Gemini version available ♊︎

EPO Crisis Under António Campinos – Part 5: Quo Usque Tandem?

Posted in Europe, Patents at 12:48 am by Guest Editorial Team

Previously in this series: Part I | Part II | Part III | Part IV | More background: Latest French Hire of Battistelli Rumoured to be After EPO Workers’ Pensions | Le Guern Leaves the EPO After Attacks on Staff’s (and Pensioners’) Finances Amid Pandemic

AC patience

Summary: “For how much longer, António, will you abuse our patience?”

With his message of 16 February on the Office intranet the EPO President António Campinos did his best to convey the impression that his most immediate and pressing concern was for the welfare of Mr Le Guern and that his sole desire was to protect the latter from “attacks” by SUEPO.

However, nobody at the EPO is fooled by this patently transparent humbug.

EPO insiders have no doubt that Campinos’ actions were primarily aimed at providing “aid and comfort” to the controversial and hugely unpopular HR Principal Director, Elodie Bergot.

“However, nobody at the EPO is fooled by this patently transparent humbug.”Techrights readers need no reminding that – together with her hubby Gilles Requena – Bergot was one of the key enablers of “Team Battistelli”.

After Battistelli‘s departure Bergot was retained by Campinos as an apparent act of loyalty to his former mentor and “patron”, the controversial deputy mayor of Saint-Germain-en-Laye.

In two Judgments delivered in June 2018 the ILOAT found Bergot guilty of masterminding a witch-hunt conducted against SUEPO officials, one of whom was unlawfully dismissed from his position and the other who was unlawfully downgraded.

In August 2020 Bergot received another official rebuke – this time from the EPO Internal Appeals Committee – for unlawful acts of censorship against the elected Central Staff Committee in 2016.

On that occasion the EPO Internal Appeals Committee, chaired by former UK Judge at the European Court of Human Rights, Sir Paul Mahoney, confirmed that staff representatives are at liberty to criticise the EPO’s policies and actions – even sharply and robustly – as long as the language used is not injurious or defamatory.

“In August 2020 Bergot received another official rebuke – this time from the EPO Internal Appeals Committee – for unlawful acts of censorship against the elected Central Staff Committee in 2016.”According to Sir Paul and his Committee, this is a perfectly legitimate manifestation of “the political jousting between management and staff bodies that is part and parcel of the life of a healthy International Organisation”.

The Appeals Committee emphasised that it is essential for staff members to have knowledge of the various positions discussed between EPO management and the Staff Committee on matters of general interest for staff. This ensures that EPO management can be exposed to a degree of accountability to staff in relation to policy decisions affecting them.

It’s as plain as the proverbial pikestaff that there are no plausible grounds to justify censorship of the SUEPO communiqué of 4 February 2021.

SUEPO was doing nothing more than informing its members of matters which are of general interest to them, namely the administration of “Compensation and Benefits” at the EPO and the current HR shenanigans in that department.

Apart from that, Campinos – a PR savvy individual who promotes himself as a “child of the Carnation Revolution” – seems to be keen on avoiding the negative publicity which would be likely to result from an association with the kind of strong-arm totalitarian techniques which were Battistelli’s hallmark.

“With his message of 16 February Campinos has nailed his colours firmly to the mast and has made it clear whose side he is on.”So under the given circumstances the only option open to Bergot and Campinos is to resort to their current “Punch & Judy Show” tactics. These consist of falsely accusing SUEPO of “attacking the professionalism and reputation of our mutual colleagues and also the reputation of the Office” and demanding an unconditional retraction and apology.

With his message of 16 February Campinos has nailed his colours firmly to the mast and has made it clear whose side he is on.

But it remains unclear what exactly he hopes to accomplish by rallying to the defence of Bergot whose fitness for the senior managerial position which she holds is likely to remain in question no matter how strongly and vigorously he protests to the contrary.

All that Campinos appears to have achieved here is to cement his reputation inside the EPO as a pusillanimous and ineffectual chief executive – who is incidentally rumoured to suffer from serious substance abuse issues.

Rather than attempting to tackle the problems facing the EPO and to promote genuine and meaningful “social dialogue” between management and staff Campinos has revealed himself to be living in the shadow of his former mentor and “patron”, Battistelli. He seems to be utterly incapable of shaking off the insidious legacy of cronyism and favouritism which he had inherited from that quarter.

“All that Campinos appears to have achieved here is to cement his reputation inside the EPO as a pusillanimous and ineffectual chief executive – who is incidentally rumoured to suffer from serious substance abuse issues.”Only time will tell whether or not Campinos will end up regretting his decision to back what is obviously the wrong horse in the present dispute.

But for the moment one thing is clear: the current controversy has once again demonstrated the precarious and perilous state of “social dialogue” at the EPO.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New

  1. Links 21/10/2021: MX Linux 21 and Git Contributors’ Summit in a Nutshell

    Links for the day

  2. [Meme] [Teaser] Miguel de Icaza on CEO of Microsoft GitHub

    Our ongoing series, which is very long, will shed much-needed light on GitHub and its goals (the dark side is a lot darker than people care to realise)

  3. Gemini Protocol and Gemini Space Are Not a Niche; for Techrights, Gemini Means Half a Million Page Requests a Month

    Techrights on gemini:// has become very big and we’ll soon regenerate all the pages (about 37,500 of them) to improve clarity, consistency, and general integrity

  4. 'Satellite States' of EPO Autocrats

    Today we look more closely at how Baltic states were rendered 'voting fodder' by large European states, looking to rubber-stamp new and oppressive measures which disempower the masses

  5. [Meme] Don't Mention 'Brexit' to Team UPC

    It seems perfectly clear that UPC cannot start, contrary to what the EPO‘s António Campinos told the Council last week (lying, as usual) and what the EPO insinuates in Twitter; in fact, a legal challenge to this should be almost trivial

  6. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part IXX: The Baltic States

    How unlawful EPO rules were unsurprisingly supported by Benoît Battistelli‘s friends in Baltic states; António Campinos maintained those same unlawful rules and Baltic connections, in effect liaising with offices known for their corruption (convicted officials, too; they did not have diplomatic immunity, unlike Battistelli and Campinos)

  7. Links 21/10/2021: GIMP 2.99.8 Released, Hardware Shortages, Mozilla Crisis

    Links for the day

  8. How Oppressive Governments and Web Monopolists Might Try to Discourage Adoption of Internet Protocols Like Gemini

    Popular movements and even some courageous publications have long been subverted by demonisation tactics, splits along unrelated grounds (such as controversial politics) and — failing that — technical sabotage and censorship; one must familiarise oneself with commonly-recurring themes of social control by altercation

  9. [Meme] Strike Triangulations, Reception Issues

    Financial strangulations for Benoît Battistelli‘s unlawful “Strike Regulations”? The EPO will come to regret 2013…

  10. [Meme] Is Saying “No!” to Unlawful Proposals Considered “Impolite”?

    A ‘toxic mix’ of enablers and cowards (who won’t vote negatively on EPO proposals which they know to be unlawful) can serve to show that the EPO isn’t a “social democracy” as Benoît Battistelli liked to call it; it’s just a dictatorship, currently run by the son of a person who actually fought dictatorship

  11. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, October 20, 2021

    IRC logs for Wednesday, October 20, 2021

  12. [Meme] EPO Legal Sophistry and Double Dipping

    An imaginary EPO intercept of Administrative Council discussions in June 2013...

  13. Links 21/10/2021: PostgreSQL JDBC 42.3.0 and Maui Report

    Links for the day

  14. [Meme] [Teaser] “Judge a Person Both by His Friends and Enemies”

    Fervent supporters of Team Battistelli or Team Campinos (a dark EPO era) are showing their allegiances; WIPO and EPO have abused staff similarly over the past decade or so

  15. 'Cluster-Voting' in the European Patent Office/Organisation (When a Country With 1.9 Million Citizens Has the Same Voting Power as a Country With 83.1 Million Citizens)

    Today we examine who has been running the Finnish patent office and has moreover voted in the EPO during the ballot on unlawful "Strike Regulations"; they voted in favour of manifestly illegal rules and for 8.5 years after that (including last Wednesday) they continued to back a shady regime which undermines the EPO's mission statement

  16. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XVIII: Helsinki's Accord

    The Finnish outpost has long been strategic to the EPO because it can help control the vote of four or more nations; evidence suggests this has not changed

  17. [Meme] Living as a Human Resource, Working for Despots

    The EPO has become a truly awful place/employer to work for; salary is 2,000 euros for some (despite workplace stress, sometimes relocation to a foreign country)

  18. Links 20/10/2021: New Redcore Linux and Hospital Adoption of GNU Health

    Links for the day

  19. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, October 19, 2021

    IRC logs for Tuesday, October 19, 2021

  20. Links 19/10/2021: Karanbir Singh Leaves CentOS Board, GPL Violations at Vizio

    Links for the day

  21. [Meme] Giving the Knee

    The 'knee' champion Kratochvìl and 'kneel' champion Erlingsdóttir are simply crushing the law; they’re ignoring the trouble of EPO staff and abuses of the Office, facilitated by the Council itself (i.e. facilitated by themselves)

  22. Josef Kratochvìl Rewarded Again for Covering Up EPO Corruption and the EPO Bribes the Press for Lies Whilst Also Lying About Its Colossal Privacy Violations

    Corrupt officials and officials who actively enable the crimes still control the Office and also the body which was supposed to oversee it; it's pretty evident and clear judging by this week's press statements at the EPO's official Web site

  23. [Meme] Sorry, Wrong Country (Or: Slovenia isn't Great Britain)

    Team UPC is trying to go ahead with a total hoax which a high-level European court would certainly put an end to (if or when a referral is initiated)

  24. How Denmark, Iceland, Finland, Norway and Sweden Voted on Patently Unlawful Regulations at the EPO

    We look back and examine what happened 8 years ago when oppressed staff was subjected to unlawful new “regulations” (long enjoyed by António Campinos, the current EPO autocrat)

  25. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XVII: The Non-Monolithic Nordic Bloc

    We start our investigation of how countries in northern Europe ended up voting on the unlawful “Strike Regulations” at the EPO and why

  26. Proof That Windows “11” is a Hoax

    Guest post by Ryan, reprinted with permission

  27. Firefox Becomes as Morally Reprehensible as Apple, Facebook, or Uber

    Guest post by Ryan, reprinted with permission

  28. Links 19/10/2021: GNU dbm 1.22 and Godot 3.4 RC 1

    Links for the day

  29. [Meme] [Teaser] GitHub an Expensive and Dangerous Trap (Also: Misogyny Hub)

    The ongoing Microsoft GitHub exposé will give people compelling reasons to avoid GitHub, which is basically just a subsidised (at a loss) trap

  30. Norway Should Have Voted Against Benoît Battistelli's Illegal (Anti-)'Strike Regulations' at the European Patent Office

    Benoît Battistelli‘s EPO faced no real and potent opposition from Norwegian delegates, who chose to abstain from the vote on the notorious and illegal so-called ‘Strike Regulations’ (they’re just an attack on strikes, an assault on basic rights of labourers)

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts