EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

02.22.19

Software Patents Are in a Freefall in Courts Worldwide, But the EPO Keeps Granting and Promoting These

Posted in America, Europe, Patents at 6:35 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

A couple of days ago: How Long Can the EPO Bend the Rules Before the Avalanche of Invalid Software Patents?

Freefall

Summary: Courts are tearing down abstract patents, but this has neither deterred nor discouraged António Campinos from coming up with new buzzwords and acronyms by which to promote these and grant these to applicants

THE subject of software patents in Europe truly re-emerged when António Campinos took over the EPO because under his leadership the EPO constantly promotes these (even more so than Battistelli). This is troubling as it shows that when it comes to patent scope the sheer disregard for the law is prevalent if not growing

.

We try hard not to invest any more time covering US affairs, knowing that software patents are more or less demolished there. Benjamin Henrion has just noted: “The USPTO’s “restore software patents” examination guidelines which they request comments does not even mention the Alice decision…”

The USPTO merely “disgraces itself,” I’ve told him, and this “will upset US judges. Iancu is to the USPTO what Trump is to the Constitution and Ajit Pai is to FCC.”

No matter what Iancu (or the Office does), the Federal Circuit does not agree with him and there’s a growing number of inter partes reviews (IPRs) at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), typically invaliding software patents at an alarming rate (thousands per year perhaps; almost as many as annual patent lawsuits). American patent maximalists continue to cherry-pick decisions on mere patent applications as if these are triumphs. The latest example is this: “Visa Finally Wins One. The PTAB Reversed an Examiner’s 101 Rejection of Claims for an Authentication Analysis System…”

It merely “won” a patent, but courts have not even actually decided on it yet. What matters is what the courts — not the Office — decide. The Office is no jackpot.

There’s meanwhile this rumour about a court that tolerates software patents and trolls: “Apple to close all (2) of its stores in the Eastern District of Texas, allegedly to avoid being sued there for #patent infringement; #SupremeCourt recently limited venue to districts where US companies incorporate or have a “regular and established place of business”…”

This is exactly what we’ve said, many times in fact, would eventually happen. There’s another new outcome related to this when it comes to Google, but we no longer cover patent cases in the US (it’s too time-consuming a thing).

It’s also noteworthy, as per this paper and new blog post from Kevin E. Noonan (Patent Docs, hardly active anymore) that the former chief patent counsel of GlaxoSmithKline now blasts SCOTUS over 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Mayo/Alice). She made millions of dollars attacking generics and such; now she attacks judges/courts. Stay classy, Sherry..

In Noonan’s words: “Sherry Knowles, former chief patent counsel of GlaxoSmithKline, and Dr. Anthony Prosser, a member of her team at Knowles Intellectual Strategies LLC, have written an article recently published in The John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law entitled “Unconstitutional Application of 35 U.S.C. 101 by the U.S. Supreme Court.” The authors’ thesis is stark: that the Supreme Court has improperly (and unconstitutionally) arrogated to itself a definition of patent eligibility that is inconsistent with over 200 years of statutory law enacted by Congress under its Article I powers.”

At least her affiliation has given away her bias. We’ll cover patents on life in the next post, as the EPO continues to promote these. But how long before we have a ‘European Alice’ and ‘European Mayo’?

That brings us back to the EPO’s approach towards software patents. It has just promoted software patents yet again, but it paints these as “medical” and “for SMEs” (the usual). This is the fourth such tweet in about a week. The patterns are more or less the same. At least it has quit the “AI”, “blockchain” and “4IR” buzzwords/buzz-phrases/acronyms for a few days (different/misunderstood terms, just like “CII”, dodging controversial terms like “software patents”).

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

2 Comments

  1. knoonan said,

    February 26, 2019 at 7:46 am

    Gravatar

    Roy: whether speaking about me personally or about the Patent Docs website, “hardly active anymore” is grossly inaccurate. I welcome your readers to visit (www.patentdocs.org) to get a different perspective

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    This site, like several others in the same domain (I could name examples), has been a lot less active in recent months if not years (excluding ads for webinars).

    I follow the site closely and occasionally find important things (not these ads) like analyses of decisions. Lately there has been a lot of stuff about science/genetics rather than patents. Even makeup.

What Else is New


  1. Links 23/4/2019: Kodi 'Leia' 18.2 and DeX Everywhere

    Links for the day



  2. Code of Coercion

    Entryism is visible for all to see, but pointing it out is becoming a risky gambit because of the "be nice!" (or "be polite!") crowd, which shields the perpetrators of a slow and gradual corporate takeover



  3. António Campinos Would Not Refer to the EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal If He Did Not Control the Outcomes

    António Campinos and his ilk aren’t interested in patent quality because his former ‘boss’, who publicly denied there were issues and vainly rejected patent quality concerns as illegitimate, is now controlled by him (reversal of roles) and many new appointees at the top are "yes men" (or women) of Campinos, former colleagues whom he bossed at EUIPO (as expected)



  4. Links 22/4/2019: Linux 5.1 RC6, New Release of Netrunner and End of Scientific Linux

    Links for the day



  5. USPTO and EPO Both Slammed for Abandoning Patent Quality and Violating the Law/Caselaw in Order to Grant Illegitimate Patents on Life/Nature and Mathematics

    Mr. Iancu, the ‘American Battistelli’ (appointed owing to nepotism), mirrors the ‘Battistelli operandi’, which boils down to treating judges like they’re stooges and justices like an ignorable nuisance — all this in the name of litigation profits, which necessitate constant wars over illegitimate patents (it is expensive to prove their illegitimacy)



  6. IRC Proceedings: January 27th, 2019 – March 24th, 2019

    Many IRC logs



  7. IRC Proceedings: December 2nd, 2018 – January 26th, 2019

    Many IRC logs



  8. Links 21/4/2019: SuperTuxKart's 1.0 Release, Sam Hartman Is Debian’s Newest Project Leader (DPL)

    Links for the day



  9. The EPO's Use of Phrases Like “High-Quality Patent Services” Means They Know High-Quality European Patents Are 'Bygones'

    The EPO does a really poor job hiding the fact that its last remaining objective is to grant as many European Patents as possible (and as fast as possible), conveniently conflating quality with pace



  10. A Reader's Suggestion: Directions for Techrights

    Guest post by figosdev



  11. Links 20/4/2019: Weblate 3.6 and Pop!_OS 19.04

    Links for the day



  12. The Likes of Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA), Team Campinos and Team UPC Don't Represent Europe But Hurt Europe

    The abject disinterest in patent quality and patent validity (as judged by courts) threatens Europe but not to the detriment of those who are in the 'business' of suing and printing lots of worthless patents



  13. The Linux Foundation Needs to Change Course Before GNU/Linux (as a Free Operating System) is Dead

    The issues associated with the Linux Foundation are not entirely new; but Linux now incorporates so many restrictions and contains so many binary blobs that one begins to wonder what "Linux" even means



  14. Largest Patent Offices Try to Leave Courts in a State of Disarray to Enable the Granting of Fake Patents in the US and Europe

    Like a monarchy that effectively runs all branches of government the management of the EPO is trying to work around the judiciary; the same is increasingly happening (or at least attempted) in the United States



  15. Links 19/4/2019: PyPy 7.1.1, LabPlot 2.6, Kipi Plugins 5.9.1 Released

    Links for the day



  16. Links 18/4/2019: Ubuntu and Derivatives Have Releases, digiKam 6.1.0, OpenSSH 8.0 and LibreOffice 6.2.3

    Links for the day



  17. Freedom is Not a Business and Those Who Make 'Business' by Giving it Away Deserve Naming

    Free software is being parceled and sold to private monopolisers; those who facilitate the process enrich themselves and pose a growing threat to freedom in general — a subject we intend to tackle in the near future



  18. Concluding the Linux Foundation (LF) “Putting the CON in Conference!” (Part 3)

    Conferences constructed or put together based on payments rather than merit pose a risk to the freedom of free software; we conclude our series about events set up by the largest of culprits, which profits from this erosion of freedom



  19. “Mention the War” (of Microsoft Against GNU/Linux)

    The GNU/Linux desktop (or laptops) seems to be languishing or deteriorating, making way for proprietary takeover in the form of Vista 10 and Chrome OS and “web apps” (surveillance); nobody seems too bothered — certainly not the Linux Foundation — by the fact that GNU/Linux itself is being relegated or demoted to a mere “app” on these surveillance platforms (WSL, Croûton and so on)



  20. The European Patent Office Does Not Care About the Law, Today's Management Constantly Attempts to Bypass the Law

    Many EPs (European Patents) are actually "IPs" (invalid patents); the EPO doesn't seem to care and it is again paying for corrupt scholars to toe the party line



  21. The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) Once Again Pours Cold Water on Patent Maximalists

    Any hopes of a rebound or turnaround have just been shattered because a bizarre attack on the appeal process (misusing tribal immunity) fell on deaf ears and software patents definitely don't interest the highest court, which already deemed them invalid half a decade ago



  22. Links 17/4/2019: Qt 5.12.3 Released, Ola Bini Arrested (Political Stunts)

    Links for the day



  23. Links 16/4/2019: CentOS Turns 15, Qt Creator 4.9.0 Released

    Links for the day



  24. GNU/Linux is Being Eaten Alive by Large Corporations With Their Agenda

    A sort of corporate takeover, or moneyed interests at the expense of our freedom, can be seen as a 'soft coup' whose eventual outcome would involve all or most servers in 'the cloud' (surveillance with patent tax as part of the rental fees) and almost no laptops/desktops which aren't remotely controlled (and limit what's run on them, using something like UEFI 'secure boot')



  25. Reader's Claim That Rules Similar to the Code of Conduct (CoC) Were 'Imposed' on LibrePlanet and the FSF

    Restrictions on speech are said to have been spread and reached some of the most liberal circles, according to a credible veteran who opposes illiberal censorship



  26. Corporate Media Will Never Cover the EPO's Violations of the Law With Respect to Patent Scope

    The greed-driven gold rush for patents has resulted in a large pool of European Patents that have no legitimacy and are nowadays associated with low legal certainty; the media isn't interested in covering such a monumental disaster that poses a threat to the whole of Europe



  27. A Linux Foundation Run by People Who Reject Linux is Like a Children's Charity Whose Management Dislikes Children

    We remain concerned about the lack of commitment that the Linux Foundation has for Linux; much of the Linux Foundation's Board, for example, comes from hostile companies



  28. Links 15/4/2019: Linux 5.1 RC5 and SolydXK Reviewed

    Links for the day



  29. Links 14/4/2019: Blender 2.80 Release Plan and Ducktype 1.0

    Links for the day



  30. 'Poor' (Multi-Millionaire) Novell CEO, Who Colluded With Steve Ballmer Against GNU/Linux, is Trying to Censor Techrights

    Novell’s last CEO, a former IBMer who just like IBM decided to leverage software patents against the competition (threatening loads of companies using "platoons of patent lawyers"), has decided that siccing lawyers at us would be a good idea


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts