EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

02.22.19

Software Patents Are in a Freefall in Courts Worldwide, But the EPO Keeps Granting and Promoting These

Posted in America, Europe, Patents at 6:35 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

A couple of days ago: How Long Can the EPO Bend the Rules Before the Avalanche of Invalid Software Patents?

Freefall

Summary: Courts are tearing down abstract patents, but this has neither deterred nor discouraged António Campinos from coming up with new buzzwords and acronyms by which to promote these and grant these to applicants

THE subject of software patents in Europe truly re-emerged when António Campinos took over the EPO because under his leadership the EPO constantly promotes these (even more so than Battistelli). This is troubling as it shows that when it comes to patent scope the sheer disregard for the law is prevalent if not growing

.

We try hard not to invest any more time covering US affairs, knowing that software patents are more or less demolished there. Benjamin Henrion has just noted: “The USPTO’s “restore software patents” examination guidelines which they request comments does not even mention the Alice decision…”

The USPTO merely “disgraces itself,” I’ve told him, and this “will upset US judges. Iancu is to the USPTO what Trump is to the Constitution and Ajit Pai is to FCC.”

No matter what Iancu (or the Office does), the Federal Circuit does not agree with him and there’s a growing number of inter partes reviews (IPRs) at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), typically invaliding software patents at an alarming rate (thousands per year perhaps; almost as many as annual patent lawsuits). American patent maximalists continue to cherry-pick decisions on mere patent applications as if these are triumphs. The latest example is this: “Visa Finally Wins One. The PTAB Reversed an Examiner’s 101 Rejection of Claims for an Authentication Analysis System…”

It merely “won” a patent, but courts have not even actually decided on it yet. What matters is what the courts — not the Office — decide. The Office is no jackpot.

There’s meanwhile this rumour about a court that tolerates software patents and trolls: “Apple to close all (2) of its stores in the Eastern District of Texas, allegedly to avoid being sued there for #patent infringement; #SupremeCourt recently limited venue to districts where US companies incorporate or have a “regular and established place of business”…”

This is exactly what we’ve said, many times in fact, would eventually happen. There’s another new outcome related to this when it comes to Google, but we no longer cover patent cases in the US (it’s too time-consuming a thing).

It’s also noteworthy, as per this paper and new blog post from Kevin E. Noonan (Patent Docs, hardly active anymore) that the former chief patent counsel of GlaxoSmithKline now blasts SCOTUS over 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Mayo/Alice). She made millions of dollars attacking generics and such; now she attacks judges/courts. Stay classy, Sherry..

In Noonan’s words: “Sherry Knowles, former chief patent counsel of GlaxoSmithKline, and Dr. Anthony Prosser, a member of her team at Knowles Intellectual Strategies LLC, have written an article recently published in The John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law entitled “Unconstitutional Application of 35 U.S.C. 101 by the U.S. Supreme Court.” The authors’ thesis is stark: that the Supreme Court has improperly (and unconstitutionally) arrogated to itself a definition of patent eligibility that is inconsistent with over 200 years of statutory law enacted by Congress under its Article I powers.”

At least her affiliation has given away her bias. We’ll cover patents on life in the next post, as the EPO continues to promote these. But how long before we have a ‘European Alice’ and ‘European Mayo’?

That brings us back to the EPO’s approach towards software patents. It has just promoted software patents yet again, but it paints these as “medical” and “for SMEs” (the usual). This is the fourth such tweet in about a week. The patterns are more or less the same. At least it has quit the “AI”, “blockchain” and “4IR” buzzwords/buzz-phrases/acronyms for a few days (different/misunderstood terms, just like “CII”, dodging controversial terms like “software patents”).

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

2 Comments

  1. knoonan said,

    February 26, 2019 at 7:46 am

    Gravatar

    Roy: whether speaking about me personally or about the Patent Docs website, “hardly active anymore” is grossly inaccurate. I welcome your readers to visit (www.patentdocs.org) to get a different perspective

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    This site, like several others in the same domain (I could name examples), has been a lot less active in recent months if not years (excluding ads for webinars).

    I follow the site closely and occasionally find important things (not these ads) like analyses of decisions. Lately there has been a lot of stuff about science/genetics rather than patents. Even makeup.

What Else is New


  1. Links 19/6/2019: Linux Mint Vs Vista 10, Qt 5.13 Released

    Links for the day



  2. The Linux Foundation's Business Model

    The Linux Foundation's plan, illustrated



  3. Links 18/6/2019: i386 Abandoned by Canonical and a New osquery 'Community'

    Links for the day



  4. Indifference or Even Hostility Towards Patent Quality Results in Grave Injustice

    The patent extravaganza in Europe harms small businesses the most (they complain about it), but administrative staff at patent offices only cares about the views of prolific applicants rather than the interests of citizens in respective countries



  5. Links 18/6/2019: CentOS 8 Coming Soon, DragonFly BSD 5.6 Released

    Links for the day



  6. 'AI Taskforce' is Actually a Taskforce for Software Patents

    The mainstream media has been calling just about everything "HEY HI!" (AI), but what it typically refers to is a family of old algorithms being applied in possibly new areas; patent maximalists in eastern Asia and the West hope that this mainstream media's obsession can be leveraged to justify new kinds of patents on code



  7. Patent Maximalism is Dead in the United States

    Last-ditch efforts, or a desperate final attempt to water down 35 U.S.C. § 101, isn't succeeding; stacked panels are seen for what they really are and 35 U.S.C. § 101 isn't expected to change



  8. Links 18/6/2019: Linux 5.2 RC5 and OpenMandriva Lx 4

    Links for the day



  9. Weaponising Russophobia Against One's Critics

    Response to smears and various whispering campaigns whose sole purpose is to deplete the support base for particular causes and people; these sorts of things have gotten out of control in recent years



  10. When the EPO is Run by Politicians It's Expected to Be Aggressive and Corrupt Like Purely Political Establishments

    António 'Photo Op' Campinos will have marked his one-year anniversary in July; he has failed to demonstrate morality, respect for the law, understanding of the sciences, leadership by example and even the most basic honesty (he lies a lot)



  11. Links 16/6/2019: Tmax OS and New Features for KDE.org

    Links for the day



  12. Stuffed/Stacked Panels Sent Back Packing After One-Sided Patent Hearings That Will Convince Nobody, Just Preach to the Choir

    Almost a week ago the 'world tour' of patent lobbyists in US Senate finally ended; it was an utterly ridiculous case study in panel stacking and bribery (attempts to buy laws)



  13. 2019 H1: American Software Patents Are as Worthless as They Were Last Year and Still Susceptible to Invalidation

    With a fortnight left before the second half of the year it seems evident that software patents aren't coming back; the courts have not changed their position at all



  14. As European Patent Office Management Covers up Collapse in Patent Quality Don't Expect UPC to Ever Kick Off

    It would be madness to allow EPO-granted patents to become 'unitary' (bypassing sovereignty of nations that actually still value patent quality); it seems clear that rogue EPO management has, in effect, not only doomed UPC ambitions but also European Patents (or their perceived legitimacy, presumption of validity)



  15. António Campinos -- Unlike His Father -- Engages in Imperialism (Using Invalid Patents)

    Despite some similarities to his father (not positive similarities), António Campinos is actively engaged in imperialistic agenda that defies even European law; the EPO not only illegally grants patents but also urges other patent offices to do the same



  16. António Campinos Takes EPO Waste and Corruption to Unprecedented Levels and Scale

    The “B” word (billions) is thrown around at Europe’s second-largest institution because a mischievous former EUIPO chief (not Archambeau) is ‘partying’ with about half of the EPO’s all-time savings, which are supposed to be reserved for pensions and other vital programmes, not presidential palaces and gambling



  17. Links 15/6/2019: Astra Linux in Russia, FreeBSD 11.3 RC

    Links for the day



  18. Code of Conduct Explained: Partial Transcript - August 10th, 2018 - Episode 80, The Truth About Southeast Linuxfest

    "Ask Noah" and the debate on how a 'Code of Conduct' is forcibly imposed on events



  19. Links 14/6/2019: Xfce-Related Releases, PHP 7.4.0 Alpha

    Links for the day



  20. The EPO is a Patent Troll's Wet Dream

    The makers of software and games in Europe will have to spend a lot of money just keeping patent trolls off their backs — a fact that seems to never bother EPO management because it profits from it



  21. EPO Spreading Patent Extremists' Ideology to the Whole World, Now to South Korea

    The EPO’s footprint around the world's patent systems is an exceptionally dangerous one; The EPO amplifies the most zealous voices of the patents and litigation ‘industry’ while totally ignoring the views and interests of the European public, rendering the EPO an ‘agent of corporate occupation’



  22. Guest Post: Notes on Free Speech, and a Line in the Sand

    We received this anonymous letter and have published it as a follow-up to "Reader's Claim That Rules Similar to the Code of Conduct (CoC) Were 'Imposed' on LibrePlanet and the FSF"



  23. Links 13/6/2019: CERN Dumps Microsoft, GIMP 2.10.12 Released

    Links for the day



  24. Links 12/6/2019: Mesa 19.1.0, KDE neon 5.16, Endless OS 3.6.0 and BackBox Linux 6

    Links for the day



  25. Leaked Financial 'Study' Document Shows EPO Management and Mercer Engaging in an Elaborate “Hoax”

    How the European Patent Office (EPO) lies to its own staff to harm that staff; thankfully, the staff isn't easily fooled and this whole affair will merely obliterate any remnants of "benefit of the doubt" the President thus far enjoyed



  26. Measuring Patent Quality and Employer Quality in Europe

    Comparing the once-famous and respected EPO to today's joke of an office, which grants loads of bogus patents on just about anything including fruit and mathematics



  27. Granting More Fundamentally Wrong Patents Will Mean Reduced Certainty, Not Increased Certainty

    Law firms that are accustomed to making money from low-quality and abstract patents try to overcome barriers by bribing politicians; this will backfire because they show sheer disregard for the patent system's integrity and merely lower the legal certainty associated with granted (by greedy offices) patents



  28. Links 11/6/2019: Wine 4.10, Plasma 5.16

    Links for the day



  29. Chapter 10: Moving Forward -- Getting the Best Results From Open Source With Your Monopoly

    “the gradual shift in public consciousness from their branding towards our own, is the next best thing to owning them outright.”



  30. Chapter 9: Ownership Through Branding -- Change the Names, and Change the World

    The goal for those fighting against Open source, against the true openness (let's call it the yet unexploited opportunities) of Open source, has to be first to figuratively own the Linux brand, then literally own or destroy the brand, then to move the public awareness of the Linux brand to something like Azure, or whatever IBM is going to do with Red Hat.


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts