09.26.19

Gemini version available ♊︎

The European Patent Office’s Relationship With Licensing Executives Society International (LESI) Shows Whose Interests Today’s Management Really Serves

Posted in Europe, Patents at 7:23 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

EPO Licensing Executives Society International (LESI)Summary: The top-level management of the European Patent Office (EPO) — António Campinos just like his predecessor — does not care about the advancement of science but the advancement of litigation agenda by all means available, even software patents in Europe

THE CURRENT Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) comes from the litigation industry, so it’s hardly surprising that he opposes 35 U.S.C. § 101. He’s supposed to follow the law, not decide on the law, but just like in the EPO what we’re seeing these days is a bunch of managers who spit on the law (disregarding if not attacking judges), ignore courts, and strive for nothing but patent maximalism. This is a crisis.

Yesterday the EPO wrote: “Do you know what the right IP strategy is for your business & for the industry you are active in?”

“We have sadly come to a point where the EPO is very blatantly and shamelessly on the side of parasites, not science. The EPO has sided with people who prey on scientists instead of the scientists themselves.”This is about the Licensing Executives Society International (LESI), or just LES, which is a front group of patent trolls. These are not scientists, so what kind of inspiration can they offer to real businesses as opposed to parasites with a patent or two?

We have sadly come to a point where the EPO is very blatantly and shamelessly on the side of parasites, not science. The EPO has sided with people who prey on scientists instead of the scientists themselves.

Look no further than the EPO’s stance on software patents. What proportion of programmers want such patents to exist? 1%? Less?

“Look no further than the EPO’s stance on software patents. What proportion of programmers want such patents to exist? 1%? Less?”Benjamin Henrion has just recalled Chirac’s stance on software patents [1, 2, 3], due to the news about Chirac’s death. It’s a reminder that he lasted 12 years in power and became an iconic personality in France (Henrion is a French-speaking Belgian). Henrion also recalled Chiraq’s betrayal. Initially, as a campaign promise, he sided with software developers.

Yesterday we saw this new article from Phillips & Leigh. It’s about an upcoming EPO case regarding software patents. The authors went ahead with an intentionally wrong question. They should have instead asked, “are software patents legal in Europe and can EPO grant them?” The answer is “NO!”

But here’s how they put it:

We have previously brought attention to a recent referral to the European Patent Office’s Enlarged Board of Appeal concerning the question of whether a computer-implemented simulation of a technical system or process could be patentable in and of itself, provided that the simulation could give rise to a technical effect above and beyond the simulation’s implementation on a computer.

The President of the European Patent Office has now submitted comments on the referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal. The comments represent an interesting set of arguments broadly in support of the notion that such a simulation could at least in principle be patentable. Rather than rehashing the full comments here, we consider it more broadly informative to take a close look at its summary.

First, it is evident both from the summary and the comments as a whole that the Office’s arguments are based on the idea that the statutory exclusions from patentability in the European Patent Convention should be interpreted narrowly, and that a “dynamic understanding” should be applied to the terms “technical” and “technology”.

[...]

The other major point made in the summary is that it shows the suitability of the EPO’s established problem-and-solution approach for assessing patentability (specifically, it is a method of assessing inventive step, one of the essential prerequisites of patentability) and argues that this provides a reasonable way to assess such inventions.

What is clear from the case law and the requirements of the European Patent Convention and Implementing Regulations is that to secure grant, two conditions must be met: the product or process to be protected must be defined in the claim by means of its technical features, and there must be a technical effect.

The essence of the case before the Enlarged Board of Appeal is whether that technical effect needs to be the direct consequence of the claimed invention, or can be “downstream”.

As we’ve explained here before (perhaps a dozen times), the Enlarged Board of Appeal is pretty powerless to decide against the wishes of the Office (management openly supports software patents) because it lacks independence. It’s not a ‘safe’ career choice to oppose software patents in such a panel. So we probably need the EU Parliament to intervene again (as it recently did regarding the question of patents on plants and seeds).

“As we’ve explained here before (perhaps a dozen times), the Enlarged Board of Appeal is pretty powerless to decide against the wishes of the Office (management openly supports software patents) because it lacks independence.”Henrion has taken note of this “new entry in the EUROPEAN SOFTWARE PATENTS knowledge base,” which demonstrates how certain software patents are not valid in Europe. So says the advice from the biggest boosters of software patents in Europe (a litigation firm; “They recruited one the EPO swpat booster,” Henrion told me, “who invented the technical blackhole.”).

We had a little debate about it in Twitter.

“Technical effects in patent law are a farce,” wrote André Rebentisch, who used to be hyper-active in FFII over a decade ago.

“Software patents have long been a good example where EPO management intentionally ignores the wishes of actual software practitioners, choosing instead the agenda of trolls and litigation firms that never wrote any software.”“It’s intentionally vague,” I replied, “like “4IR”, “IoT”, and “HEY HI” (AI), so we’re dealing with nonsensical semantics and buzzwords instead of solid science, code, automatons…”

“The recent AI discussion is ever more off,” he said, citing this page from the EU. “As an observer I would guess that the rlatest EBoA design simulation case aims to pave the way for ML patent applications…”

Software patents have long been a good example where EPO management intentionally ignores the wishes of actual software practitioners, choosing instead the agenda of trolls and litigation firms that never wrote any software.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. The Demonisation and Stereotyping of Coders Not Working for Big Corporations (or 'The System')

    The war on encrypted communication (or secure communications) carries on despite a lack of evidence that encryption stands in the way of crime investigations (most criminals use none of it)



  2. On the 'Peak Hacker' Series

    Hacker culture, unlike Ludditism, is ultimately a movement for justice, for equality, and for human rights through personal and collective emancipation; Dr. Farnell has done a good job explaining where we stand and his splendid series has come to a close



  3. Links 23/1/2022: First RC of Linux 5.17 and Sway 1.7 Released

    Links for the day



  4. Peak Code — Part III: After Code

    "Surveillance perimeters, smart TVs (Telescreens built to Orwell's original blueprint) watched over our living rooms. Mandatory smart everything kept us 'trustless'. Safe search, safe thoughts. We withdrew. Inside, we went quietly mad."



  5. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, January 22, 2022

    IRC logs for Saturday, January 22, 2022



  6. Links 23/1/2022: MongoDB 5.2, BuddyPress 10.0.0, and GNU Parallel 20220122

    Links for the day



  7. A Parade of Fake News About the UPC Does Not Change the General Consensus or the Simple Facts

    European Patents (EPs) from the EPO are granted in violation of the EPC; Courts are now targeted by António Campinos and the minions he associates with (mostly parasitic litigation firms and monopolists), for they want puppets for “judges” and for invalid patents to be magically rendered “valid” and “enforceable”



  8. Welcome to 2022: Intentional Lies Are 'Benefits' and 'Alternative Facts'

    A crooks-run EPO, together with the patent litigation cabal that we’ve dubbed ‘Team UPC’ (it has nothing to do with science or with innovation), is spreading tons of misinformation; the lies are designed to make the law-breaking seem OK, knowing that Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos are practically above the law, so perjury as well as gross violations of the EPC and constitutions won’t scare them (prosecution as deterrence just isn’t there, which is another inherent problem with the UPC)



  9. From Software Eating the World to the Pentagon Eating All the Software

    “Software is eating the world,” according to Marc Andreessen (co-founder of Netscape), but the Empire Strikes Back (not the movie, the actual empire) by hijacking all code by proxy, via Microsoft, just as it grabbed a lot of the world’s communications via Skype, bypassing the world's many national telecoms; coders need to fight back rather than participate in racist (imperial) shams such as GitHub



  10. Links 22/1/2022: Skrooge 2.27.0 and Ray-Tracing Stuff

    Links for the day



  11. IRC Proceedings: Friday, January 21, 2022

    IRC logs for Friday, January 21, 2022



  12. Peak Code — Part II: Lost Source

    "Debian and Mozilla played along. They were made “Yeoman Freeholders” in return for rewriting their charters to “work closely with the new Ministry in the interests of all stakeholders” – or some-such vacuous spout… because no one remembers… after that it started."



  13. Links 22/1/2022: Ubuntu MATE 21.10 for GPD Pocket 3, MINISFORUM Preloads GNU/Linux

    Links for the day



  14. Computer Users Should be Operators, But Instead They're Being Operated by Vendors and Governments

    Computers have been turned into hostile black boxes (unlike Blackbox) that distrust the person who purchased them; moreover, from a legislative point of view, encryption (i.e. computer security) is perceived and treated by governments like a threat instead of something imperative — a necessity for society’s empowerment (privacy is about control and people in positions of unjust power want total and complete control)



  15. Peak Code — Part I: Before the Wars

    Article/series by Dr. Andy Farnell: "in the period between 1960 and 2060 people had mistaken what they called "The Internet" for a communications system, when it had in fact been an Ideal and a Battleground all along - the site of the 100 years info-war."



  16. Links 21/1/2022: RISC-V Development Board and Rust 1.58.1

    Links for the day



  17. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, January 20, 2022

    IRC logs for Thursday, January 20, 2022



  18. Gemini Lets You Control the Presentation Layer to Suit Your Own Needs

    In Gemini (or the Web as seen through Gemini clients such as Kristall) the user comes first; it's not sites/capsules that tell the user how pages are presented/rendered, as they decide only on structural/semantic aspects



  19. The Future of Techrights

    Futures are difficult to predict, but our general vision for the years ahead revolves around more community involvement and less (none or decreased) reliance on third parties, especially monopolistic corporations, mostly because they oppress the population via the network and via electronic devices



  20. [Meme] UPC for CJEU

    When you do illegal things and knowingly break the law to get started with a “legal” system you know it’ll end up in tears… or the CJEU



  21. Links 20/1/2022: 'Pluton' Pushback and Red Hat Satellite 6.10.2

    Links for the day



  22. The Web is a Corporate Misinformation/Disinformation Platform, Biased Against Communities, Facts, and Science

    Misinformation/disinformation in so-called 'news' sites is a pandemic which spreads; in the process, the founder of GNU/Linux gets defamed and GNU/Linux itself is described as the problem, not the solution to the actual problems



  23. Links 20/1/2022: McKinsey Openwashing and Stable Kernels

    Links for the day



  24. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, January 19, 2022

    IRC logs for Wednesday, January 19, 2022



  25. Links 20/1/2022: Linuxfx 11.1 WxDesktop 11.0.3 and FreeIPMI 1.6.9 Released

    Links for the day



  26. Links 19/1/2022: XWayland 22.1 RC1 and OnlyOffice 7.0 Release

    Links for the day



  27. Links 19/1/2022: ArchLabs 2022.01.18 and KDE's 15-Minute Bug Initiative

    Links for the day



  28. When Twitter Protects Abusers and Abuse (and Twitter's Sponsors)

    Twitter is an out-of-control censorship machine and it should be treated accordingly even by those who merely "read" or "follow" Twitter accounts; Twitter is a filter, not a news/media platform or even means of communication



  29. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, January 18, 2022

    IRC logs for Tuesday, January 18, 2022



  30. Links 19/1/2022: Wine 7.x Era Begins and Istio 1.12.2 is Out

    Links for the day


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts