Brigading Against Women - Part VII - 'Trolling' Courts and Legal Systems in America and in the UK (Europe) Costs a Lot to Taxpayers
They only attend hearings after being arrested (because they must):
He was brought to Court months later (after his arrest) and there was a broadcast of it. He had been charged and repeatedly begged me to hide what happened when he worked for Microsoft. Then he was ushered in by Garrett to engage in lawfare using the exact same solicitor and forgetful barrister.
Previous Parts:
In previous parts we established that Garrett and Lozza had collaborated in 2023, 2024, 2025, and even last month (2026) [1, 2, 3].
In 2023 Lozza lied to the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) in order to bully a webhost in another continent (having just done the same in another country). Lozza, moreover, misused HRTO, lied to HRTO about my wife and I living in Canada, then withdrew all of one's own applications without explanation a year later. Like the litigants in absentia in the UK, Lozza was abusing a process (and tribunal) to bully people. Lozza had already done this for years and, as noted in prior parts, was accordingly flagged or sanctioned for it. "Lozza" basically became a precedence/precedent for HRTO to throw out abusive applications.
In a properly-functioning system, Lozza would need to compensate us and to also compensate the webhost. But Lozza is a psychotic drug user on shoestring budget, and moreover being the case that Lozza lives in another continent, it won't be worth pursuing.
In a nutshell, Lozza got a tribunal to accept lies, whereupon we informed them of this perjury. Citing formalities, they didn't pay attention and played along for a little (participated in the abuse, maybe unwittingly).
Lozza was gaming and 'trolling' the legal system for silly games or what Garrett called "funny". Their aim was 'revenge'; it was not about justice. The judge who ruled in a trial last October said in the courtroom that Garrett's case was a waste of the court's money (he didn't even live here, no taxes paid here) and she wrote in her decision that both my wife and I had been subjected to horrible abuse we neither invited nor deserved. In hindsight we know that Lozza participated in this. Two months ago I told and spelled out to another judge the full name of Lozza after he had asked me to. He wrote that down. Garrett wasn't there because he chose not to attend a hearing he had paid over $130,000 to have. I find this astounding, truly astonishing. He wasn't faraway or too broke to borrow money for a flight ticket; he was already in London at the time. It would cost him absolutely nothing to attend the hearing. He could just walk there. Imagine how a judge sees one team outnumbered by another (by a large gap) as the petitioner who started the application did not even bother showing up after paying over $130,000 for it (plus causing the British taxpayers to shell out a similar amount), as if he bailed out or realised his expectations were ill-conceived (or sold based on a deception by self-serving hired guns in another continent).
That's sort of like what Lozza did 3 years earlier.
Similarly, in relation to Garrett, his litigation buddy in America never (not even once) showed up for a hearing and there were many.
For a Court of Justice to function properly it needs to weed out abusive petitioners. Failing to do so necessarily, and more so inevitably, results in disrepute.
In a later series we'll cover attempts to 'SWAT' my wife and I. They always try to create a distraction from their own behaviour.
GGG ("Restricted Boot" Garrett, "Microsoft Plagiarism" Graveley & "Gas The Jews" Lozza) are all connected to Microsoft - albeit in different ways - and Garrett acts as an informal 'coordinator'. He repeatedly lied to courts about this, as did his fall guy; this amounts to contempt of court, but as Garrett must be aware, holding people accountable for contempt of court is expensive. He used Graveley to drain our legal budget very shortly after we had countersued him in September 2024 [1, 2] and Lozza started sending more threats to our webhost only days later. This current series will soon show evidence of that.
Garrett has been consciously and conspicuously quiet in Mastodon (social control media) for nearly 3 days, we're assuming because there's no sustainable, defensible excuse at this point. The more he says (running his mouth), the more comes out.
Garrett's feud with me was a result of my opposition to Restricted Boot, which he was pushing while getting drunk with Microsoft employees (according to himself). Compensating with ego for a lack of qualifications [1, 2]? He saw me as an obstruction to that nefarious agenda of back doors and kill switches (inside PCs running GNU/Linux). What he did back then continues to damage GNU/Linux users everywhere, even this month (new ruinous incident which caused Ubuntu 24.04.5 downloads to become unavailable).
I feel vindicated again. █