Why BBC is Microsoft Media (Video)
- Dr. Roy Schestowitz
- 2008-06-25 09:52:49 UTC
- Modified: 2008-06-25 09:52:49 UTC
Recent Techrights' Posts
- New Article Explains How the GPL Came About and WordPress Having Copyleft Obligations
- Having been involved in the WordPress development community since almost the beginning, I know why it chose the GPL and how it restricts abuse by Automattic
- Dr Richard Stallman (RMS) Gives Talk in Oxford University in 4 Hours
- If you live nearby, go there (it's free as in gratis)
- Using a Law Firm's Licence to Exercise Politics Through Frivolous SLAPPs and Nastygrams (to Silence People, Remove Pages, Demand Fake or Forced 'Apologies')
- Things must be getting really bad when lawyers act for raving antisemites
- Another Site Bites the Dust: "Open Source For You" Becoming a Slopfarm (LLM Slop)
- What a shame. Another dead site.
-
- Links 24/04/2025: GAFAM Problems and No Peace (or Ceasefire) in Sight
- Links for the day
- Slopfarms on the Web Almost Always Generate Anti-Linux FUD When They Produce "Linux" Output
- Welcome to the dying Web
- Richard Stallman's Oxford Talk Has Just Ended, Here Are Some Photos
- he might hop over to another European country
- Gemini Links 24/04/2025: Birthday and Good Work of Academia in Esotericism
- Links for the day
- Links 24/04/2025: EU fines Apple and Facebook, Another Microsoft GitHub Security Blunder
- Links for the day
- IBM Gained Almost 6 Billion Dollars in "Goodwill" Value in Just 3 Months, According to IBM
- Congrats to the management!
- In Belarus, Yandex is Now Measured as 50 Times More 'Popular' (by Usage) Than Microsoft
- Yandex continues to gain, whereas Bing cannot even register at 1%. Last month it was registered or measured at a measly 0.65%.
- IBM Cannot Lie to Shareholders Anymore
- "I would not be surprised if we see a layoff every quarter this year."
- We're Working to Make Full-Site Search Available
- This site has over 1,000 'wiki' pages, many thousands of documents, several thousands of videos, and about 50,000 blog posts or articles. We need to make them easier to find/navigate.
- Links 24/04/2025: IBM Loses Many Contracts, Intel to Lay Off Over 20% (Not Counting Those Who Leave 'Voluntarily')
- Links for the day
- Richard Stallman Can Explain to Oxford Artificial Intelligence Society Why LLM Slop is Not Artificial Intelligence and Why It Hurts Society
- another 'crop' of LLM slop that damages GNU/Linux and facts
- Over at Tux Machines...
- GNU/Linux news for the past day
- IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, April 23, 2025
- IRC logs for Wednesday, April 23, 2025
- Open Source Initiative (OSI) Promoting Microsoft and Proprietary Software Using Microsoft Operatives
- Because nothing says "Open Source" like GPL violations facilitated by Microsoft
- Links 23/04/2025: Crackdowns on Dissent, Palin Loses Libel Retrial Against New York Times
- Links for the day
- Links 23/04/2025: Hard Times and Digital Amnesia
- Links for the day
- The GNU/Linux Site Formerly Known as "linoxide.com" is Back... as an LLM Slopfarm!
- Better for linoxide.com to go offline than to do this
- Get Rid of Back Doors, Don't Obsess Over Bounties and Other Corporate PR Stunts (or Needless Reboot Rituals)
- Security as a term has mostly lost its meaning due to repeated misuse for many years
- Richard Stallman to Speak in Oxford University Exactly a Day From Now
- outsourced to GAFAM
- Links 23/04/2025: "Hiding Corruption" and "The Cost of Defunding Harvard"
- Links for the day
- Microsoft 'Studies' Again? Leon Musolff is Writing Papers With Microsoft.
- Even if one can see/find a link to "the study" (in the Bezos-controlled publication), most people won't look any further and just take everything at face value.
- Towards GNU World Domination
- The FSF led by Geoffrey S. Knauth with his friend Richard Stallman in the FSF's Board [...] Let's encourage people to adopt GNU/Linux. There has never been a better time.
- statCounter Helps Visualise Just How Deep in Trouble Microsoft is (Especially in Africa)
- Microsoft sabotaged efforts to connect Africans and equip them with GNU/Linux laptops
- The Register is Using Linux-Hostile Clickbait in Articles of Linux Proponents
- Don't be a "whore" to advertisers, team El Reg
- Microsoft Windows in Cyprus Lacking a Future
- Most people access the Web there from mobile
- Matrix Has a Severe Problem With Illegal Images
- If Matrix cannot get the CP problem under control, many projects and people will dump Matrix
- Never Try to Justify Strangulation of Women (Not in the US and Not in the UK)
- Joint post by Mrs. Rianne Schestowitz and Dr. Roy Schestowitz
- Links 23/04/2025: Tesla Profits Plunge 71%, Intel Ready to Lay Off 20% of Staff, Microsoft and IBM Layoffs
- Links for the day
- Microsoft's Most Profound Issue is That People Moved to 'Mobile' and "App Stores" (Microsoft's Presence There is Negligible)
- Expect a wild ride for Microsoft this year
- Google News is Amplifying FUD and Lies About Linux (and OpenSSH/SSH) by Promoting Slopfarms With Machine-Generated FUD and Slop Images
- Google should know better
- Gemini Links 23/04/2025: Librarians, Anubis, and Refactoring a Gemini Capsule
- Links for the day
- Over at Tux Machines...
- GNU/Linux news for the past day
- IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, April 22, 2025
- IRC logs for Tuesday, April 22, 2025
- Links 22/04/2025: Ending DEI Policies at Adobe, FTC Sues Uber
- Links for the day
- RMS is Done at KCL, Next Stop is Oxford
- The message of RMS has long resonated well in India
- US Government Already Bailing Out OpenAI/Microsoft With "Contracts", As Usual, Back Doors You Cannot Remove Becoming 'a Step Closer' on New PCs (Unless Everyone Acts ASAP)
- The next "logical" step towards digital prisons
- Microsoft Devises PR Stunts to Distract From Impending Mass Layoffs and Likely Bad Results Preceding Those Mass Layoffs
- A "voluntary exit plan"
- Gemini Links 22/04/2025: Deaths, HamsterCMS, and More
- Links for the day
- Links 22/04/2025: FTC v. Meta Trial and Google Remedies
- Links for the day
- In Turkey, Windows Down Rapidly While GNU/Linux Grows
- Although Turkey is in NATO (but not the EU), it cannot quite trust computer systems controlled by the United States
- GNOME, Microsoft, and GitHub: The Lack of Reporting on Abusive Colleagues Contributed to Profound Media Vacuum (or Blackout), Now Resorting to SLAPPs
- This lack of morality/courage has helped enable further abuse, lining up more victims
- Richard Stallman Has Updated His Article on Why "Free Software Is Even More Important Now"
- Richard Stallman is about to give a talk here in the UK in a few hours
- Microsoft Already Attacks the BSDs as Well (the E.E.E. Way, as Usual)
- Bearers of bad news
- The Open Source Initiative (OSI) is in Trouble, May Soon be Out of Business
- Openwashing needs to end
- Microsoft's Debt Grew Over 6 Billion Dollars in the Last Reporting Quarter (Before Inauguration), Expect Worse Next Week When 'Results' Are Disclosed and Mass Layoffs Resume
- Microsoft is bleeding. It does not want people to notice.
- Over at Tux Machines...
- GNU/Linux news for the past day
- IRC Proceedings: Monday, April 21, 2025
- IRC logs for Monday, April 21, 2025
- Richard Stallman Gives Public Talk in London in 7 Hours (Need to Register as Venue Limited to 150 Seats), Public Announcements Begin to Appear
- These are not announced weeks or months in advance
Comments
Faemir
2008-06-25 21:25:35
In fact I wouldn't be surprised if they swapped to using dirac for the iplayer, atleast optionally at some point.
This is almost as bad as MS FUD.
Ben
2008-06-26 07:44:14
Roy Schestowitz
2008-06-26 07:59:36
As for DIRAC, that's the 'Old BBC'. The new BBC (media division) is managed by Microsoft folks, some of whom came from Microsoft.
Ben
2008-06-26 10:33:44
Roy Schestowitz
2008-06-26 14:18:21
This post contains only a video (showing you a hearing at the Parliament) and 4 links. Where are accusations made? If you challenge previous posts, then be specific and I'll gladly provide evidence. Don't rush and shoot the messenger.
RyanT
2008-06-26 17:19:14
Some of the links are pretty suspicious too - one, still being links to your own site, and 2, the fact that BBC made a documentary on Bill (a series called the Money Programme about history of many of todays biggest businesses) and while it focused more on his retirement, still had time to bring up some criticism including "talking head" sections from his critics. While it wasn't comprehensive, it seemed to be something a little more lighter anyway rather than a hard case expose.
Then, as already mentioned, the investment in Dirac.
There's been a spotty past, but even so they've tried, and are mostly tied by what is currently popular (flash, and at one point using Realmedia/WMP based players, which they realised they had to move away from and did).
RyanT
2008-06-26 17:45:50
Watchnig that video, there is so much stuff said in the text that makes us out as no worse than the people we're accusing of FUD. First of all:
It's easy to be a smart arse when you're not under interview pressure and have google to hand to check the figures, while she, being a human being, is not a perfect human being, and even so did remember the rough estimate (as noted during the interview, excuses staff payment, so I don't really see how the figure mentioned in the text is debunking or showing anything - it was clear to all it seemed that this was excusing that, and if it wasn't, it was mentioned by her anyway).
Unfounded claims of Silverlight wrapper (despite it's linux based back end and the fact it uses flash, and works fine for streaming on all systems), and while downloading is a bitch to not have, you have to remember is copyrighted original works, therefore has to be protected, making it harder to get around the Linux/open source side of things, and even if they did they'd probably complain because they wouldn't release the source of something that is meant to seal off/protect the content entirely (Firefox can get away with it because a lot of exploits are down to bugs and such, not that it has to protect copyrighted works from piracy of course - that's down the content of the page, not the browser).
Then the incredibly presumptive text in general that doesn't bring up anything - it just spins and suggests FUD to make the interviewees sound suspicious when for the most part they haven't said anything deserving of that, except for the interoperability part being on all platforms, which considering the confusion they seemed to have over what they meant, could've been an honest mistake or a slip of the tongue. The clip itself sadly only shows a very specific part too, not the whole thing, which would be better.
Ben
2008-06-27 12:26:24
During the video, the subtitles were serious accusations but no evidence to back it up. Some examples:
at 0:43 : "In fact, the IPlayer cost more than 130 Million! (See Grocklaw.net)." Your accusing the BBC of giving dodgy figures yet no direct links to any evidence, asking viewers to search through a huge site or take our word for it. (And for the record I did find the interview, 130 Million was the cost of modernising the entire BBC from tape based to digital based, Iplayer itself was about 4.5 Million.) And a real citation ;) http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20071118205358171 look for [14:49]
at 3:25: "Because his pals at Microsoft Told him to". That's a serious allegation against both the BBC and Microsoft. And without any evidence its pure FUD.
at 3:54: "No its a monopoly tool created by Microsoft". Well firstly that makes no sense given the context. MP "Why did you build Iplayer, why not use BitTorrent or BTVision" BBC Director "Actually Iplayer isn't an internal BBC creation* we did use external tools" * Subtitle appears here
at 3:13: "By Microsoft...", He doesn't actually name the various components (and why should he, it wouldn't answer the question). And the strong implication is that using Microsoft technology is bad, probably is but unless you say why (and it has to be a good reason), or specifically link to someone who says why, its nothing but FUD.
Roy Schestowitz
2008-06-27 12:46:50
BBC iPlayer protest report
"We have 1500 fliers to distribute, that focus on the key issue with the iPlayer, and why $130 Million and 4 years of development don't get you much when you choose Microsoft DRM."
http://www.defectivebydesign.org/blog/iPlayerProtestReport
re: second point
Bear in mind that I didn't edit or produce the video, but just to bear in mind: Erik Huggers, group controller at BBC Future Media & Technology at the time, is a former Microsoft high-level employee who also attended antitrust proceedings in Europe (over Windows Media Player abuses, IIRC).
re: third point
Why would the BBC exclude the #1 rival of its new media partner then?
Feeling the heat at Microsoft
[CNET]: If I ask you who is Microsoft's biggest competitor now, who would it be?
[Ballmer:] Open...Linux. I don't want to say open source. Linux, certainly have to go with that.
http://www.news.com/Feeling-the-heat-at-Microsoft/2008-1012_3-6232458.html?tag=ne.fd.mnbc
re: fourth and last point
Microsoft has a proven track record of abuse and delivery of shoddy software which, by design, does not play nice with competitors. The iPlayer and its constituent parts are a brilliant example of this.
Mark Kent
2008-06-27 13:01:08
The BBC DG (the top bod, responding to a parliament questioning) could only admit to "more than €£20 millions", which indicates quite clearly that it's a lot more, and they were not going to say quite how much. Suggesting that the BBC's DG and his advisers would be so incompetent as to be unable to answer "what does it cost" to a parliamentary committee specifically set up to investigate the iPlayer is ludicruous. If he's really that incompetent, he should find another job, along with his advisers.
The Dirac codec was developed years before the Microsoft iPlayer disaster came along, which was the result of some ex-Microsoft people joining the BBC in their new "media" section, and doing a deal back with Microsoft. There has never been any real intention to support Linux, and it will never happen. This would not be in Microsoft's interests.
The successful iPlayer, the one built in a few weeks on the Adobe platform, after the humiliating failure of spending up to €£120 millions with Microsoft for something which is so locked to a specific version of windows that hardly anyone can use it, cost a tiny fraction of the Microsoft version, and has been very succesful.
The BBC's main argument *for* the Microsoft solution was "DRM", amazingly, this argument was forgotten in moments when the flash solution was pushed out. Clearly, the DRM line had been a Microsoft one.
The key party in the BBC eventually lost his job over the whole fiasco, and rightly so in my view. I was disgusted, and remain disgusted, at the amount of my own money (licence-fee) wasted on this ill-advised proprietary junk from Microsoft.
Ta,
Mark
Ben
2008-06-28 07:39:46
"Bear in mind that I didn’t edit or produce the video," Dosn't matter. Posting it on your blog without commentary is a full endorsement, if you do that you have to take responsibility for any inacuracies.
I have no idea why they said >€£20 Million to parliament, but that's a guestimate, if you want accurate figures read the interview where he actually had them on hand. http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20071118205358171
"Erik Huggers, group controller at BBC Future Media & Technology at the time, is a former Microsoft high-level employee" If he's part of an evil plot to take over the BBC from within then take him down. But unless you have actual evidence he's deliberately doing evil its pure FUD to claim he's part of a sinister plan.
"Why would the BBC exclude the #1 rival of its new media partner then?" Technical reasons, prioritising by user count, maybe they wanted to get the public response and make changes before they started porting. Who knows? But jumping to the worst conclusion without evidence is FUD. Besides the online verison is cross platform and it was worth a little teathing troubles to get hold of.
"Microsoft has a proven track record of abuse and delivery of shoddy software which, by design, does not play nice with competitors. The iPlayer and its constituent parts are a brilliant example of this." Nope, Iplayer's online Flash version is compliant with internet de-facto standards (and its not like there is an official standard to use anyway), cross platform and pretty high quality. I don't know if there's any web 2.0 features people are missing but if you want to watch some BBC TV online, its great.
The Downloadable client according to the digital grapevine (I never used it) shoddy and tied to Microsoft. But that dosn't prove anything. You can say the same about any badly written peace of Windows software in existence.
"There has never been any real intention to support Linux, and it will never happen. This would not be in Microsoft’s interests." Iplayer has an online flash version. Its far more popular than the downloadable version (even with Windows users) and fully supports Linux. I use it and I have no complaints.
"The BBC’s main argument *for* the Microsoft solution was “DRM”, amazingly, this argument was forgotten in moments when the flash solution was pushed out. Clearly, the DRM line had been a Microsoft one." The BBC isn't pro-DRM, if you read what they actually said http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20071118205358171 its that DRM was a nessacary evil, not because of pirates, but because they needed to convince the copyright holders to allow Iplayer to allow their shows online, DRM convinced them. If they can convince them to allow their shows on the Flash version of Iplayer without DRM, nice work BBC!
"The successful iPlayer, the one built in a few weeks on the Adobe platform, after the humiliating failure of spending up to €£120 millions" IPlayer itself did not cost €£120 million, the €£120 million was spent restructureing the BBC without witch the Flash Iplayer could not have been built. I agree the downloadable Iplayer was a waste of time and money, I just don't see an evil intent, but please, get your figures right.