How Microsoft is Profiteering from Conficker
- Dr. Roy Schestowitz
- 2009-11-11 21:56:24 UTC
- Modified: 2009-11-11 21:56:24 UTC
Summary: Conficker is still proving profitable to Microsoft; FUD against rivals of Internet Explorer arrives from Microsoft Certified Partner, Cenzic
BACK in July, one journalist pointed out that Microsoft was making big profits by pretending to solve problems that it itself was to blame for. That main problem was Conficker, which took advantage of some very major hole in Windows. Microsoft resorted to its typical PR stunts to shift the blame to someone else (see the links appended at the bottom).
According to
this new article from IDG in Canada, Microsoft makes money in British Columbia by offering a so-called 'solution' to problems for which it is to blame.
How B.C. hospitals deal with Conficker
[...]
Its security measures include Microsoft Corp.’s Forefront Client Security, plus a firewall from Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. of Redwood, City, Calif.
Well done, Microsoft. Conficker has made the company quite a bundle, hasn't it?
As a side note, the other day
we explained how Microsoft lies about security of Red Hat and Firefox, some of its biggest Free software opponents. As we
know from experience, Microsoft prefers to 'outsource' the messengers of FUD because it makes this more credible and Microsoft less susceptible to backlash.
As some readers may have noticed, an obscure firm called Cenzic throws FUD at Firefox at the moment -- that's the one that we addressed the other day without referring specifically to any of the claims (why give it visibility when it is a lie?). As one of our readers points out, Cenzic was
"recognized as a Microsoft Certified Partner," based on its very own Web site. Follow the interests, follow the money.
⬆
Related posts:
- Journalists Suggest Banning Windows, Maybe Suing Microsoft Over DDoS Attacks
- When Does it Become Appropriate to Take Windows off the Information Highway?
- Microsoft's Blame-Shifting Strategy Precedes More Trouble
- Leave Microsoft Alone
- Never Blame Microsoft, Blame Users and Exploits
- Botnets and Bounties Versus Real Security
- Is Windows to Blame for Cracking of Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)?
- Windows Problems Take Down Airplanes, JFK Airport, Houston Municipal Courts
- Turkey, France, United Stated Under Attack by Microsoft Windows Insecurities
- Microsoft Adopts Malware Techniques to Advance .NET
- Windows Botnets Go Out of Control, Obama Web Site Delivers Windows Malware
- One Windows Worm, One Week, and Possibly 250,000,000+ New Windows Zombies
- Death by Microsoft Windows
- UNIX/Linux Offer More Security Than Windows: Evidence
- US Army Becomes Zombies Army; London Hospitals Still Ill (Windows Viruses)
- Eye on Microsoft: Another Messy Week for Security
- Cybercrime Rises and Vista 7 is Already Open to Hijackers
- Vista 7: Broken Apart Before Arrival
- Vista 7 Security “Cannot be Fixed. It's a Design Problem.”
- Department of Homeland Security 'Poisoned' by Microsoft; Vista 7 is Open to Hijackers Again
- Liability for Software When Life is at Stake
- Microsoft Windows Zombies Also Knocked Facebook and Gawker Offline, More “Critical” Microsoft Flaws Discovered
- Bad Day for Twitter: Attack from Microsoft Windows Zombies, Texas Lawsuit Over Software Patents
- Off Topic: A World Where Almost One in Two PCs is a Windows Zombie PC
- Eye on Microsoft: Conficker Moves on to More Victims
- Conficker Bounty Did Not Work, Windows Zombies Still Run Rampant
- Conficker Strikes Again
- Eye on Microsoft: Eye on Conficker, More Twitter Malware
- Microsoft Breaks the Law by Not Patching Windows as Per the Agreement
- The Windows Security Theatre