Microsoft Leaves Linspire Robbed, Naked
- Dr. Roy Schestowitz
- 2007-07-18 04:45:38 UTC
- Modified: 2007-07-18 08:14:33 UTC
Well, well, well...
That's what 'partners' are for.
Just shortly after
Microsoft had betrayed Novell, Microsoft decided to move on to Linspire. DinformationWeek, which has been
Microsoft's pet for delivering endless FUD recently, has the
report.
Microsoft says software that's licensed under a new version of a popular open source license isn't covered by the patent protection deal it recently signed with desktop Linux distributor Linspire.
If we get this straight, and only if (that's a
big if) Microsoft's claims are legally valid at all, Linspire faces two choices (or scenarios) now:
- Linspire has no access to GPLv3-licensed software, of which there will be plenty.
- Linspire achieved nothing with its deal. It is not supposedly 'protected'. It spends money building a so-called 'translator' to serve a convicted monopoly abuser. It also propagates the myth that Linux requires protection and at the same time drives many of its existing customers away.
This might be the perfect punishment to
the man who called certain Linux distributors "high-brow pirates" and, as a Linux distributor,
spread FUD on behalf on Microsoft (for profit).
A question remains here. Are Novell and Xandros affected by association/inference?
Have a look at
this discussion at Digg.com and the pointers it contains. It says it all.
Comments
elkosmas
2007-07-18 12:09:38
Roy Schestowitz
2007-07-18 12:42:29
Example articles:
Becta's schools software scheme reported to EC
,----[ Quote ] | An advisor to Becta, the education technology quango, has complained | to the European Commission about its procurement process for firms | to provide online learning platforms and content to British schools. `----
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01..._ec_complaint/
OSC joins criticism of UK education's attitude to open source
,----[ Quote ] | Open Source Consortium president, Mark Taylor, has been in contact to | voice its opinion on the controversy surrounding Becta's purchasing | frameworks and the adoption of open source adoption in UK schools. | | In short, it doesn't make happy reading for Becta. "The essence of | our concern is that they're saying one thing and actually pursuing | policies that are exclusive," he said. "Becta's own research shows there | are major benefits [with open source], however the reality of the | framework is that it excludes both products and services." `----
http://www.businessreviewonline.com/...ins_criti.html
UK Government criticised for stifling open source in schools
,----[ Quote ] | MP Pugh reckons shcools should support independent or open source | software firms. He says, "In my experience a school is a key part | of the community and as such has a role to play in the economy of | that community. By supporting SMEs the local high-technology | industry will be encouraged which will benefit everyone." `----
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=36464
Becta under fire for procurement framework
,----[ Quote ] | Nineteen MPs have accused a government agency of restricting the | procurement of software in schools. `----
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/11...nt_criticised/
MPs criticise government roadblocks to Open Source adoption in schools
,----[ Quote ] | The UK Government's own studies have shown savings of up to 60% can be | made by schools and colleges using Open Source software. Despite this | clear advantage, some MPs believe the software procurement frameworks | from Becta and official advice from DfES effectively locks out the us | of free, Open Source software. `----
http://opensourceblog.itproportal.com/?p=220
Among many more...
Gopal
2007-07-18 13:22:41
Rickie Stallman
2007-07-18 17:42:29
Larz
2007-07-18 17:50:32
Steve
2007-07-18 18:14:14
______________ http://www.FreeOpenMoko.com
Balmbag Balmer
2007-07-18 18:16:43
Jonathan
2007-07-18 18:18:42
And for that matter, writing "M$" just screams "from the heart of my Mom's basement, I stab at thee!" Try working for the EFF or groups actually defending Linux and open-source if you really want to burn Microsoft.
Fred
2007-07-18 19:15:19
David Ponce
2007-07-18 19:40:21
Yes M$, you will die slowly...very slowly.
Shawn Q
2007-07-18 19:52:59
Roy, I believe Linspire's efforts were partly due to the "strange new" attitude Microsoft had. Microsoft seemed to "give up" and start unifying with other companies like Novell - which, perhaps was a nice ploy to knife a couple enemies in the back (keep your friends close, enemies closer), but, I couldn't blame a single head at either Novell or Linspire for at least trying.
Karl L. Gechlik
2007-07-18 20:00:26
Good story though from your friends @ http://www.askTheAdmin.com
mike
2007-07-19 02:57:32
Roy Schestowitz
2007-07-19 04:10:51
Kennon Keoseyan
2007-07-20 18:33:13
sailor
2007-07-20 21:02:13
That was it's purpose...because that is all the MS can do...make threats to steer business users away from linux.
Roy Schestowitz
2007-07-21 00:42:00
Novell has already been betrayed by Microsoft as well. See:
http://boycottnovell.com/2007/07/10/novell-and-microsoft-meet-gpl/
Linux distributors must begin to understand that sidling with Microsoft is never an option, no matter how much Microsoft pays (which is does, because it knows the death knell is worth that money).
Chris
2008-03-17 09:26:19
I contribute to what these people are distributing - so they're taking my code, removing the GPL references they're required to show, then selling it on.
What insane hipocracy - calling other people thieves and pirates, when they're in fact the worse offenders...
Roy Schestowitz
2008-03-17 09:42:55