Bonum Certa Men Certa

One More (Failed) Attempt to Deplatform the Sites by Harassing and Threatening Webhosts

posted by Roy Schestowitz on Jun 17, 2024,
updated Jun 17, 2024

A lot of empty used cardboard boxes

Webhosts are not authors. Webhosts are service providers. Just as you wouldn't report an ISP (utilities) for someone saying something about you, trying to attack or blackmail webhosts is a really low blow. After a while you get put in their blacklist, as they know better; they do not wish to bother wasting any time on you.

Some time ago my webhost relayed to us something it had received (it's just part of the procedure; they follow the protocol). It said this: (with my response in-line)

To whom it may concern,

https://techrights.org/n/2024/01/29/My_Husband_s_Reply_to_Our_Webhost_After_False_Accusations_Perju.shtml

It really does not matter what I may have or may not have done. Autism does not make me mentally ill, and his claims are complete fabrications and he repeatedly used doctored evidence.

Nope, never. So the person the post deals with (and the post seems to have struck a nerve) is trying to take down the whole Web site. Put another way, writing about bogus claims and ridiculous attempts to take a site down results in the same perpetrator trying to do so yet again. It doesn't work that way.

So what's the latest bogus angle?

*The UK Government:*

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/copyright-notice-digital-images-photographs-and-the-internet/copyright-notice-digital-images-photographs-and-the-internet

I want to take a photo of a copyright work and use it

If someone takes a photo, copyright can exist in that photo. If someone takes a photo of a work protected by copyright, and the work forms an essential part of the image, using that photo on the web is likely to be an infringement of copyright. In other words, people are allowed to take a photo of a room of paintings, provided the inclusion of such paintings in the photo was merely incidental (e.g. they formed inessential background). However, you would need to be careful about copyright infringement if taking photos of specific paintings.*

Is there any way I can be completely safe when I use an image from the internet?

The vast majority of images on the internet are likely to be protected by copyright, so it is only safe to use it if you have specific permission to do so through a licence; or your particular use is specifically permitted in the terms and conditions of the website supplying the image and this is the copyright owner’s website or another website which has the copyright owner’s permission to allow other people to use an image; or if you have established that copyright has expired; or if you are using the image in a way which is covered by a permitted act/exception to copyright (see above). The use of licensed images is usually much safer than using unlicensed images which offer no protection against infringement.

Classic appeal to authority, "The UK Government".

The above does not in any way apply here because of a variety of different reasons, including Fair Use and right to self-defence. That aside, take a load of this spin:

As a copyright holder of the images, I can revoke permission at any time and Roy Schestowitz does not have a license from me to reproduce those images. I have reached out to both Classmates and LinkedIn and those images are no longer available anywhere on the web except for your clients website.

Those are screenshots of the sites, not copies of images, which were voluntarily uploaded there. It's essential to connect the abuses of the same person going by different names/identities.

Even the person then acknowledges that it is a very weak "claim":

Regardless of the copyright claim though, the human rights lawsuits are moving forward. Your organization should have replied to me about the image usage.

No, they should not. Also, there are no lawsuits. Those are merely applications. Nobody even bothers replying to them. There's a good reason why.

I am also filing a privacy complaint with the UK's Information Commissioner’s Office, your organization should not have shared that e-mail with your client.

Nope, they merely follow protocols. If you make bogus complaints about a site, that site is then being notified so that it can properly respond.

What we're seeing here is a person who abuses the system in Canada at Canadian taxpayers' expense trying to do the same in the UK, at British taxpayers' expense. The authorities here aren't keen to go along with it. They made that clear too.

I am a victim of abuse and he is not. You essentially doxxed an abuse victim, one who is an actual paralegal and is litigating against you because of your lack of action.

No, the abuse always came from:

Miss Britney Lozza

Who, as Brandon Lozza, spent over a decade attacking many people, including my cohost, his family, myself, and my family.

Lozza was already banned from IRC well over a decade ago. Lozza kept breaking rules. Being autistic does not make it OK to act this badly.

Seeing that the webhost isn't paying attention to the serial abuse, Lozza already tried to open "cases" and scare (or blackmail) the webhost:

On Sat, Nov 4, 2023 at 4:50 PM Britney Lozza <bnlozza@gmail.com> wrote:
> To whom it may concern,
>
> [redacted]]
>
> I sent your organization the legal pleadings out of courtesy, so that you
> can do something about the human rights violations quickly and avoid the
> hassle of a legal battle.
>
> The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) will send you a copy of the
> pleadings as well. Also, they consider e-mail to be "served". It does your
> organization no good to pretend to not have received anything.
>
> More articles have appeared online:
>
> https://news.tuxmachines.org/n/2023/11/04/Toxic_People_in_the_Community_Are_Often_Connected_to_Microsoft_.shtml
>
> https://techrights.org/n/2023/11/04/The_People_Who_Try_to_Deplatform_Techrights_Are_Simply_Not_Sane.shtml
>
> This will also be part of the lawsuit and any future articles will be too.
>
> Britney

This was almost a year ago and of course nothing happened. The webhost isn't Canadian, isn't your employer etc.

This is clear and overt misuse of process for harassment's sake.

Now, let's take stock of what we've just shown. A person who was repeatedly banned from IRC is trying to come back to IRC, does more abusive things, gets banned.

Then, when the site explains the ban there's an attempt to open complaints in some other continent, under the guise of "discrimination".

My wife, who published the article, opened a police case (second police case) against B Lozza. The high-level police officer assured her that writing this is perfectly lawful and does not violate any law.

My wife was subjected to cybercrimes by B Lozza and is permitted to write about the abuse she suffered. She is also constantly being harassed by B Lozza.

If needed, I shall get officials in touch with the relevant police officer, who has a very negative view of Lozza.

Were cybercrimes committed? Yes, even as recently as months ago.

Lozza has a long history of abusing authorities and Lozza previously filed a complaint to the webhost using a sockpuppet account, which is not legal. Online harassment by Lozza goes at least 14 years back (we have evidence), Lozza was arrested for harassment before, and it seems like even months ago Lozza was engaging in DoS attacks on people in our IRC channels, according to them. That would not be unprecedented either. In short, reasonable webhosts will not entertain this ongoing "harassment by process".

Also, to be clear, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) does not apply to the webhost, THERE IS NO LAWSUIT (another drug-induced psychosis?), and this is part of misuse by Lozza of the free-of-charge Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO). In effect, that in itself is a mechanism of harassment.

Previously Lozza admitted to them that drug use caused false statements/allegations. Lozza is unfit and is trying to terrorise every perceived "enemy", as was done for over a decade already.

Folks can safely disregard these false claims. There are about 3 cases in British police against B Lozza and quite a bit of history across the pond too.

Anyway, suffice to say, the webhost doesn't see the need to waste time on this nonsense:

Dear Customer,

Many thanks for resolving the issue(s) related to this abuse complaint and letting us know.

Abuse report #26385 has now been closed successfully.

Kind regards,

It only took hours.

Opening more such reports will most likely result in getting oneself in the "immediate binlist". Using sockpuppet accounts to open reports (giving a false impression of plurality) may only results in more police cases being opened against Lozza, maybe even in Canada. If one can bother making international phonecalls...

Lozza has been collaborating with people who phone my employer, phone my wife's employer, and send menacing communications. Being autistic is not an excuse for this kind of behaviour and one needn't be "transphobic" to assert such behaviour is utterly despicable.

Techrights wishes to cover tech issues and not be dragged down by low-lives, whose modus operandi we can probably explain in a whole book.

Last week we published about 180 pages and maybe this week we can do even more. These Monday articles are only about 0.5% of what we publish. We don't want to spend much time on it. We have better things to do.

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

[Video] Boston Area Assange Defense (Yesterday)
It was published only hours ago
In Malta, Android/Linux Has Overtaken Microsoft Windows (According to statCounter)
statCounter milestone?
 
[Meme] The Red Bait (Embrace... Extinguish)
They set centos on fire, then offer a (de facto) proprietary substitute for a fee
Shooting the Messenger to Spite the Message
segment of a Noam Chomsky talk
Guinea: Windows Down From 99.3% to 2.7% 'Market Share'
Guinea is not a small country
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, July 15, 2024
IRC logs for Monday, July 15, 2024
What's Meant by "Antenna Abuse" (Gemini)
syndication is not a monopoly in Gemini and if one doesn't condone political censorship, then one can create one's own syndication service/capsule
Microsoft Layoffs and Entire Unit Termination: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
What an announcement to make just before Independence Day
Links 16/07/2024: Old Computer Challenge and One Page Dungeon Contest
Links for the day
Microsoft Falls Further and Closer Towards 10% (Windows "Market Share") in Kuwait
more countries entering the "single-digit Windows" (under 10%) club
Gemini Links 15/07/2024: Antenna's Pro-Hamas Bias Revisited and Old Computer Challenge
Links for the day
[Video] Julian Assange, Over One Decade Ago, Cautioning About What the Internet Had Truly Become
video is not new
Antenna Abuse and Gemini Abuse (Self-hosting Perils)
Perhaps all this junk is a sign of Gemini growing up
Homage to Malta
Malta is probably easy for Microsoft to bribe
IRC at 16
Logging has been used for us and against us
Links 15/07/2024: China’s Economic Problems, Boeing Under Fire
Links for the day
500 Days' Uptime Very Soon
Good luck doing that with Windows...
Windows Falls Below 20% in Tunisia
A month ago we wrote about GNU/Linux in Tunisia
Links 15/07/2024: Google Wants Wiz and Why "Sports Ruin Everything"
Links for the day
Gemini Links 15/07/2024: Old Computer Challenge and Sending Files via NNCP
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, July 14, 2024
IRC logs for Sunday, July 14, 2024
Debian History Harassment & Abuse culture evolution
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Microsoft Windows Down to 23% in Spain
the rate of change is noteworthy
[Meme] It Is Not About Empowerment, It's About Optics for Bigots and Businessmen
Truth hurts
Truth is Always Truth
Desperate efforts to suppress the truth resulted in even worse chaos and some people are going to pay for it
Android Surges to New Highs in Georgia, Windows Plunges to 30% (It Was 99% in 2012)
Until 2012 almost all Web requests there came from Windows
Another Casualty of the 'GAI' Ponzi Scheme: Most of the News Cycle and News Sites
accelerated death of journalism
Empowering Predators Who Fancy Exercising Control Over Women (Using Corporate Money)
Remember this when Google talks about diversity, women etc.
GNU/Linux Continues Its Rapid Growth in July, Today We Look at Belgium
Again, a word of caution: statCounter isn't a perfect yardstick
Links 14/07/2024: Goldman Sachs Says 'Advanced' or 'Generative' Hey Hi (AI) is Just Hype, Thoughts on Negatives
Links for the day
GNOME Foundation Welcomes Dolly
It didn't work out with Molly and Holly
Links 14/07/2024: Perils for AI PC Hype Train, Further Attacks on Freedom of the Press
Links for the day
A Response to Bill Maher's Senseless Attacks on Julian Assange and Wikileaks
published a few hours ago
The List of Sites or Sources for Linux News is Getting Shorter Over Time (Despite GNU and Linux Steadily Growing in Usage)
A lack of publishing begets lack of educated, informed population (a return to Dark Ages where rulers leverage mass ignorance)
The Number of Web Servers Has Gone Down
Cloud fatigue deux?
[Meme] GNOME Foundation's Relationship With Women
Lots more coming soon, so stay tuned
The Smugness of "I'm a Journalist"
Attacking women for expressing their opinions (for example, about the abuse they received) isn't unprecedented
It Takes No Courage to Become Another Corporate Stooge
transition to spam
Why Techrights Has Just Programmatically Blacklisted ZDNet
Even their "Linux" writers are AWOL
Gemini Links 14/07/2024: The Stress of 24/7 Notifications and FOSS tools for Sipeed Tang Nano 1K
Links for the day
Windows Already Down to 10% in Lao (It was 96% a Decade and a Half Ago), Vista 11 Adoption Has Stalled
And GNU/Linux is topping a 1-year high in Loa
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, July 13, 2024
IRC logs for Saturday, July 13, 2024
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day