Summary: A shocking new example which shows just how broad patents can be
JUST WHEN you think you've coming across bizarre patents Andres Guadamuz tells us all that there is a lawsuit over "technology that synchronises masturbation and porn": [via Glyn Moody]
Best patent suit ever? Dispute over patented technology that synchronises masturbation and porn
"We Are Not Making This Up" says the headline from courthousenews.com, which is a serious Web site that's baffled by this case:
In a patent case that gives new meaning to the term "digital technology," New Frontier Technologies claims that a rival's "Real Touch" masturbation tool infringes on its "Method and Device for Interactive Virtual Control of Sexual Aids Using Digital Computer Networks." New Frontier took a license on the patent on Valentine's Day 2008.
According to the federal complaint in Las Vegas, Hassex owns the patent and licensed it to New Frontier. Both of them sued Internet Services, a California LLC that operates out of Charlotte, N.C., and WMM
Holdings LLC, of Nevada. The patent at issue is No. 6,368,268.
The patent for the "Method and Device for Interactive Virtual Control of Sexual Aids Using Digital Computer Networks" was issued on April 9, 2002, according to the complaint.
How ridiculous does the USPTO try to look? Watch this video. ⬆
On 28th May 2026 EPO President António Campinos paid a visit to the Most Serene Republic of San Marino where he was received with full diplomatic honours
"Lawyers who front SLAPP‑style threats on behalf of powerful institutions are not “defending reputation”; they are abusing legal process to intimidate and silence legitimate public‑interest scrutiny."
The industry in its current form acts a bit more like a cabal of power-hungry companies that actively try to back-door everything and smear people who oppose that