EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

03.10.18

Alice/§ 101 is Improving the Quality of Patents in the United States and Patent Law Firms Are Panicking

Posted in America, Deception, Patents at 12:29 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

If code, then invalid patent

Code

Summary: Patent maximalists in the United States not only freak out over Alice but also distort the outcome of recent court cases (Federal Circuit) in order to make it seem as though Alice is going away

THE likelihood of receiving software patents from the USPTO is decreasing. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) nowadays gets involved in mere patent applications, not just patent grants or already-granted patents. We gave many examples of that last month and earlier this month. We suppose that PTAB is going to break another record, whereas reliable sources say that the number of patents granted by the USPTO will have decreased by year’s end. It’s not a bad thing but a sign of improved patent quality/scrutiny.

“We suppose that PTAB is going to break another record, whereas reliable sources say that the number of patents granted by the USPTO will have decreased by year’s end. It’s not a bad thing but a sign of improved patent quality/scrutiny.”Look at Taiwan. It has a very strong economy (a lot stronger than China’s). According to this post/rant from IAM, the number of patents in Taiwan is decreasing, not increasing, unlike China with SIPO. Lessons for EPO and USPTO? It’s OK to grant fewer patents, the important thing is quality, not quantity. It’s always about quality, not numbers. China amasses patents by the millions, but that doesn’t mean China is ahead. Litigation is China in soaring and it’s not necessarily a good thing (unless you work for a law firm). In Taiwan the number of granted patents has been decreasing for a number of years, so there’s a trend. Nobody seems to be upset about it except the patent trolls’ and maximalists’ lobby (IAM). Here is what it wrote:

New figures released by the Taiwan IP Office show that mainland Chinese firms are playing a greater role than ever in the local patent environment. Both resident and non-resident firms upped their filing rates in 2017 as the island managed to reverse several years of falling applications. Among the biggest corporate TIPO users, invention patent filings increased by nearly 25%.

The last year in which Taiwan patent applications increased year-over-year was 2012, when they reached a peak of 51,189. The headline figure from 2017 was well below that figure – coming in at 46,122 – but it did represent 5% growth over a 12-month period. Both resident and non-resident applicants were more active.

IAM keeps speaking about “growth”, but a growth of what? Monopolies? One can easily grant millions of monopolies overnight. Would that be a positive thing? Would that add value to the economy and improve people’s lifestyles? Of course not.

“One can easily grant millions of monopolies overnight. Would that be a positive thing? Would that add value to the economy and improve people’s lifestyles? Of course not. “We were watching with scepticism and restrained disdain this latest nonsense from Bilski Blog, best known for Alice spin and promotion of software patents. These Big Litigation lobbyists (Fenwick & West) are, as usual, using cases that aren’t about software patents to promote an illusion/lie. Christopher King even names Core Wireless (GUIs, not algorithms). But these lies are profitable to them. To quote the core basis for the flawed hypothesis (the headline says “Thawing in the 3600s? An Updated Look at Allowance Rates Post Alice”):

Although even with the increases in 2017 the allowance-to-abandonment ratios are still far below their pre-Alice levels, the statistics suggest that a sea change may have begun, with the PTO starting to loosen somewhat in the wake of a series of pro-eligibility cases such as Enfish, BASCOM, McRO, Thales, Trading Technologies and Visual Memory. More recent pro-eligibility cases such as Finjan, Core Wireless, Berkheimer and Aatrix will presumably further bolster this trend.

A lot of these cases aren’t about software!

But just as we expected, facts don’t matter to these people. Here’s Amol Parikh from McDermott Will & Emery mentioning Core Wireless in relation to software again (title says “Concrete Solution to Computer Problem Is Patent Eligible”).

“A lot of these cases aren’t about software!”Then there’s yesterday’s lie from the American Enterprise Institute (AEI). These cases aren’t about software patents and hardly about Alice (wrong case for the subject at hand), but then again AEI is a very nefarious front group, so this kind of slant is expected.

It names Aatrix and Berkheimer — two cases which we recently emphasised (almost a dozen times in a dozen articles) were not about software. To quote AEI:

First, in Berkheimer v. Hewlett-Packard, the Federal Circuit upended a lower court’s entry of summary judgment — a pre-trial legal ruling — that the patent (for processing and archiving files in a digital asset management system) was ineligible under Alice.

[...]

Just a week later, in a similar case, Aatrix v. Green Shades Software, the Federal Circuit again vacated a lower court’s early rejection on eligibility grounds, this time of a patent on “designing, creating, and importing data into a viewable form on a computer so that a user can manipulate the form data and create viewable forms and reports.”

This is misleading, but their goal is to comfort applicants and cushion applications, urging for more of both. They just want lots and lots of software patents at a time when they’re simply a waste of time and money (but monetary gain to lawyers).

“They just want lots and lots of software patents at a time when they’re simply a waste of time and money (but monetary gain to lawyers).”Watch this new article from LeClairRyan’s Gunnar Leinberg and Bryan Smith. These patent extremists are really very nervous about Alice, as it dooms their hopes of profit from software patents. “Drafting Strategies to Avoid Subject Matter Eligibility Issues and to Minimize the Risks of Having a Section 101 Dismissal Based on Recent Federal Circuit Decisions” is the title of their article. They’re just trying to work around § 101 (rather than simply accept it, which would be the rational thing to do).

How about Patently-O with “What are the Rules for Assessing Patent Eligibility?”

In Front Row Tech. v. MLB Advanced Media, the patentee has filed a petition for writ of certiorari – asking the Supreme Court flip the lower court rulings on its sports-data-app patents.

The Supreme Court has repeatedly (for years) rejected such petitions for writ of certiorari. It’s not interested in revisiting a subject it already dealt with nearly 4 years ago.

Over at Watchtroll, the most extremist of patent advocacy sites, an event’s introduction started thusly: “Is there hope for Alice? What recent Federal Circuit decisions mean for drafting and litigating software patents in the U.S…”

“The Supreme Court has repeatedly (for years) rejected such petitions for writ of certiorari. It’s not interested in revisiting a subject it already dealt with nearly 4 years ago.”Maybe they meant “Is there hope for bypasing Alice?” rather than “Is there hope for Alice?”

Perhaps they live in a mythical planet where Alice no longer matters at all. Maybe that’s how they try to seduce people to attend another lobbying event. Watchtroll meanwhile (selectively) recalls Google losing at PTAB, under the headline “A Google Opponent Actually Wins an IPR Battle with the Tech Giant” (conveniently never covering any of the cases where Google’s IPRs were successful).

Let’s just face the facts; Google tackles low-quality patents with assistance from PTAB. Who other than patent attorneys (like Watchtroll) stands to lose from elimination of patents that oughtn’t have been granted?

“Their motivations are tainted by their sheer greed and their judgment is clouded by desire rather than reason.”Kluwer Patent Blog recalled Arendi’s case against Google some days ago. “The Patent Trial and Appeal Board correctly determined that all 79 claims of a patent related to a computerized method for identifying and substituting information in an electronic document were invalid for obviousness,” said the summary. Maybe Watchtroll should write a little more about such cases.

The bottom line is, Alice isn’t really challenged in any meaningful way, but people who make a living by ‘selling’ the illusion that software patents are worth pursuing always find excuses to claim otherwise. Don’t listen to them. Their motivations are tainted by their sheer greed and their judgment is clouded by desire rather than reason.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 19/9/2018: Chromebooks Get More DEBs, LLVM 7.0.0 Released

    Links for the day



  2. Links 18/9/2018: Qt 5.12 Alpha , MAAS 2.5.0 Beta, PostgreSQL CoC

    Links for the day



  3. Today's European Patent Office (EPO) Works for Large, Foreign Pharmaceutical Companies in Pursuit of Patents on Nature, Life, and Essential/Basic Drugs

    The never-ending insanity which is patents on DNA/genome/genetics and all sorts of basic things that are put together like a recipe in a restaurant; patents are no longer covering actual machinery that accomplishes unique tasks in complicated ways, typically assembled from scratch by humans; some supposed 'inventions' are merely born into existence by the natural splitting of organisms or conception (e.g. pregnancy)



  4. The EPO Has Quit Pretending That It Cares About Patent Quality, All It Cares About is Quantity of Lawsuits

    A new interview with Roberta Romano-Götsch, as well as the EPO's promotion of software patents alongside CIPA (Team UPC), is an indication that the EPO has ceased caring about quality and hardly even pretends to care anymore



  5. Qualcomm's Escalating Patent Wars Have Already Caused Massive Buybacks (Loss of Reserves) and Loss of Massive Clients

    Qualcomm's multi-continental patent battles are an effort to 'shock and awe' everyone into its protection racket; but the unintended effect seems to be a move further and further away from 'Qualcomm territories'



  6. Links 17/9/2018: Torvalds Takes a Break, SQLite 3.25.0 Released

    Links for the day



  7. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Helps Prevent Frivolous Software Patent Lawsuits

    PTAB with its quality-improving inter partes reviews (IPRs) is enraging patent maximalists; but by looking to work around it or weaken it they will simply reduce the confidence associated with US patents



  8. Abstract Patents (Things One Can Do With Pen and Paper, Sometimes an Abacus) Are a Waste of Money as Courts Disregard Them

    A quick roundup of patents and lawsuits at the heart of which there's little or no substance; 35 U.S.C. § 101 renders these moot



  9. “Blockchain” Hype and “FinTech”-Like Buzzwords Usher in Software Patents Everywhere, Even Where Such Patents Are Obviously Bunk

    Not only the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) embraces the "blockchain" hype; business methods and algorithms are being granted patent 'protection' (exclusivity) which would likely be disputed by the courts (if that ever reaches the courts)



  10. Qualcomm's Patent Aggression Threatens Rationality of Patent Scope in Europe and Elsewhere

    Qualcomm's dependence on patent taxes (so-called 'royalties' associated with physical devices which it doesn't even make) highlights the dangers now known; the patent thicket has grown too "thick"



  11. Months After Oil States the Patent Maximalists Are Still Desperate to Crush PTAB in the Courts, Not Just in Congress and the Office

    Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) inter partes reviews (IPRs) improve patent quality and are therefore a threat to those who profit from spurious feuding and litigation; they try anything they can to turn things around



  12. IAM, Watchtroll and the EPO Still Spread the Mentality of Patent Maximalism

    The misguided idea that the objective (overall) should be to grant as many monopolies as possible (to spur a lot of litigation) isn't being challenged in echo chamber 'events', set up and sponsored by think tanks and pressure groups of the litigation 'industry'



  13. Watchtroll and Other Proponents of Patent Trolls Are Trying to Change the Law Outside the Courts in Order to Bypass Patent Justice

    35 U.S.C. § 101 (Section 101) voids almost every software patent — a reality that even the most zealous patent professionals have come to grips with and their way of tackling this ‘problem’ is legislative, albeit nowhere near successful (so far)



  14. Links 16/9/2018: Windows Plays 'Nice' Again, Elisa Music Player 0.3 Beta and Latte Dock 0.8.1

    Links for the day



  15. Slamming Courts and Judges Won't Help the Patent Maximalists; It Can Only Make Things Worse

    Acorda Therapeutics sees its stock price dropping 25% after finding out that its patent portfolio isn't solid, as affirmed by the Federal Circuitn(CAFC); the only way out of this mess is a pursuit of a vastly improved patent quality, thorough patent examination which then offers legal certainty



  16. Patent Trolls Are Still Active and Microsoft is Closely Connected to Many of Them

    A roundup of patent trolls' actions in the United States; Microsoft is connected to a notably high number of these



  17. Advancements in Automobile Technology Won't be Possible With Patent Maximalism

    Advancements in the development of vehicles are being discouraged by a thicket of patents as dumb (and likely invalid) as claims on algorithms and mere shapes



  18. Battistelli “Has Deeply Hurt the Whole Patent Profession, Examiners as Well as Agents” and Also the Image of France

    A French perspective regarding Battistelli's reign at the EPO, which has not really ended but manifests itself or 'metastasises' through colleagues of Battistelli (whom he chose) and another French President (whom he also chose)



  19. António Campinos Needs to Listen to Doctors Without Borders (MSF) et al to Salvage What's Left of Public Consent for the EPO

    Groups including Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) and Médecins du Monde (MdM) have attempted to explain to the EPO, with notoriously French-dominated leadership, that it’s a mistake to work for Gilead at the expense of the public; but António Campinos is just another patent maximalist



  20. The Max Planck Institute's Determination on UPC's (Unitary Patent) Demise is Only “Controversial” in the Eyes of Rabid Members of Team UPC

    Bristows keeps lying like Battistelli; that it calls a new paper "controversial" without providing any evidence of a controversy says a lot about Bristows LLP, both as a firm and the individuals who make up the firm (they would not be honest with their clients, either)



  21. Links 15/9/2018: Wine 3.16, Overwatch's GNU/Linux (Wine) 'Ban', New Fedora 28 Build, and Fedora 29 Beta Delay

    Links for the day



  22. Max Planck Institute Pours More Water on the Dying Unitary Patent (UPC)

    The Max Planck Institute gives another sobering reality check for Team UPC to chew on; there's still no sign of any progress whatsoever for the UPC because even Team UPC appears to have given up and moved on



  23. EPO Seals Many Death Sentences With Acceptance of EP 2604620

    Very disappointing news as EP 2604620 withstands scrutiny, assuring that a lot of poor people will not receive much-needed, life-saving treatments



  24. Links 13/9/2018: Compiz Comeback, 'Life is Strange: Before the Storm'

    Links for the day



  25. Now We Have Patents on Rooms. Yes, Rooms!

    The shallow level of what nowadays constitutes "innovation" and merits getting a patent for a couple of decades



  26. EPO Granted a Controversial European Patent (Under Battistelli) Which May Literally Kill a Lot of People

    The EPO (together with CIPA) keeps promoting software patents; patents that are being granted by the EPO literally put lives at risk and have probably already cost a lot of lives



  27. Links 13/9/2018: Parrot 4.2.2, Sailfish OS Nurmonjoki, Eelo Beta

    Links for the day



  28. Patents on Life at the EPO Are a Symptom of Declining Patent Quality

    When even life and natural phenomena are deemed worthy of a private monopoly it seems clear that the sole goal has become patenting rather than advancement of science and technology; media that's controlled by the patent 'industry', however, fails to acknowledge this and plays along with privateers of nature



  29. Defending the World's Most Notorious Patent Trolls in an Effort to Smear the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) is an Utterly Poor Strategy

    The 'case' for patent maximalism is very weak; those who spent years if not decades promoting patent maximalism have resorted to attacks on judges, to defense of trolls like Intellectual Ventures, defense of patent scams, and ridiculous attempts to call victims of patent trolls "trolls"



  30. The Belated Demise of Propaganda Sites of the Litigation 'Industry'

    Sites that promote the interests of Big Litigation (patent trolls, patent law firms etc.) are ebbing away; in the process they still mothball the facts and push propaganda instead


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts