ECIS, which shed light on Microsoft's crimes last year (scroll down to the appendix and also see this summary of crimes against Netscape in another appendix), has just suggested that Microsoft should take its biased ballot [1, 2] to countries outside Europe. Suffice to say, Microsoft boosters including Microsoft Emil and Mary Jo Foley are whining. They are of course hostile towards the idea.
ECIS describes itself as "an international non-profit association founded in 1989 that endeavours to promote a favourable environment for interoperable ICT solutions," but Mary Jo Foley dismisses it as a "lobbyist group" (it's like calling one's solicitor or a judge a "lobbyist for justice"). Here is how she put it:ECIS, a lobbyist group with many Microsoft adversaries as members, is calling on regulators worldwide to follow the European Commission (EC) in requiring Microsoft to offer a browser ballot that calls out non-Internet-Explorer alternatives available to PC users.
Starting March 1, Microsoft began pushing out to European Union users an EC-stipulated browser ballot, which makes it plain to consumers that even though Internet Explorer (IE) comes preloaded on Windows PCs, there are other browsers available. Microsoft agreed to provide the browser ballot to EU consumers running IE as their default browser on XP, Vista and Windows 7 as part of a settlement deal with the EC in an antitrust case brought against Microsoft by browser maker Opera Software.
A lawyer for Microsoft confirmed that the software giant told the US Department of Justice and the European Commission how Google’s business practices may be harming publishers, advertisers and competition in search and online advertising.
Closing 6Music and the Asian Network may have grabbed the headlines in the BBC’s plan to reallocate a fifth of its licence fee income - but it’s the web that’s bearing the brunt.
“By far the biggest single adjustment is the tightening of focus of the website,” director general Mark Thompson told FT’s Digital Media & Broadcasting Conference, hours after unveiling the strategy that proposes cutting a quarter from the annual web budget and online staff by 2013 (read all the online key points from earlier).
Thompson gave the example of the BBC’s web community for Scotland’s Western Isles: “Actually, those communities are launching their own sites - someone else is doing it - we can step back. In entertainment - we’ve seen a lot of people stepping up in that space - we can draw back.”
Comments
Lanadapter
2010-03-07 17:13:56
It'd be like telling Ubuntu that they must have a ballot and couldn't have firefox by default.
Roy Schestowitz
2010-03-07 19:31:59
The question here is totally different; the ballot is an attempt to compensate for Microsoft's crimes against Netscape. IOW, it is a form of justifiable punishment.
Lanadapter
2010-03-10 19:24:52
No I'm not. It's impossible to repeat what you ignore. XD
Anyway, it should have been enough that you can uninstall IE. The browser ballot issue was just a sham by the EU to milk money out of microsoft.
It's a real fucked up world when Microsoft is the victim rather than the aggressor, but it happened.
Although I do agree that they had it coming with all the time they spent spreading lies against competitors and calling free software communist.
Dr. Roy Schestowitz
2010-03-10 20:57:13
clayclamp
2010-03-10 22:13:38
your_friend
2010-03-08 05:56:52
Adequate punishment would be to fine Microsoft and given the money to Xandros, Ubuntu, GoOS and others who were pushed off store shelves by Microsoft's illegal actions. It would be easy enough to demand two or three times Microsoft's revenue from Walmart and other places where there are smoking gun emails. This would discourage the kinds of contracts they force onto OEMs and retailers. "Browser choice" is a farce that Microsoft will quickly eliminate by deals with publishing buddies and Windows "upgrades" that break competing browsers. Free browsers like Firefox can keep up with Microsoft's never ending malice but Windows users have to work very hard to keep their browsers up to date and Microsoft can really wreck things at anytime. Why shouldn't they when the worst punishment they ever get is that a few users actually get a false choice every now and then?