02.24.09

Gemini version available ♊︎

Confirmed: Microsoft is Deploying GNU/Linux Solutions

Posted in GNU/Linux, Microsoft at 6:03 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Because it’s so good

A FEW DAYS ago we wrote about a large subsidiary of Microsoft giving IIS the boot, having been based on GNU/Linux and Free software before it was acquired.

Well, it turns out that — rather surprisingly — Microsoft is building sites for customers using Free software (maybe WordPress) on top of GNU/Linux.

Philly.Com was redesigned by Avenue A/Razorfish and at a very high cost. If the rumors were correct (we suspect they are since the source was someone employed at Philly.Com). We were told last year “A copy of WordPress, a handful of plugins and a template and the new site could have been done in a matter of days for free internally.. instead we shelled out a huge amount of money for Microsoft to build us a Linux based site.”

Fascinating. If rumours are true, Microsoft will let those 2,000 employees* from Razorfish go. They are not compatible. Razorfish staff does not use technologies from its owner, Microsoft. This is not a sole incident [1, 2, 3]. As the famous saying goes, Microsoft just can’t eat its own dog food.

“Forty percent of servers run Windows, 60 percent run Linux…”

Steve Ballmer (September 2008)

____
* Or less than 2,000 [1, 2, 3, 4].

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

31 Comments

  1. Dan O'Brian said,

    February 24, 2009 at 8:59 am

    Gravatar

    You guys keep bashing Mono, yet more and more people are using it every day.

    To quote Albert Einstein, “Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”

  2. seller_liar said,

    February 24, 2009 at 10:08 am

    Gravatar

    More and more people know about ms novell pact.

    Insanity is use a lot of time to attack this site .

    Like you…..

  3. LinuxN00b said,

    February 24, 2009 at 10:34 am

    Gravatar

    I am fairly new to this whole discussion on Mono, but from where I am standing – and I do use a simplistic approach – it looks like you are trying to hit nails in hardwood with a screw driver (= mono) while you have a hammer (= microsoft) at your disposal in the toolbox (= virtualization).
    Surely, the obvious choice is microsoft ??

    I do not see the point of this exercise that is Mono … it might have made sense a couple years and .net versions back …

  4. Myfraudsoft said,

    February 24, 2009 at 10:46 am

    Gravatar

    LinuxN00b, the point of Mono(poly) is to get as much as possible GNU/Linux developers addicted to MS technologies.

  5. LinuxN00b said,

    February 24, 2009 at 10:59 am

    Gravatar

    @Myfraudsoft

    If what you say is valid, then you are trying to attract developers that can’t make the distinction between a screw driver and a hammer …

    … sounds like someone is getting the short end of the stick

  6. Roy Schestowitz said,

    February 24, 2009 at 11:00 am

    Gravatar

    LinuxN00b, the point of Mono(poly) is to get as much as possible GNU/Linux developers addicted to MS technologies.

    Yes. And if they want the ‘Real Thing’ they’ll be temped to go to Windows/VS. Microsoft wants to ‘lead’ GNU/Linux and Free software developers.

  7. Myfraudsoft said,

    February 24, 2009 at 11:22 am

    Gravatar

    Well considering that the ‘Real Thing’ (Visual Studio + .NET on Windows) will always be at least one step ahead of Mono, switching to Windows is the most logical thing to do for Mono users. Not to mention that it is legally safer (it is possible that MS can sue Mono users or their clients for patent infringement).

  8. Roy Schestowitz said,

    February 24, 2009 at 11:27 am

    Gravatar

    http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2008/Dec-02-2.html

    I wrote a small tool that exports my Groupwise Calendar to Google Calendar.

    This tool only runs on Windows…

  9. Jose_X said,

    February 24, 2009 at 11:29 am

    Gravatar

    I wonder if Novell has intentions of using its dollars (payed employees) to seed more ms/mono-centric distros, then hope the community around it will have momentum to keep doing the work as they pull and move their resources elsewhere.

    Also, it seems Red Hat has gotten back into the desktop distro business with seriousness. That is great.

  10. Roy Schestowitz said,

    February 24, 2009 at 11:33 am

    Gravatar

    You must be referring to this. SJVN exaggerates a little.

  11. Myfraudsoft said,

    February 24, 2009 at 11:37 am

    Gravatar

    Well, what a surprise:
    “I’d like to see Gnome applications written in .NET in version 4.0 – no, version 3.0. But Gnome 4.0 should be based on .NET,”
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/02/01/gnome_to_be_based/

  12. Myfraudsoft said,

    February 24, 2009 at 11:40 am

    Gravatar

    Maybe the next version of GNOME will run only on Windows, too.

  13. Myfraudsoft said,

    February 24, 2009 at 11:41 am

    Gravatar

    NT kernel + Mono + GNOME = Windows 8?

  14. Roy Schestowitz said,

    February 24, 2009 at 11:52 am

    Gravatar

    http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/01/novl-pressures-scox/#comment-32336

    “I just heard that Novell is designing the OS for Windows 7. I live in Provo Utah and heard it from an insider that Novell is designing it w/ a flavor of Linux. I guess that M$ even admits that NT is loaded w/ security and stability issues.

    “I am not sure if this is true, but it would not surprise me.”

  15. Jose_X said,

    February 24, 2009 at 11:58 am

    Gravatar

    Novell designing the core of Windows 7 from Linux and GNOME seems a little much. They may be working with Microsoft in that area. The reason I don’t think this is likely is because of copyright ownership and all Microsoft would be giving up (and Microsoft’s greed, pride, etc).

    What might be happening though is that Novell is turning their proprietary OS code (Netware?) into a project with Microsoft. They can give rights to Microsoft (maybe even relicensing rights).

    Which brings to mind OS/2 .. and Windows 95.

  16. Myfraudsoft said,

    February 24, 2009 at 12:11 pm

    Gravatar

    We already know that Windows (Vista) 7 will be NT-based (NT 6.1?). Unless MS “pulls a Longhorn” again, and releases Vista7 somewhere around 2015 (rewriting it several times in the process).

  17. David Gerard said,

    February 24, 2009 at 12:13 pm

    Gravatar

    Not even using their own Interix? Tch!

  18. ml2mst said,

    February 24, 2009 at 12:39 pm

    Gravatar

    @ Myfraudsoft:

    Thanks for the link to the interview with de Icaza. I hope it’s only de Icaza’s whet dream and not an official announcement.

    What a horror story, could pass for one of Stephen King’s Novells :-)

  19. Roy Schestowitz said,

    February 24, 2009 at 12:54 pm

    Gravatar

    How about a Star Wars novell[sic]?

    Star wars Vader

  20. Ian said,

    February 24, 2009 at 12:54 pm

    Gravatar

    What might be happening though is that Novell is turning their proprietary OS code (Netware?) into a project with Microsoft. They can give rights to Microsoft (maybe even relicensing rights).

    Never going to happen. NetWare is a 32 bit OS in need of a serious rewrite before it could be used on modern(64 bit) hardware bare metal. The kernel was tweaked enough by Novell to run paravirtualized on newer hardware, but it still needs a hypervisor in between NetWare and the hardware to run properly. Plus, writing software for NetWare is a horrible experience from what I’ve read.

    Add that together and I don’t see any logical reason why anyone would spend the time to do a complete rebuild on NetWare when the critical network services NetWare is historically known for have all but been moved to Linux already.

  21. Jose_X said,

    February 24, 2009 at 2:59 pm

    Gravatar

    I don’t think it’s important what they re-use, if anything. It would be interesting if it’s the case that they might be using their expertise and anything else they own in order to help improve Microsoft’s core OS offering. This would not be a surprise to a lot of people since it’s just code after all and they are already collaborating in many ways.

  22. Ian said,

    February 24, 2009 at 4:12 pm

    Gravatar

    Anything is possible of course. If I had to put money on it, however, I would bet that Novell is not helping Microsoft improve Windows in any way directly. What, in Novell’s past, would lead you to believe that they’re capable or willing to help Microsoft improve Windows directly?

  23. Roy Schestowitz said,

    February 24, 2009 at 4:17 pm

    Gravatar

    Make the leap.

  24. Ian said,

    February 24, 2009 at 4:47 pm

    Gravatar

    I don’t read japanese(kanji?), sorry.

  25. Roy Schestowitz said,

    February 24, 2009 at 5:04 pm

    Gravatar

    It used to be in English. Now they redirect. See for yourself.

    I only noticed that the language had changed some time this afternoon when someone linked to it in a forum.

  26. Jose_X said,

    February 24, 2009 at 7:11 pm

    Gravatar

    >> What, in Novell’s past, would lead you to believe that they’re capable or willing to help Microsoft improve Windows directly?

    They have a closer relationship with Microsoft today than did IBM during the OS/2 days.

  27. Jose_X said,

    February 24, 2009 at 7:13 pm

    Gravatar

    I think Novell would undergo almost any “dotnet” project at all in cooperation with Microsoft in the “belief” that they could make the market a two vendor market.

  28. Roy Schestowitz said,

    February 24, 2009 at 7:22 pm

    Gravatar

    They have a closer relationship with Microsoft today than did IBM during the OS/2 days.

    For Microsoft and IBM there was a little “before|after” period.

  29. Ian said,

    February 24, 2009 at 10:15 pm

    Gravatar

    They have a closer relationship with Microsoft today than did IBM during the OS/2 days.

    Based on what? IBM and Microsoft entered into a pact to specifically work on OS/2 together. Novell and Microsoft have no such explicit deal. You’re way off base here.

  30. Jose_X said,

    February 24, 2009 at 11:32 pm

    Gravatar

    >> Based on what?

    They have a closer relationship when you look at any of various metrics, eg, $$ exchanging hands as a % of total revenues for Novell. They have partnered fairly close in many areas.

    Let’s clarify something again. I am not alleging this is happening formally. I’m not even saying that I think this is happening informally (they are collaborating but not necessarily on deep OS design/coding). I’m saying I would not be surprised if they were.

    >> Novell and Microsoft have no such explicit deal.

    None that I know about. If this project would not form a substantial component of the businesses of either of these companies in their opinion at this point in time (eg, maybe they have a small engineering group trying to work out various things), then I don’t even see why they’d make it public, especially if they wanted to keep quiet about it for any reason.

    I am not intending to spread rumors or anything like that. I hope that much is clear now.

  31. Needs Sunlight said,

    February 25, 2009 at 2:33 am

    Gravatar

    Remember, folks, the “real deal” that MS and Novell are trying to steer people away from is J2EE and Java in general.

    There’s nothing (except maybe maintenance nightmares) that can’t be created, faster, cheaper, better using Java, Python, ruby or even Perl.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Microsoft Thought Police

    Reprinted with permission from Ryan



  2. Links 08/02/2023: GNOME Smoother Scrolling of Text Views

    Links for the day



  3. Links 08/02/2023: Transmission 4.0.0 Released and Mass Layoffs at Zoom

    Links for the day



  4. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, February 07, 2023

    IRC logs for Tuesday, February 07, 2023



  5. When the Pension Vanishes

    Today we commenced a multi-part mini-series about pensions and what happens when they suddenly vanish and nobody is willing to explain where all the money went



  6. Sirius 'Open Source' Pensiongate: An Introduction

    The Sirius ‘Open Source’ series continues in the form of a mini-series about pensions; it’s part of an ongoing investigation of a deep mystery that impacts people who left the company quite a long time ago and some of the lessons herein are applicable to any worker with a pension (at times of financial uncertainties)



  7. Links 07/02/2023: Endless OS 5.0 and Voice.AI GPL Violations

    Links for the day



  8. No Doubt Microsoft Unleashed Another 'Tay', Spreading Bigotry Under the Guise of Hey Hi (AI)

    Reprinted with permission from Ryan



  9. Links 07/02/2023: Fedora 39 Development Plans Outlines

    Links for the day



  10. IRC Proceedings: Monday, February 06, 2023

    IRC logs for Monday, February 06, 2023



  11. Links 06/02/2023: Escuelas Linux 8.0 and Many Political Issues

    Links for the day



  12. Links 06/02/2023: Sparky 6.6 and IPFire 2.27 – Core Update 173

    Links for the day



  13. Taking Back Control or Seizing Autonomy Over the News Cycle (Informing People, Culling the Marketing)





  14. Reality Versus Fiction: EPO Insiders Versus EPO Web Site and UPC 'Churnalists'

    The "official" sources of the European Patent Office (EPO), as well as the sedated "media" that the EPO is bribing for further bias, cannot tell the truth about this very large institution; for proper examination of Europe's largest patent office one must pursue the interpretation by longtime veterans and insiders, who are increasingly upset and abused (they're being pressured to grant patents in violation of the charter of the EPO)



  15. Links 06/02/2023: Linux 6.2 RC7 and Fatal Earthquake

    Links for the day



  16. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, February 05, 2023

    IRC logs for Sunday, February 05, 2023



  17. Links 05/02/2023: Wayland in Bookworm and xvidtune 1.0.4

    Links for the day



  18. Links 05/02/2023: Pakistan Blocks Wikipedia, Musharraf Dies

    Links for the day



  19. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, February 04, 2023

    IRC logs for Saturday, February 04, 2023



  20. Links 04/02/2023: FOSDEM Happening and Ken Thompson in SoCal Linux Expo

    Links for the day



  21. 2023 is the Year Taxpayers' Money Goes to War and Energy Subsidies, Not Tech

    Now that a lot of powerful and omnipresent ‘tech’ (spying and policing) companies are rotting away we have golden opportunities to bring about positive change and maybe even recruit technical people for good causes



  22. Getting Back to Productive Computer Systems Would Benefit Public Health and Not Just Boost Productivity

    “Smartphoneshame” (shaming an unhealthy culture of obsession with “apps”) would potentially bring about a better, more sociable society with fewer mental health crises and higher productivity levels



  23. Links 04/02/2023: This Week in KDE and Many More Tech Layoffs

    Links for the day



  24. Dotcom Boom and Bust, Round 2

    The age of technology giants/monopolies devouring everything or military-funded (i.e. taxpayers-subsidised) surveillance/censorship tentacles, in effect privatised eyes of the state, may be ending; the United States can barely sustain that anymore and raising the debt ceiling won't solve that (buying time isn't the solution)



  25. Society Would Benefit From a Smartphoneshame Movement

    In a society plagued by blackmail, surveillance and frivolous lawsuits it is important to reconsider the notion of “smart” phone ownership; these devices give potentially authoritarian companies and governments far too much power over people (in the EU they want to introduce new legislation that would, in effect, ban Free software if it enables true privacy)



  26. IRC Proceedings: Friday, February 03, 2023

    IRC logs for Friday, February 03, 2023



  27. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, February 02, 2023

    IRC logs for Thursday, February 02, 2023



  28. Links 03/02/2023: Proton 7.0-6 Released, ScummVM 2.7 Testing

    Links for the day



  29. Links 03/02/2023: OpenSSH 9.2 and OBS Studio 29.0.1

    Links for the day



  30. Links 03/02/2023: GNU C Library 2.37

    Links for the day


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts