Bonum Certa Men Certa

When EPO Does Not Control and Coerce the Judges — Part II — ILOAT Judgment No. 4550

Series parts:

  1. When EPO Does Not Control and Coerce the Judges — Part I — ILOAT 134th Session: Two More Bittersweet Victories for EPO Staff
  2. YOU ARE HERE ☞ ILOAT Judgment No. 4550


Campaign of managerial bullying and 'moral harassment' from Benoît Battistelli his 'Human Resources' enforcer Elodie Bergot
Back in the day, EPO staff protested vigorously against the campaign of managerial bullying and "moral harassment" which Benoît Battistelli (l.) and his "Human Resources" enforcer Elodie Bergot (r.) conducted against CSC appointees Michael Lund and Aurélien Pétiaud.



Summary: Case 4550 [PDF] was lost by EPO management last week [1, 2] at the Administrative Tribunal of the International Labour Organisation (ILOAT); today we look closely into it

In the case of Judgment No. 4550, the complainant was Michael Lund from Denmark (now retired) and it’s worthwhile recalling the full background to this particular matter.



Back in 2014, Michael and his French colleague Aurélien Pétiaud [PDF] were members of the EPO’s Internal Appeals Committee (IAC). [PDF]

The IAC deals with appeals filed by EPO staff against management decisions and it is a "joint body" comprising members appointed in equal numbers by EPO management and by the Central Staff Committee (CSC).

Michael and Aurélien were not elected staff representatives but rather they were staff members with a recognised level of legal expertise who enjoyed the confidence of the CSC and had been nominated by it as members of the IAC.

At some point in 2014, their heavy workload did not allow them to deal with all of their tasks as IAC members, which include “completing opinions or dissenting opinions following the hearings and sessions within the deadlines provided.”

Michael and Aurélien had to make a difficult choice: either stop writing dissenting opinions on cases of previous sessions, or refuse to work on new cases. They made a decision not to attend an upcoming session of the IAC.

"Michael and Aurélien were not elected staff representatives but rather they were staff members with a recognised level of legal expertise who enjoyed the confidence of the CSC and had been nominated by it as members of the IAC."Battistelli was furious and threw one of his famous "tantrums". He accused them of insubordination and instructed his HR "dompteuse" Elodie Bergot to have them subjected to a politically-motivated disciplinary proceedings which led to their downgrading.

Michael was accused of obstructing the work of the IAC by refusing to attend a session of the committee. He was further accused of having committed, in the framework of the disciplinary proceedings, an additional actionable offence by disclosing confidential and personal appeal-related information to unauthorised third parties.

The majority opinion of the disciplinary committee recommended that the charges against Michael be dismissed. However, a minority found a breach of duty and recommended downgrading by a single step.

True to form, Battistelli ignored the majority opinion and decided that Michael should be downgraded in accordance with the minority opinion. However, Battistelli decided that the relegation in grade should be three steps - that is to say, two more than recommended by the minority opinion.

Both Michael and Aurélien appealed against their downgrading but they lost their cases before the ILOAT: Judgment no. 3971 of the 125th session (Aurélien) and no. 4050 of the 126th session (Michael).

"True to form, Battistelli ignored the majority opinion and decided that Michael should be downgraded in accordance with the minority opinion. However, Battistelli decided that the relegation in grade should be three steps - that is to say, two more than recommended by the minority opinion."ILOAT Judgment No. 4050 [PDF] - delivered on 26 June 2018 following the 126th session of the Tribunal under the presidency of Italian judge Giuseppe Barbagallo - dismissed Michael’s complaint. The judgment focused on a single aspect of the case – Michael’s non-attendance at the IAC session - while ignoring the pertinent factual circumstances and dismissing what seem to be his valid reasons for not being able to participate in that session. Aurélien Pétiaud’s complaint had already suffered a similar fate during the preceding ILOAT session.

Amongst EPO staff [PDF], the disciplinary measures against Michael and Aurélien were widely perceived as being politically motivated. These managerial actions were seen as part of a vicious campaign of bullying and "moral harassment" conducted by Battistelli and his minions, in particular Elodie Bergot, against staff representatives and their nominees on the EPO’s joint bodies.

Nevertheless, in its judgments relating to these disciplinary cases, the Tribunal showed no understanding of the difficult situation in which Michael and Aurélien found themselves and it somehow managed to find the sanctions imposed on them to be “within the range of acceptability” or “not to be disproportionate”.

Battistelli for his part was not content with the imposition of disciplinary sanctions on the CSC-appointed members of the IAC. He wanted to punish them further for their perceived "insubordination" and so he decided to prematurely terminate their terms of office on the IAC.

"Amongst EPO staff, the disciplinary measures against Michael and Aurélien were widely perceived as being politically motivated."This was accomplished by means of the notorious "reform" bearing the title of "Social Democracy" - CA/D 2/14 [PDF], which was adopted by the Administrative Council of the EPO on 28 March 2014 on the basis of a proposal submitted to it by Battistelli.

Amongst other things [PDF], Battistelli’s Orwellian "Social Democracy" substantially restricted the CSC’s power to appoint its nominees to the EPO’s various joint bodies. It required the CSC to henceforth choose amongst its own elected members, whereas previously it could choose freely among all staff in active employment.

This meant that when CA/D 2/14 entered into effect on 1 April 2014, Michael and Aurélien and all other non-elected CSC nominees were no longer permitted to serve on the joint bodies to which they had been appointed.

The premature termination of Michael’s IAC appointment on the basis of CA/D 2/14 forms the subject of ILOAT Judgment no. 4550.

In this case, the Tribunal found in Michael’s favour, noting that "CA/D 2/14, by restricting the Staff Committee’s choice of persons it could appoint as members of the Appeals Committee, had a significant negative impact ... on the quality of staff representation within the Appeals Committee and, consequently, on the composition of that joint body, which is no longer balanced."

According to the Tribunal:

"…the obligation imposed on the Staff Committee to choose the members to be appointed on the Appeals Committee exclusively from among its own members substantially undermined, in various respects, the quality of the effective representation of staff on that body."


The Tribunal dismissed the EPO’s unsubstantiated and manifestly bogus claims to the effect that the impugned measures had been aimed at "improving the conditions of staff representation within the Organisation", noting that the CSC was clearly opposed to these measures and that there was no evidence that the Organisation was responding to a wish expressed by staff members.

According to the Tribunal:

"The EPO’s argument cannot therefore lawfully warrant the violation of the employees’ right to freely associate by restricting the Staff Committee’s powers and undermining the quality of staff representation on the Appeals Committee."


However, despite the fact that the Tribunal found in favour of the complainant, it dismissed his claim for "exemplary damages" against the EPO and merely awarded the paltry amount of € 100 as "moral damages" along with a further € 500 in costs.

"Battistelli for his part was not content with the imposition of disciplinary sanctions on the CSC-appointed members of the IAC."In the next part we will look at Judgment no. 4551, the second case from the 134th session which confirms breaches of the fundamental rights of EPO staff due to the arbitrary and unlawful censorship of mass e-mails by the Office management.

Recent Techrights' Posts

Nobody Denies That SecureBoot Will Cause Problems After September 11
Not even Microsoft
Gemini Links 06/09/2025: Infinite Scrolling and Posting from Emacs
Links for the day
Links 06/09/2025: GitHub Meltdown Over Slop, "U.S. Jury Says Google Should Pay $425 Million in Privacy Lawsuit"
Links for the day
Despite Its Severe Financial Problems Gnome Foundation Inc Paid Rosanna Yuen Over 100,000 Dollars Last Year
maybe relocation should be considered
The "Left" and the Right"
It poisons everything
Mozilla and Rust Are Not Leftists
they're part of the mass consumerism machine
Disposable to Microsoft
There is an extensive set of people who got used by Microsoft, only to be thrown away a month later or a year later or a decade later
The UEFI 9/11 - Part VII - This Coming Week Many PCs Will Refuse to Boot "Linux" (Because of Microsoft's Expired Certificate)
The real solution is, disable "secure boot" or "SecureBoot" while it's still possible. [...] Just like submarine patents, a lot of this problem was "hibernating" for a while
The Thing Nobody in Red Hat Wants to Talk About Openly
There is a real sentiment or worry among Red Hatters, Europeans and Americans in particulars (because of higher salary expectations)
Slopwatch: Small Parade of Fake News About "Linux" and Scams Borrowing the Name (or Word) "Linux"
In practice, LLMs are a risk
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, September 05, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, September 05, 2025
Genini Links 05/09/2025: Community, ROOPHLOCH, and PITkit
Links for the day
Links 05/09/2025: Vaccine Sceptics Poison the Well, Two Exploited Vulnerabilities Patched in Android
Links for the day
Gemini Links 05/09/2025: Logitech Lift and DIY Gemini Servers
Links for the day
Links 05/09/2025: Sainsbury's Caught Spying on In-Store Shoppers and Microsoft "OpenAI is Using Legal Threats to Harass its Critics"
Links for the day
BASIC Predates Microsoft by Over a Decade, Microsoft-Controlled Sites Like The Register MS Don't Want You to Know This
The state of the media is really bad when it relies a lot on oligarchs' money and is appointing editors who are working for oligarchs
Analogies for "Memory Safety" in Rust
Don't worry, it's Rust! It can do anything!
Brian Kernighan, "Only Third to Dennis Richie and Ken Thompson" (UNIX), Agreed With Someone Who Said Rust Was Just Hype, Should Not Replace C
17 hours ago
Reminder: Microsoft's "Secure Boot" Certificate for "Linux" Will be Expired in One Week
Many PCs won't manage to 'rotate' to another certificate
"Many of the Red Hat Employees Are Still Looking for Work"
Shame on IBM's CEO
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, September 04, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, September 04, 2025
Microsoft Started With Code Literally From The Trash, Nothing Has Improved Since
The reality is, there are systems and code that are reliable. But they're not Microsoft's.
Hypothesis That New McKinsey/Microsoft Executive Inside Red Hat Will Outsource Research and Development Operations to India (Like They Do in IBM)
IBM is floundering
Slopwatch: Scams, Fake Articles About "Linux", Plagiarism, and Worse
Perhaps some time soon the LLMs or the "Big LLMs" will run out of money (to borrow) and go offline, leaving those slopfarms in a tough place
Gemini Links 04/09/2025: Means of Production and Rusting Out
Links for the day
Links 04/09/2025: Science, Hardware, and Eyes on China
Links for the day
Gemini Links 04/09/2025: Digital Minimalism and Social Control Media
Links for the day
IBM's GNU/Linux Divestment, Based on Hard But Anecdotal Evidence (IBM Fails to Recognise How Much Money It Made and Can Still Make From "Linux")
Love us or hate us, a lot of what we've been saying about Red Hat under IBM turns out to be rather accurate
Links 04/09/2025: Massive Microsoft Staff Cuts (Barely Reported), "Strange Conspiracy Theory Is Reportedly Spreading Inside OpenAI"
Links for the day
Activists Can Win, But Keep an Eye on the Ball and on the Trophy
GitHub is dying, it was a loss-making trap, not free hosting
Gemini Links 04/09/2025: Katrina Remembered, Distracted Driving, and Virtual Economics
Links for the day
At This Point It's No Longer Matthew Garrett But People Who Fund Matthew Garrett (or Companies That Fund His SLAPPs Against My Wife and I)
The only thing worse than misogynists are misogynists who fail to respect other people's right to go on holiday
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, September 03, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, September 03, 2025
The UEFI 9/11 - Part VI - This Serious Harm Was Planned for Over a Decade, Not an Accident or Merely Some Misfortune
The term "Serious Harm" is legally meaningful here
GNOME Unfit for Diversity and Inclusion
GNOME's leadership is using "bad words"
Brodie Robertson Addressing the Recently-Discovered Comments
Most people probably knew nothing about this until he wrote a response
Red Hat QA Team "Had Shrunk by Half Over the Past Year." (After IBM Divestment)
If Red Hat's workforce is being moved to the East, then RHEL can become a national security problem
Slopwatch: "Open Source" and "Linux" News Faked, Made by Bots and Entered Into Google News
Spam combined with slop about "Linux" has entered Google News