”They agree that Microsoft owns part of SUSE and Microsoft agrees to get paid in vouchers.“The strategy seems to be to marginalize GPL and replace it with IP compliant 'Open Source' -- a Novell-Microsoft Open Source.
I said this earlier, but the next strategy is for Microsoft to buy up an Open Source company and then start selling Microsoft Open Source. The Novell-Microsoft deal seems to be a precursor to that. How else do you explain their total mishandling of the deal? They agree that Microsoft owns part of SUSE and Microsoft agrees to get paid in vouchers.
Remember that Novell is talking to people in the business who assume they are listening to an unbiased view. From this, from other sources and the covenant, I'm afraid Novell has totally sold out.
Comments
eet
2007-11-13 23:16:53
BTW, why should M$ not sell Linux? Great idea! That would make all their code ours! :p
Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an abusive Internet troll
Logan
2007-11-14 02:13:39
And you criticize his lack of logic! Ha ha!
Not only the only the blogs are ridiculous, but the comments all come from Looney Tunes. Is this the official blog of the Arkham Asylum?
SundayRefugee
2007-11-14 06:14:56
Do you, by chance, actually KNOW what royalty payments are?
What, in your amazing perception then, is it that Novell has to pay MS royalties for? Please, dazzle us and put this puppy to bed ;-)
Roy Schestowitz
2007-11-14 09:45:41
eet
2007-11-16 10:19:59
Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an abusive Internet troll