EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

06.04.13

Copyright and Patent Laws Have Nothing in Common, Developers Should Stick With Copyrights Alone

Posted in Patents at 8:02 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Code is not a machine

Sewing machine

Summary: Input from one of our Australian readers motivates writing a simple essay on why software patents are unnecessary

Our reader from Australia wrote to say: “Remember my attempt in Feb to get Software Patents abolished? Well, it’s at the final stage. I need some supporting material, that is less than 300 words. Is that something you can help me with? If you can write about why software patents should be abolished, that would be great.”

There was a similar request in Groklaw some days ago, as Reddit invited people to submit text for reading by a movie celebrity (with the same length limitation) and Pamela Jones suggested writing about software patents.

Essays about why software patents are bad would not be unique. They have been written for years in many sites (the facts have hardly changed for decades) and they use technical, economic and philosophical arguments (or a combination of these). I will do this today in Techrights using the angle of a developer, not a customer — a person to whom patents in general are of no value. It is written in terms that even politicians (usually lawyers) can grasp.


Software Developers Need No Patents

When a developer writes software, he or she uses a computer (or even a piece of paper) to outline instructions to be run in sequence, a bit like solving an equation. These instructions are reducible to pure mathematics, but computers nowadays offer high-level abstractions, which make development more rapid and render instructions readable by a compiler rather than a computer processor. This technology is many decades old.

A lot of programs these days are built by providing a user-facing layer, a GUI, which reuses off-the-shelf graphical toolkits, as well as a back-end logical unit, typically accessible through callback functions. This is where the clever bits of a program usually exist. There is rarely something very innovative or novel in the GUI, which is less science-based in nature.

Assuming that something unprecedented (i.e. no prior art) can be found in callback functions, it is covered by default by copyright law, enabling the programmer to tackle plagiarism. When the program is compiled, plagiarism is impeded anyway. The code turns into binary data. This means that copying of programs is hard and where it occurs there are already laws in place to tackle that, at no cost to the developer.

Patents are an unnecessary complication at two levels; first, the developer needs to waste time filing a verbal description of the program’s instructions (distracting from further development of potentially innovative programs) and then pay someone for the infeasible task of identifying prior art; secondly, and quite inadvertently, by introducing this level of protectionism into the system, we render any programmer “potentially infringing”, which further impedes development and contributes to uncertainty. Both aspects reduce innovation and productivity. In an age when writing programs is possible by everyone, this creates no incentive to write more programs; au contraire.

Programmers need copyrights, not patents. That is their consensus. For anyone other than programmers to weigh in on this subject would be rather inappropriate and usually opportunistic.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 19/4/2015: New KaOS (2015.04), Manjaro Linux 0.8.13 Pre1

    Links for the day



  2. Links 18/4/2015: ExTiX 15.2, RaspArch

    Links for the day



  3. Microsoft Tired of Pretending to be Nice to Free/Open Source Software (FOSS), Microsoft 'Open' Technologies Dumped

    Microsoft dumps its proxy (misleadingly named 'Open Tech') and other attacks on Free software persist from the inside, often through so-called 'experts' whose agenda is to sell proprietary software



  4. More Translations of French Article About the EPO

    German and Dutch translations of the Le Monde article are now available



  5. Links 17/4/2015: Wipro and the Netherlands Want FOSS

    Links for the day



  6. Microsoft's Multi-Dimensional Assault on Android/Linux: Extortion, Lobbying of Regulators, and Bribes

    Microsoft's vicious war on Linux (and Android in its current incarnation) takes more sophisticated -- albeit illegal (as per the RICO Act) -- forms



  7. Microsoft's Plot to Associate Windows with 'Open Source' is Proving Effective, Despite Being Just a Big Lie

    A look at the latest headlines which can lead to a false perception that Microsoft is now in bed with 'Open Source'



  8. Microsoft Windows Remotely Crashed, Remotely Hijacked, But Still No Logo and No Branding for the Bugs

    Windows maintains its reputation as a back doors haven, but the media is still not highlighting the severity of this issue, instead focusing on accidental bugs in Free software, even very old (and already fixed) bugs



  9. Black Duck's Latest Self-Promotional Propaganda (for Proprietary Software) Still Fools Journalists

    Under the traditionally misleading title "Future of Open Source" Black Duck expresses its desire for proprietary software sales, salivating over fearful managers who may get bamboozled into buying the patents-'protected' Black Duck 'product'



  10. Links 16/4/2015: Opera for 32-bit GNU/Linux, New Chromebook Site

    Links for the day



  11. Links 15/4/2015: Plasma 5.3 Beta, Docker's New Funding

    Links for the day



  12. Microsoft is Still Googlebombing the Term Open Source and Fooling Politicians Who Now Think Microsoft is Open Source

    Microsoft's attempt to assimilate (to confuse) bears some fruit and the Microsoft-linked media plays a considerable role in it



  13. Back Doors/Bug Doors in All Versions of Microsoft Windows Need a Name, a Logo, and Branding Too

    All versions of Microsoft Windows are found to have been insecure since 1997, but the bug responsible for this is not named as candidate for back door access, let alone named (with logo and marketing) like far less severe bugs in Free/libre software such as OpenSSL



  14. OnePlus (or OnePlus Customers) Should Wipe CyanogenMod From Existing Devices and Install Something Else

    A call for OnePlus to reconsider any future updates from Microsoft's Trojan horse, Cyanogen



  15. Links 14/4/2015: 3DR Dronecode, Z1/Z2 Tizen

    Links for the day



  16. Links 13/4/2015: Linux 4.0 Released; A Look at Antergos 2015.04.12

    Links for the day



  17. EFF Uses Alice v. CLS Bank Case to Pressure USPTO to Halt Software Patenting

    A look at recent patent policies and actions from the EFF, as well as increasing secrecy at the USPTO



  18. No, Panasonic Did Not Open-Source Anything (Another Example of Openwashing for PR)

    A dissection of media deception (or media being bamboozled) regarding the act of promising not to sue using patents, which in no way relates to Free/Open Source software



  19. Yes, Software Patents Are Dying, But Media Continues to Be Dominated by Those Denying it For a Salary

    The debate about software patents in this post-Alice era parallels the Net neutrality debate, where voices of people with vested interests contribute to confusion and meddle with largely-accepted views/consensus



  20. Links 12/4/2015: Linux 4.0 Imminent, Semplice 7 Reviewed

    Links for the day



  21. GNU/Linux is Crushing Windows, So Microsoft Leaps Ahead to X+2 Vapourware (Two Versions Ahead Into the Future)

    Microsoft continues to pile up bogus claims and empty promises in an effort to stall migrations to GNU/Linux



  22. The ITC's and US Media's Surprisingly Soft Treatment of Patent Bully Apple

    Despite Apple's history of initiating patent aggression against its competition (mostly Android-backing companies), the US corporate media treats Apple like a victim



  23. Microsoft Continues to Attack (and Tax) Linux Using Software Patents

    Microsoft stabs Linux in the back while it continues to insist that it 'loves' Linux



  24. European Unitary Patent Decision Due 5th of May

    The meta-industry of patent protectionism is debating and pushing forth the Unitary Patent Court, with or without endorsement from the European public



  25. Microsoft is Still Googlebombing 'Open Source'

    Microsoft's massive campaign of deception, obfuscation and misuse of the "Open Source" brand is still on, even a week after it was cleverly started by Condé Nast



  26. Links 11/4/2015: elementary OS Freya, Mageia 5 on the Way

    Links for the day



  27. Links 10/4/2015: Linux 4.0 Imminent, ZFS On Linux Improved

    Links for the day



  28. New Article Chronicles Suicides and Nervous Breakdowns at the EPO Due to the Management's Abuses

    Article from Le Monde translated into English



  29. Links 9/4/2015: SalentOS, Semplice Releases

    Links for the day



  30. The EPO is Becoming More Like the USPTO Under Benoît Battistelli's Greed-Driven Reign

    Recent articles about the EPO and the Unitary Patent are bundled together to highlight truly disturbing developments whereby those in power beget power through instruments of state-sanctioned power, such as the EPO (stateless entity within a continent-wide 'island')


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts