11.18.07

Gemini version available ♊︎

Some Victims of the Novell and Xandros Deals

Posted in GNU/Linux, Microsoft, Novell, OpenSUSE, SLES/SLED, Xandros at 2:23 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

There are quite a few people whose role in the recent developments is that of a bystander. It is a passive role, not an active one. Among those who feel hurt, we feel obliged to take an active role. Some of those who are hurt have to pretend to be happy or apathetic because they are tied to a company’s payroll. Others have to accept changes in the market. These are changes which are absorbed by volunteers, paid developers, end users, and customers. Here are two such examples.

OpenSUSE Volunteers

Steve Ballmer rides SUSESee the folowing article and assess its content briefly. Pay particular and special attention the bits at the bottom which talk about OpenSUSE. I too used to help the OpenSUSE project, but the impact of the deal was too much to bear and accept. It was worth abandoning and making compromises by criticising a decision which had been foolishly made by the management. No advice or opinion was sought which actually involved the community. It was only the Big Egos at Novell that counted.

From the point of view of a developer community, this was unacceptable. It was a betrayal, without a doubt. I know this because I was there, among the SUSE fans. I also saw the reaction from other groups and it was not pleasant. SUSE’s reputation among the Free software enthusiasts was bound to get worse.

Novell has just tried to separate OpenSUSE from Novell. It is using a board’s affiliation as some sort of a PR stunt and a strategic decision. We covered this last week and on Saturday as well. My guess is that Novell tries to elevate levels of participation in OpenSUSE because that’s the distribution Novell feeds on. It hopes that it can hide in the fog while others do all the labour. Later it will sneak out of the fog and grab the free labour (yes, it’s free because many volunteers are still involved).

Someone really ought to fork SLED or OpenSUSE. OpenSUSE is a decent distro, but it’s ruined in Novell’s hands (Mono IP, patents, etc.). As for SLED|S, Novell strongly resists letting its source code go, which says a lot about its hesitant approach towards open source, even as far as SUSE Linux alone is concerned.

ASUSTek

”ASUS is caught in the middle of this because it isn’t known why it chose Xandros.“Remember the Eee? That’s the device which can keep Xandros floating for a while. It was roughly 6 months ago that Xandros had layoffs, which they conveniently named “staffing adjustments”.

ASUS is caught in the middle of this because it isn’t known why it chose Xandros. It’s also a bit of a mystery how long they have worked together on this device, which they first unveiled in an Intel conference, if I recall correctly.

To be fair, the unit is said to be hacker-friendly, so one could install another distribution on it (with iffy support nonetheless). Having said that, the sales of Eee units contributes to the bottom line of Xandros and it probably includes the Windows tax (via Xandros), so mixed feelings remain. Microsoft might actually be paid for each Eee unit that is sold.

ASUS should really pull out all that source code and artwork, then graft it and pour it onto another KDE-based GNU/Linux distribution, preferably one which is not associated with Microsoft’s mythical patents in any way. This may never happen, but there is always hope. The same goes for an SUSE fork.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

24 Comments

  1. eet said,

    November 18, 2007 at 4:38 am

    Gravatar

    “My guess is that Novell tries to elevate levels of participation in OpenSUSE because that’s the distribution Novell feeds on. It hopes that it can hide in the fog while others do all the labour.”

    Nah; that would be Red Hat and Fedora you’re talking about… Novell has its top-employees like Federico working on openSUSE _full-time_.

    “Someone really ought to fork SLED or OpenSUSE.”
    SLED is = openSUSE + some proprietary components, you know-nothing.

    “OpenSUSE is a decent distro, but it’s ruined in Novell’s hands (Mono IP, patents, etc.).”
    Untill Novell aquired it, SUSE was a closed, proprietary distribution with no community-contributions at all, mind you.

    This is just showing that you have absolutely no idea about openSUSE; I guess your only ‘contribution’ to openSUSE consisted in one or two angry posts on one of the mailing-lists…

    You really are such a know-nothing jerk, feeding you own ego with this blog; it’s a repulsive sight.

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an abusive Internet troll

  2. Victor Soliz said,

    November 18, 2007 at 8:32 am

    Gravatar

    Hi eet, have you read the article linked here, read the patent pledge for being an OpenSUSE contributor? It is disgusting, every once in a while I happen to read something MS-related that makes me totally sick, this one to force contributors to openSUSE to live in those gross terms is one, because of this I can’t yet understand how could there people still supporting Novell… As if the whole “moonlight is advertising for an MS-locking, and only Novell can legally distribute it even though they call it open source” deal wasn’t enough…

  3. Roy Schestowitz said,

    November 18, 2007 at 8:41 am

    Gravatar

    I don’t usually feed it (pronounced “eet”, which is basically a troll), but be aware that his arguments are not arguments; they are accusations and attacks. Asking eet to read the cited article is asking eet to face some facts, which is hard for eet.

  4. Anonymous said,

    November 18, 2007 at 9:34 am

    Gravatar

    Roy(who is known as troll)’s arguments are usually no arguments (and hence main stream media doesn’t pick them up) because they are invented accusations and attacks, like:

    > As for SLED|S, Novell strongly resists letting its source code go, which says a lot about its hesitant approach towards open source

    It took me only two minutes to find http://www.novell.com/linux/source/

  5. eet said,

    November 18, 2007 at 10:10 am

    Gravatar

    Asking Roy to research his stuff means asking too much of him.

    Thinking before writing is also asked too much.

    Not slandering is asked too much.

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an abusive Internet troll

  6. Roy Schestowitz said,

    November 18, 2007 at 3:41 pm

    Gravatar

    Surely you have not read this:

    why there is no Open Source SLES

    [...]

    One of them is that the SLES community is much smaller and more aimed at proprietary software. Novell itself is promoting Mixed Source and promotes its own proprietary software on top of SLES (also see OES). This obviously scares part of the community away. The deal with Microsoft obviously does as well. As a result Novell is big within Enterprises with little community people, and these are not the kind of people that would spend their free time rebuilding packages and do QA.

    Another reason is that Novell is not in favor of such a project (even though people from within Novell _and_ people in the SLES community disagree with management) because it fears it will take away some of the profit and Novell made a big risk by taking the Linux route, they cannot afford to make it fail.

  7. eet said,

    November 18, 2007 at 4:08 pm

    Gravatar

    Repeating meaningless quotations doesn’t make them any more true. As I said, ‘thinking before writing seems to be asked too much’ of you.

    You know where the sources are, now, go build your SLES-fork yourself!

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an abusive Internet troll

  8. Yuhong Bao said,

    November 18, 2007 at 9:29 pm

    Gravatar

    http://www.linux.com/articles/21338

  9. eet said,

    November 19, 2007 at 5:16 am

    Gravatar

    So Roy; I don’t see you having made all the necessary corrections to your blog-entries, yet.

    How about starting with the availability of the SLED/S-sources?

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an abusive Internet troll

  10. Dark Phoenix said,

    November 20, 2007 at 12:06 am

    Gravatar

    “Nah; that would be Red Hat and Fedora you’re talking about…”

    How DARE you, troll? Fedora is more open than openSUSE ever will be, and despite your stupid assertions, Red Hat engineers do work on Fedora. The difference is they don’t act as all-knowing controllers of the distro like some other companies, and actually LISTEN to the community members when they make suggestions and help out with the distro.

    On the other hand, I see openSUSE slowly collecting a huge pile of garbage fake “open source” stuff like Moonlight, and I wonder how long it’ll be before the fools contributing realize they’re being abused by Novell at the expense of their own time?

    As for you, eet, since I know you’ll be responding to this, no doubt with another attack on me personally, I’d like to ask you why you claim to be a “voice or reason” or somesuch when all you do is attack and/or tell people they should “ignore Microsoft”. Okay, we’ll ignore Microsoft. When they start demanding money or trying to force us developers to work for them for free, then what? Oh, yeah, that won’t happen, right? Got any proof of that, other than vague “Linux is in the Enterprise” claims?

  11. eet said,

    November 20, 2007 at 10:17 am

    Gravatar

    I quoted this here, just as a reminder:

    “My guess is that Novell tries to elevate levels of participation in OpenSUSE because that’s the distribution Novell feeds on. It hopes that it can hide in the fog while others do all the labour.”

    This describes exactly what Red Hat does with Fedora. Not that it was a bad thing, as everybody working on or using Fedora is conscious ofusing a bleeding-edge distro.

    So, to explain in more detail: Fedora was meant to help the development of Red Hat’s codebase with the help of the community. Red Hat uses Fedora (good as it may be) purely as a test-bed, where they can try out new technologies that could prove to be too unstable for RHEL without any risk. Fixes from RHEL don’t go upstream to Fedora because the codecase it too different. Not because of evil intent from Red Hat’s side but just because the enterprise-distro and the bleeding-edge-testing distro are too far apart.

    The only part that is really negative about Fedora is that something doesn’t happen before a release that happens before openSUSE-releases: A decided corporate effort at bug-squashing. It doesn’t happen because Red Hat cannot afford to put its complete ressources at de-bugging code that they won’t use for their commercial product anytime soon (while for Novell it makes sense because openSUSE’s code goes back into SLED, soon).

    The result is that Fedora is a fine distro but a bit rough around the edges.

    About openSUSE-devs not listening to community members, I personally have found them very co-operative when it comes to technical issues (not pseudo-politics). Also, they’ve just founded a board with community-members in it, it will turn into a community-led distribution. Isn’t that what you asked for. But, just a moment, Roy just damned Novell for this as a slick political move. There’s no doing right by fanatatics.

    So – if you want a bleeding-edige distro Fedora is the thing for you. If you want more of a compromise between enterprise-distro and bleeding-edige openSUSE is for you.

    Calling community developers at openSUSE ‘fools’ certainly doesn’t make you look good, does it?

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an abusive Internet troll

  12. eet said,

    November 20, 2007 at 11:23 am

    Gravatar

    Dark Phoenix; realize that Roy is the one trying to incite the Linux community to a religious war among distributions; not me!

    Roy’s our [satire mode]‘little Bin Ladin’[/ satire mode]. I’m just the man trying to get people to hold their breath and re-consider their own fanatic mindsets.

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an abusive Internet troll

  13. SundayRefugee said,

    November 20, 2007 at 3:20 pm

    Gravatar

    eet,

    It took me about 4 seconds on google to find this.

    Is it too much to at least ask you to google, fact-check, research, and come armed before you make comments? (Since this is your biggest “beef” and complaint?)

    http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraMyths

  14. Roy Schestowitz said,

    November 20, 2007 at 3:57 pm

    Gravatar

    eet,

    For crying out loud, stop comaring this to religion, wars, and even “Nazis”. This site is an analysis. Your attempts to muddy the waters won’t work.

  15. eet said,

    November 20, 2007 at 3:58 pm

    Gravatar

    That is not exactly good evidence, is it? ;)

    Some quotations, in case you haven’t read the document:

    “RHEL is derived from Fedora every few releases.”
    Considering that a new version of RHEL is released very rarely, this underlines exactly what I’ve said about the codebases of both distros.

    “Fedora as a platform to promote the development of new technology, some of which might end up in Red Hat Enterprise Linux”
    Sounds like testbed to me. It all depends on your definitions. The author of the document says ‘BUT we’re not using _too_new_code_’. That may well be so. Still, comparatively, Fedora IS the most bleeding-edge distro around, and not the best bug-tested.

    Security updates for _just_one_year_ is also the lowest among all Linux distributions, further underlining my point that the relation between Fedora and Red Hat is very much like what Roy impudently claimed the relation between openSUSE and Novell to be: one of getting unpaid, outside contributors to work on something that your commercial distribution is feeding on.

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an abusive Internet troll

  16. eet said,

    November 20, 2007 at 3:59 pm

    Gravatar

    Roy, GET YOUR FACTS straight, and I might leave you alone.

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an abusive Internet troll

  17. Dark Phoenix said,

    November 20, 2007 at 4:29 pm

    Gravatar

    ““RHEL is derived from Fedora every few releases.”
    Considering that a new version of RHEL is released very rarely, this underlines exactly what I’ve said about the codebases of both distros.”

    There are 5 versions of RHEL, and 8 versions of Fedora. What is that about releases being rare again?

  18. eet said,

    November 20, 2007 at 4:40 pm

    Gravatar

    You might not know that (though researching on Wikipedia could have told you), but Fedora 1 coincided with RHEL 3, in 2003.

    RHEL is released every two years, Fedora twice a year. We’ve seen 3 releases of RHEL since the beginning of Fedora which is now at its 8th release.

    So what was your point again?

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an abusive Internet troll

  19. SundayRefugee said,

    November 21, 2007 at 1:56 am

    Gravatar

    “Security updates for _just_one_year_ is also the lowest among all Linux distributions,”

    What was that you were saying about getting your facts straight? ;)

  20. Yuhong Bao said,

    November 21, 2007 at 1:58 am

    Gravatar

    Even better, how about threatening to fork SUSE if the patent part of the deal (the only part that can make Linux non-free software) is not ended.

  21. Roy Schestowitz said,

    November 21, 2007 at 2:35 am

    Gravatar

    At one stage, we spotted FreeSUSE and even discussed this further. It’s a way of pressuring Novell to get its act together (if not actually grab some of its business like CentOS, Startcom, or Oracle).

  22. eet said,

    November 21, 2007 at 5:36 am

    Gravatar

    Come on, you’re not pressuring anyone here, you’re just feeding you ego…

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an abusive Internet troll

  23. Roy Schestowitz said,

    November 21, 2007 at 6:03 am

    Gravatar

    No, that’s Ellison (ego) and Red Hat is indeed pressured.

    http://www.redhat.com/promo/real/

  24. eet said,

    November 21, 2007 at 4:11 pm

    Gravatar

    Well, I rather thought of a student with a rather ego-overfeeding website: http://www.schestowitz.com.

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an abusive Internet troll

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Microsoft GitHub Exposé — Part XX — Entering Phase II

    We're about to resume the long-running series about the sick clique which ran GitHub until the assault on women became too much of a liability (among other wrongdoings and PR blunders)



  2. Links 24/05/2022: Fedora 37 Test Days and Tor Browser 11.0.13

    Links for the day



  3. Microsoft Vidal, as USPTO Director, Already Plays 'Political Cards' to Disguise and Deflect Away From the Corporate Agenda

    Microsoft Vidal, another corporate pawn in charge of the world’s most dangerous patent system, is using soft-spoken defle



  4. Links 24/05/2022: WAL-G 2.0

    Links for the day



  5. IRC Proceedings: Monday, May 23, 2022

    IRC logs for Monday, May 23, 2022



  6. Unethical Advertising, Published as So-called 'Articles', in CNX Software

    As we noted earlier this year, the CNX team is looking for money in the wrong places



  7. Links 23/05/2022: Broadcom to Buy VMware?

    Links for the day



  8. LibreOffice Conference 2022, As Before, Puts the Keynotes on Sale (the Rich Buy Influence, the Price Doubles)

    Discrimination against the community; talks and mentions are based on money, not merit ($2000 has become $4000 in just one year)



  9. Links 23/05/2022: Kdenlive 22.04.1 and New Alpine Linux Released

    Links for the day



  10. António Campinos Promotes Software Patents Using Buzzwords and Sketchy Loopholes With Dubious Legal Basis

    ‘Monopoly Tony’ (António Campinos) is shamelessly manipulating EPO processes at both ends (sender and receiver) to facilitate the illegal granting of invalid European software patents; we’re meant to think this former EU official and imposter (banker) is some guru in the sciences because he reads a lousy speech crafted for him with lots of meaningless buzzwords peppered all over it (he’s not good at reading it, either)



  11. [Meme] Jorgotta Be Kidding Us, Campinos!

    Monopoly Tony (António Campinos) runs the EPO by attacking the very legal basis of the EPO’s existence



  12. Unified Patent Court (UPC) Relies Too Much on Lies and Mischief Without Any Basis in Law

    Today’s video runs through the typical (weekly) lies from Team UPC — lies that are very easy to debunk; Team UPC not only drafted the thing but also looks to profit from it while misleading politicians and bribing publishers to spread intentionally misleading statements (lies)



  13. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, May 22, 2022

    IRC logs for Sunday, May 22, 2022



  14. Links 23/05/2022: Fedora 36 Reviewed

    Links for the day



  15. [Meme] It's My Working Party... And I'll Cry If I Want to!

    EPO President António Campinos is still not being held accountable for his Code of Conduct violations



  16. Links 22/05/2022: The 5.18 Kernel is Out

    Links for the day



  17. Gemini is Bigger Than Most People Care to Realise

    Geminispace has gotten to the point where it's too computationally expensive (or outright pricey) to study, let alone keep abreast of, Gemini capsules or the domain space as a whole



  18. Links 22/05/2022: Rock64 and Peppermint OS Release

    Links for the day



  19. [Meme] UPC is Always Next Year (and Next Year It'll Surely be the Year After That)

    The UPC will come “next year”, just like every year (since almost a decade ago) just because the lunatic promises so and crushes the law, quite frankly as usual, cusioned and protected by the UPC lobby



  20. UPC: Turning Patent Lawyers Into Liars and the Media Into Their Money-Grabbing Megaphone (Platform for Fake News)

    The above 26 screenshots (with necessary annotation added) hopefully illuminate the degree of deceit, manipulation, bribery and distortion of public discourse (fake news and advocacy of patently unlawful activities)



  21. Number of Working/Online Gemini Capsules, Known to Totally Legit Gemini Search (TLGS) and to Lupa, Exceeds 2,500

    Assuming that Lupa reduced its crawling capacity (this graph seems to confirm this), we’ve decided to aggregate data from 3 sources and assess the size of Geminispace; Lupa says it can see 1,947 active capsules, but there are many more it has not kept track of



  22. [Meme] Monopoly Tony

    The gentlest, kindest president the EPO ever had



  23. It Took Campinos Three or More Years to Undo Illegal Battistelli Actions on Boards of Appeal and Strike Regulations (Only After Losing at ILO-AT!), But He Does Not Mention That

    Let’s all remember that as the EPO‘s so-called ‘President’ António Campinos (Monopoly Tony) vigorously defended completely unlawful actions of Benoît Battistelli until courts compelled him to stop doing that (Strike Regulations); notice how, in the video above — a portion of this full clip from several months ago — he did not bother mentioning that for 3.5 years that he had “led” the Office the Boards of Appeal were in exile, in direct violation of the EPC, yet nobody is being held accountable for it



  24. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, May 21, 2022

    IRC logs for Saturday, May 21, 2022



  25. Links 22/05/2022: Free Software Developments in Bratislava

    Links for the day



  26. Gemini is the Direction the Paginated Internet Should Have Taken (Not Bloated Web With JavaScript and DRM)

    An update on Gemini and why you might wish to explore it (if you aren't using it already)



  27. EPO.org Now Openly Brags About Making Illegal Patents a Welcomed Part of the Examination Guidelines

    The EPO persists in illegal, unlawful agenda; it's even finding the audacity to advertise this in the official Web site



  28. Links 21/05/2022: Security Blunders and Microsoft Posturing

    Links for the day



  29. Links 21/05/2022: GitLab at Fedora and Pipewire in Next Ubuntu

    Links for the day



  30. Links 21/05/2022: HP Teams up with System76

    Links for the day


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts