Bonum Certa Men Certa

Out-of-Control Battistelli Repeatedly Breaks Office Rules and EPC Rules, Then Tries to Change the Rules (Retroactive Legalisation)

Michael Hayden and Battistelli
Utter disregard for the law a privilege of few



Summary: A look at the abuses from Battistelli, who is breaking rules in a pathetic effort to gag critics, one day ahead of a third 'trial' against a truth-telling judge

THE absurdities at the EPO are somewhat reminiscent of GCHQ. Not only are rules being broken (knowingly and consciously) by management. The management tries to hide evidence of this and if the evidence leaks out to the world, then a campaign begins to try to retroactively authorise the abuses. Such is the nature of the EPO under Battistelli and the following relatively new text helps explain this from start to finish (which might be tomorrow or a few days later).

Here is some background information:

Double jeopardy is a procedural defence that forbids a defendant from being tried again on the same (or similar) charges in the same case following a legitimate acquittal or conviction. In common law countries, a defendant may enter a peremptory plea of autrefois acquité or autrefois convict (autrefois means "in the past" in French), meaning the defendant has been acquitted or convicted of the same offence and hence that they cannot be retried under the principle of double jeopardy that is mirrored by the “non bis in idem” principle applied by the ATILO in respect of disciplinary cases.


"EPO Law," on the other hand, is full of abuses. Consider 'Decision 1' Art. 23 1/15 (as HTML) and another which coincided with Board 28's letter to Heads of Delegation of the Administrative Council. Here is the PDF of 'Decision 2' Art. 23 2 /15. As we have been noting here for over a week, 'Decision 3' Art 23 ?/16 is on its way. To quote the above sources: "Hearing [will be] open to the public. [...] on 14 to 16 June 2016" (apparently because the EBoA insisted on it).

The above sources give an explanation of the situation as follows (doing a good job at highlighting the Nixonite behaviour of Battistelli amid Watergate):

Third time lucky?



Towards the end of 2014, the Investigative Unit carried out covert surveillance operations on a computer on the first floor of the Isar building as reported in the press and Internet blogs some time later. This computer is public: it was used by visiting delegates and patent attorneys. Subsequently a member of the Boards of Appeal was accused of “anonymous defamation1” of Mr. Topić (VP4) and served a “house ban” (technically equivalent to a suspension). The result was a storm of protest2 and quite rightly so. The Office does not have the right to spy on computers used by Council delegates and third parties. Investigating DG3 members further infringes their independence. For the same reason (infringement of their independence) Mr. Battistelli does not have the authority to suspend DG3 members. The latter aspect was more or less covered-up by the Council retroactively (sic) approving of the action. The alleged victim of defamation, Mr. Topić, appears to have a significant number of cases slowly working their way through the Croatian legal system. Interestingly, Mr. Topić lost his defamation complaint against a former co-worker despite the very serious nature of the accusations that she raised against him3. Hence it is difficult to determine what exactly can be considered “defamatory” in relation to Mr. Topić. The Office, on the other hand, apparently did not hesitate to facilitate the circulation of numerous very dubious accusations against the DG3 member, leaving the impression that a Board of Appeal member with an impeccable resume was in fact an armed nazi stalking the corridors of the Isar building4.

Mr. Battistelli is clearly determined to have the DG3 member removed from office, but seems to be rather lost as to the procedures to follow. The first attempt was via a Disciplinary Committee set up by the Council, to be followed by a dismissal by the Council in October 2015. In making this proposal Mr. Battistelli overlooked Art. 23 (1) EPC which stipulates that members of the Boards can only be dismissed upon a proposal from the Enlarged Board of Appeal. In other words: the President of the EPO proposed to the Council to act in breach of the EPC. The Council apparently had its doubts about the legality of the course of action proposed by the President and commissioned an independent legal opinion which confirmed their suspicions: a Board member cannot be removed from office unless the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBoA) has decided to make a proposal to that effect.

A first attempt to get the EBoA to issue a proposal for removal from office had already been initiated earlier in 2015 but had failed because the EBoA apparently could not make sense of the mass of unstructured material that had been thrown at them. It found the request submitted by the Council to be irreceivable due to lack of substantiation. Apparently, the Office management suppressed the publication on the Office website within days despite the decision of the EBoA that it should be published. This obviously is another problem since it amounts to Mr. Battistelli censoring the EBoA, which seems to be a further interference with its independence. Not awaiting the written reasons for the first decision, the Council, apparently at the urging of the President, proceeded to launch a second request for removal from office. This second request suffered from the same flaws and was withdrawn by the Council on 11 February after a delay of several months. The decision in the second request, although flagged for publication by the EBoA, never made it to the outside world but can be found on the Internet5.

The Council then launched a third request which is still pending. In order to accommodate the prolongation of the procedure, Art. 95 SevRegs was changed in December 2015 with retroactive effect (!) so that now not only the Board member concerned, but any Board member can be suspended for 2 years and longer. After 1.5 years suspension, now on half pay, and 5 procedures (investigation, disciplinary procedure and 3 EBoA procedures), one wonders how many times the Council may come back with basically the same case.

Detailing the complete catalogue of procedural errors in this case would go far beyond the scope of [this] article. Suffice it to say that the whole procedure provides a textbook example for the lack of competence that prevails in the Battistelli administration. And whatever the outcome will be, it is clear that there will only be losers: the Council, who did not assume responsibility as appointing and disciplinary authority, Mr. Battistelli who, in this procedure, has breached almost every regulation in the book; DG3 that has seen its independence seriously undermined, and the DG3 member concerned who has been living an uncertain and very expensive nightmare for 18 months, with no end in sight.

______ 1Communiqué No. 64 (€« Anonymous defamation : EPO staff member apparently involved €») of 03.12.2014, referring back to a Communiqué of 26.02.2013 (€« Defamation Campaign against VP4 €») 2 http://ipkitten.blogspot.de/2014/12/breaking-news-enlarged-board-appeals.html 3 http://techrights.org/2016/01/19/croatian-defamation-lawsuit-an-update/ (access to Techrights is censored in the EPO) 4 Similar accusations were repeated by the President in a letter to Mr. Pierre-Yves Le Borgn' 5 A short overview of the case and links to both decisions can be found on wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art_23_1/15_and_Art_23_2/15



I have personally been following this saga since the beginning and it is appalling that Battistelli still calls himself "President". He should have been impeached not with compensation but with legal cases against him. It's Battistelli who should be on trial, and maybe some day we shall see that too.

Make no mistake about it. It's not as though EPO staff isn't aware of what's going on. It's mostly the media, which has been greased up by Battistelli, that remains apathetic or unwilling to cover the above scandal (or cover it poorly/improperly if it does at all). Sometimes the media just helps Battistelli defame his victim -- a subject on which we might say more one day (we have some insider knowledge of how it came about).

Regarding EPO under Battistelli, one person asked yesterday: "Who is going to be stupid enough to apply for a job at these conditions?" Here is the message in full: "If I understand correctly, the President is introducing new laws meaning that if he fires me for failing to meet 15% yearly increases of examination targets, or because my husband is a patent attorney, he can prohibit me from working for 2 years, cut my pension and apparently also cut my health insurance.

"This sounds crazy when the office is announcing internally that they will recruit hundreds of examiners in the next 3 years to get rid of the backlog until 2020 (4 years). And at that point they will need hundreds of examiners less, of course. Who is going to be stupid enough to apply for a job at these conditions?

"In addition, this is not at all what the council asked. Maybe the President has a plan to destroy the EPO and replace it with a new patent system. Or maybe he is indeed crazy, I don't know. He is not so young. In any case, what can the council really do? Can they get rid of a President in advance? Can they force him to do anything? "

This is not compatible with European law. Battistelli "might kill the EPO in the process," one person wrote yesterday. To quote the entire comment: "I don't think he has a plan to replace the whole system with something else.

"He is just applying what he has learned and what has been applied to all public agencies and corporations for the last 3 decades, cost cutting at the bottom combined with bonuses for the top floors.

"He might kill the EPO in the process, but that is not very likely without political will to do so.

"He will probably do a lot of irreversible damage that will affect the whole IP profession in Europe, examiners and attorneys alike and also some applicants. After all, if filling a form is all that I need to get a patent, I certainly will consider doing that myself."

Well, patent lawyers too increasingly realise that Battistelli is against their interests.

We couldn't help but notice someone still responding to provocative comments if not trolling (which we prefer to altogether ignore and skip). The term “team Battistelli” seems to have been adopted there (it was coined by Techrights). Remember that Battistelli leaving would not be enough as his circle of entryism (i.e. Team Battistelli) now poisons the EPO's management as a whole. Battistelli has surrounded himself with people as abusive as himself, or at least loyal enough to cover up his abuses.

Recent Techrights' Posts

Total Lock-down Ambitions - Part IV - The Latest Examples and the Perils (in Summary)
For further reading take a look at Musial's nice outline
FOSDEM is Called "FOSDEM" Because of Richard Stallman (RMS)
The overlap there seems timely; yesterday RMS spoke in French-speaking (in part) Switzerland where questions in French were accepted
Video: University in Peru Honours Richard Stallman
Tomorrow, January 20, Richard Stallman speaks in France
 
They Won't Buy Vista 11 PCs or "Hey Hi" Copilot+++++++ PCs of Microsoft (With TPM)
Windows at 8%
No Time Left for President Biden to Pardon Julian Assange
At least they tried
[Meme] 404, Not Found
Kuhn: I'd like to interject for a moment, we made an alliance with the Microsoft-dominated LF to outsource projects to Microsoft GitHub and rich people gave us money to do this
Links 19/01/2025: Gaza Ceasefire and PR Stunt by Fentanylware (TikTok), Faking It by "Going Dark" to Incite American Addicts (Users)
Links for the day
Links 19/01/2025: TikTok (Fentanylware) Now Banned in the US, Convicted Felon Talks to Fentanylware CEO and Pooh-Tin About Undoing the Ban Despite the Supreme Court Unanimously Upholding It
Links for the day
FTC Realises Microsoft Buying Fake 'Clients' to Fake "Revenue" (Microsoft 'Buying' Services and Products From Itself!)
Ponzi scheme
Total Lock-down Ambitions - Part III - The Web Browser as DRM Pusher
A lot of "streaming" stuff is DRM
IBM Termination Story and Information From Microsoft About Mass Layoffs
In 2 weeks of 2025 Microsoft already had 2 waves of layoffs
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, January 18, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, January 18, 2025
Links 18/01/2025: Restoring the Great Wall of China and Economic Expansion in China
Links for the day
Guardian Digital (linuxsecurity.com) is Spamming the Web With Microsoft's Promotional LLM Slop About UEFI 'Secure' Boot (Which is Against Real Security)
This is an attack on honest journalism
Links 18/01/2025: TikTok's Endgame, "Car Freedom", and Spying in Cars 'Fines' GM (Settlement)
Links for the day
January 20: Richard Stallman Talk in Europe
evening time in Europe, around midday in the United States and Canada
Links 18/01/2025: Apple Getting Out of Hey Hi (AI) Slop (Too Much Misinformation), Chaffbots/Chatbots Try to Settle Copyright Infringement Lawsuits
Links for the day
What Fake News Sites Are Doing to GNU/Linux
The LLM slop about Linux serves two purposes
Links 18/01/2025: Microsofters Upset at Microsoft's Ridiculous Rebrands (Excuse for Massive Price Hikes), Chaffbot Company ('Open'AI) Faces More Lawsuits
Links for the day
Gemini Links 18/01/2025: Surge in Illnesses, ctags, and Gemsync
Links for the day
Slopwatch: Too Lazy to Write Real Articles, Offloading to Chatbots Instead (LLM Slop About "Linux")
The Web was already full of garbage before the LLM frenzy. Now it's even worse.
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, January 17, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, January 17, 2025
RMS 'Inauguration' in Montpellier (Government Administration) on January 20th
Happy hacking
Even Technical Articles and HowTos From UNIXMen Nowadays Seem to be LLM Slop
We've just permanently removed the RSS feed of UNIXMen
The FSF's 2024 End-of-Year Fundraiser Succeeds: Over $400k to Support Software Freedom
That's worth bringing up again because the SFC is trying to 'crash' this achievement of the FSF
[Meme] Fentanylware (TikTok) Banned in the United States, Next Up European Union (EU)
And the United Kingdom (UK)
President Biden is Right, "Free Press is Crumbling" and the United States Exports Its Media-Hostile Culture to Other Continents
perhaps Biden should pay closer attention to how Donald Trump-inspired Americans take their battles to other continents
Links 17/01/2025: TikTok Banned by the United Stated (SCOTUS Rejects Appeal)
Links for the day
Software Freedom Conservancy Inc (SFC) Makes It Obvious It's Just a Copycat Trying to Exploit or Leech Off the FSF's (and GNU's) Work
They swim next to the rich people (who "match")
Links 17/01/2025: Fentanylware (TikTok) Herds Its (Drug) Users Into Even More Harmful "Apps"
Links for the day
Guardian Digital, Inc (linuxsecurity.com) Uses Microsoft-Controlled Front Groups and LLM Slop in Order to Spread Microsoft-Directed Anti-Linux FUD
Microsoft garbage likely produced by Microsoft LLMs, spewing out Microsoft FUD
Likely Fake 'Article' About Linux Mint 22.1
BetaNews fired up its plagiarism machine (LLM)
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, January 16, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, January 16, 2025