Censorship Doesn't Always Work
Days ago: Plan for European Patent Office (EPO) Coverage This Month, Next Month, and Next Year | Annus Horribilis at the European Patent Office (EPO)
With exactly 6 weeks left in the year we can say with certainty this scandal at the EPO will 'spill over' to future years and will be vastly worse than the Belarus scandal which had António Campinos - maybe stoned at the time - shouting at his staff the F-word (the "real" F word, not Formalities Officers).
Somehow we've managed to attract the wrath of some large corporations and organisations (the EPO is Europe's second-largest), which only gives us more appetite to do lots more of the same. In the case of Microsoft, when we started the series about a huge EPO scandal with Microsoft our webhost told us that she had been offered a job at Microsoft despite never applying for one! Odd, isn't it? When the EPO hired several law firms to attack me constantly it was also after I had exposed Microsoft-EPO collusion back in 2015. Earlier this year a Microsoft employee who had spent time in prison for strangling (and filed a lawsuit because I mentioned this well-documented fact) unintentionally revealed that several barristers worked on his files and several lawyers too, at least one of whom from a second law firm. Have they come to conclude one law firm isn't enough to censor what I publish? Where does this madness end? Motorcyclists racing through an awful storm from the City of London to my front door to serve legal papers? Or people leaving over 50KG (over 100 pounds) of legal papers at our front door in just one morning? This is financed by an unnamed third party. █