Bonum Certa Men Certa

All Patents on 'Artificial Intelligence' (or Machine Learning) Are Basically Fake Patents Waiting for Rejection by Courts

Scientific-sounding hype for very old algorithms, which are simply not patent-eligible

They tell me AI (Artificial Intelligence) is a buzzword; So now I just say Machine Learning instead



Summary: Patents on maths/stats are not legal; but when the media uses all sorts of other words, or non-abstractions that over-complicate matters (making simple things sound more magical than they really are) we're supposed to think that magic defies patent law, too

WE ARE, as usual, still filing a lot of patent news in Daily Links, especially news pertaining to particular cases and US policy. Why do we do this? Simple. Lack of time. We don't have enough time to cover these things like we did in prior years. Moreover, it certainly seems like some time around 2017 there was active discussion/debating about/around 35 U.S.C. ۤ 101 and its handling by the American courts. That's not the case anymore (or barely). It's often assumed abstract patents will perish, based on the prosecution (or lack thereof) track record.



"It's often assumed abstract patents will perish, based on the prosecution (or lack thereof) track record."One item, however, caught our attention and merits special/lengthy commenting. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) inter partes reviews (IPRs) have, in recent years, helped squash a lot of software patents -- to the point where many parties were reluctant to file lawsuits or make demands with these (fearing a petition would be filed with PTAB). Seeing that the Federal Circuit had increasingly affirmed PTAB in this area, serial bullies nearly gave up and many went out of 'business'. And this is where spying operations crept in, offering ways around PTAB, first by analysing IPRs and later -- seeing that IPRs statistics could not support their propaganda (Mr. Loney apparently left his job over it) -- they went on to analysing Ex Parte Reexaminations instead. We have been mentioning this, at least in passing, in past Daily Links.

"But these are software-implemented. They're software patents. They should not be granted."Anticipat is the largest culprit in that regard. It now says "3600 art units are well known for applying knee-jerk Section 101 patent-ineligible rejections" as if applying the law and rejecting software patents is "knee-jerk"; this is the expected kind of response from the anti-PTAB (and therefore anti-patent quality) collective known as Anticipat (they seem to be very small judging by this new booth photo, taken at an event of patent extremists [1, 2]). Anticipat is basically promoting software patents in the European Patent Office (EPO -- not just the USPTO -- under the guise of “hey hi” (still maths/stats, plus buzzwords and hype). So we wish to respond to that.

My credentials in this domain are a matter of public record (it's all online). When I was 20 I implemented a computer game with so-called "hey hi" (game theory) and its Web site has been online for over 15 years. Later, when I did my Ph.D., I formally studied Machine Learning (way back in 2003), wrote papers about it, and carried on in this field for about a decade, first as a Ph.D. student and later as a postdoc. This whole "hey hi" nonsense (obscure buzzword and a vague, catch-all phrase) isn't new to me. But the media as well as law firms want us to think it's very new and exciting; in reality that goes back at least half a century. So, let's examine what Anticipat is saying:

One reason why these allowance rates are much lower may depend on the art unit differences. Machine learning inventions typically get assigned to the 2121 or 2122 art units whereas business method inventions get assigned to the 3620s, 3680s and 3690s. The 3600 art units are well known for applying knee-jerk Section 101 patent-ineligible rejections whereas AI art units are not as preoccupied with Section 101. Often times, Examiners in these machine learning art units see the cutting edge technology of machine learning in these applications and generally quickly grant the patents for these inventions.


But these are software-implemented. They're software patents. They should not be granted.

On they go, this time with "hey hi" instead of "machine learning" and the vague term "technical" (e.g. "technical purpose" at the EPO):

But not all AI inventions are as easy to get allowed, especially depending on the jurisdiction. Take Europe, for example. The standard for patent-eligibility at the EPO is somewhat different than the US in that it requires a sufficiently technical nature (i.e., the claim must have a technical implementation or technical application). For image processing and speech recognition, this technical nature can be easily shown. But other types of machine learning tech, such as NLP, have not been so recognized as having a technical purpose.

[...]

The [US] Board viewed the claim holistically by stating that “[t]aken as a whole, claim 1 recites a set of steps for a particular query- and hypothesis-based processing sequence and set of rules, executed by a QA system.” Then citing McRO, the Board held that this amounts to “us[ing] the limited rules in a process specifically designed to achieve an improved technological result in conventional industry practice,” i.e., to improve the technology of QA systems.” After coming to this determination, the Board found that the claim imposes meaningful limits on the application of the recited judicial exception for generating candidate answers to a question and thus are not directed to a patent-ineligible abstract idea.

AI will continue to transform all sectors of industry and patentability standards across jurisdictions will continue to change. Patentability standards across jurisdictions should continue to evolve to balance the growing impact of AI on society. As it does so, it is important to anticipate prosecution strategy internationally with the best patent data.


OK, this is complete waffle. They move on from discussion about machine learning and particular families of algorithms to this vague thing they've dubbed "hey hi" -- the same thing nontechnical management does at the EPO and USPTO.

"We'll continue to blast patent offices that resort to buzzwords instead of patents."It does not seem like this hype wave is going away from the media and from patent offices. It's not a passing fad if it can persist for years. They totally exploit misconceptions to associate just about anything -- automation, computers, algorithms -- with "hey hi". We've written over a dozen articles about this one pattern of misinformation. Even if we did dozens more, people would still name-drop these buzzwords. Examiners would still be compelled -- by guidelines that mention these buzzwords -- to grant patents on these algorithms (or use of such algorithms in particular contexts, e.g. neural networks for spam filtering).

This will hopefully be the last post on this particular subject because it has gotten somewhat repetitive. We'll continue to blast patent offices that resort to buzzwords instead of patents. But explaining why this is wrong won't put an end to it. That much is pretty clear by now.

Recent Techrights' Posts

NVIDIA Corp Lost 36% of Its "Value" Since Cheeto Inauguration, But "Gen Hey Hi" (GenAI) is Totally Not a Bubble
Selling loads of unneeded hardware based on hysterical hype; like selling shovels during a Gold Rush
 
The State of EPO Staff's Health in Rijswijk or The Hague
We're going to cover the EPO some more later in the month
GNU/Linux Growing in East Asia, Windows by Default No More?
GNU/Linux is now on the shelf
Slopwatch: Anti-Linux 'Articles' From Linux-Hostile LLMs
It is almost always negative things and nobody can be held responsible for it except the charlatans prompting the LLMs
Links 05/04/2025: Fentanylware (TikTok) "Sale Looks Highly Imminent" (US), Stock Market Drowning in Panic
Links for the day
Gemini Links 05/04/2025: Moving Plants, No to Smartwatches, RAID Hygiene
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, April 04, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, April 04, 2025
Techrights Has Dealt With More Potent SLAPPs Than Violent Microsofters Begging to Hide What They Did to Women
I became accustomed to SLAPPs
Links 04/04/2025: Fury in South Korea, Flight MH370 Remains Mystery
Links for the day
Gemini Links 04/04/2025: Anger and Raspberry Pi CM4
Links for the day
Links 04/04/2025: LLM Slop Bubble Bursting and Korea Music Copyright Association Bans Slop 'Music'
Links for the day
Traf-O-Data, the Company That Jeffrey Epstein's BFF (Bill Gates) (Co)Founded 53 Years and Went Out of Business Due to Heavy Losses
Who will die first, Bill or Microsoft?
Why Microsoft's Shares Sank Almost 20% in Recent Months (the Bubble is Imploding)
verified press reports from the past 24 hours
A Note on SimilarWeb
Or why SimilarWeb is meaningless for more than 99% of the sites on the Web
GNU/Linux Rises to Almost 5% in Algeria While Windows Sinks to All-Time Low
GNU/Linux grew tenfold
Where to Get More Gags
A valued reader recommended that to us
Links 04/04/2025: Tech Stock (Inc. GAFAM) Fall, Google Pretends to Do End-to-End Encrypted Emails (With Google in Control)
Links for the day
IBM Said to be Shutting Down Offices or Sites in the United States
the press can no longer avoid admitting that IBM moves many jobs to India
To Participate in Fedora Diversity You Must Use Proprietary Software
Not for the first time either
LLM Slop as Attack Vector on the Reputation of Linux
The attacks on Linux have escalated to information warfare
Yandex About to Be Three Times Bigger Than Microsoft (Bing) in Asia
That's about 60% of the world's population
Gemini Links 04/04/2025: Decoupling Updates, Elaho as Gemini Client
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, April 03, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, April 03, 2025
Microsoft's Trouble in Africa and Asia
A new all-time high for GNU/Linux
Brett Wilson LLP Reported to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA)
The saddest thing in all this is that law firms can maintain high standards shall they wish to
Links 03/04/2025: Tariff Pains and C.D.C. Cuts
Links for the day
StatCounter: Microsoft is Masking a Disaster, It's Way Behind DeepSeek Already and Interest in LLMs Has Waned
it turns out the money "raised" for "Open" "AI" may not even exist at all
Links 03/04/2025: SoftBank Money for Microsoft "Open" "AI" Probably Doesn't Even Exist, Wikimedia Foundation Blasts LLM Nuisance While Microsoft Admits Demand Has Shrunk
Links for the day
Gemini Links 03/04/2025: Patch Panel and Pictures
Links for the day
Islamic Republic of Iran: GNU/Linux at All-time High This Month, Windows Falls to 12%
Vista 10 is up this month despite being "end of life" (EoL) soon
Indonesia: All-Time Highs for GNU/Linux
What's noteworthy right now is the growth of GNU/Linux
statCounter Says GNU/Linux Usage is Up Again (Internationally)
some preliminary April data
Only on April 1st Can the Free Software Foundation Associate With Microsoft's Open Source Initiative (OSI)
We saw some pranks that day linking the FSF to Microsoft (e.g. "endorsing" Windows)
Confirmed in the Mainstream Media: A Lot of Microsoft "Workloads" Were Just LLM Slop (Helping to Fake Growth for Years, as Microsoft Had Paid "Open" "AI" to Become a "Client") and Demand is Rapidly Waning, Datacentres Canceled and/or Shut Down
Anything to facilitate further accounting fraud
Taiwan's Media Covers Closure of Microsoft's "AI" Lab, It's Time to Talk About the Gradual Death of Windows and Implosion of the "AI" Bubble
Earlier this week we showed that mostly Asian media had the 'nerve' to mention Microsoft silently shutting down its 'AI' lab
IBM Gets Rid of Kelly Chambliss as Mass Layoffs Reported in IBM Consulting, IBM Loses Key Contracts/Graft
IBM Consulting has been in disarray lately
More Gains for GNU/Linux, Based on Web Surveys
the Steam site shows rapid growth for "Linux" this month
Slopwatch: Anti-Linux Articles, Not Even Written by Humans
Why aren't Web sites more vocal about this problem?
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, April 02, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, April 02, 2025
Links 03/04/2025: Apple Fined Over Secret Surveillance, "Elegant Writer For A More Civilized Age"
Links for the day