Bonum Certa Men Certa

Workers of the European Patent Office Take the Office to Court Over Pension

posted by Roy Schestowitz on Jun 22, 2024,
updated Jun 22, 2024

Appeals Committee favours staff and pensioners in salary adjustment litigation

European Patent Office (EPO) pensions still precarious

SEVERAL hours ago the Staff Union of the European Patent Office (SUEPO) published and circulated a new publication about the ongoing attack on pensioners and future pensioners by António Campinos and his predecessor Benoît Battistelli.

As a little bit of background consider the following:

The latest publication is dated Friday and it was accompanied/spread with the message in the abstract/overview: "SUEPO has been actively contesting the new salary adjustment procedure introduced in 2020, which has led to reduced or halted annual adjustments of salaries and pensions. A test-case procedure before the Enlarged Chamber of the Appeals Committee has now resulted in an opinion favouring staff and pensioners, which has been sent to the President. In a recent publication, the President has downplayed the opinion and indicated a preference for a judgment from ILOAT. SUEPO criticises the inflated financial provisions of EUR 2 billion cited by the President and emphasises the Office’s strong financial position. The President should follow the opinion of the Appeals Committee, as generally foreseen in the Service Regulations."

Here's the full thing as HTML, plain text, and GemText:

INTERNATIONALE GEWERKSCHAFT IM EUROPÄISCHEN PATENTAMT
STAFF UNION OF THE EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE
UNION SYNDICALE DE L'OFFICE EUROPEEN DES BREVETS

Zentraler Vorstand Central Executive Committee Bureau central
Staff Union of the European Patent Office (SUEPO) www.suepo.org

21 June 2024
su24012cp 0.2.1 – 5.2

Appeals Committee favours staff and pensioners in salary adjustment litigation

SUEPO has been actively contesting the new salary adjustment procedure introduced in 2020, which has led to reduced or halted annual adjustments of salaries and pensions. A test-case procedure before the Enlarged Chamber of the Appeals Committee has now resulted in an opinion favouring staff and pensioners, which has been sent to the President. In a recent publication, the President has downplayed the opinion and indicated a preference for a judgment from ILOAT. SUEPO criticises the inflated financial provisions of EUR 2 billion cited by the President and emphasises the Office’s strong financial position. The President should follow the opinion of the Appeals Committee, as generally foreseen in the Service Regulations.

Dear SUEPO members,

Since the introduction of the new salary adjustment procedure in 2020, SUEPO has been supporting appeals and complaints against it. The Office has regularly reduced or even halted the annual adjustments of salaries and pensions, which should normally reflect the average development of the purchasing power of national civil servants, and has excluded pensioners from the redistribution pool.

Recent developments: Internal appeal procedure

An important positive development has now taken place in this dispute. On 13 April 2022, the presiding member of the Enlarged Chamber of the Appeals Committee announced the possibility of initiating a test-case procedure for appeals against the salary adjustment procedure and its implementation for 2021 (86,8% cut in adjustments). SUEPO considered this proposal adequate and informed its members accordingly. The initiation of the test- case procedure was then announced on 8 August 2022.

After several submissions of observations by the test appellants and the Office, a hearing before the Enlarged Chamber on 15 November 2023, and further exchanges of information, the Appeals Committee sent its reasoned opinion to the President on 7 June 2024. This opinion shall apply to every appeal in which a similar issue has been raised (see Article 9b of the Implementing Rules for Articles 106 to 113 ServRegs). Pursuant to Article 110(4) ServRegs, the President shall take a final decision on the appeal, of which the appellants shall receive a copy.

President’s response and implications

Although latter has not yet taken place, the President published on the Intranet on 13 June 2024 that the Enlarged Chamber had concluded that the application of the sustainability clause (cut in adjustments) had gone against the principle of purchasing power parity. In addition, the Enlarged Chamber considered it fair and advisable that the periodical settlement clause should not exclude pensioners.

The President shall in general follow the opinion of the Appeals Committee. If not, he shall set out in writing the reasons for deviating from the opinion. Interestingly, in this legal context (Article 110(4) ServRegs), the President minimised the opinion of the Enlarged Chamber in a test-case procedure as a “non-binding opinion” and declared, without further reasoning, that the Office did not share this opinion. Instead, he suggested that the lawfulness of the current salary adjustment procedure would ultimately be cleared by an ILOAT judgment.

Paradoxically, the President, who once favoured a shift from a litigation culture to a culture of social dialogue, now seeks resolution from the Tribunal in Geneva. In addition, on the same date, he also published an announcement stating that many measures taken by the Office in recent years have strengthened dialogue, but that the backlog before the Tribunal remains a concern.

Analysis and proposal

The jurisprudence of the Tribunal attributes considerable deference to rational and balanced findings of internal appeal bodies (see Judgments Nos. 2295, 3400, 4697). When rejecting an opinion of the Appeals Committee, the President thus must give clear and cogent reasons (see Judgments Nos. 2699, 4697). We believe that respect for this opinion must be all the greater since this is a test-case procedure in which the Enlarged Chamber of the Appeals Committee has carefully investigated and assessed the matter. SUEPO would therefore not shy away from supporting complaints by the test appellants in Geneva in the event of a negative decision by the President.

Unfortunately, we cannot comment in detail on the opinion because the President has not published it together with his Intranet statement. Neither has he sent a copy to the appellants yet. It seems wrong to publicly criticise a positive opinion in a test-case procedure before it is even published. This approach is lacking transparency and fairness. It appears that that the President wants to ensure the sovereignty of interpretation before allowing the appellants and all other concerned employees and pensioners to make their own assessment.

SUEPO encourages the President to fully implement the opinion of the Appeals Committee and to propose the removal of the sustainability clause (Article 9) from the Implementing Rule for Article 64 ServRegs. This would also render the periodical settlement redundant (Article 10), thus preventing the discrimination of pensioners (which contravenes Article 33(2)(c) EPC). The dispute over the salary adjustment procedure would then be settled with a subsequent payment of the arrears, interests, and costs.

Financial situation

Some colleagues approached us because the President referred in his publication to a provision of circa EUR 2 bn in the Office’s reserves, equivalent to the savings of the salary adjustment procedure. Indeed, the impact of the salary adjustment procedure on the alleged coverage gap was estimated in CA/19/20 at EUR 2 bn under the conditions of the so-called Base 2 scenario. This scenario, which assumed no recovery from a low interest rate environment and a global economic recession in 2020, did not materialise. The savings of EUR 2 bn forecasted in the financial study 2019 assumed the application of limiting the adjustments to the inflation in the Eurozone + 0,2% over a period of multiple cycles of the salary adjustment procedure, but the current opinion of the Appeals Committee should lead to a correction of the SAP already in this first cycle. It follows, that a more realistic figure is at least one order of magnitude lower. The financial situation of the Office is as follows (2023 year-end actuals): RFPSS: EUR 12,1 bn; EPOTIF: EUR 3,5 bn; cash reserve: EUR 0,5 bn; annual surplus: EUR 0,4 bn. This is much better than estimated. The reference to a EUR 2 bn provision is clearly inflated and not aligned with the current financial situation.

Furthermore, the fact that a provision is only mentioned now, despite a four-digit number of requests for review and appeals against the salary adjustment procedure having been filed since 2020, raises the question as to whether the Office has adequately assessed the legal risks and failed to recognise the need to make provisions at an earlier stage. The annual statements according to IFRS for the accounting periods of 2021 and 2022 make it clear that the EPOrg has contingencies arising from the ordinary course of business, mainly due to disputed invoices, pending legal disputes and arbitration procedures or appeals by staff members including those in front of the ILOAT. The Office does not anticipate that these will give rise to any material liabilities other than those for which provision has been made. The provisions for litigation risks amounted to EUR 6,1 million on 31 December 2022 (see CA/60/23, note 26), and to EUR 5,6 million on 31 December 2021 (see CA/60/22, note 25).

Together, we are strong!

We would like to emphasise that the only way we can finance the dispute about the salary adjustment procedure is through your contributions. SUEPO collaborates with reputable lawyers who draft appeals for SUEPO members and who support the appellants. As a union with strong membership, SUEPO is perfectly placed to defend the rights of staff and pensioners.

Your SUEPO Central Bureau

What happens at the EPO in that regard is part of a broader trend.

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

[Video] The 'Dangerous Precedent' (Jen Robinson on Assange Plea Bargain)
Published 3 hours ago in Australia
Microsoft is Losing Its Grip on Bulgaria
now may be a good time to look into statistics from Bulgaria
LinuxSecurity.com Back to Relaying Anti-Linux FUD From Microsoft, Using Microsoft Chatbots That Recycle and Add Permutations to the FUD
They're killing the Web every time they do this
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
Microsofter Throwing Stones in a Glasshouse Again
"Life is imitating art" and if you're a BS artist, your life must be BS
 
European Commission fooled by IBM Red Hat merger risk to source code
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Links 27/06/2024: Black-Lives-Matter-Poster-Related Lawsuit, Misinformation and Propaganda by Chinese Userfarms
Links for the day
Gemini Links 27/06/2024: Rogue Legends and Old Computers
Links for the day
[Meme] They Think of Their Business Partner, Microsoft
Think.
At the Cusp of Productivity
Work in progress: a critique of terms of service (ToS) in "modern" computing
The Free Software Foundation (FSF) is Becoming More European Than the Google- and Microsoft-Funded 'FSFE' (Fake 'FSF', a Case of Identity Theft)
The Board of Directors of the FSF is now all European as far as women (3) go
[Meme] Meanwhile at IBM's Headquarters
Old white men can find common themes to laugh at in IBM
IBM's Board is a Men's Club, Unlike the FSF's, But Red Hat/IBM Are Trolling the Community Using the "Diversity Shtick"
CoC-fighting over diversity to distract from their own failings
John Gilmore, Cofounder of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Joins the FSF's Board
it's already riling up the Microsofters and misogynists
Links 27/06/2024: Microsoft's Chief Brand Offices Kathleen Hall to Leave, The Beauty of Blogging, Ukraine Updates
Links for the day
Microsoft Got Lost in Bermuda
based on far too little data
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, June 26, 2024
IRC logs for Wednesday, June 26, 2024
Far Too Young to Die
He seemed to be healthy
Virgin Islands, Marshall Islands, Guam and Other American Satellites Drift Further Away From Microsoft
So even US-controlled islands are moving away from Windows, little by little...
Let's Encrypt is Dying in Geminispace (Now Down Very Sharply to 6%), More People Self-Sign as They Certainly Should
Abandoning a fake security model?
No More Justice for Assange?
Not the site anyway
[Meme] "No News is Good News"
2 days have passed and still not a word
Northern Mariana Islands May Have Been Taken Over by Debian!!
The place is strategic for military reasons (like a giant aircraft carrier with running water)
Birthday With His Family
Julian Assange was born 3 July 1971
Julian Assange on Cryptographically-deniable Block Storage Device (aka Marutukku)
An oldie
Links 26/06/2024: US State Department Controlling YouTube, Artificial Intelligence (AI) Hype on the Brink as "Losses Balloon"
Links for the day
GNU/Linux Back Above 4% (in statCounter)
happened minutes or a few hours ago
Free Assange! (by Alexandre Oliva)
Reprinted with permission from Alexandre Oliva
Julian Assange & Debian: was he a developer?
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Links 26/06/2024: More on Hey Hi (AI) Bubble Fading, RIAA Steps in
Links for the day
Gemini Links 26/06/2024: UAF Botanical Garden and YouTube Workarounds
Links for the day
Microsoft Market Share Falling to New Lows in Aruba
Being below 20% in America is the exception, not the norm
Streaming in a Few Minutes: Julian Assange Press Conference
They test the microphone now.
[Video] Julian Assange Arrives Safely in Australia
even the person on the air cried
Debian Project Still Has a Lot of Explaining to Do...
Assange was actually a Debian Developer
[Meme] When Ian (of Debian) Was Still Alive
I wasn't always a Debian Developer...
"Julian Assange is Free"
Published ~34 minutes ago
GNU/Linux Userbase Surging in Iceland
Maybe there's something big going on, like people deleting Vista 11 in droves and installing GNU/Linux instead
Jennifer Robinson: "After 14 years of legal battles, Julian Assange can go home a free man”
She explains the implications for the general freedom of the press
Judge: Assange Leaves Court 'A Free Man'
on his way to Australia now
Julian Assange verdict: guilty, not guilty or blackmailed
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
12 Months Ago the FSF Said It Would Issue a Statement on IBM Taking RHEL Proprietary
Statement never happened
Sheriff of Cork & Debian Edward Brocklesby or Brockelsby Street confusion
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Microsoft's Bing Fall From 2.6% Before LLM Hype to Just 0.79% Right Now in Russia
statCounter's data
[Meme] Speaking Truth to Power (Still Easier in the West Than in Russia/BRIC)
Different people, different outcomes
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, June 25, 2024
IRC logs for Tuesday, June 25, 2024
The Plot to Silence (or Deplatform) Techrights
This past month I've been spending time working on the text of an online publication
[Meme] Julian Assange's Lawyers Need to Ensure Assange Maintains Freedom to Publish
Let's ensure he can continue to publish
"Conviction for a Crime he Did Not Commit," Said Jennifer Robinson
Robinson is the kind of woman accomplisher we should look up to
Trying to Make Blogs (Independent and Mostly Decentralised Platforms) What Comes After Social Control Media
Social Control Networks 'stole the thunder' of blogs, but can we get back to blogs?
Julian Assange Has Landed
There will probably be some press interviews some time this month or next month
L is for Linux and Lao
Lao should really have something called LaOS
[Meme] Need More Sites Like Wikileaks, Not Less
On US government vs Wikileaks
We Know Who Stands to Gain From the Demise of the Press
the Assange release was a win for his family, but likely a dire loss for press freedom
[Meme] Think Twice Before Exposing or 'Embarrassing' Powerful People and Interests
The United States government has basically won the Assange case
An Extended Statement on Julian Assange
Assange's release was not important enough to "make the cut" for News, only "tweets" and other Social Control Media nonsense.
The Open Source Initiative (OSI) is Openwashing, Ben Cotton (Fedora) Acknowledges It, Fails to See How Bribes Led to That
As if... it "just happened"
Links 25/06/2024: RAM Stress, COVID Graft
Links for the day
Gemini Links 25/06/2024: Hey Hi Punditry and Right to Repair
Links for the day
Links 25/06/2024: Julian Assange Freed From Prison, "AI" Bubble Imploding Some More
Links for the day
Three Points About Julian Assange Plea Deal
There is still a secret problem
[Meme] EFF Became a 'Bunch of Pussies' Working for GAFAM (and Sponsored by GAFAM)
It won't protect people, except very rich people's interests
IBM Does Not Care for the Blind (Wayland Harms Accessibility)
What a punch in the gut
Who Is This Backup FOR, the NSA?
As Admfubar put it, "backups for everyone..."
Tux Machines Past 20: Still Thriving
Now 20 years and 2 weeks old
[Meme] Microsoft is Coming /Home
"LOL, REAL SORRY!!!"
Microsoft's Siege of Libya Coming to an End
One might be tempted to guess the users deleted Windows and installed something else
Gemini Links 25/06/2024: Old Computer Challenge; An Opinionated GNU/Linux Guide
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, June 24, 2024
IRC logs for Monday, June 24, 2024
IEEE Computer Society on Andrew Tanenbaum, Winner of ACM Award, Who Also Inspired Linux Development
10 years ago
New Talk by Dr. Richard Stallman Published Two Days Ago By CeSIUM - Centro de Estudantes de Engenharia Informática da Universidade do Minho (Portugal)
The FSF no longer mentions Richard Stallman's talks, but we will
FSF Looking to Raise Money by Adding 200 New Members by July 19
The FSF is in good shape, according to Alexandre Oliva
Not Only Does It Not Add Security... (UEFI as a 'Bug Door')
SecureCore?
Data From Monaco Should Alarm Microsoft
Just how many people are deleting Windows and installing something else this year?
Name the Threats and Threat Actors
Looking back to 2006, there was Novell and gregkh (partly salaried by Microsoft), so these are familiar territories
Linux in Central Sahel (Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger)
Vast area, vast number of "Linux users" (if one counts Android as such)
[Meme] Gagging One's Own Staff as a Signal of Corporate Distress
Censorship at Microsoft