Using FUD That Blames "Linux" for Typos, Turning It Into LLM Slop That Blames "Linux" for Typos
Some days ago we caught half a dozen new examples of "Linux" being blamed for typosquatting and, perhaps using these as a training set, the slopfarm linuxsecurity.com made a permutation or two to manifest some more FUD, this time computer-generated slop: (potpourri of words)
Almost for sure (100% probability) LLM slop? The usual? Yes.
LLM slop lessens the incentive to do good journalism (you must compete with garbage), so the quality of journalism is becoming lower and lower and this erosion is then fed back - along with slop - into slop machines. At each generation or iteration we drift further away from the truth.
We gave more examples from linuxsecurity.com yesterday. It is probably the "leader" at LLM slop (fake 'articles') about "Linux". █