Rather Than Software Patents

    Some of last week's more important reports, which serve to demonstrate how the system is attempting to tackle a side-effect of software patents rather than the patents themselves (their irrational scope)



  3. The Circus of Patent 'Reporting' (by Omission) on the Subject of Software Patents in the US and USPTO Bias

    look at some of the latest oddities in the US patent system and much of the reporting about software patenting (more or less monopolised by those who profit from it, not harmed by it)



  4. IP3 Demonstrates That Today's Patent Systems Devolve Into a Conglomerates' Game, Won't Protect the Mythical Small Inventor

    Multinational corporations bring together their shared interests and steer the increasingly-inseparable patent systems according to their needs and goals, but has anyone even noticed?



  5. Disrupting Battistelli's Distracting Propaganda: EPO Staff to Protest Again in About a Fortnight

    The overly extravagant (waste of money) EPO European Inventor Award will have to compete for media attention with thousands of EPO staff (in all EPO sites) marching in the streets to protest against the EPO's abuses



  6. Corrupting Democracy? Growing Frequency of Rumours That the EPO's President Battistelli is 'Buying' Votes of Small Member States

    Several sources suggest that rather than appease the Administrative Council by taking corrective action Battistelli and his notorious 'circle' now work hard to remove opposition from the Administrative Council, especially where this is easier a task to accomplish (politically or economically)



  7. [ES] Los Mitos de la EPO ‘Calidad’ de Patentes y de ‘Creación’ de Patentes: Basados en Ventas de Cafe y Trauma

    La carrera hacia el fondo, o la ridícula asumpción de Battistelli de que otorgar más y más patentenes más rápidamente (e.g. usando PACE) sería beneficióso a largo término, puede guíar al final colapse del valor de la EPO y la pérdida de su lárgamente ganada reputación a nivel mundial



  8. Links 22/5/2016: Systemd 230, Debian Installer Alpha 6

    Links for the day



  9. EPO Patent 'Quality' and 'Patent Creation' Myth: Capsule-Based Coffee Sales and Trauma

    The race to the bottom, or Battistelli's ludicrous assumption that granting more and more patents faster (e.g. using PACE) would be beneficial in the long run, may lead to the ultimate collapse of the EPO's value and demise of its long-earned reputation worldwide



  10. Guest Post: How Vista 10 Imposes Itself on Users of Windows

    A reader's experience being nagged by Microsoft, as documented and explained by this reader



  11. [ES] El Notorio Tirano de la EPO, Benoît Battistelli, Se Reune Con Otros Tiranos, Reportes de Que ‘Limpia’ el Consejo Administrativo

    El régimen de Battistelli, talvez la fuente de verguénza más grande, alegadamente está “cortejándo países pequeños/corruptos para asegurárse de que los delegados que votarón contra él serán remplazados”



  12. [ES] Comentadores Anónimos Debaten Si la EPO de Battistelli Puede Revocar las Pensiones de Empleados Que Se Atreveen — GASP — a Buscar Empleo Alternativo

    Una mirada a las causas de desesperación e imensa presión en la EPO, donde las pensiónes pueden ser cortadas como medio de represália y la gente puede ser negada empleo aún después de dejar la Oficina Europea de Patentes (EPO)



  13. [ES] Otra Casi Vacía Presentación de la EPO en La Hague

    El propagandístico “estudio social” de Battistelli (básicamente un montón de engañosas afirmacionesdisfrazadas como ‘investigación’) ayuda a demostrar que los empleados de la EPO no tiene absolutamente fe en la gerencia



  14. Links 21/5/2016: Manjaro Linux RC, Flock 2016 Schedule

    Links for the day



  15. USPTO Ignores a Lot of Cases Against Software Patents to Justify Resumption of More Software Patenting

    The US patent system (USPTO) is so obsessed with granting as many patents as possible -- even bogus patents in areas that are no longer patent-eligible -- that its guidelines are further perturbed and whose appeals board is massively overwhelmed/overworked/understaffed



  16. Notorious EPO Tyrant, Benoît Battistelli, Meets Other Tyrants, Reportedly 'Cleanses' the Administrative Council

    The Battistelli regime, perhaps the biggest embarrassment of Europe right now, is allegedly "courting smaller countries to make sure the delegates who voted against him will be replaced"



  17. Links 20/5/2016: Purism Tablet, ChromeOS PCs Outsell 'Mac'-Branded PCs

    Links for the day



  18. CAFC Rules Against Software Patents But Witness With Horror the Silence From Patent Lawyers (Bias by Omission)

    In an effort to protect software patents in the United States, where these patents came from in the first place (and continue to spread from), patent lawyers pretend not to see cases where software patents get invalidated and instead focus on the rare exception



  19. It's All Just Artificial Distractions From EPO Management, 'Yellow' Union Comes Under Scrutiny Again

    What's happening inside the EPO these days and what meaningless rubbish the management of the EPO would rather have the media obsessed with



  20. Anonymous Commenters Debate Whether Battistelli's EPO Can Revoke Pensions of Dismissed Employees Who Dare -- GASP -- Find Alternative Employment

    A look at causes for desperation and immense pressure at the EPO, where pensions can be cut as means of reprisal and people can be denied employment even after they leave the European Patent Office (EPO)



  21. Australian Productivity Commission's Research Calls for Ban on Software Patents, Davies Collison Cave Calls for Complaints Against This Finding

    As the push against software patents grows in Australia, much to the chagrin of Australian software developers, Davies Collison Cave (patent law firm) publicly calls for opposition, calling its side "the truth" and pretending it represents "Australian innovators."



  22. Links 19/5/2016: Wine-Staging 1.9.10, Android N

    Links for the day



  23. Another Almost Empty EPO Presentation at The Hague

    The propagandistic "social study" of Battistelli (basically a lot of misleading claims disguised as 'research') helps demonstrate that EPO staff has absolutely no faith in the management



  24. [ES] La UPC un Ataque No Sólo Contra el Público Europeo Pero También Contra los Empleados de la EPO

    El despido de los empleados actuales de la EPO y el remplazo del interés público por intereses corpórativos (intereses de grandes compañíás del otro lado del charco) es todo lo que la UPC realmente es



  25. Links 18/5/2016: ReactOS 0.4.1, KWayland in KDE Frameworks

    Links for the day



  26. Endless Harmonious Self-Congratulatory Praises From Self-Serving Law Firms in the Wake of Just One Pro-Software Patents Decision From CAFC

    The court that brought software patents to the United States has defended a software patent and patent lawyers want us to believe that this is an historic game-changing decision (potentially to be appealed by Microsoft, if Microsoft actually wanted to fight software patents)



  27. If Battistelli Stayed and UPC Became a Reality, Patent Quality at the EPO Would Get a Lot Worse

    The vision that Team Battistelli has for the EPO is an ENA-inspired neoliberal and corporatist vision that would bring the legitimacy of the system down to zero and the European economy to the brink of collapse



  28. Two Months Down the Line, Battistelli Has Done None of What the Administrative Council Told Him to Do; He Should be Sacked Next Month

    An informal but timely progress report shows that Battistelli has made no progress whatsoever and all the injustices remain in tact, in spite of the warnings from the Administrative Council (mid March)



  29. [ES] Al Abundar Patentes de Sofware, Free/Open Source Software Pierde, Mientras que los Abogados de Patentes Ganan Más que Nadie

    Impuestos al desarrollo — o el costo relaciónado con el caos de patentes — rápidamente creciéndo cada vez mas y en el caso del Free software rápidamente excede las ganancias por distribución, que usualmente es $0



  30. [ES] La UPC es Guerra de Classes (los Ricos contra Todo el Mundo), He Aqu el Porque de la Militarización de la Oficina Europea de Patentes

    En cara a la resistencia a contróversiales y frecuéntemente antidemocráticas, ilegales y posiblemente actos críminales o felonías, los chácales de Battistelli recurren a ataques de decapitación (atacando o torturando figuras claves) y armándose alrededor de sí misma — todo esto mientras falsamente acusando otros de portar armas o recurrir a la agresión


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts