09.01.21

Gemini version available ♊︎

Response to Daniel X. Thomas, Former Director at the European Patent Office (EPO)

Posted in Europe, Patents at 8:47 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

The original was posted in a Microsoft site that spies on millions (not that the EPO can ever understand that), hence it is reproduced here without sending traffic to Microsoft, along with our response in-line (fair use doctrine)

G 1/21 – The RPEBA2015 - How to deal with the president’s comments and the amicus curiaeSummary: Techrights takes a moment to respond to Daniel X. Thomas, who worries that his criticism of the way António Campinos handled G 1/21 can get him in trouble

THE Benoît Battistelli regime totally obliterated the independence of the Boards of Appeal at the EPO, including that of the highest boards (TBA, EBA/EBoA etc. not exempted from the bollocking and stacking). While it is true that over a decade ago our main critique of the EPO was its practice of granting European software patents “as such”, we’ve since then covered so many other aspects. Until the EPO’s management started bribing and blackmailing the media (even blogs like IP Kat) there was an opportunity to see lots of abuses; but then, the EPO’s PR budget and legal budget (for lawyers who intimidate bloggers/blogs like IP Kat, Techrights and maybe even Daniel X. Thomas) squashed a lot of that coverage, except here. So now the EPO’s head honcho du jour can focus on just ad hominem attacks on one person (yours truly).

“They constantly defame journalists and staff representatives (sometimes even judges!) and then they accuse them of “defamation”…”It’s worth taking a moment to respond to a public post from Daniel X. Thomas, “Former Director at European Patent Office” (in his own words; this is how he identifies himself, first and foremost). A lot of the ad hominem attacks happen in private, behind my back, and are then used to justify (secret decisions by EPO management) to go as far as blocking IP Kat and blocking all Internet (Web and beyond) access to Techrights — basically an utterly desperate effort to prevent people finding out about crimes of EPO management (they don’t refute articles/accusations, they just attack the messengers; yes, just like in China…) and then they have the audacity to accuse others of what they’re guilty of (projection/hypocrisy). They constantly defame journalists and staff representatives (sometimes even judges!) and then they accuse them of “defamation”…

Chilling.

By the way, now that we use Gemini (gemini:// protocol) people can access all Techrights articles from work, using any of the many Web proxies (there are dozens). Unless the EPO blocks all Gemini Web proxies (i.e. EPO blocks access to literally thousands of different sites!), these dictators cannot block Techrights, except by direct access. They play a game of whack-a-mole. Over gemini:// protocol we serve over 20,000 pages a day.

Before we proceed to the response, which is well overdue, it would be worth pointing out how amusing it is to see EPO managers (even directors!) past and present referring to software patents as “HEY HI” (AI) or “4IR” (along with other buzzwords/nonsense). Well, they clearly never coded or hacked on code, they just push software patents to fill their dirty pockets… and maybe not too shockingly those managers (even directors!) use Microsoft’s proprietary software as their ‘blogging’ platform. Yes, Microsoft — a top proponent of software patents, including the motor behind many of the European front/lobby/pressure groups that influence the EPO on these matters. We wrote about that countless times in the past. We named the culprits and proxies.

To be clear, Daniel X. Thomas seems like a nice person, but he is deeply misguided. The fact that he so openly supports software patents does not surprise me. In fact, what’s the likelihood of an opponent of software patents rising to a director/top-level position at the EPO? I’m not sure why he decided to write this post, but he’s probably just worrying about his pension (he did not retire so long ago) because right now his own words are used against his colleagues, who can retaliate against him. They already attack other EPO pensioners as well. There’s that old saying, “[i]t is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” (Upton Sinclair)

Since he comes from EPO management and he has made tons of money at the management tier there (without having to pay tax) maybe he prefers to think everything is rosy. Also, harm to the EPO’s management puts his own pension at risk.

Thomas:

I have got the “honour” of being quoted in Techrights.

http://techrights.org/2021/06/18/superficial-epo-coverage/

I have again had the “honour” of being quoted in Techrights.

http://techrights.org/2021/06/20/the-epo-games/

Mr Schestowitz takes every opportunity to attack the EPO, and his methods are abject to say the least.

What do you mean by “methods”?

What do you mean by “attack”?

Let’s roll back and clarify the intent of this false narrative.

My profession is under a constant attack from patents, granted by patent offices that ignore caselaw in order to cheat the system, usually for financial gain (and as a favour to “large clients”, i.e. multinational monopolies).

Who is attacking whom?

And what does the word “methods” mean in this context? Reporting the facts? Yeah, some methods…

As we shall see in a moment, he relies on the utterly false premise that my sole criticism of the EPO is for software patents; initially it was the sole issue I was aware of, but about 3,500 articles later I’ve written about so many other issues. It seems like he’s lying and oversimplifying the matter, wrongly implying that the sole problem I have with the EPO is patent scope; as if all is well at EPOnia and, as we shall see in a moment, he insists that it’s OK to grant software patents. He ignores so many other things, such as the constant lying about the UPC after Brexit. We’ll write more about that some time later in the week…

12 hours after we had published this communication a lot of useful comments (3 so far) started showing up here (response to face-saving spin). They cannot keep up with the lies. They try…

Thomas:

It is an “honour” I can do without as I do not agree to see my freedom of opinion repeatedly misused for a campaign against the EPO which I cannot support.

No, Sir. Your freedom to express yourself is protected by the law, but that does not extend to “freedom to have an audience” or “freedom not to be criticised”. You might want to look up the very basics of free speech — something that EPO management never managed to grasp. Heck, it has been blocking this Web site (without explanation/justification) for about 7 years already. It also blocked some other sites and it’s constantly gagging its union, its staff representatives, judge, etc. Yes, even this year

Thomas:

Lots of things might not be optimal at the EPO, but constant slanting it is not a way to help resolving the difficulties the EPO is going through.

“Lots of things might not be optimal” is an understatement — probably one of the (full) decade if not (half) century in the context of the EPO. Why belittle this crisis? Even the EPO itself called it a crisis some years ago (behind closed doors, but somebody leaked it to us).

Thomas:

I have said certain things about the way the first OP in G 1/21 went along, as my concern is the respect of existing legal rules.

It is important to show that even EPO insiders of a very high level (albeit with lower risks of reprisal) admit these issues.

That’s the whole point.

Thomas:

I am convinced that without respect of legal rules we go back to the jungle and the right of the strongest prevails. This is not what I wish for myself, my children and grandchildren.

He keeps bringing up his children (more on that in a moment), which is a bit strange (as if to make it seem like I’m attacking children or something).

Thomas:

What I have said has actually nothing to do with my former quality as EPO staff.

It is not something that just vanishes overnight. The former status is relevant. It’s also what pays the pension (still).

Thomas:

It was the view of somebody interested in the topic as it concerns an institution is am still loyal to. Any objective observer could come to similar conclusions.

Good people concede their loyalty when they become witnesses to bad things.

Thomas:

In view of the constant misuse of my honest opinion, I will now refrain from any statement relating to G 1/21.

How was it misused? It was not. It was quoted (and not out of context). What he wants is selective audiences/mentions.

Thomas:

I do not want to help this person to constantly attack the EPO.

I do not attack the EPO; the reason so many EPO workers read Techrights is that we’re trying to actually save the EPO from those who attack it from the inside.

Thomas:

It should also be kept in mind that beyond the personal attacks against some members of staff, the pet peeve of this person is the possibility of patenting programmes CII or even AI.

“CII” and “AI” is meaningless nonsense. The fact that he’s repeating such meaningless nonsense reaffirms my belief that too many incompetent people make it into top roles at the EPO.

Thomas:

I said it many times, and repeat it once more, contrary to what Mr Schestowitz thinks, CII or even AI are not forbidden by the EPC.

The EPC says nothing about “CII” and “AI”, so quit using buzzwords, which you likely don’t even understand (nobody is meant to understand such lingo).

Thomas:

The simple considerations as to why CII are well patentable under the EPC is apparently too complicated for Mr Schestowitz to enter in his brain. The doctrinal blindness and hatred of this person against the EPO is indeed flabbergasting.

The typical accusation of “hatred” is an old tactic, suggestive of emotion and irrational feelings. We use simple logic and we observe facts, not financial interest (which is all that matters to EPO management — that’s why it breaks the law).

Thomas:

Last but not least, attacking persons for their supposed likeness with other ones or for their hair colour is absolutely abject.

This is false. I am guessing he alludes to the Willy Wonka thing. It’s alluding to “FUDGE” (as in legal fudge), nothing to do with hair colours…

Thomas:

My son and my two grandchildren have red hair, and attacking a person for its hair colour is also attacking my family.

So now he’s trying to make it seem like I personally attacked him and his children. I attacked neither.

Now we’ve entered “crybully” territories.

Thomas:

In view of this turn of events provoked by Mr Schestowitz I have to conclude that this person has managed to silence me due to my status of former staff of the EPO.

Someone from Red Hat once tried the same tactics, basically saying in public that I had “silenced” by merely quoting someone. They try to incite colleagues that way, shifting blame for their own choices/actions.

Did I silence him?

No, someone choosing to not talk anymore is silencing oneself. You know who silences people and sites? The EPO’s management. To the point of blocking them and siccing lawyers at them. They did it to me countless times and I’m not alone.

Thomas:

This does not withhold myself to have my idea about the topic and the procedure used to come to a decision. Some of the amicus curiae are quite eloquent in this respect.

We’ve cited them a lot more than anything from Mr. Thomas. We didn’t even say anything negative about him; quite the contrary!

Moreover, we already know (and proved) that the EPO hid some amicus curiae from the public. It only selectively showed what people had to say. That’s known as censorship.

From the comment, Thomas:

I had to react. No opportunity to bash the EPO is missed by this person. And I do not want to contribute to this!

You did not contribute. You expressed an opinion in public. Now you want to control who can read it?

Thomas:

The more so since it appears that the only drive for this person is to bash the EPO because it grants patents on CII.

Again, totally false! Straw man argument.

Thomas:

I rarely came across such stubbornness and stupidity.

Now we see insults too. I never insulted him. But here he is using swear words.

Thomas:

I feel a deep loyalty to the organisation and I will not support such a behaviour against it.

It seems sad to me that he has “deep loyalty” to Battistelli’s den of corruption.

Update: As it turns out, Mr. Thomas still works for Battistelli.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Links 19/10/2021: GNU dbm 1.22 and Godot 3.4 RC 1

    Links for the day



  2. [Meme] [Teaser] GitHub an Expensive and Dangerous Trap (Also: Misogyny Hub)

    The ongoing Microsoft GitHub exposé will give people compelling reasons to avoid GitHub, which is basically just a subsidised (at a loss) trap



  3. Norway Should Have Voted Against Benoît Battistelli's Illegal (Anti-)'Strike Regulations' at the European Patent Office

    Benoît Battistelli‘s EPO faced no real and potent opposition from Norwegian delegates, who chose to abstain from the vote on the notorious and illegal so-called ‘Strike Regulations’ (they’re just an attack on strikes, an assault on basic rights of labourers)



  4. Links 19/10/2021: Sequoia PGP LGPL 2.0+, Open RAN Adoption

    Links for the day



  5. [Meme] [Teaser] Benoît Battistelli, King of Iceland

    Later today we shall see how the current deputy of the head of the EPO‘s overseeing body was in fact likely rewarded for her complicity in Benoît Battistelli‘s abuses against EPO staff, including staff from Iceland



  6. IRC Proceedings: Monday, October 18, 2021

    IRC logs for Monday, October 18, 2021



  7. Links 19/10/2021: MyGNUHealth 1.0.5 and Ubuntu 22.04 Now Developed

    Links for the day



  8. [Meme] [Teaser] Thrown Under the Bus

    Tomorrow we shall look at Danish enablers of unlawful EPO regulations, Jesper Kongstad and Anne Rejnhold Jørgensen



  9. The World Needs to Know What Many Austrians Already Know About Rude Liar, the Notorious 'Double-Dipper'

    Today we publish many translations (from German) about the Austrian double-dipper, who already became the subject of unfavourable press coverage in his home country; he’s partly responsible for crushing fundamental rights at the EPO under Benoît Battistelli‘s regime



  10. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XVI: The Demise of the Austrian Double-Dipper

    Friedrich ‘Rude Liar’ Rödler is notorious in the eyes of EPO staff, whom he was slandering and scandalising for ages while he himself was the real scandal



  11. Links 18/10/2021: Porteus Kiosk 5.3 and Ventoy 1.0.55

    Links for the day



  12. [Meme] [Teaser] More to Life Than Patents

    Greedy sociopaths oughtn’t be put in charge of patent offices; this is what’s dooming the EPO in recent years (all they think about is money



  13. Microsoft GitHub Exposé — Part II — The Campaign Against GPL Compliance and War on Copyleft Enforcement

    Microsoft contemplated buying GitHub 7.5 years ago; the goal wasn’t to actually support “Open Source” but to crush it from the inside and that’s what Microsoft has been doing over the past 2.5 years (we have some details from the inside)



  14. Links 18/10/2021: Linux 5.15 RC6 and 7 New Stable Kernels

    Links for the day



  15. [Meme] The Austrian School of Friedrich Rude Liar

    With reference to the Austrian School, let’s consider the fact that Friedrich Rude Liar might in fact be standing to personally gain by plundering the EPO‘s staff by demonising them while helping Benoît Battistelli crush them



  16. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, October 17, 2021

    IRC logs for Sunday, October 17, 2021



  17. How (Simple Technical Steps) to Convince Yourself That DuckDuckGo is Just Spyware Connected to Microsoft, Falsely Advertised as 'Privacy'

    In recent days we published or republished some bits and pieces about what DuckDuckGo really is; the above reader dropped by to enlighten us and demonstrate just how easy it is to see what DuckDuckGo does even at the client side (with JavaScript); more people need to confront DuckDuckGo over this and warn colleagues/friends/family (there’s more here)



  18. Austria's Right-Wing Politicians Displaying Their Arrogance to EPO Examiners

    The EPO‘s current regime seems to be serving a money-hungry lobby of corrupt officials and pathological liars; tonight we focus on Austria



  19. [Meme] Friedrich Rödler's Increasingly Incomprehensible Debt Quagmire, Years Before EPO Money Was Trafficked Into the Stock Market

    As it turns out, numerous members of the Administrative Council of the EPO are abundantly corrupt and greedy; They falsely claim or selfishly pretend there’s a financial crisis and then moan about a "gap" that does not exist (unless one counts the illegal gambling, notably EPOTIF, which they approved), in turn recruiting or resorting to scabs that help improve ‘profit margins’



  20. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XV: Et Tu Felix Austria…

    Prior to the Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos regime the EPO‘s hard-working staff was slandered by a corrupt Austrian official, Mr. Rödler



  21. Links 17/10/2021: Blender 2.93.5, Microsoft Bailouts

    Links for the day



  22. Links 17/10/2021: GhostBSD 21.10.16 and Mattermost 6.0

    Links for the day



  23. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, October 16, 2021

    IRC logs for Saturday, October 16, 2021



  24. [Meme] First Illegally Banning Strikes, Then Illegally Taking Over Courts

    The vision of Team Battistelli/Campinos is a hostile takeover of the entire patent system, not just patent offices like the EPO; they’d stop at nothing to get there



  25. Portuguese Network of Enablers

    Instead of serving Portuguese people or serving thousands of EPO workers (including many who are Portuguese) the delegation from Portugal served the network of Campinos



  26. In Picture: After Billions Spent on Marketing, With Vista 11 Hype and Vapourware, No Real Gains for Windows

    The very latest figures from Web usage show that it’s hardly even a blip on the radar; Windows continues bleeding to death, not only in servers



  27. [Meme] [Teaser] Double-Dipping Friedrich Rödler

    As we shall see tomorrow night, the EPO regime was supported by a fair share of corrupt officials inside the Administrative Council



  28. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XIV: Battistelli's Iberian Facilitators - Portugal

    How illegal “Strike Regulations” and regressive ‘reforms’ at the EPO, empowering Benoît Battistelli to the detriment of the Rule of Law, were ushered in by António Campinos and by Portugal 5 years before Campinos took Battistelli’s seat (and power he had given himself)



  29. Links 16/10/2021: SparkyLinux Turns 10 and Sculpt OS 21.10

    Links for the day



  30. “Facebook Whistleblowers” Aside, It Has Been a Dying Platform for Years, and It's Mentally Perverting the Older Generation

    Guest post by Ryan, reprinted with permission


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts